00:02.39 |
Maloeran |
Eh, it will come handy to test and improve
scalability, play with global illumination, SURVICE's fire
simulations, AI |
00:03.45 |
``Erik |
heh, the 2048 machien is useless |
00:04.01 |
Maloeran |
How so? |
00:04.01 |
bjorkBSD |
Maloeran, do you work for SURVICE? |
00:04.03 |
``Erik |
the 16 core machine is useless, the best I
have that's useful is 12 |
00:04.16 |
Maloeran |
As a consultant, bjorkBSD |
00:04.34 |
bjorkBSD |
cool! is their version of brl-cad
different? |
00:04.35 |
Maloeran |
How are they useless, it requires paperwork to
get to use them? |
00:05.00 |
``Erik |
the 2048 machine has a cummulative load of
more than 2000 |
00:05.08 |
``Erik |
the 16 core machine has a load of more than
20. |
00:05.18 |
``Erik |
the 12 core machine has a load of like
.2 |
00:05.19 |
Maloeran |
They are developing software built on top of
BRL-CAD, such as Archer, I wouldn't know if their "version" is
"different".. |
00:05.26 |
brlcad |
their version is not different, they just
print up everything onto CD and create hard-copy user manuals as if
you'd bought a boxed copy |
00:06.09 |
Maloeran |
Nice Erik, that's what you get for using
shared hardware |
00:06.11 |
brlcad |
they also provide pre-compiled binaries and
perform their own testing (including for windows, for
example) |
00:06.18 |
bjorkBSD |
oh. |
00:06.39 |
Maloeran |
I'll get some AMD's Barcelone chips when they
come out too, if you want an account on my home mini-cluster
:) |
00:06.44 |
``Erik |
(many uneducated users look at a machines
ability as a simple number of cpu's... they dont' subtract load
from that... they don't understand the real difference between
arch, os, clocks, etc) |
00:07.08 |
bjorkBSD |
that's non-marketing speak, erik! |
00:07.09 |
``Erik |
obviously; the 8 cpu irix box is faster than
the 1 processor linux box. because 8>1 |
00:07.29 |
``Erik |
n/m that the irix box has 150mhz r10k's and
the linux box has a 3.6ghz |
00:07.47 |
bjorkBSD |
how much is the 8cpu irix box? |
00:07.58 |
``Erik |
oh, and the irix box has a load of 15, and the
linux box has 0.00 |
00:08.02 |
bjorkBSD |
$98,000.00 without a keyboard, monitor, or
mouse. |
00:08.23 |
``Erik |
keyboards, monitors, and mice are not for
machines that do real work. |
00:08.28 |
bjorkBSD |
<PROTECTED> |
00:08.44 |
``Erik |
you sit at a pretty graphical machine, maybe
it can play videos and look at web pages |
00:08.52 |
``Erik |
but crunch happens on machines in another
room, mebbe another building |
00:09.59 |
bjorkBSD |
so how much does the 8 thing cost? |
00:10.37 |
Maloeran |
It's 3k$ for a nice Xeon Clovertown 8 cores,
if you would prefer that |
00:11.07 |
``Erik |
clovertown is a dual core die? |
00:11.13 |
``Erik |
4x2 ? |
00:11.31 |
Maloeran |
4 cores on a die, the latest Intel
chip |
00:11.36 |
``Erik |
ah, 2x4 |
00:11.44 |
Maloeran |
They don't produce motherboards with 4 sockets
unfortunately |
00:12.05 |
Maloeran |
But their memory bus wouldn't support that
anyway, I think it's already going to be saturated with 8
cores |
00:12.16 |
dtidrow_work |
when is the quad-core Opterons coming
out? |
00:12.21 |
``Erik |
I think the opteron machien I'm working on
these days is 4 seperate sockets... might be 2x2... twingy spec'd
it, monarch built it, I just do os shit |
00:12.29 |
Maloeran |
Second quarter of 2007, they said |
00:12.57 |
dtidrow_work |
and I know they have quad-socket opteron
mobos.... |
00:12.57 |
brlcad |
where altix shines is that you can go up to
512 processors in a single image.. that is .. very cool |
00:13.08 |
dtidrow_work |
yep |
00:13.11 |
Maloeran |
They have 8 sockets opteron motherboards
actually |
00:13.12 |
brlcad |
no matter what the price, that's the top of
the line |
00:13.31 |
dtidrow_work |
well, I've seen the four-socket ones |
00:13.36 |
brlcad |
with the price, it's quite expensive compared
to a cluster based solution |
00:13.49 |
Maloeran |
brlcad, I really wonder how that single huge
memory bank can cope with the ever growing number of
cores |
00:13.59 |
Maloeran |
AMD's NUMA is a simple and elegant
solution |
00:14.10 |
brlcad |
licensed from sgi :) |
00:14.12 |
dtidrow_work |
Altix is NUMA |
00:14.20 |
Maloeran |
Altix is NUMA as well? Oh. |
00:14.22 |
``Erik |
is it numa? |
00:14.26 |
``Erik |
altix is numa, yes |
00:14.27 |
brlcad |
it came from them |
00:14.29 |
dtidrow_work |
SGI has had NUMA systems for a decade
now |
00:14.32 |
``Erik |
with big honkin' cables out the butt |
00:14.36 |
Maloeran |
Neat |
00:14.43 |
``Erik |
almost as big as my forearm (I have narrow
bones) |
00:14.47 |
brlcad |
which in turn came from an earlier craylink
variant when sgi acquired cray |
00:14.54 |
dtidrow_work |
the Onyx2's were NUMA |
00:16.15 |
brlcad |
they've got it scaling nearly linearly up
towards 512 processors.. but then I've read they've not been able
to scale linearly much past that |
00:16.39 |
dtidrow_work |
I wonder why |
00:16.39 |
brlcad |
course that in itself is a major feat..
