| 00:16.17 | IriX64 | http://rafb.net/p/oynrsY45.html just curious, have i hit solaris code yet? |
| 00:19.09 | IriX64 | remember i ignore warnings such as cast make integer from pointer of different size |
| 00:19.43 | IriX64 | because in a cast i assume you know what you want |
| 00:36.47 | IriX64 | http://rafb.net/p/UZsUZI80.html <---- is anybody else getting this kind of stuff, this is trying to make bwish |
| 00:37.35 | IriX64 | reams of errors do you want all of it? |
| 00:40.25 | IriX64 | http://rafb.net/p/D4wdlm67.html maybe that will help |
| 00:41.45 | IriX64 | bte mged exhibits the same symptom, i tried compiling it just in its directory |
| 00:41.51 | IriX64 | btw too |
| 01:15.52 | *** join/#brlcad IriX64 (n=mario_du@bas2-sudbury98-1096601029.dsl.bell.ca) | |
| 02:04.09 | *** join/#brlcad cad46 (n=4b139e8d@bz.bzflag.bz) | |
| 03:37.15 | *** join/#brlcad Twingy (n=justin@74.92.144.217) | |
| 05:59.45 | *** join/#brlcad Laniakea (i=clock@77-56-107-241.dclient.hispeed.ch) | |
| 08:21.50 | *** join/#brlcad Elperion (n=Bary@p54876820.dip.t-dialin.net) | |
| 09:36.23 | *** join/#brlcad deltazap (n=deltazap@pool-71-251-104-132.tampfl.fios.verizon.net) | |
| 12:49.18 | *** join/#brlcad elite01 (n=elite01@dslc-082-082-068-204.pools.arcor-ip.net) | |
| 13:26.33 | *** join/#brlcad CIA-4 (n=CIA@208.69.182.149) | |
| 13:43.12 | *** join/#brlcad CIA-4 (n=CIA@208.69.182.149) | |
| 14:54.42 | *** join/#brlcad Laniakea (i=clock@77-56-107-241.dclient.hispeed.ch) | |
| 15:28.57 | *** join/#brlcad Laniakea (i=clock@77-56-107-241.dclient.hispeed.ch) | |
| 16:49.56 | *** join/#brlcad Laniakea (i=clock@77-56-107-241.dclient.hispeed.ch) | |
| 17:01.28 | *** join/#brlcad docelic (n=docelic@212.15.179.73) | |
| 17:02.12 | *** join/#brlcad CIA-4 (n=CIA@208.69.182.149) | |
| 17:22.54 | *** join/#brlcad CIA-4 (n=CIA@208.69.182.149) | |
| 18:09.08 | *** join/#brlcad IriX64 (n=mario_du@bas2-sudbury98-1096601029.dsl.bell.ca) | |
| 18:17.14 | IriX64 | http://irix32.spaces.live.com/photos brlcad albumn, here's that photoshop pix of tinwoodsman i promised you :P |
| 18:28.52 | IriX64 | actually it's a 5-clicks photo ;) |
| 18:30.11 | IriX64 | brlcad: i deleted that tree and did a fresh complete cvs checkout, waiting on you now at your leisure. |
| 18:31.57 | poolio | IriX64: It's the weekend, he might not be working today :) |
| 18:33.05 | IriX64 | doh!!!! yer right |
| 18:34.11 | IriX64 | you get that iceweasel of yours to access the blog? |
| 18:34.52 | IriX64 | heh firefox detected refusing access() |
| 18:35.57 | IriX64 | probably hides on weekends :) |
| 18:37.14 | poolio | IriX64: no, i haven't bothered though, been busy with work/play. |
| 18:37.43 | IriX64 | ahh |
| 18:38.13 | IriX64 | wonder if others have that problem, i know yukonbob hit it too |
| 18:38.33 | IriX64 | said something about curling the url |
| 18:41.28 | IriX64 | http://rafb.net/p/FDzKcw22.html hehe checking the solaris code :) |
| 18:44.13 | IriX64 | understand how this works, I can follow any of the lines you support and cross compile to my platform :) |
| 18:57.28 | *** join/#brlcad IriX64 (n=mario_du@bas2-sudbury98-1096601029.dsl.bell.ca) | |
| 18:59.14 | IriX64 | yukonbob, he fixed your display thing , fisheye :) |
| 18:59.23 | IriX64 | errr check fisheye |
| 19:07.41 | *** join/#brlcad IriX64 (n=mario_du@bas2-sudbury98-1096601029.dsl.bell.ca) | |
| 19:13.09 | IriX64 | heh |
| 19:13.38 | IriX64 | only thing i don't like is defaults to join on open |
| 19:18.06 | IriX64 | my irix32 blog :) |
| 19:22.11 | IriX64 | should have put the pirates of the carribean up at disney |
| 19:49.22 | *** join/#brlcad neur0n (n=andreas@52.81-167-60.customer.lyse.net) | |
| 20:28.08 | *** join/#brlcad CIA-4 (n=CIA@208.69.182.149) | |
| 20:48.21 | *** join/#brlcad Elperion (n=Bary@p54876820.dip.t-dialin.net) | |
| 21:39.46 | IriX64 | poolio.... that assert.h thing, thought they fixed it. |
