00:23.08 |
*** join/#brlcad ibot
(i=ibot@rikers.org) |
01:51.21 |
Twingy_ |
mmm |
01:51.28 |
Twingy_ |
clone svideo display works now |
01:52.38 |
Twingy_ |
only 2 hours left for optimized
kd-tree |
01:53.21 |
Maloeran |
Two hours? Shouldn't you have the whole night
left? :) |
01:53.47 |
Twingy_ |
hrm? |
01:54.09 |
Maloeran |
Ah, I thought you had some deadline, but I
understand that was an estimate |
01:54.26 |
Twingy_ |
I need to get a video of my ray-tracer ready
by tommorrow |
01:54.35 |
Twingy_ |
going to make a quicktime |
01:55.06 |
Twingy_ |
just finished configuring my other machine
with freebsd, it has a svideo dongle |
01:55.14 |
Twingy_ |
and dorking with X for the better part of 2
hours |
01:55.18 |
Maloeran |
Here, I dump raw frames on stdout and have
mencoder encode on the fly from stdint |
01:55.39 |
Twingy_ |
right, but then I have to encode time
intervals |
01:55.46 |
Twingy_ |
since all frames are not evenly
spaced |
01:55.52 |
Maloeran |
Ah, okay. |
01:56.23 |
Twingy_ |
this way they can see me starting up the app
and driving it |
01:56.30 |
Twingy_ |
with the mouse and what not |
01:57.16 |
Twingy_ |
the kd-tree caching kicks butt with the
distributed setup |
01:57.26 |
Twingy_ |
the only downside is I gotta kick more data
around to the nodes |
01:57.39 |
Twingy_ |
300MB (geom + kdtree) to each node |
01:57.52 |
Twingy_ |
so that only requires 24 seconds of data
transfer |
01:58.07 |
Twingy_ |
for my 15 mil polygon model |
01:58.13 |
Maloeran |
Good deal |
01:58.26 |
Twingy_ |
openrt is kinda lame like that |
01:58.36 |
Twingy_ |
they require you to have the file(s) on the
nodes as well |
01:59.04 |
Twingy_ |
being able to just shoot the data to the
nodes, which have no disks, is nice |
01:59.13 |
Maloeran |
I think I'll implement distributed processing
that isn't even visible to the library user |
01:59.29 |
Twingy_ |
it's called MPI |
01:59.35 |
Twingy_ |
it was done 30 years ago |
01:59.37 |
Twingy_ |
:) |
01:59.41 |
Maloeran |
Fine :) |
02:00.03 |
Twingy_ |
my network code is larger than the actual
engine |
02:00.14 |
Twingy_ |
since I'm handling all the little cases of
what can go wrong |
02:00.36 |
Maloeran |
Ah yes, question : what "kind" of scene was
Reschenov rendering to get 10 millions? A single object with
abundant void around it? |
02:00.40 |
Twingy_ |
allowing nodes to connect whenever, dissapear,
etc... |
02:00.53 |
Twingy_ |
he was walking around inside an office
building |
02:01.17 |
Maloeran |
So the count of visible polygons was much
lower than 10m at any time |
02:01.24 |
Twingy_ |
yah |
02:01.38 |
Twingy_ |
he didn't show any outdoor scenes |
02:01.42 |
Maloeran |
That's precisely the kind of scene my
ray-tracer was thought for |
02:01.56 |
Twingy_ |
cool |
02:02.19 |
Twingy_ |
exactly the type of scene we don't do at ARL
:) |
02:02.56 |
Twingy_ |
(but I try to support that sort of stuff off
the clock) |
02:03.07 |
Maloeran |
Fine, it doesn't perform too bad in scenes
where rays pass near most of the geometry either :) |
02:03.20 |
Twingy_ |
yep yep |
02:03.30 |
Maloeran |
I think I'll reach that 15m primary rays per
second soon, for the tank model |
02:03.42 |
Twingy_ |
you should get some new geometry :) |
02:03.49 |
Twingy_ |
I've found some cases were my tracer bottomed
out |
02:03.56 |
Twingy_ |