something nobody else can do still |
00:17.02 |
dtidrow_work |
indeed - a Linux-based kernel running on 512
CPU's :-) |
00:17.07 |
brlcad |
IBM is probably closest.. but they peak out
way before 512 with P5 |
00:18.11 |
dtidrow_work |
is S_I (they dropped the 'G' last year) still
circling the drain, or have they stabilized? |
00:18.34 |
Maloeran |
You'll have to sacrifice a few processors to
"manage" others as it grows, but it should still scale very well if
they got the memory architecture right |
00:19.47 |
brlcad |
dropped the G? I know they dropped the
markey, but not a name change |
00:19.52 |
brlcad |
s/markey/market/ |
00:20.23 |
dtidrow_work |
well, that's my name for them now |
00:20.26 |
brlcad |
ah, heh |
00:20.52 |
dtidrow_work |
read, "S-blank-I" ;-) |
00:21.32 |
Maloeran |
Cool, the Gambian President announced that he
can cure AIDS in 3 days |
00:21.42 |
brlcad |
Maloeran: aside from the OS needing to be
custom tailored, that's what's particularly cool about what the
altix does .. there's no special processing nodes or otherwise
limitation on the architecture .. it acts like one massive 512-core
machine |
00:22.24 |
Maloeran |
It sounds quite neat, brlcad. I read briefly
about the arch but it wasn't technical enough ; I even thought it
was one main memory bank and not NUMA |
00:23.14 |
dtidrow_work |
heh |
00:23.41 |
Twingy |
2 cpus dual core |
00:27.40 |
Maloeran |
Dual-core is so 2006. :) |
00:30.01 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/src/other/libz/
(172 files in 32 dirs): |
00:30.01 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: update of the bundled zlib from
version 1.2.2 to 1.2.3; per the zlib website, |
00:30.02 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: this eliminates a potential security
vulnerability when decoding invalid |
00:30.02 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: compressed data (VU#238678 / SA11129)
as well as eliminates a potential security |
00:30.02 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: vulnerability when decoding specially
crafted compressed data (VU#680620 / |
00:30.04 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: SA15949). other updates included, see
the zlib release notes for details. |
00:31.07 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/NEWS: |
00:31.07 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: update of the bundled zlib from
version 1.2.2 to 1.2.3; per the zlib website, |
00:31.07 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: this eliminates a potential security
vulnerability when decoding invalid |
00:31.07 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: compressed data (VU#238678 / SA11129)
as well as eliminates a potential security |
00:31.08 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: vulnerability when decoding specially
crafted compressed data (VU#680620 / |
00:31.10 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: SA15949). other updates included, see
the zlib release notes for details. |
00:39.00 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/src/other/libz/Makefile.am: follow zlib's makefile and
generate example and minigzip binaries (test compilation/linking if
anything). make them noinst. |
00:39.31 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/src/other/libz/.cvsignore: add example and
minigzip |
00:44.33 |
louipc |
Maloeran: so what's the new trend for
2007? |
00:46.56 |
bjorkBSD |
more screen time :) |
00:47.38 |
louipc |
hahaha |
01:04.13 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/src/other/libz/Makefile.am: example.c doesn't belong in
the library |
01:54.58 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/ (15 files in 13
dirs): remove duplication of zlib's public headers from our
include/ dir; have configure provide a LIBZ_CPPFLAGS that points to
src/other/zlib instead. |
