01:11.27 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad *
10brlcad/src/mged/attach.c: jeebus, why in the world is a vls being
used for a constant string.. |
01:52.49 |
*** join/#brlcad poolio
(n=poolio@c-69-251-3-107.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
02:27.48 |
*** join/#brlcad Daytona
(n=jra@c-68-55-36-65.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
02:47.24 |
*** join/#brlcad Daytona
(n=jra@c-68-55-36-65.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
02:47.57 |
Daytona |
Sean, are you there? |
02:56.43 |
Daytona |
anybody have any details on the mged ubits
command problem? |
02:56.57 |
Daytona |
oops, I mean "units" command |
02:58.30 |
brlcad |
hey Daytona |
02:58.38 |
brlcad |
hm, is this a first? :) |
02:59.33 |
Daytona |
Yep |
03:00.09 |
Daytona |
I saw the "units" command in the
TODO |
03:00.17 |
Daytona |
What is the problem? |
03:00.44 |
brlcad |
well, I just noticed today -- doesn't report
the units if you just run units |
03:01.08 |
Daytona |
Oh, I noticed that, too |
03:01.36 |
Daytona |
But the help message doesn't say it will
report the units |
03:01.51 |
Daytona |
and the units are displayed in the
GUI |
03:02.31 |
brlcad |
iirc it used to report the units,
though |
03:02.37 |
brlcad |
just like title |
03:03.02 |
Daytona |
Probably should, for consistency with other
commands |
03:03.11 |
brlcad |
plus, displaying in the gui doesn't really
help if you're in console mode :) |
03:03.25 |
brlcad |
hm, so you think it never did? |
03:03.30 |
Daytona |
Yeah, should be an easy fix |
03:03.48 |
Daytona |
I don't recall for sure whether it did or
not |
03:03.50 |
brlcad |
i swear i remember it returning the units.. or
maybe there's just some other command I'm thinking of that also
reports it |
03:04.19 |
brlcad |
but I even had that wired in my mind, as I was
actually modelling something earlier |
03:05.09 |
Daytona |
Maybe I'll take a look at it this
weekend |
03:06.28 |
brlcad |
just took a quick look at wdb_units_cmd.. it
has print statements in there to report the current units |
03:06.33 |
brlcad |
"You are now editing in ..." |
03:06.49 |
brlcad |
so something fishy |
03:07.25 |
Daytona |
Is it putting the string in
interp.results? |
03:07.32 |
brlcad |
would hunt it down, but I'm deep in the middle
of a graphical crash reporter :) |
03:07.45 |
Daytona |
I'll have a look |
03:08.16 |
brlcad |
it does do a tcl_appendresult |
03:08.36 |
Daytona |
OK, I'll look at it this weekend |
03:09.08 |
Daytona |
Right now I need to hit the sack. Have to get
up early to take the grandson to a ball game |
03:09.23 |
brlcad |
cool |
03:09.32 |
brlcad |
at ripken's? |
03:09.33 |
Daytona |
bye |
03:09.52 |
Daytona |
No, he's playing in a tournament in
Essex |
03:09.59 |
brlcad |
oh, even better ;) |
03:10.08 |
brlcad |
well, best of luck to him |
03:10.13 |
brlcad |
and g'night! |
03:10.14 |
Daytona |
see ya, thanks |
04:07.33 |
*** join/#brlcad thing0
(n=ric@124-168-79-115.dyn.iinet.net.au) |
04:07.36 |
thing0 |
hey guys |
06:51.32 |
*** join/#brlcad Laniakea
(i=clock@77-56-105-31.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
07:10.08 |
*** join/#brlcad cad34
(n=5702f3db@bz.bzflag.bz) |
08:57.22 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=elite01@dslc-082-082-084-168.pools.arcor-ip.net) |