and made smarter in the kd-tree
algorithm |
02:04.21 |
Maloeran |
The pipe scene isn't far from the worse cases
I could imagine :) |
02:05.16 |
Twingy_ |
yep |
02:05.40 |
Maloeran |
At least for my ray-tracer, BSP doesn't care
as much about spatial organisation and distribution |
02:07.01 |
Twingy_ |
welp, time to poke at this video
some |
02:23.55 |
silvap_ |
so sick.. |
02:24.07 |
Twingy_ |
o.O |
02:24.33 |
Twingy_ |
hrm |
02:24.38 |
silvap_ |
think i have mono |
02:24.39 |
Twingy_ |
erik undid the delacktimes |
02:24.40 |
silvap_ |
:( |
02:24.44 |
Twingy_ |
bummer dude |
02:26.18 |
Twingy_ |
or not |
02:54.12 |
Twingy_ |
hrm |
02:54.27 |
Twingy_ |
3.85 hours and going |
03:03.19 |
Twingy_ |
very tempting to wait for it to
finish |
03:03.32 |
Twingy_ |
should be done within the hour |
03:03.58 |
Twingy_ |
then I could just put the video together in
the morning |
03:04.03 |
Twingy_ |
hrms |
03:04.45 |
Twingy_ |
I think that's what I'll do |
03:05.31 |
Twingy_ |
okay, be back in about 7 hours |
03:06.51 |
Twingy_ |
ooh! |
03:06.54 |
Twingy_ |
it just finished |
03:07.05 |
Twingy_ |
happy dance! |
03:07.11 |
Twingy_ |
talk about timing |
03:23.53 |
Maloeran |
Ah :), that spares you the doubt of waking up
to see a Segmentation fault |
10:00.54 |
*** join/#brlcad cad028
(n=c139f720@bz.bzflag.bz) |
10:41.39 |
*** join/#brlcad learner
(n=brlcad@pcp0011649376pcs.aberdn01.md.comcast.net) |
10:41.39 |
*** mode/#brlcad [+o learner]
by ChanServ |
11:05.00 |
Twingy_ |
. |
11:21.02 |
learner |
./ |
11:24.06 |
Maloeran |
:/ |
12:16.08 |
Twingy_ |
mmm |
12:16.16 |
Twingy_ |
sleeeeee3333eeeep |
12:23.39 |
*** join/#brlcad d_rossberg
(n=c28bf505@bz.bzflag.bz) |
12:47.08 |
brlcad |
yay, time to release soon |
15:10.37 |
*** join/#brlcad cad241
(n=c0a7ccfd@bz.bzflag.bz) |
15:13.39 |
*** join/#brlcad AlekosP
(n=c0a7ccfd@bz.bzflag.bz) |
15:15.40 |
*** join/#brlcad AlekosP
(n=c0a7ccfd@bz.bzflag.bz) |
15:17.12 |
AlekosP |
need some help on building brlcad with
Microsoft Visual C; anyone can help |
15:18.37 |
brlcad |
hello AlekosP |
15:18.53 |
brlcad |
what sort of help? |
15:22.08 |
AlekosP |
I tried to build with Vusual C++, but most of
.dsp have problems; I think I fixed at least a part, but something
strange happens with my TK-windows; is there anyone I can send the
result of my efforts? |
15:23.06 |
AlekosP |
by the way, it's my first time on a chat, so
my netiquette is poor: hello brlcad! |
15:23.33 |
brlcad |
heh, not a problem |
15:23.38 |
brlcad |
and welcome |
15:23.53 |
brlcad |
some actually live on irc ;) |
15:24.20 |
brlcad |
as for the build, that's not incredibly
surprising -- there's two primary devs working on the windows
builds |
15:25.03 |
brlcad |
there were a handful of fixes that have been
made to cvs recently, you would be better off using the latest cvs
than using a source tarball from the project site |
15:25.25 |
brlcad |
there's also build files in the misc/
directory that look like are more up to date |
15:26.44 |
AlekosP |
for that matter, I just checked on the cvs
that the .dsp for the liboptical stuff is still missing the "r"s ,
so Microsoft becomes Micosoft and Target is spelt as Taget (and the
project file isn't recognized!)... |
15:27.43 |
AlekosP |
... I mean the one in the src/liboptical
folder... |
15:28.53 |
