00:13.12 |
*** join/#brlcad poolio
(n=poolio@c-69-251-3-107.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
00:33.13 |
b0ef |
brlcad: yup, that didn't slow things down, but
the render was black; I'll try with some simple geometry |
00:40.35 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/TODO: progress
status during raytrace |
01:08.30 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/src/libbu/semaphore.c: |
01:08.30 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: fix raytrace synchronization bug
introduced via valgrinding. release pairs up |
01:08.30 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: with acquire, not init. need some
other (new) routine to release the memory |
01:08.30 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: allocated during init and probably
some atexit() handler to free that memory. |
01:52.26 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/configure.ac: |
01:52.26 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: fix anonymous report of configure
failure on 7.10.0 where turning off urt would |
01:52.26 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: result in a configure failure. the
problem was a variety of checks for |
01:52.27 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: configure settings that checked for
the wrong value (!no instead of !yes, where |
01:52.27 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: default is "auto"). so the default
worked, but not when the 3rd party lib was |
01:52.29 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: disabled. |
01:59.09 |
*** join/#brlcad MinstrelGypsy
(n=mario_du@bas2-sudbury98-1096601318.dsl.bell.ca) |
02:10.04 |
*** join/#brlcad poolio
(n=poolio@c-69-251-3-107.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
02:11.33 |
*** join/#brlcad poolio_
(n=poolio@c-69-251-3-107.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
02:29.16 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/TODO: auto_path
tcl initialization startup code was once again re-written and
verified via valgrind. this should fix a crash (that I don't have
ready access to) reported via irc on a debian platform. |
02:50.00 |
*** join/#brlcad Joel1
(n=joel@adsl-71-147-42-12.dsl.emhril.sbcglobal.net) |
02:51.34 |
Joel1 |
hey....umm brlcad, do you remember the command
line you told me to put in yesterday to allow the tesselation
tolerance to not go kaput on my computer? i can't find any
logs...and my computer shut down before i wrote it down
:( |
02:52.13 |
brlcad |
run the command without any args and it should
display usage |
02:52.32 |
Joel1 |
ah, but i don't know exactly what the problem
was... |
02:52.45 |
brlcad |
i believe it was the distance
tolerance |
02:52.55 |
brlcad |
so, probably -D |
02:53.04 |
Joel1 |
ok thank you |
02:53.09 |
brlcad |
no prob |
03:17.53 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/include/brlcad_version.h: fix horrible, horrible oversight
typo that prevents brlcad_version() from working |
03:19.21 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/src/conv/g-dxf.c:
extensively improve the g-dxf usage statement, add options, add
version info |
04:14.52 |
*** part/#brlcad Joel1
(n=joel@adsl-71-147-42-12.dsl.emhril.sbcglobal.net) |
05:11.19 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/src/librt/db5_scan.c: quietly return -1 if given null or
there is no file pointer opened |
05:25.08 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/configure.ac:
check for sync for db_sync() |
05:26.24 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/src/librt/db_open.c: condense the windows section, using
the 'b' mode identifier is fine on non-_WIN32 platforms (c90
defines it to do nothing) |
05:27.00 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/src/librt/db_open.c: ws |