02:01.09 |
Maloeran |
Sean, how many people get an email every time
you commit? :) |
02:02.33 |
brlcad |
heh, dunno exactly |
02:03.10 |
brlcad |
not a massive list, some join all the lists
and then shortly after unsubscribe to commits .. :) |
02:04.06 |
Maloeran |
I wonder why! :) |
02:07.58 |
Twingy |
hooray grapes |
02:14.13 |
Twingy |
I love this charger |
02:15.01 |
Twingy |
backlit blue lcd, programmable to
charge/discharge user selectable cycles, current, battery type,
figures out how many cells in the battery, doesn't get any
better |
02:20.19 |
Twingy |
I hate how opengl display lists store the
modelview matrix and use that in glGetDoublev instead of the
current one |
02:23.42 |
Twingy |
<Raven> I tried setting my hotmail
password to penis. <Raven> It said my password wasn't long
enough. :( |
02:28.39 |
louipc |
high tech |
02:29.31 |
Twingy |
yep |
02:29.35 |
Twingy |
back in the day |
02:29.44 |
Twingy |
I'd have to wait 15 hours for both batteries
to recharge |
02:29.52 |
Twingy |
cause all you had was the trickle
charger |
02:30.12 |
Twingy |
granted even today that ensures the longest
possible battery life |
02:30.31 |
Twingy |
but I don't mind losing 10% of my battery
cycles if I can go from 15 hours to 15 minutes |
02:30.59 |
Twingy |
battery died at the field, time to go
home |
02:31.10 |
Twingy |
now if it dies at the field, wait 20 minutes
and you are up in the air again |
02:31.57 |
bjorkBSD |
Twingy have you ever read any of gingery's
books? |
02:32.25 |
louipc |
I'd like nuclear power in a battery |
02:32.59 |
Twingy |
I don't have time to read books |
02:33.08 |
Twingy |
I'm always building something or writing
code |
02:33.19 |
Twingy |
and when I'm not doing that I'm passed out on
my bed |
02:34.06 |
Twingy |
the last book I read and enjoyed was NURBS - a
Monograph in visual communications |
02:35.34 |
bjorkBSD |
he wrote a series on building a machine shop
from scrap. |
02:36.07 |
Twingy |
okay... |
02:36.30 |
louipc |
nice |
02:36.57 |
bjorkBSD |
<PROTECTED> |
02:37.01 |
louipc |
I still wonder how the first straightedge was
created |
02:37.22 |
bjorkBSD |
with a spirit level :-j |
02:37.33 |
louipc |
or how they go the first lathes to run
perfectly true |
02:37.59 |
bjorkBSD |
it was trial after trial after
trial. |
02:38.12 |
bjorkBSD |
then they looked at the horizon and it
matched. |
02:38.17 |
Twingy |
louipc, a piece of string and a rock, let
gravity do the work? |
02:38.35 |
bjorkBSD |
or they used a string. |
02:38.55 |
Twingy |
that's how I'dve done it *shrug* |
02:39.44 |
louipc |
I'm just imagining to make accurate machines
you need machines, but you need them to be very accurate as
well |
02:40.24 |
Twingy |
that was true until laser measurement came
around |
02:40.37 |
louipc |
but I guess you could make a precise machine
from a not-as-precise machine but it would be very tough |
02:40.45 |
louipc |
hehe they didn't have lasers back in the
day |
02:40.46 |
Twingy |
now you just use the phase angle and you've
got perfect measurement |
03:33.04 |
Maloeran |
What the... Gentoo dropped xmms, for some
reason, it's out of the package tree entirely |
03:34.09 |
Twingy |
spyware! |
03:34.32 |
bjorkBSD |
Twingy, what kinda projects do you work
on? |
03:34.37 |
bjorkBSD |
... in your shop, ie. |
03:37.35 |
Maloeran |
Official reason : "Gentoo can't afford to
offer unmaintained packages" |
03:38.49 |
Twingy |
bjorkBSD, you mean my garage? |
03:39.45 |
bjorkBSD |
yeah. |
03:40.10 |
Twingy |
well, my big project I'm gearing up for is my
next generation rocket motors |
03:40.18 |
Twingy |
getting away from the monopropellant
stuff |
03:40.31 |
Twingy |
and to do that I needed a cnc mill and
software for it |
03:40.35 |
louipc |
yep gentoo annoyed the heck out of me so I
switched to archlinux |
03:40.39 |
louipc |
I love it |
03:40.42 |
Twingy |
and I wasn't about to spend $$$ on cnc