*** join/#brlcad Obscene_CNN
(n=DiscoBan@66.15.214.167) |
15:29.20 |
brlcad |
heh |
15:29.22 |
brlcad |
hmm |
15:31.52 |
brlcad |
yep, looks like that one in particular had
\r's stripped a really long time ago... |
15:32.41 |
AlekosP |
who is directly in charge of the
Windows/Microsoft VC stuff? And is there a place where I can learn
how to track/debug the flow of a tcl/tk application? For it seems
to me that The problem I'm encountering are mostly of that
nature |
15:33.59 |
brlcad |
I wouldn't say anyone's directly in "charge"
of the VC projects, there are two devs that work on it from time to
time |
15:34.18 |
brlcad |
you're more than welcome to maintain that
build if you're interested ;) |
15:34.53 |
Obscene_CNN |
if your a masochist ;-) |
15:35.06 |
AlekosP |
well, I'm for sure interested, but I can't say
if I'm able to... |
15:35.45 |
brlcad |
Obscene_CNN: hehe |
15:36.17 |
brlcad |
AlekosP: shouldn't be too much work to rewrite
the liboptical project file, there's not much tricky about that
library |
15:36.35 |
AlekosP |
Hi, Obscene_CNN, why shudder, if a project is
open source, I think it should be as open as possible (of course
working with MS VC isn't always comfortable) |
15:36.46 |
brlcad |
or even readd the missing r's .. i'll have to
track it back through the history to see where they were stripped
accidentally |
15:37.11 |
brlcad |
I should be able to restore it, but even then
it may still be out of date - that goes back a couple
years |
15:37.14 |
Obscene_CNN |
M$ VC doesn't always work as
advertised. |
15:37.39 |
Obscene_CNN |
<PROTECTED> |
15:38.09 |
brlcad |
VC6 is pretty buggy, the newer versions are
considerably better |
15:38.19 |
AlekosP |
I already have a working liboptical project
file and a working mged.exe. Only it "almost" works; the tk windows
behave quite strangely, get updated not when they are expected
to... |
15:38.39 |
brlcad |
AlekosP: that's good to hear |
15:39.22 |
brlcad |
AlekosP: if you post up any mods to the
sourceforge project patches tracker, I or one of the other guys can
commit it |
15:39.35 |
AlekosP |
I agree with brlcad about vc7 beeing better
than vc6 -- |
15:39.38 |
brlcad |
do that more than a couple times and it's an
easy means to get your own commit access |
15:40.31 |
brlcad |
I'm always interested in getting new
devs |
15:40.32 |
AlekosP |
well, brlcad. I need some help for posting my
changes |
15:40.35 |
brlcad |
even if you do use windows :) |
15:40.44 |
AlekosP |
sorry ... |
15:40.48 |
Obscene_CNN |
M$ anounced they are going to ship the next
version of their developer studio after the last beta. Users of it
begged for another beta, but were denied. M$ also plans to
introduce a major component without a beta test in the release
version. |
15:40.50 |
brlcad |
hehe, j/k |
15:43.25 |
AlekosP |
so, brlcad, what if I simply pack only my
modified sources (no objs or temporary things) in a tar/bz2 and I
ship it to you directly? |
15:44.26 |
AlekosP |
and maybe also the executable + dll's so that
you can look at the strange behavior of the gui
windows...? |
15:46.49 |
brlcad |
sure |
15:47.31 |
brlcad |
or post up that tarbz to the patches tracker
(without the exe/dlls) |
15:49.15 |
AlekosP |
I'll try the last one. Thanks. Bye
everybody |
15:50.37 |
brlcad |
you might want to comment on the devs mailing