10:29.04 |
*** join/#brlcad Laniakea
(i=clock@77-56-105-31.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
10:42.02 |
*** join/#brlcad thing1
(n=ric@210-84-22-12.dyn.iinet.net.au) |
10:42.11 |
*** part/#brlcad thing1
(n=ric@210-84-22-12.dyn.iinet.net.au) |
10:42.14 |
*** join/#brlcad thing1
(n=ric@210-84-22-12.dyn.iinet.net.au) |
10:42.17 |
thing1 |
hey |
10:42.34 |
thing1 |
hey |
10:42.37 |
thing1 |
dammit |
10:44.48 |
*** part/#brlcad thing1
(n=ric@210-84-22-12.dyn.iinet.net.au) |
12:21.11 |
*** join/#brlcad thing1
(n=ric@210-84-22-12.dyn.iinet.net.au) |
12:44.14 |
thing1 |
hmmm |
12:44.21 |
thing0 |
finally |
12:44.25 |
thing0 |
back to normal |
13:04.03 |
brlcad |
howdy thing0 |
13:04.15 |
brlcad |
you're on and off too quickly :) |
13:04.19 |
brlcad |
(to respond) |
13:04.25 |
thing0 |
howdy brlcad |
13:04.28 |
thing0 |
yeah |
13:04.44 |
thing0 |
my router was dropping out today |
13:07.01 |
thing0 |
so what you been up to brlcad? |
13:07.35 |
brlcad |
coding ;) |
13:07.43 |
thing0 |
hehe |
13:07.56 |
thing0 |
but of course |
13:07.56 |
brlcad |
trying to get a few last things implemented so
a release can be posted |
13:07.56 |
thing0 |
;) |
13:08.14 |
thing0 |
i have been getting more into project
management stuff |
13:08.29 |
thing0 |
listening to podcasts while doing other stuff
;) |
13:10.54 |
b0ef |
any way to prevent mged from using mouse
follow? |
13:11.33 |
b0ef |
it's impossible to switch to the listener when
the mouse is hovering over the graphics window |
13:15.30 |
``Erik |
"project management stuff"/ |
13:15.31 |
``Erik |
? |
13:15.37 |
thing0 |
yeah |
13:15.46 |
thing0 |
my next goal in life |
13:15.50 |
thing0 |
project manager |
13:15.59 |
``Erik |
heh |
13:16.02 |
thing0 |
yeah |
13:16.12 |
thing0 |
I get to be a senior project engineer by
default |
13:16.18 |
thing0 |
just have to sit around for a while |
13:16.23 |
thing0 |
PM I have to work for |
13:16.33 |
thing0 |
ahh |
13:16.36 |
thing0 |
;) |
13:16.47 |
``Erik |
related to software development,
primarily |
13:16.53 |
thing0 |
yeah |
13:17.09 |
``Erik |
deep dependancy chains, radically un-equal
"resources", ... |
13:17.18 |
thing0 |
hmm |
13:17.49 |
``Erik |
I even have a ruby prototype of a time
mgmt/todo list program that tries to address a lot of the shit
other osftware doesn't :) |
13:17.50 |
thing0 |
I want to be able to learn general skills in
PM |
13:17.53 |
``Erik |
uhmmmm |
13:17.59 |
``Erik |
joel spolsky |
13:18.03 |
thing0 |
so that it can be transferable to any
environment |
13:18.26 |
``Erik |
wrote an article on it that is interesting
(just bear in mind that he was the project manager for excel... so
bring a salt lick for any excel related comment in that
article) |
13:18.29 |
thing0 |
i am in engineering construction at the
moment |
13:18.40 |
thing0 |
ahh ok |
13:18.48 |
thing0 |
you got the name of the article? |
13:19.04 |
``Erik |
I'd assert that software development (an
artform) and construction are so radically different, that the
skills are simply not transferrable :( |
13:19.10 |
``Erik |
not off the top of my head |
13:19.29 |
thing0 |
i disagree |
13:19.29 |
thing0 |
the principle of project management is
transferable |
13:19.33 |
thing0 |
but it has to be adapted |
13:19.34 |
``Erik |