software |
03:40.52 |
Twingy |
so I hit source forge |
03:40.56 |
Twingy |
and didn't find crap |
03:40.57 |
bjorkBSD |
heheheh |
03:41.02 |
bjorkBSD |
and now you have to write your own. |
03:41.06 |
Twingy |
right |
03:41.09 |
Twingy |
and 1 year later |
03:41.09 |
louipc |
making packages is easy too I'm making one for
BRLCAD |
03:41.14 |
Twingy |
I have cnc software |
03:41.19 |
bjorkBSD |
wonderful! |
03:41.24 |
Twingy |
and now I can make my rocket motors |
03:41.35 |
Twingy |
I still need to be able to make
pcb's |
03:41.41 |
bjorkBSD |
i don't have space for a foundry. |
03:41.41 |
louipc |
Twingy: you do 3D work on the CNC? |
03:41.46 |
Twingy |
which requires spending 2-3 weeks parsing
gerber files |
03:41.54 |
bjorkBSD |
or i'd be sandcasting the parts for a lathe
right now. |
03:41.57 |
Twingy |
louipc, 2.5D planar and soon radial |
03:42.13 |
Twingy |
stop calling it a foundry |
03:42.17 |
louipc |
hehehe |
03:42.19 |
Twingy |
it's a pile of bricks and a $100
torch |
03:42.23 |
bjorkBSD |
hahaha |
03:42.38 |
bjorkBSD |
i'll turn off my gas and call it a space
heater. |
03:42.44 |
bjorkBSD |
yours melts everything right? |
03:42.47 |
louipc |
2.5 = not all 3 Axis at once? |
03:42.55 |
louipc |
*moving at once |
03:43.04 |
Twingy |
it'll sustain 1kg object at 1700F no
problem |
03:43.21 |
Twingy |
louipc, 2.5 means it can't do
concave |
03:43.28 |
bjorkBSD |
will i win a darwin award if i had it in my
kitchen? |
03:43.37 |
Twingy |
you have to build a jig and reposition or use
4th axis radial |
03:43.45 |
Twingy |
no |
03:43.53 |
Twingy |
friend of mine has a taig in his
dorm |
03:43.54 |
louipc |
well depends on your cutter |
03:43.58 |
Twingy |
he built a box around it |
03:44.04 |
Twingy |
so swarf doesn't fly everywhere |
03:44.13 |
bjorkBSD |
i can see having a lathe or a mill
... |
03:44.14 |
louipc |
yeah good idea |
03:44.24 |
bjorkBSD |
but the expensive torch is another
story. |
03:44.26 |
louipc |
put in some coolant too ;) |
03:44.37 |
Twingy |
you don't need coolant for aluminum |
03:45.01 |
Twingy |
you just run it at 2.0 ipm @ 0.01"
layers |
03:45.11 |
louipc |
you can increase your speeds and get better
finish |
03:45.16 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/configure.ac:
test opennurbs regardless of setting. ws, indent to 4 and tab at 8
like everything else for the entire functionality
section. |
03:45.27 |
Twingy |
louipc, you can also do a final pass @ 0.001"
and get same result |
03:45.43 |
Twingy |
I also polish my stuff |
03:45.47 |
Twingy |
I have a floor drill press |
03:45.51 |
Twingy |
I put in my buffer |
03:45.55 |
Twingy |
hit it with some rouge |
03:46.00 |
louipc |
too many operations! |
03:46.00 |
Twingy |
and spend 30 seconds polishing |
03:46.05 |
louipc |
oh ok hah |
03:46.25 |
Twingy |
depends on if you want it shiney or
not |
03:46.46 |
Twingy |
gcam.js.cx |
03:46.48 |
bjorkBSD |
Twingy, do you have a url for your
thingIamNotGonnaCallAFurnaceButBurnsRealHot ? |
03:46.49 |
Twingy |
that was polished |
03:46.49 |
louipc |
do you know if there are any addons to emacs
or vim for NC editing? |
03:47.06 |
Twingy |
bjorkBSD, http://js.cx/~justin/images/alumiforge2/ |
03:47.12 |
bjorkBSD |
the plans for building one? |
03:47.20 |
Twingy |
louipc, download gcam |
03:47.24 |
Twingy |
you won't need to edit |
03:47.32 |
Twingy |
bjorkBSD, plans? |
03:47.38 |
louipc |
I do a lot of manual programming |
03:47.38 |
Twingy |
goto home depot and spend $10 on
bricks |
03:47.57 |
bjorkBSD |
and the torch? |
03:47.57 |
Twingy |
they won't last as long as fire
bricks |
03:48.03 |
Twingy |
hybridburners.com |
03:48.07 |
Twingy |
"Shorty" |
03:48.24 |
louipc |
gnucam eh? |
03:48.28 |
Twingy |
got the website from a guy that taught a
ray-tracing session at siggraph |
03:48.32 |
Twingy |
louipc, yes |
03:49.55 |
bjorkBSD |
hah! |
03:50.10 |