list if you can describe the problems |
15:51.06 |
brlcad |
I'll be glad to take a look at it too, see
what strange behavior you mean |
15:54.30 |
AlekosP |
something like this; you open a .g file from
the db directory from the command windows of mged; then you browse
the geometry and say to mged that you want the root of the model to
be displayed; nothing happens. But if you go to the help menu of
the graphics window, select the item "commands" and simply exit the
menu, suddenly you get your model displayed in the graphics
window |
15:56.57 |
AlekosP |
quite strange,isn't it? That's why I think it
should be easier if you get a copy of the executable, and look
directly; this is for sure just one of the problems... |
16:00.33 |
brlcad |
sounds like the display manager isn't
updating |
16:00.46 |
brlcad |
I suspect if you resize the window, it'd
draw |
16:02.40 |
AlekosP |
brlcad, I'll try to see if resizing does the
work; thanks in advance. By now, bye everybody, I'll try to get in
touch tomorrow (morning, for you) ... |
16:02.54 |
brlcad |
cya |
16:03.19 |
brlcad |
by the way, you might be interested in getting
a better non-web-browser based irc client |
16:03.44 |
brlcad |
they're much "better" apps, the web interface
is just to get folks in quick ;) |
16:04.17 |
AlekosP |
of course, so I can let you not that I'm say
"looking" or something like that. Any suggestion? |
16:05.19 |
AlekosP |
[ ... I can let you know (not NOT) ...]
cya |
16:07.12 |
brlcad |
http://irchelp.org |
16:07.21 |
brlcad |
xchat is one many use |
16:08.07 |
brlcad |
mirc is another |
16:08.11 |
brlcad |
http://www.ircreviews.org/clients/platforms-windows.html |
16:09.34 |
brlcad |
http://www.psyon.org/projects/xchat-win32/ |
17:22.30 |
*** join/#brlcad DTRemenak
(n=DTRemena@DHCP-170-143.caltech.edu) |
20:08.54 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03twingy * 10brlcad/src/adrt/libtie/
(define.h kdtree.c tie.c): about to try some stuff. |
20:11.41 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/TODO: better
configure section output, m4 macro in order |
20:19.08 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/TODO: add legal
headers on the manpages (as comments), update header.sh |
21:20.43 |
*** join/#brlcad cad635
(n=450f9442@bz.bzflag.bz) |
21:22.39 |
brlcad |
hello cad635 |
21:34.00 |
*** join/#brlcad cad293
(n=450f9442@bz.bzflag.bz) |
21:36.40 |
cad293 |
Just looking at BRLCAD for the 1st time
today |
21:39.22 |
brlcad |
sounds good |
21:40.30 |
brlcad |
if you have any questions or get stuck
somewhere, feel free to ask your questions |
21:40.41 |
brlcad |
someone will eventually answer :) |
21:42.54 |
cad293 |
are there any thermal analysis
capabilities? |
21:43.36 |
brlcad |
there are limited analysis capabilities in
general except those related to geometric structure or signal
processing |
21:43.41 |
brlcad |
but yes |
21:43.55 |
brlcad |
there's an rttherm raytracer |
21:44.22 |
brlcad |
that uses a multispectral rendering to
simulate thermal energy signatures |
21:44.53 |
brlcad |
hasn't been used in a long time by anyone
here, but it's there |
21:58.16 |
cad293 |
ok, thanks, i'll probably be back after I get
this installed |
21:58.21 |
*** part/#brlcad cad293
(n=450f9442@bz.bzflag.bz) |
23:30.42 |
Twingy |
grumph |
23:31.39 |
brlcad |
said the grinch |