05:38.36 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/src/librt/db5_scan.c: return quietly if dbip is null or if
the file pointer isn't set, plus some ws |
05:47.24 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/src/tclscripts/mged/openw.tcl: quotes |
05:47.59 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/src/tclscripts/mged/mged.tcl: quotes, and update
comment |
07:18.13 |
*** join/#brlcad clock_
(n=clock@zux221-122-143.adsl.green.ch) |
09:37.36 |
*** join/#brlcad docelic
(n=docelic@212.15.185.6) |
10:39.15 |
*** join/#brlcad louipc_
(n=louipc@bas8-toronto63-1177613689.dsl.bell.ca) |
11:32.22 |
*** join/#brlcad louipc
(n=louipc@bas8-toronto63-1096669382.dsl.bell.ca) |
11:34.58 |
*** join/#brlcad wiLL
(n=will_bm@200-150-189-117.corp.ajato.com.br) |
11:35.20 |
*** part/#brlcad wiLL
(n=will_bm@200-150-189-117.corp.ajato.com.br) |
12:11.16 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=elite01@dslc-082-082-084-183.pools.arcor-ip.net) |
12:15.15 |
*** join/#brlcad louipc_
(n=louipc@bas8-toronto63-1096667813.dsl.bell.ca) |
12:35.48 |
*** join/#brlcad louipc
(n=louipc@bas8-toronto63-1096670019.dsl.bell.ca) |
12:38.43 |
*** join/#brlcad Elperion
(n=Bary@p54874D55.dip.t-dialin.net) |
13:24.17 |
Haleiwa |
brlcad: how many days do you rest before
exercising a muscle again? |
13:38.26 |
*** join/#brlcad louipc
(n=louipc@bas8-toronto63-1096782730.dsl.bell.ca) |
14:14.26 |
brlcad |
Haleiwa: depends on the muscle and whether I'm
bulking or conditioning |
14:15.57 |
Haleiwa |
brlcad: for bulking? |
14:16.10 |
brlcad |
if i'm bulking, it's usually 48 hours after it
stops hurting or 72 hours after working out, whichever is longer --
which is basically if you workout a particular muscle heavy on
monday, it's not focused again until thursday (and it's left alone
in the days in-between) |
14:17.37 |
brlcad |
some mucles like abs can take more, and it
depends on your frame, but that's a schedule that's pretty good for
most -- the trick is really hitting only one or two mucles on any
given day, and then leaving it alone |
14:18.16 |
*** join/#brlcad louipc
(n=louipc@bas8-toronto63-1088754299.dsl.bell.ca) |
14:21.54 |
Haleiwa |
brlcad: I go to gym every 3 days and work out
all the muscles and they don't hurt then it's the same isn't
it? |
14:22.36 |
Haleiwa |
brlcad: I have problem with biceps then
increase weight only very slowly is there some trick? |
14:23.01 |
Haleiwa |
I feel like the signal into the muscle is too
weak, like the muscle could do much more but the brain tells it too
little |
14:23.55 |
Haleiwa |
other muscles like triceps go forward like
hell I already hit the limit of the machine with triceps |
14:30.43 |
brlcad |
Haleiwa: that "could" be fine, but not for
biceps -- the smaller muscles need more than that to rest once they
start getting bigger, even after they don't hurt |
14:31.17 |
Haleiwa |
so I should train the biceps less
often? |
14:31.20 |
brlcad |
i usually give biceps another 24 at best, e.g.
monday to friday |
14:32.21 |
Haleiwa |
and if I do biceps only once per week is it
fine? |
14:32.30 |
Haleiwa |
cause getting into the gym costs some
time |
14:32.39 |
brlcad |
the other thing, though, is that if you're
going every three days (presumabely M -> Thu -> Sun -> Wed
-> Sat -> etc) .. I don't buy that you're focusing on the
given muscles enough :) |
14:32.50 |
Haleiwa |
Thanks for advice, these words help much more
than mindless incorrect lifting of irons |
14:33.09 |
Haleiwa |
I do all the muscles every time I go |
14:33.29 |
brlcad |
that can be a problem |
14:33.42 |
Haleiwa |
what can it cause? what should I do
instead? |
14:34.31 |
Haleiwa |
or I could actually train the biceps
asynchronously because I have a little dumbbell for that at
home |
14:34.32 |
brlcad |
i mean, you can't be doing benchpress and
triceps and shoulders on the same day and expect all three to max