bjorkBSD |
they're not terribly cheap but it should be
manageable :-? |
03:50.41 |
Twingy |
it um, takes some trial and error |
03:51.06 |
Twingy |
eventually your adhoc setup will let you cast
decent size blocks of aluminum with minimal air bubbles |
03:51.52 |
Twingy |
just remember that if you spill something like
that on your foot it'll dissintegrate it |
03:52.37 |
Twingy |
and once you get a system down, you'll cut
your aluminum costs to a quarter |
03:52.39 |
bjorkBSD |
damn! |
03:52.48 |
Twingy |
provided you can get soda cans and scrap
aluminum for free |
03:53.16 |
bjorkBSD |
i'll have to fight with the homeless people
around here :) |
03:53.40 |
Twingy |
I have more scrap aluminum and cans than I
know what to do with right now |
03:53.40 |
Maloeran |
With only 2 feet, that's not too much margin
for trial and error |
03:53.40 |
Twingy |
I like to do 50/50 mix of 6061 and 3104
cans |
03:53.40 |
bjorkBSD |
where do you get them from, the
recyclers? |
03:53.48 |
Twingy |
work |
03:54.09 |
Twingy |
if you have a recycle day, go around the night
before and pilfer them all |
03:54.15 |
bjorkBSD |
hehehe |
03:54.30 |
Twingy |
um, my old chair |
03:54.37 |
Twingy |
had an aluminum base, cut it up on my
bandsaw |
03:54.42 |
Twingy |
my network rack is next to go |
03:54.53 |
Twingy |
~30lbs of aluminum there |
03:55.11 |
Twingy |
just smelt it with 1% zinc |
03:55.25 |
bjorkBSD |
alright. |
03:55.29 |
Twingy |
http://js.cx/~justin/cgi-bin/aluminum.cgi |
03:55.45 |
Twingy |
that's what I charge |
03:56.00 |
bjorkBSD |
cool :) |
03:56.07 |
bjorkBSD |
where do you get the zinc from? |
03:56.23 |
Twingy |
stuff |
03:56.44 |
Twingy |
the zinc fairy |
03:56.58 |
Twingy |
the usual |
03:57.03 |
bjorkBSD |
she must be hawt! |
03:58.00 |
Twingy |
so I aim to have full in-house PCB and cnc
production by summer |
03:58.14 |
bjorkBSD |
to launch your satelltes with right? |
03:58.17 |
bjorkBSD |
... the rockets, ie. |
03:58.35 |
Twingy |
dunno about that, because that much propellant
costs alot |
03:58.56 |
louipc |
I'd think you'd need more specialised aluminum
for that eh |
03:59.00 |
Twingy |
once I get the engineering and design down
it's just a matter of scaling |
03:59.16 |
Twingy |
I haven't revealed my design yet |
03:59.23 |
bjorkBSD |
<PROTECTED> |
03:59.33 |
Twingy |
one of those epiphanies |
03:59.34 |
bjorkBSD |
everything created using open-source software
right? |
03:59.37 |
Maloeran |
I'm sure you'll find a couple people willing
to donate for such a geeky adventure :) |
03:59.39 |
Twingy |
right |
03:59.45 |
Twingy |
well |
03:59.49 |
bjorkBSD |
the tech undergound. |
03:59.54 |
Twingy |
I'd like to patent the motor and donate to GNU
patents |
04:00.16 |
bjorkBSD |
alright mr galt. |
04:01.08 |
Twingy |
I have a trailer for my truck |
04:01.13 |
Maloeran |
"Galt" : To murder a man without
knowing |
04:01.16 |
Twingy |
if I scale it up I'll use that as the launch
platform |
04:01.52 |
Twingy |
I'll put a tarp on it and drive to ohio where
I have FAA clearance |
04:02.06 |
bjorkBSD |
who is john galt, malorean ;) |
04:02.15 |
bjorkBSD |
which part of Ohio/ |
04:02.48 |
Maloeran |
Ah, definitely not someone I know |
04:03.17 |
Twingy |
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15993507/ |
04:04.02 |
bjorkBSD |
<PROTECTED> |
04:04.23 |
Twingy |
if I have to drive any further I might not do
it |
04:04.41 |
bjorkBSD |
baltimore to ohio. |
04:04.47 |
bjorkBSD |
tha'ts a good 12 hrs |
04:04.50 |
Twingy |
yep |
04:04.58 |
bjorkBSD |
never again! |
04:05.31 |
bjorkBSD |
i drove from AR to De over the new
years. |
04:05.41 |
brlcad |
12 hours? maybe to the far west of
OH |
04:06.05 |
brlcad |
I make it to detroit from here in 6-8 hours
and that takes me through ohio |
04:06.06 |
bjorkBSD |
25 frigging hrs in my trusty '88 240 dl
:) |
04:06.47 |
bjorkBSD |
ah you must have driven through W.