| 21:40.45 | IriX64 | well i fixed my copy sigh... again |
| 21:41.15 | IriX64 | sometimes it doesn't pay to start from scratch :) |
| 21:41.53 | IriX64 | scratch being a complete cvs checkout |
| 21:42.09 | poolio | I can commit it for you |
| 21:42.33 | IriX64 | could you just #include <assert.h> with his includes |
| 21:42.43 | poolio | yeah sure, one sec |
| 21:42.48 | IriX64 | thanks |
| 21:44.07 | poolio | which file was it in again? |
| 21:44.23 | IriX64 | opennurbs_bezier.cpp |
| 21:45.05 | IriX64 | not sure if it should go there or common.h |
| 21:45.38 | IriX64 | i put mine in the cpp file |
| 21:46.26 | IriX64 | is that file name right just a sec |
| 21:47.21 | IriX64 | its right |
| 21:47.27 | poolio | I'm just going to put it in opennurbs_bezier.cpp, the dev can move it later if he wants |
| 21:47.39 | IriX64 | good |
| 21:48.10 | poolio | alright, cvsup |
| 21:48.19 | IriX64 | thanks |
| 21:48.37 | CIA-4 | BRL-CAD: 03poolio * 10brlcad/src/other/openNURBS/opennurbs_bezier.cpp: included assert.h |
| 21:55.03 | IriX64 | http://rafb.net/p/CKliVD10.html line 3352 or there abouts poolio, why set x11_works to no on a successfull test result? |
| 21:55.22 | IriX64 | err configure.ac |
| 21:56.04 | IriX64 | the previos check sets to yes, this one resets to no on success |
| 21:58.14 | IriX64 | so when i go edit happy, I just change that little no to a yes, and voila my x passes inspection now |
| 21:58.23 | IriX64 | heh |
| 22:01.57 | poolio | I ahve a feeling you fail the second check |
| 22:02.19 | poolio | It doesn't set it to no on success, it sets it to no on failure. And apparently you fail that check |
| 22:06.45 | poolio | http://rafb.net/p/vXnvBf74.html |
| 22:06.49 | poolio | compile and run that and tell me what it outputs |
| 22:08.15 | IriX64 | just a sec |
| 22:12.43 | IriX64 | undefined reference to _Xnewmodifier map, you telling me my x is broken? |
| 22:12.53 | poolio | yes siree. |
| 22:13.00 | IriX64 | crapville |
| 22:13.02 | poolio | oh wait, it won't even compile? |
| 22:13.06 | IriX64 | right |
| 22:13.15 | poolio | oh duh |
| 22:13.23 | poolio | you have to link the right xlibs, one sec |
| 22:15.11 | poolio | -lX11 |
| 22:16.07 | IriX64 | gives back a pointer so my x is not broken :) |
| 22:16.23 | IriX64 | you printfed the pointer its there poolio |
| 22:17.12 | IriX64 | IriX64@FthrNtr ~ |
| 22:17.12 | IriX64 | $ ./test |
| 22:17.12 | IriX64 | 0x100f0198 |
| 22:17.12 | IriX64 | IriX64@FthrNtr ~ |
| 22:17.13 | IriX64 | $ |
| 22:18.58 | IriX64 | going for a walk cya later, thanks for the commit |
| 22:19.15 | poolio | IriX64: wait, got another minute? |
| 22:21.49 | poolio | ah well, you'll read it when you get back. I don't know much about automake so I missed this, but AC_TRY_RUN has 4 arguments, the first is the program, , if the program returns true the second argument is executed, false the third, and ** if autoconf knows it is cross-compiling for another |
| 22:21.54 | poolio | machine and therefore can't run a test program at all, it doesn't try |
| 22:21.57 | poolio | but just executes the fourth argument. |
| 22:37.50 | IriX64 | so what are we saying here i have a busted x11? |
| 22:39.47 | IriX64 | so,,x11_works=no what will happen on success |
| 22:40.28 | IriX64 | x11_works gets set to a null? |
| 22:41.44 | IriX64 | whats wrong with plain ole [x11_works=yes] ? |
| 22:42.39 | IriX64 | gotta reboot ill be back |
| 22:42.44 | *** part/#brlcad IriX64 (n=mario_du@bas2-sudbury98-1096601029.dsl.bell.ca) | |
| 22:47.45 | *** join/#brlcad IriX64 (n=mario_du@bas2-sudbury98-1096601029.dsl.bell.ca) | |
| 22:48.03 | yukonbob | IriX64: what "display thing" are you talking about...? |
| 22:48.51 | IriX64 | DISPLAY environment variable brlcad did something about it |
| 22:49.01 | *** join/#brlcad elite01 (n=elite01@dslc-082-082-068-204.pools.arcor-ip.net) | |