perhaps |
13:19.47 |
thing0 |
there is QA etc in construction |
13:19.48 |
``Erik |
I'm just skeered, cuz there's a notion that a
programmer is a programmer |
13:19.52 |
b0ef |
I've just completed a semester in
PM;) |
13:19.57 |
thing0 |
hehe |
13:20.01 |
``Erik |
so you can grab a java UI developer... and
make 'em do os C work |
13:20.11 |
``Erik |
I've seen it happen WAY TOO FUCKING MUCH over
the past 3 years. |
13:20.11 |
``Erik |
:( |
13:20.19 |
``Erik |
('cept more in the other direction) |
13:20.37 |
thing0 |
yeah |
13:20.51 |
``Erik |
and denying perfect fit situations where both
the customer and developer really really want to be because of body
count on some other high profile project |
13:21.02 |
thing0 |
lol |
13:21.07 |
thing0 |
nah keep going |
13:21.07 |
thing0 |
;) |
13:21.15 |
``Erik |
I'm on vacation, that trainwreck of fucked up
idiotic criminal management does not exist. |
13:21.22 |
thing0 |
hehe |
13:21.23 |
thing0 |
ahh ok |
13:21.31 |
thing0 |
you should chill then |
13:21.32 |
thing0 |
;) |
13:21.39 |
``Erik |
in 1.5 hours, I'm driving to the
airport |
13:21.43 |
``Erik |
yo |
13:21.46 |
thing0 |
ah |
13:21.49 |
thing0 |
where you going? |
13:21.54 |
``Erik |
picking someone up |
13:22.40 |
thing0 |
ahh |
13:22.47 |
thing0 |
hehe |
13:23.24 |
thing0 |
hehe |
13:23.36 |
thing0 |
PARTY at ``Erik house |
13:23.38 |
``Erik |
and hopefully enough left over for the next
month *cough* |
13:23.45 |
thing0 |
hehe |
13:23.48 |
thing0 |
sure |
13:24.11 |
``Erik |
not sure, though... people from missoura like
the booze O.o |
13:24.41 |
thing0 |
ahh |
14:01.26 |
thing0 |
hmm |
14:01.37 |
thing0 |
``Erik : One hour remaining |
14:53.30 |
*** join/#brlcad Elperion
(n=Bary@p548778ED.dip.t-dialin.net) |
15:31.14 |
thing0 |
7 minutes ``Erik |
15:31.16 |
thing0 |
go go go |
15:58.19 |
*** join/#brlcad Twingy
(n=justin@74.92.144.217) |
16:02.45 |
*** join/#brlcad Elperion
(n=Bary@p548776EB.dip.t-dialin.net) |
17:55.33 |
thing0 |
you back ``Erik? |
18:01.02 |
*** join/#brlcad Laniakea
(i=clock@217-162-229-69.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
18:32.41 |
thing0 |
cya pppl |
18:32.43 |
thing0 |
bye! |
18:32.44 |
*** part/#brlcad thing0
(n=ric@210-84-22-12.dyn.iinet.net.au) |
20:00.44 |
*** join/#brlcad akreal
(n=ak@87.249.56.197) |
20:25.31 |
akreal |
hello all! |
20:48.39 |
*** join/#brlcad jimmyz
(n=asd@host81-129-128-152.range81-129.btcentralplus.com) |
20:55.37 |
jimmyz |
anyone in? |
20:58.09 |
akreal |
jimmyz: aloha! |
21:18.08 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03johnranderson * 10brlcad/src/mged/
(8 files): |
21:18.08 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: Eliminated direct access of
interp->result (Not reliable since tcl 8.0). |
21:18.08 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: See the comment in tcl.h. |
21:18.08 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: This also fixes the "units"
command. |
21:27.02 |
*** join/#brlcad Daytona
(n=jra@c-68-55-36-65.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
21:27.42 |
Daytona |
sean, are you there? |
21:32.03 |
jimmyz |
anyone in now? |
21:32.12 |
Daytona |
hi |
21:32.17 |
jimmyz |
hiya |
21:32.24 |
jimmyz |
i installed brlcad yesterday |
21:32.39 |
Daytona |
any problems? |
21:32.51 |