Va? |
04:06.50 |
brlcad |
that's a lot of bathroom breaks :) |
04:07.11 |
bjorkBSD |
3 hrs of sleep and maybe 3 breaks. |
04:07.15 |
brlcad |
i've gone the wva route before, but it's not
really faster .. spend a lot of time winding through the
mountains |
04:07.44 |
bjorkBSD |
not counting the endless refueling
stops. |
04:07.46 |
brlcad |
across pa turnpike into ohio |
04:07.47 |
Twingy |
in any case, it'll be fun |
04:07.49 |
bjorkBSD |
those bricks are HEAVY! |
04:08.15 |
Twingy |
? |
04:08.54 |
bjorkBSD |
a 240DL stationwagon is a brick. |
04:13.19 |
Twingy |
next release of gcam after tonight will be
stable |
04:13.30 |
louipc |
nice! |
04:13.36 |
Twingy |
only took a year right? |
04:13.52 |
louipc |
that's pretty good |
04:15.48 |
Twingy |
well it's a pretty simple program |
04:15.54 |
Twingy |
it's just got alot of caveats |
04:15.58 |
louipc |
I've only ever noticed projects here and there
that are in 'planning' phase |
04:16.07 |
Twingy |
heh |
04:16.10 |
louipc |
never releasing any code |
04:16.14 |
Twingy |
I skip right over planning and go into
coding |
04:16.17 |
louipc |
I mean in the CAM arena |
04:16.22 |
louipc |
for open source |
04:16.31 |
Twingy |
most CAM people are computer
scientists |
04:16.41 |
Twingy |
machinists + computer scientists are a rare
breed |
04:16.54 |
Twingy |
*aren't |
04:16.57 |
Twingy |
meh |
04:17.00 |
bjorkBSD |
<PROTECTED> |
04:17.02 |
Twingy |
you get my drift |
04:17.07 |
bjorkBSD |
yeah. |
04:17.35 |
louipc |
aren't? so why isn't there an open source
package rivaling mastercam? |
04:17.47 |
louipc |
who wants to pay $30,000 in licensing
fees |
04:18.24 |
Twingy |
I'm not trying to rival mastercam |
04:18.29 |
Twingy |
mastercam is overly complicated |
04:18.29 |
bjorkBSD |
what's mastercam? |
04:18.39 |
Twingy |
it's like brl-cad |
04:18.42 |
Twingy |
it does everything |
04:18.48 |
Twingy |
I'm not trying to do everything |
04:18.52 |
Twingy |
simpler the better |
04:18.58 |
bjorkBSD |
the unix way |
04:19.01 |
louipc |
yeah mastercam could be a bit
simpler |
04:19.07 |
louipc |
hehe |
04:19.12 |
Twingy |
instead of completely extracting the user from
the machine |
04:19.13 |
bjorkBSD |
louipc, are you a machinist too? |
04:19.18 |
louipc |
yeap |
04:19.22 |
Twingy |
the user thinks in terms of what their machine
will be doing as they model |
04:19.25 |
Twingy |
that's the gcam model |
04:19.45 |
Twingy |
I don't like the idea of sitting down to a
computer, making a 3d model |
04:19.54 |
Twingy |
and having the computer choose the "best" tool
paths |
04:19.56 |
louipc |
but I'm no computer scientist.. more like a
hobbist |
04:20.08 |
Twingy |
I like to control what my machine is doing and
in what order |
04:20.16 |
bjorkBSD |
cool :) |
04:20.30 |
Twingy |
as complex as gcam will get is probly contour
pocketing |
04:20.38 |
Twingy |
right now it does simple zig zag
pocketing |
04:20.57 |
Twingy |
calculating the tool offsets for multiple
level hierchies was a headache |
04:21.23 |
louipc |
yeah I agree with that, the computer can make
really stupid unnecessary movements |
04:21.29 |
Twingy |
it takes the pro-engineer philosophy of
sketching something and extruding it |
04:21.32 |
louipc |
that's why I like to program manually
heh |
04:22.09 |
Twingy |
if some one wants to go in and make gcam have
pretty anisotropic globally illuminated 3d shaded models that's
fine |
04:22.12 |
Twingy |
but wire frame is fine |
04:22.34 |
louipc |
that would be nice |
04:22.44 |
Twingy |
seems overzealous to me |
04:22.53 |
Twingy |
eventually I want to have assemblies |
04:23.03 |
Twingy |
so I take something big "like a
submarine" |
04:23.10 |
Twingy |
and I break it into parts I can mill on my
taig |
04:23.15 |
louipc |
wire frame can numb the brain I find |
04:23.20 |
Twingy |
see the whole thing and see just the part I'm
going to cnc mill |
04:23.40 |
Twingy |
for example |
04:23.41 |
louipc |
hehe so you're taking on catia then
eh? |
04:23.49 |
Twingy |
imagine if after you get down to the lowest
region in brl-cad |
04:23.52 |
bjorkBSD |
i thought brl-cad > catia :P |
04:23.59 |
Twingy |
you had gcam that displayed the tool
paths |
04:24.04 |
Twingy |
for cutting that hmmwv |
04:25.12 |
louipc |
yeah that would be great |
04:25.12 |
brlcad |