out nicely |
14:34.38 |
Haleiwa |
so you say every 5 days the biceps? |
14:34.42 |
brlcad |
once you do any one of those three, you cheat
the other two |
14:34.46 |
Haleiwa |
no I get tired |
14:34.57 |
Haleiwa |
sure yes I get tired |
14:35.08 |
Haleiwa |
and the others just the signal from the brain
gets weaker |
14:35.30 |
brlcad |
that's what I mean about sticking to just two
muscles -- I give about a half-hour to each muscle |
14:35.51 |
Haleiwa |
and what you do with the muscles you don't
focus? No training or do you give them some
low-intensity? |
14:35.54 |
brlcad |
low, slow, heavy, controlled reps |
14:36.18 |
Haleiwa |
and the focused get what? |
14:36.40 |
brlcad |
if you're lifting for bulk, leave the ones off
you just worked out alone |
14:36.40 |
Haleiwa |
I think my training was crap :) |
14:36.54 |
Haleiwa |
I don't get it |
14:37.03 |
brlcad |
they really are in recovery mode until they've
had their three days or so of rest |
14:37.04 |
Haleiwa |
I want to lift for bulk only |
14:37.31 |
Haleiwa |
but then I have to go more often than every 3
days |
14:37.40 |
brlcad |
if you lift light in the meantime, you're
pressing them to respond to strength training (which limits growth
capacity) |
14:38.07 |
brlcad |
yeah, every 3 days isn't ideal |
14:38.24 |
Haleiwa |
so if I go every 2 days and I do half of the
body every visit? |
14:38.33 |
Haleiwa |
Plus do the bicepses asynchronously at home
every 5 days? |
14:38.34 |
brlcad |
every day or even every other day lets you
respond to each muscle after they've had their recovery |
14:39.19 |
Haleiwa |
wohoo, this training will surely work
:) |
14:39.20 |
brlcad |
depends what you mean by half the body, but
yeah, that's more doable |
14:39.27 |
brlcad |
i hear that and it sounds like a 4 hour
workout |
14:39.30 |
Haleiwa |
I mean half of the muscles |
14:39.58 |
Haleiwa |
half of the machines |
14:40.39 |
Haleiwa |
is it a problem that the muscles get 4 days
for recovery instead of 3? |
14:40.43 |
Haleiwa |
cannot they get lazy? |
14:41.20 |
brlcad |
seriously, a half hour per muscle -- intense
focus on getting the muscle to fail within a few heavy reps with
some warmup and cooldown reps -- and if you do something like
shoulders one day, that means you can't do low chest or arms that
day |
14:42.26 |
Haleiwa |
what's the factor that gets
optimized? |
14:42.42 |
Haleiwa |
that I feel the muscle is maximum tired after
leaving the room? |
14:43.48 |
brlcad |
like if you want shoulders on some day, you do
heavy military or incline (but not both) followed by shoulder
raises followed by heavy shrugs, followed by dumbell shoulder work
to finish -- something like that |
14:43.49 |
*** join/#brlcad louipc_
(n=louipc@bas8-toronto63-1096734991.dsl.bell.ca) |
14:44.06 |
brlcad |
specifically avoiding bench, arms, and
back |
14:44.56 |
brlcad |
if done on monday, that would/should basically
leave your shoulders out until wed/thurs |
14:45.31 |
brlcad |
also means you can't do bench/arms/back until
tues/wed at the earliest |
14:45.51 |
Haleiwa |
what is the best exercise for upper
pecs? |
14:45.57 |
Haleiwa |
my upper pecs are total crap |
14:46.01 |
Haleiwa |
and the lower are much better |
14:46.18 |
brlcad |
incline and pec deck |
14:46.42 |
Haleiwa |
incline is incline bench with
dumbbells? |
14:47.59 |
brlcad |
and yes -- the factor that's optimized is that
the muscle you are working on is noticeably tired, but not those
immediately around it (i.e. isolate the area somewhat) |
14:48.25 |
brlcad |
then the trick is to get that fatigue with as
few reps as possible using patterns that your muscles respond
to |
14:48.40 |
Haleiwa |
why as few reps as possible? |
14:48.43 |
Haleiwa |
to save time? |
14:48.49 |
brlcad |
max'ing out is critical for the big muscles,
but really hard without spotters |
14:49.17 |