jimmyz |
now my comp says i have a file called
c:program, which may render computer unstable |
21:33.07 |
jimmyz |
the file doesn't have a suffix for file
type |
21:33.28 |
jimmyz |
is it connected with the install? |
21:34.26 |
Daytona |
I've never installed in Windows, so I can't
help you, but if anyone else is listening, they might
help |
21:34.41 |
jimmyz |
hmm |
21:34.57 |
jimmyz |
how does brlcad compare with
autocad? |
21:35.28 |
Daytona |
brlcad doesn't do drawings, it's a solid
modeller |
21:36.33 |
jimmyz |
i don't follow |
21:36.50 |
Daytona |
Mostly uses CSG (components built up from
combinations of simple primitive shapes) |
21:37.04 |
Daytona |
CSG == Combinatorial Solid Geometry |
21:37.47 |
jimmyz |
ok. what do you use it for |
21:37.54 |
Daytona |
Autocad does engineering drawings and some
BREP (Boundary Respresentation) |
21:38.44 |
jimmyz |
hmm. i'm lost |
21:38.58 |
Daytona |
The Army uses it to create detailed 3D
computer models of vehicles, which can then be interrogated via
raytracing |
21:39.07 |
jimmyz |
is brlcad used for particular things like
vehicles? |
21:39.40 |
Daytona |
Actually, it can be used to model any
objects |
21:40.10 |
Daytona |
It has excellent raytracing
capability |
21:40.54 |
jimmyz |
what is that useful for? |
21:42.03 |
Daytona |
In simualtions that model bullet paths through
vehicles, or photon paths through scenes, things like
that |
21:43.18 |
jimmyz |
wouldn't you need FEA to know if a bullet gets
through a surface? |
21:44.58 |
Daytona |
It doesn't do the physics, just the geometry.
BRL-CAD can tell you what lies along a line through the model, but
another application would calculate how far along that line a
bullet would penetrate |
21:46.27 |
jimmyz |
hmm |
21:46.32 |
jimmyz |
what do you use it for? |
21:46.44 |
Daytona |
I work for the Army :-) |
21:47.59 |
jimmyz |
oh right |
21:48.07 |
jimmyz |
you design vehicles? |
21:48.32 |
Daytona |
No, I work on the software used to evaluate
vehicles |
21:49.15 |
jimmyz |
how does the software evaluate
vehicles? |
21:49.16 |
Daytona |
That software uses BRL-CAD |
21:49.34 |
jimmyz |
crash testing? |
21:50.21 |
Daytona |
No, simulations of bullet penetration and
damage. BRL-CAD supplies the vehicle geometry
information. |
21:52.01 |
jimmyz |
hmm |
21:52.07 |
jimmyz |
which vehicles have you worked on? |
21:52.42 |
Daytona |
Many, unfortunately, I can't get into details
here :-) |
21:52.52 |
jimmyz |
ahh |
21:53.42 |
Daytona |
BRL-CAD can also make some good images of
models |
21:54.15 |
jimmyz |
if i want to design a boat would brl be
suitable? |
21:55.20 |
Daytona |
If you actually want to build the boat,
probably not. It can't make the required engineering
drawings. |
21:55.59 |
jimmyz |
what would an engineering drawing contain that
brl wouldn't do? |
21:56.04 |
jimmyz |
excuse my ignorance |
21:57.16 |
Daytona |
Engineering drawings show things like
dimensions, curve radii, surface finishes, ... |
21:57.52 |
jimmyz |
brl just shows lines? |
21:58.13 |
Daytona |
BRL-CAD can do very nice colr shaded images of
the model, but it won't automatically add dimensions, etc |
21:58.24 |
Daytona |
oops, I mean "coloc" |
21:58.38 |
Daytona |
That is "color" |
21:58.55 |
jimmyz |
hmm |
21:59.09 |
jimmyz |
so can't do plots from it? |