catia is mostly a different market |
04:25.32 |
brlcad |
and considerably more developed on the
interface side of things on many levels (they've had billions
invested) |
04:26.12 |
Twingy |
gcam has had about $60 invested :) |
04:26.29 |
brlcad |
heh, not quite :) |
04:26.37 |
brlcad |
you're time is worth more than 0.02 cents
:) |
04:26.45 |
Twingy |
don't kid yourself! :) |
04:26.47 |
brlcad |
heh |
04:27.01 |
Twingy |
0.015 cents tops |
04:27.10 |
Twingy |
you act like I know how to write code or
something |
04:27.26 |
Twingy |
look at photon mapping! |
04:27.30 |
Twingy |
nuff said |
04:27.41 |
brlcad |
heh |
04:29.20 |
Twingy |
PEANUT BUTTAH JELLY TIME! |
04:29.30 |
brlcad |
where it at, where it at |
04:29.31 |
louipc |
oh yea |
04:29.49 |
Twingy |
where are you living now? |
04:32.19 |
brlcad |
with a baseball bat? |
04:32.54 |
Twingy |
you're living with a baseball bat? |
04:33.22 |
brlcad |
peanut butter jelly with a baseball
bat! |
04:33.51 |
Twingy |
where it at where it at! |
04:37.52 |
Twingy |
k |
04:37.57 |
Twingy |
windows portage |
04:41.47 |
Twingy |
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/01/boston.bombscare/ |
04:42.54 |
louipc |
they would answer questions only about hair
awesome |
04:51.41 |
louipc |
Twingy will you set up a CVS or SVN server for
gcam eventually? |
05:34.14 |
Twingy |
once I finish cleaning a few things
up |
05:34.46 |
Twingy |
I don't want to see things thing get bloated
with goofy features |
05:35.15 |
Twingy |
I think it's going to attract a bunch of
people that just learned how to write c++ code and want to add
buttons galore |
05:44.42 |
louipc |
hehe |
05:45.16 |
louipc |
what's that version of emacs that brlcad
uses? |
05:47.55 |
Twingy |
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=7424511&type=product&productCategoryId=pcmcat107700050032&id=1122655672294 |
05:48.15 |
bjorkBSD |
louipc, jove |
05:48.26 |
louipc |
ah right |
05:48.29 |
bjorkBSD |
it's scary. none of the vi commands work in
it. |
05:48.37 |
louipc |
jeff's own version of emacs? |
05:48.49 |
louipc |
or john |
05:49.01 |
bjorkBSD |
jonathan |
05:49.30 |
louipc |
why should vi commands work in emacs?... but
you could probably set it up to do so |
05:50.18 |
louipc |
Twingy: sweeet |
05:51.03 |
bjorkBSD |
<PROTECTED> |
05:51.34 |
brlcad |
it's not exactly a "version of emacs", save a
fork from a really long time ago when emacs was but a
baby |
05:51.51 |
brlcad |
there is a vi-mode for emacs |
05:52.05 |
louipc |
that's what I mean 'a fork' |
05:52.56 |
bjorkBSD |
i was being silly. |
05:53.41 |
louipc |
nah i think it's silly that there's a
vi-mode |
05:53.58 |
bjorkBSD |
i think it's awesome. |
05:54.06 |
bjorkBSD |
it makes emacs more useable. |
05:54.11 |
louipc |
why not just use vim? hah |
05:54.12 |
bjorkBSD |
<PROTECTED> |
05:54.40 |
bjorkBSD |
a text editor w/o modes. that's just
wrong. |
05:54.59 |
louipc |
feels right to me |
05:55.07 |
bjorkBSD |
mged has 6 modes! that's even
better. |
05:55.13 |
louipc |
I grew up with windows ahem |
05:55.27 |
bjorkBSD |
i grew up with dos and as soon as i could, i
abandoned it. |
05:55.31 |
bjorkBSD |
*spits on it* |
05:55.32 |
louipc |
but I'm only using vim now ... to educate
myself |
05:55.45 |
bjorkBSD |
the fastest way is to use ed :) |
05:55.52 |
bjorkBSD |
you'll be forced to learn what you need
to. |
05:56.06 |
bjorkBSD |
... and in no time at all. |
05:56.07 |
louipc |
and it seems less needlessly huge than
emacs |
05:59.16 |
louipc |
ohh ed nooo |
06:37.16 |
Maloeran |
http://darkmonkey.org.uk/4/1/1153390177481.jpg |
06:37.51 |
louipc |
! |
06:46.49 |
brlcad |
heh, that's quite a lot of moving
parts |
06:47.33 |
brlcad |
apparently 256GB/drive if I count correctly,
not too shabby |
07:01.09 |
brlcad |
wow, I like this guy's /. comment .. can be
applied to most religion wars |
07:01.11 |
brlcad |
"Linux is like a religion for people who
really ought to be putting their intelligence to better use than a
religion. Stop wasting time thinking of ways to get your neighbours
to accept Linux as their personal saviour from malware, and start
teaching yourself C++ and get to work improving things." |
07:07.00 |
Maloeran |
A healthy dose of advertissing is still
necessary, even if such words of mouth is no match for Microsoft's