Haleiwa |
harry spotter is the guy who catches falling
barbells? |
14:49.33 |
brlcad |
no, not to save time -- even 30 reps can take
a half an hour if done right |
14:49.57 |
Haleiwa |
why as few reps as possible then? |
14:50.10 |
brlcad |
fewer heavy reps build bulk, stimulate muscles
for growth |
14:50.25 |
Haleiwa |
but one superheavy rep just tears the tendons
away doesn't? |
14:50.55 |
brlcad |
the more reps you add for a given set,
particularly on the big muscles, the more it becomes conditioning
and strength training |
14:51.58 |
Haleiwa |
what if I lift the weight halfway but cannot
complete? What should I do? |
14:52.06 |
Haleiwa |
Terminate the series? |
14:52.56 |
brlcad |
if done incorrectly, yes, you can tear tendons
and cause all sorts of bad stuff to happen -- thats why the
workouts are supposed to take a long while, to do them controlled,
to rest extensively between sets, to have a spotter for failure and
to watch you're doing proper form, etc |
14:53.30 |
Haleiwa |
6-8 reps is that OK for bulking? |
14:53.35 |
brlcad |
heh, yes definitely -- if you absolutely
cannot complete with proper form, you've presumably reached
failure |
14:53.57 |
Haleiwa |
I can complete if I twist my body or use other
muscles but I don't do it |
14:54.02 |
Haleiwa |
That's incorrect form right? |
14:54.14 |
brlcad |
you ideally reach failure on each muscle at
least once during the workout, and then move to a light cooldown on
that muscle |
14:54.24 |
brlcad |
very incorrect |
14:54.25 |
Haleiwa |
or if I can complete but instead of 3 seconds
it takes half a minute? |
14:54.34 |
brlcad |
that's a good way to give yourself a hernia or
rip something |
14:54.45 |
Haleiwa |
and I also try to keep the speed constant
that's right too? |
14:55.05 |
brlcad |
relatively slow, but more importantly very
controlled |
14:55.18 |
Haleiwa |
but if it's too slow then it's aerobic isn't
it? |
14:55.35 |
Haleiwa |
controlled means smooth? |
14:55.54 |
brlcad |
6-8 reps is fine for most muscles -- smaller
muscles can take more, and you can play with that number some as
you get familiar with how yours respond |
14:56.03 |
brlcad |
smooth, proper form, full range of
motion |
14:56.30 |
Haleiwa |
and if I cannot complete the whole range say
only 90% then declare failure, right? |
14:56.35 |
brlcad |
if you're pressing 300 lbs, there's nothing
aerobic about it |
14:56.39 |
brlcad |
no matter how slow you go |
14:56.54 |
Haleiwa |
just the static tension consumes enough
leakage power? |
14:58.21 |
brlcad |
ideally you don't declare failure -- your
spotter does (at least if it's a big muscle group) |
14:58.32 |
brlcad |
or rather, your body very clearly
will |
15:00.26 |
brlcad |
there's is a point where a given muscle will
outright fail under an increasing heavy load |
15:00.27 |
brlcad |
for smaller loads, it's very
different |
15:00.27 |
brlcad |
but for heavy ones, you want them to fail with
a heavy weight at least once -- and then each time you work that
muscle out, you push towards making that heavy weight failure
happen 5-10 lbs heavier |
15:02.02 |
Haleiwa |
what we want to induce is a damage,
right? |
15:02.09 |
Haleiwa |
but microscopical and not
macroscopical |
15:03.31 |
brlcad |
example workout, I might be doing a pyramid
set on incline, doing 10x120 warmup, then 10x180, 8x200, 6x220,
4x240, and then failing at 2x260 (with a spotter, and presuming I
already knew my max was around 270) -- followed by maybe a two-set
cooldown of 10x120 and 20x80 |
15:03.55 |
brlcad |
right |
15:04.10 |
brlcad |
macro bad, micro great |
15:04.26 |
Haleiwa |
so it's like bending an aluminium strip ten
times back and forthn |
15:04.30 |
brlcad |
if I was doing that workout, and I failed on
the second set, that'd change everything |
15:04.36 |
Haleiwa |
not like tearing it outright over |
15:04.54 |
brlcad |