22:00.34 |
Daytona |
It can do plots, but they are different that
what you would get from Autocad |
22:02.16 |
jimmyz |
so what is the use of brl without engineering
drawings? |
22:02.21 |
jimmyz |
not dissing it....... |
22:03.34 |
Daytona |
It was not intended for design and build. It
was originally created for the Army's use. |
22:03.59 |
jimmyz |
what was it created for then, and why did the
OS it? |
22:04.43 |
Daytona |
Others have used it for things like x-ray
treatment planning. |
22:05.17 |
jimmyz |
radiotherapy you mean? |
22:05.30 |
Daytona |
The Army created it for its raytracing
capability. To quickly determine what lies along any line through
the geometry |
22:05.55 |
Daytona |
X-Ray treatment for cancer turmors |
22:06.01 |
jimmyz |
i see |
22:07.07 |
Daytona |
You could build your boat in BRL-CAD and make
images and drawings of the boat from any viewpoint. |
22:07.37 |
Daytona |
And use that boat model in another application
that needed to know about boat geometry. |
22:08.08 |
Daytona |
But boat manufacturers would not find your
boat model useful. |
22:09.16 |
jimmyz |
do you deal with boats at all? |
22:09.22 |
Daytona |
no |
22:09.33 |
Daytona |
That's theNavy :-) |
22:09.58 |
jimmyz |
lol |
22:10.09 |
jimmyz |
are you an engineer? |
22:10.32 |
Daytona |
No, Computer Scientist |
22:10.56 |
Daytona |
how about you? |
22:11.41 |
jimmyz |
vision science |
22:12.09 |
jimmyz |
but i have silly ideas of building a
boat |
22:12.32 |
jimmyz |
complex business tho' hydrodynamics and
all |
22:12.32 |
Daytona |
Now my ignorance, what is vision
science? |
22:12.39 |
jimmyz |
how the brain sees |
22:12.43 |
Daytona |
Oh |
22:13.18 |
Daytona |
Yes, as I said, you can modle the geometry
with BRL-CAD, but it doesn't know about physics. |
22:13.45 |
jimmyz |
which programs do? |
22:14.38 |
akreal |
Daytona: physics is weight and so on? but not
color and transpacy?... |
22:14.42 |
Daytona |
Don't know what might be available free, but
things like NASTRAN do FEA |
22:15.06 |
Daytona |
correct, BRL-CAD can handle color and
transparency |
22:15.25 |
jimmyz |
catia? |
22:16.35 |
Daytona |
CATIA, Pro/Engineer, Unigraphics, ... are CAD
systems specifically designed for design-to-build. |
22:17.28 |
Daytona |
They do mostly geometry, but connect with
other packages that can do physics, kinematics, weight and balance,
... |
22:17.47 |
jimmyz |
god, it's a complicated business |
22:18.12 |
Daytona |
Sure is, that's why I stay with simple
computer software!!!! |
22:20.10 |
jimmyz |
like brl? |
22:20.20 |
Daytona |
yes :-) |
22:20.56 |
jimmyz |
brl is simple? |
22:21.47 |
Daytona |
It's actually a pretty simple idea, that has a
lot of tools and capabilities built up around it. |
22:22.23 |
Daytona |
It's predecessor was started in the
1970's |
22:23.00 |
jimmyz |
i saw the pic of someone on a pdp with
it |
22:23.31 |
Daytona |
It was written to replace having to look
through engineering drawings of vehicles to determine what wasa
along a line through the vehicle |
22:24.08 |
jimmyz |
oh right |
22:24.15 |
Daytona |
One of the guys in the picture was probably
Mike Muuss, the original designer of BRL-CAD |
22:26.43 |
Daytona |
got to go now, see you around |
22:27.06 |
jimmyz |
thanks a lot |
22:27.08 |
jimmyz |
nice talking |