00:00.26 |
IriX64 |
do i dare try to make it, make is associated
so it should go |
00:01.31 |
IriX64 |
rotflmao |
00:01.41 |
IriX64 |
its doing it again |
00:02.24 |
IriX64 |
gotta go out for a bit later thanks for
educating me |
00:03.51 |
*** join/#brlcad iraytrace
(n=iraytrac@cocoa.sci.utah.edu) |
00:20.37 |
IriX64 |
guy i went to see had the gall to ask me if I
was of the true religion, I answered of course, beleiving is the
true relgion, catholicism, judaism, etc are merely *ways of
beleiving, sheeesh |
00:22.35 |
*** join/#brlcad AchiestDragon
(n=david@whipy.demon.co.uk) |
00:24.15 |
IriX64 |
scuse me venting on you sigh |
00:29.28 |
*** join/#brlcad AchiestDragon
(n=david@whipy.demon.co.uk) |
00:31.39 |
IriX64 |
http://rafb.net/p/8vMizB71.html
<--- guys this ones yours |
00:44.33 |
*** join/#brlcad docelic
(n=docelic@212.15.172.93) |
00:53.56 |
IriX64 |
http://rafb.net/p/wW7wwR25.html
<-- okay, this ones not completley proper, because I used the
-i(gnore) switch on make to force it to keep going around that
error i just pasted a while ago, but ntvdm built it |
01:52.03 |
*** join/#brlcad dtidrow
(n=dtidrow@c-69-255-182-248.hsd1.va.comcast.net) |
02:02.25 |
poolio |
evenin |
02:21.49 |
poolio |
brlcad: I had a question about some memory
clean up and stuff. I found that the rtips needed to be cleaned
with rt_clean_rti(), should I also be clearing the resource
pointers? and what about rt_uniresource? should I run
rt_clean_resource on those? |
03:29.44 |
*** join/#brlcad thing1
(n=ric@203-59-163-191.dyn.iinet.net.au) |
03:29.47 |
*** join/#brlcad b0ef
(n=b0ef@062016142179.customer.alfanett.no) |
04:14.58 |
*** join/#brlcad dtidrow
(n=dtidrow@c-69-255-182-248.hsd1.va.comcast.net) |
04:28.30 |
brlcad |
poolio: yes, the resource structures should
always belong to the application and it's the app's job to free
them (if you see api that contradicts this, let me know or try
fixing it -- there shouldn't be) |
04:31.07 |
brlcad |
rt_clean_resource will do "most" of the job of
free'ing data except for one case that I don't believe you're using
(but you should be able to ignore that case regardless) |
04:31.25 |
brlcad |
rt_uniresource is special, you don't free it
(you didn't allocate it) |
04:31.41 |
brlcad |
you can clean it, but iirc, it doesn't really
matter much |
04:32.44 |
poolio |
brlcad: but if I have it setup for multiple
CPUS, I should make sure to free all the resource
pointers? |
04:33.33 |
poolio |
also: it appears g_qa doesn't clean anything.
I'm not quite sure where I got rt_clean() usage from. g_transfer
uses rt_clean but proceeds to rt_clean_rti() later |
04:34.01 |
brlcad |
yes |
04:34.29 |
brlcad |
rt_clean just prepares for the next frame
and/or render session |
04:34.45 |
brlcad |
g_transfer is a demo application where it
shoots rays over and over until it's shut down |
04:34.56 |
brlcad |
so between each session, it needs to
clean |
04:35.09 |
brlcad |
but then on shutdown, it needs to clear out
the rti |
04:36.52 |
poolio |
wait, so if I have a rtip that i'm going to
re-extrace from a db_i, do I need to run rt_clean_rti or just
rt_clean? |
04:37.04 |
poolio |
note, rt_gettree() is going to be
recalled |
04:38.57 |
brlcad |
hmm |
04:41.01 |
brlcad |
that's a good question, I'm not positive
without re-reading the guts, but I think you will need to
rt_clean_rti() as the directory structure needs to be cleared out
(which is in the rti) |
04:41.03 |
poolio |
I can experiment but it's hard to
tell |
04:41.21 |
poolio |
alright yeah, because rt_new_rti clones the
db_i |
04:41.22 |
brlcad |
rt_clean_rti() runs rt_clean() too
fwiw |
04:41.28 |
poolio |
yeah that's correct |
06:08.00 |
poolio |
brlcad: you around at this hour? |
06:08.41 |
poolio |
zit |
06:09.21 |
poolio |
wow my brain is fried |
06:09.36 |
poolio |
i was trying to type exit in another window,
and managed to type ex adn then must have tapped into this and
typed zit |
06:09.39 |
poolio |
I guess I'll go to sleep now |
06:09.41 |
poolio |
gnite :) |
07:41.07 |
*** join/#brlcad Laniakea
(i=clock@77-56-111-42.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
08:06.01 |
*** join/#brlcad zapp
(n=deltazap@pool-72-64-146-7.tampfl.fios.verizon.net) |
08:33.46 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=elite01@dslc-082-082-067-117.pools.arcor-ip.net) |
08:46.27 |
*** join/#brlcad Elperion
(n=Bary@p5487431D.dip.t-dialin.net) |
09:00.13 |
Laniakea |
``Erik: have you managed to install the
openbsd into your emulator? |
10:26.53 |
*** join/#brlcad docelic
(n=docelic@212.15.179.254) |
10:31.56 |
*** join/#brlcad ken
(n=chatzill@c-68-42-232-149.hsd1.mi.comcast.net) |
10:34.49 |
*** join/#brlcad ken
(n=chatzill@c-68-42-232-149.hsd1.mi.comcast.net) |
10:37.24 |
ken |
this is kenwolcott from the mailing list,
looking for someone who knows anything about the deal with the
website. feel free to ping me or whatever if you have any
info |
11:22.42 |
*** join/#brlcad docelic
(n=docelic@212.91.112.56) |
12:58.20 |
``Erik |
hrm, what? huh? what website? |
13:12.03 |
ken |
ohey there |
13:12.23 |
ken |
I responded to a thing on sourceforge about a
webdesigner wanted |
13:12.36 |
ken |
I got this email that said "drop by
irc" |
13:13.51 |