marketing budget for example |
07:08.23 |
Maloeran |
I don't think there's an unbalanced amount of
Linux zealots in comparison to other aspects of life. Some people
out here pratically live for some sportive team, their future car
or next television |
07:13.06 |
brlcad |
what you mean by "unbalanced" is certainly
curious, but sure there are fans and beliefs in just about every
aspect of life |
07:13.27 |
brlcad |
the whole argument is probably a difference on
whether that advertising really is necessary or not |
07:14.07 |
brlcad |
proof by action, example, and advancement or
by what effectively amounts to manipulation or convincing |
07:14.22 |
brlcad |
merit to both sides I think |
07:18.42 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/include/rle_getraw.h: remove the obsolete rle_getraw.h
header .. was renamed to rle_raw.h in a prior urt update |
07:20.36 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/src/other/libz/Makefile.am: reorder |
07:21.00 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/ (28 files in 12
dirs): |
07:21.00 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: remove the libutahrle headers (utah
raster toolkit) from our include/ directory, |
07:21.00 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: and move them up to
src/other/libutahrle/include. let configure set |
07:21.00 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: RLE_CPPFLAGS and set accordingly
amongst the various tools/libraries that need |
07:21.00 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: to know the path. |
07:50.38 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/configure.ac:
provide CPPFLAGS for tcl, tk, itcl, itk, and termlib |
08:02.22 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/ (8 files in 6
dirs): move libterm.h back to termlib's own directory and make
everyone use TERMLIB_CPPFLAGS to get the search path |
08:44.21 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/ (10 files in 4
dirs): remove the itcl/itk header files from our include/
directory, moving them back up to src/other/incrTcl. utilize the
new ITCL_CPPFLAGS and ITK_CPPFLAGS accordingly. |
10:34.42 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/ (56 files in 50
dirs): |
10:34.42 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: *yawn* remove one of the big two
remaining public header sets from our include/ |
10:34.42 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: directory. remove tcl headers from
include/ and utilize the TCL_CPPFLAGS so |
10:34.42 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: compilation pulls headers from within
src/other/libtcl instead. since bu.h and |
10:34.42 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: raytrace.h include tcl foo, this
implicates a change across almost the entire |
10:34.45 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: build to add the new
CPPFLAGS. |
10:35.09 |
brlcad |
i suppose that's enough damage for
now |
10:42.56 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/src/adrt/ (7
files in 7 dirs): take a blind guess that since these parts of adrt
have/use bu.h that they similarly need tcl_cppflags now
too |
13:26.40 |
*** join/#brlcad cad60
(n=a87ebb52@bz.bzflag.bz) |
13:26.49 |
cad60 |
hello |
13:26.55 |
cad60 |
hello~ |
13:27.00 |
cad60 |
anyone here?? |
13:38.33 |
``Erik |
heh |
13:44.37 |
archivist |
2 nano seconds to answer else
timeout |
14:03.30 |
``Erik |
children these days have no
patience. |
16:00.22 |
*** join/#brlcad SWPadnos_
(n=Me@dsl245.esjtvtli.sover.net) |
18:46.40 |
*** join/#brlcad bobbens
(n=bobbens@84.16.237.134) |
19:08.38 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/src/conv/Makefile.am: group the converters with their
flags, sort. |
20:07.25 |
CIA-5 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/ (19 files in 12
dirs): last one, remove the tk headers from our include/ directory.
use the TK_CPPFLAGS automake variable instead, pointing to the
headers in src/other/libtk/generic/ dir |
22:55.08 |
*** join/#brlcad iday
(n=iday@c-68-50-191-200.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
22:55.21 |
*** part/#brlcad iday
(n=iday@c-68-50-191-200.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |