01:10.50 |
*** join/#brlcad guu
(i=guu@myth.gibbscam.com) |
01:17.32 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-16
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
01:39.00 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
01:46.40 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
02:03.59 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-4
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
02:30.55 |
*** join/#brlcad tegtmeye
(n=tegtmeye@pool-71-248-83-186.bltmmd.east.verizon.net) |
02:41.02 |
Twingy |
http://js.cx/~justin/images/livingroom/ |
02:41.05 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
03:16.22 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
03:40.34 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
04:11.35 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
04:44.21 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
05:02.24 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
05:27.18 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
05:52.47 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-4
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
05:58.23 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-4
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
06:23.34 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
06:49.27 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
07:02.51 |
brlcad |
CIA is ill this evening |
07:03.03 |
brlcad |
navi is down |
07:23.17 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
07:40.09 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
08:01.07 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
08:26.30 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
08:46.33 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-4
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
08:57.13 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(i=cia@cia.navi.cx) |
10:20.49 |
archivist |
I expected to see the milling machine in the
living room |
14:16.17 |
*** join/#brlcad tegtmeye
(n=tegtmeye@bz.bzflag.bz) |
16:45.12 |
*** join/#brlcad pra5ad-werk
(n=803f2049@bz.bzflag.bz) |
16:45.34 |
pra5ad-werk |
brlcad: at home? |
16:45.42 |
brlcad |
yes |
16:45.47 |
pra5ad-werk |
dammit |
16:45.55 |
pra5ad-werk |
where's jason |
16:46.23 |
brlcad |
in mexico all weekend |
16:46.37 |
brlcad |
hopefully still hung over |
16:46.44 |
pra5ad-werk |
oh |
16:46.50 |
pra5ad-werk |
u in tomorrow? |
16:48.33 |
brlcad |
possibly |
16:48.52 |
brlcad |
i'm always in somewhere |
16:49.46 |
pra5ad-werk |
ew |
16:49.52 |
pra5ad-werk |
too much info |
16:49.54 |
pra5ad-werk |
=) |
17:30.29 |
*** join/#brlcad pra5ad-werk
(n=803f2049@bz.bzflag.bz) |
17:56.55 |
``Erik |
heh |
17:57.33 |
``Erik |
you shoulda came in today, sean, I was looking
for someone to pawn racking a machine off on |
18:00.31 |
tegtmeye |
sean, you know gcc can do profiling opts like
the intel compiler can right? |
18:13.27 |
learner |
yeah, would love to see the results |
18:16.08 |
learner |
i did mention that was without going into any
great length on either compiler, add -O3 to each and what are the
results, add no options, what are the results, etc |
18:17.12 |
learner |
the multi-pass gcc would be nice to see,
though I would be still be incredibly surprised if it closes the
gap fully |
18:19.53 |
brlcad |
``Erik: aww, darn.. and I missed that?
shucks |
19:06.37 |
Maloeran |
Just -O3 is a very poor benchmark with GCC,
especially on AMD chips... |
19:33.32 |
learner |
give a list of ia-64 flags that should be
optimal, and I'll give it a whirl |
19:33.57 |
learner |
fast-math, mtune, expensive-opts, not much
different |
19:34.51 |
learner |
i.e. this is an itanium2, an altix |
19:39.27 |
learner |
i've gone through more than a dozen compiles
now, and in each case the intel compiler is out-performing with the
exception of specifying no optimization options gcc takes
it |
19:40.38 |
learner |
which really just isn't so surprising. intel
compiler only supports a couple platforms, you'd hope that they'd
do a decent job |
19:43.42 |
Maloeran |
Ah yes, I didn't know the arch you were
benchmarking, GCC's optimisation for IA-64 isn't anywhere near
Intel's |
20:01.32 |
*** join/#brlcad kierra
(n=Les@fl-71-0-162-17.dyn.sprint-hsd.net) |
20:01.54 |
*** part/#brlcad kierra
(n=Les@fl-71-0-162-17.dyn.sprint-hsd.net) |
20:16.21 |
``Erik |
<PROTECTED> |
20:16.23 |
``Erik |
gheh |
20:18.01 |
tegtmeye |
we where talking today, you know that
-fast-math turns off ieee math right? |
20:32.13 |
brlcad |
yep |
20:32.48 |
brlcad |
brl-cad doesn't rely on ieee floating
point |
20:36.04 |
brlcad |
the benchmark test the actual results of the
computations to ensure that they are within an accepted level of
deviation (zero off-by-many pixel errors) |
20:36.20 |
brlcad |
if they don't match up, the benchmark will
fail |
21:03.49 |
``Erik |
make |
21:03.50 |
``Erik |
ghah |
21:08.26 |
brlcad |
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile
found. Stop. |
21:10.37 |
``Erik |
gmake -j99999999 |
21:11.28 |
brlcad |
gmake: command not found |