| 22:49.40 | IriX64 | poolio if i change it to just ,[x11_works] the result is true which means the test passed and i do have that little thing it's testing for |
| 22:49.50 | IriX64 | err x11_works=yes |
| 22:50.34 | yukonbob | IriX64: Ahh... ;) |
| 22:53.11 | IriX64 | the url for fisheye1 is in the topic if you ewant to look |
| 22:53.17 | IriX64 | err want |
| 22:53.26 | poolio | IriX64: Well, I don't think it will execute the ,[x11_works] = yes, it detects you are cross-compiling and doesn't even bother to do AC_TRY_RUN (I think). So for now I'd just hack it apart/comment out/whatever to make it run |
| 22:53.50 | poolio | I don't quite see why that test is being run, it looks like it only is for testing if you are cross compiling |
| 22:53.58 | IriX64 | right but one argument is set it to that if true correct? |
| 22:54.17 | poolio | huh? |
| 22:54.19 | IriX64 | only one , |
| 22:54.39 | poolio | Just comment it out / change it to automatically set x11_works = yes for now, and talk to brlcad when he gets back about why they bother to run that test |
| 22:55.00 | IriX64 | good |
| 22:55.45 | IriX64 | every time i touch configure.ac he calls me edit happy :P |
| 22:56.50 | IriX64 | good to be happy tho, edit or otherwise ;) |
| 22:56.56 | poolio | Well, you are edit happy. There are reasons things are done and checked for in configure.ac and brlcad wants to make sure it compiles and runs on as many systems as possible. So he doens't just wnat to cut out a certain check / modify it so it works for _you_, because that could break the install for many others |
| 22:57.24 | IriX64 | you mean nobody else is seeing this? |
| 22:58.31 | poolio | Well, it seems like for some reason or another X11 is automatically disabled if you are cross compiling.(maybe ;)) |
| 22:58.41 | poolio | And I would presume there is a reason, I just don't know what |
| 22:58.47 | IriX64 | mebbe so :) |
| 22:58.53 | poolio | I don't think very many people cross compile brlcad |
| 22:59.21 | poolio | ...why are you cross compiling? |
| 23:01.42 | IriX64 | oh i see, let me clarify cygwin is not supported, so i follow a code line that is supported and generate code for my system from it |
| 23:02.29 | IriX64 | true cross compiling is a ways down the road yet |
| 23:03.08 | IriX64 | but already I have grief, most configures bail out saying can't check such and such while cross compiling |
| 23:03.49 | poolio | that's a bummer. I feel like if you can compile _for_ a system there is no reason why you can't compile _on_ that system |
| 23:04.05 | IriX64 | so i cheat and use the build,target,host switches and preprocess configure to provide results based on those. |
| 23:04.57 | IriX64 | or on another system is the way i feel about it |
| 23:05.17 | poolio | if you're willing to run cygwin why not just spare yourself a headache and run it in vmware or something |
| 23:05.27 | IriX64 | if you're in config.sub, i may support you :) |
| 23:05.46 | IriX64 | vmware is costly |
| 23:05.52 | poolio | It's actually free |
| 23:06.01 | IriX64 | since when? |
| 23:06.03 | poolio | (vmware player) |
| 23:06.20 | IriX64 | heh thought you meant vmware workstation |
| 23:06.51 | IriX64 | i actually have an expired copy on here with warp4 on it |
| 23:06.55 | poolio | no, but if you found someone with vmware workstation and just made an image, you could distribute that image (probalby of a linux install with brl-cad) |
| 23:07.13 | IriX64 | ?? illegal |
| 23:07.21 | poolio | no, it's entirely legal |
| 23:07.33 | IriX64 | how vmware costs money. |
| 23:07.57 | poolio | well find someone who has bought it and use their computer to do it, or ask brlcad nicely and maybe he could do it. he's got funding :) |
| 23:08.07 | IriX64 | :) |
| 23:11.55 | IriX64 | see if the BSD or SOLARIS specific stuff successfully builds it means it's working |
| 23:12.28 | IriX64 | my latest 7.8.8 had the -DBSD flag set it runs here. |