not a great analogy :) |
15:06.12 |
Haleiwa |
how long do you wait between changing
weights? |
15:07.02 |
brlcad |
that's a hard one, depends how it feels and
how close to failure .. generally a few minutes at least |
15:07.20 |
Haleiwa |
you're right with the biceps because when I
start with the biceps after some time of not using it, I feel it's
powerful but next time it feels like crap |
15:07.30 |
Haleiwa |
what do you do in these minutes? |
15:07.59 |
brlcad |
not so long that the muscle has entirely
cooled down (like 30 minutes later) and not immediate (like 1
minute later) |
15:08.22 |
brlcad |
otherwise, you can play with different
recoveries depending on what you're trying to achieve |
15:08.44 |
Haleiwa |
what's best for the biggest muscles? |
15:08.57 |
brlcad |
biceps are a good example -- once they fail,
they're pretty much useless, but they have a fast
recovery |
15:09.15 |
Haleiwa |
fast recovery? |
15:09.18 |
Haleiwa |
You said it's slow, 5 days |
15:09.41 |
brlcad |
so you can just wait 2 minutes after a set,
and even if you were close to failure with 8 reps, you could still
get 6-8 reps on the next with increased weight |
15:09.56 |
Haleiwa |
oh that recovery |
15:09.57 |
brlcad |
i mean on the spot recovery between
sets |
15:10.28 |
brlcad |
you can generally do more reps with the
smaller or more toned muscles |
15:10.42 |
brlcad |
you can work out your abs just about every
day, for example |
15:10.54 |
Haleiwa |
wikipedia says that that is a myth |
15:11.00 |
brlcad |
but then you generally don't "bulk" your
abs |
15:12.38 |
Haleiwa |
abs are small or big muscles? |
15:13.00 |
brlcad |
with workouts, just about everything is a myth
or bad advice in certain concepts or put to certain practice -- as
it all depends heavily on your own body, your muscles, your frame,
etc |
15:13.40 |
brlcad |
as a group they're pretty big .. but they're a
collection of a lot of smaller muscle bundles |
15:14.02 |
brlcad |
i was referring more to the difference between
working your biceps and your quadriceps |
15:14.58 |
brlcad |
still, 8 is a good general number if you're
starting out to stick to that doesn't start to matter until/if
you've plateau'd a muscle |
15:15.15 |
brlcad |
8-12 or so |
15:15.45 |
brlcad |
reducing reps as you hit more serious
weights |
15:16.32 |
Haleiwa |
I mean the biceps on the arm |
15:16.37 |
Haleiwa |
isn't there another on the leg? |
15:16.58 |
brlcad |
huh? |
15:17.03 |
Haleiwa |
then probably not :) |
15:25.50 |
*** join/#brlcad louipc
(n=louipc@bas8-toronto63-1088754675.dsl.bell.ca) |
15:36.23 |
*** join/#brlcad clock_
(n=clock@zux221-122-143.adsl.green.ch) |
15:45.04 |
Tanelorn |
brlcad: how does it come that the recovery
time (the one in order of days) depends on muscle size? |
16:11.52 |
``Erik |
heh |
16:12.03 |
``Erik |
my biceps still hurt from tuesday :( |
16:23.13 |
Tanelorn |
brlcad: actually could I say that the recovery
is complete when I feel the muscle is fresh and I cannot stop
myself from playing with the weights? |
17:19.15 |
brlcad |
``Erik: heh |
17:19.38 |
brlcad |
that's not a good sign if that little bit of
effort makes ya sore :) |
18:25.45 |
``Erik |
<-- puss, and did bunches of carrying and
lifting before you got there |
18:27.35 |
``Erik |
nothing else hurts *shrug* |
18:27.40 |
``Erik |
just my biceps |
19:26.49 |
*** join/#brlcad docelic
(n=docelic@212.15.177.205) |
21:14.03 |
*** join/#brlcad yukonbob
(n=bch@whthyt247-240.northwestel.net) |
22:28.08 |
*** join/#brlcad Twingy
(n=justin@74.92.144.217) |
23:30.34 |
*** join/#brlcad ibot
(i=ibot@rikers.org) |
23:30.34 |
*** topic/#brlcad is BRL-CAD
Open Source Solid Modeling || http://brlcad.org || http://sf.net/projects/brlcad
|| http://fisheye1.cenqua.com/browse/brlcad/brlcad
|| 7.10 is now released! .. e-mail announcements will follow
posting of binary distributions |