ken |
Im just here asking about what's expected, in
terms of design/function and all that |
13:51.56 |
*** part/#brlcad zapp
(n=deltazap@pool-72-64-146-7.tampfl.fios.verizon.net) |
13:55.50 |
*** join/#brlcad dtidrow
(n=dtidrow@c-69-255-182-248.hsd1.va.comcast.net) |
14:44.12 |
``Erik |
ah, brlcad is the guy to talk to, when he
wakes up O.o |
14:44.43 |
``Erik |
I presume you've perused what exists at the
moment? |
14:45.25 |
ken |
the b+w site? |
14:45.29 |
``Erik |
and are comfortable with the notion of making
a grotesqly conformant page (i.e. renders on just about any
browser, with just about any font size, screen size, etc) |
14:45.40 |
ken |
yea, that wont be a problem |
14:45.47 |
``Erik |
http://www.brlcad.org/ |
14:46.29 |
``Erik |
okie, brlcad is the guy to talk to :) I have
to go make a shopping list and head now O.o hasta |
14:46.45 |
ken |
kk |
14:47.04 |
ken |
do svedanya |
14:53.44 |
brlcad |
howdy ken |
14:53.59 |
ken |
how are ya? |
14:54.18 |
brlcad |
pretty good, still shaking off some
sleep |
14:54.35 |
ken |
thats good to hear |
14:55.00 |
ken |
you mentioned mediawiki in the email |
14:55.06 |
ken |
I like that idea |
14:55.58 |
ken |
I was wondering about
layout/color/etc |
14:56.08 |
brlcad |
yes, I actually mentioned a lot of things,
iirc too :) |
14:56.35 |
brlcad |
there are four primary sections to the site
that need to be worked on, with various levels of independence for
those sections |
14:57.27 |
ken |
right |
14:57.49 |
ken |
but its all going to look pretty much the
same, right? |
14:57.50 |
brlcad |
as I mentioneed, there's already a guy that's
been working on the front portal section of the site, he's
unfortunately not here this weekend though he'll be back on
Mon |
14:58.04 |
brlcad |
they can look the same or not |
14:58.11 |
brlcad |
so long as their consistent within their
section |
14:58.16 |
ken |
I mean, visually consistant and all? or are
they four different sites? |
14:58.18 |
ken |
riht |
14:58.25 |
brlcad |
so there's a lot of flexibility in terms of
how each one looks independently |
14:59.05 |
brlcad |
they're really four different sections to the
same site, they all relate to and are connected to
BRL-CAD |
15:00.02 |
brlcad |
though they could be on separate domain names
for identity or something, maybe separate virtual names, or even
separate domains -- but all interconnected in terms of navigation
and data being presented |
15:00.54 |
brlcad |
for example it would be really useful on the
main page to have a summary of the benchmark statistics, a graph of
recent results or entry statistics |
15:01.32 |
ken |
right |
15:02.03 |
brlcad |
and selecing that data would then of course
take you to the section that talks about what the performance
numbers mean, just what is the "BRL-CAD Benchmark", how to add
their own results, download a benchmark-only binary kit,
etc |
15:02.39 |
brlcad |
that benchmark performance section could be in
the same drupal/mediawiki install or could be entirely
custom |
15:04.01 |
brlcad |
i say that mainly because it's going to be
pretty tricky to do all of the backend connections, like for that
performance section, without a bit of customization (both on the
backend and the front end), so I did not want to artificially
constrain any of those four sections amongst each other |
15:05.16 |
brlcad |
so if you're interested in working on one of
the sections, I can point out some of the stuff that's already
being worked and what's not |
15:06.34 |
ken |
well, most of what Ive done is front-end code,
with a bit of (very) light php/perl to make it useful, but if I
need new skills, it wouldnt hurt the resume to pick em up |
15:08.01 |
brlcad |
I think the less customization we can get away
with the better, because that makes for less of a maintenance
burden |
15:09.14 |
brlcad |
e.g. I think you could probably do the entire
performance database and materials database in just about any CMS
with a fair bit of setup, and entirely through the frontend if one
wanted |
15:10.12 |
ken |
actually, I'd imagine the materials db wouldnt
be too much setup in mediawiki |
15:11.03 |
brlcad |
hmm, that's entirely possible .. hadn't
thought that one through so much |
15:12.06 |
brlcad |
the difficulty I think would be having a
consistent set of information for each material as well as having
summary information pages |
15:12.41 |
ken |
just add a few more form fields on the upload
page? |
15:12.52 |
brlcad |
like if you wanted to do a search of all
metals that have a density over some specified value |
15:13.17 |
brlcad |
or if you wanted a table of all materials that
have a brinell hardness < .2 |
15:13.33 |
ken |
yea, I was just gonna say, toss in some kinda
search deal beyond the very basic find-a-page |
15:13.47 |
brlcad |
just looking at an "info sheet" of rolled
hardened steel #12 and comparing it to some other material
side-by-side |
15:14.03 |
brlcad |
and being able to compare the same
fields |
15:14.20 |
brlcad |
without manually editing both wiki pages,
manually categorizing every property, etc |
15:15.01 |
ken |
right, just make the search useful |
15:15.25 |
ken |
instead of lists of links, bring up
tables |
15:15.58 |
brlcad |
how would someone "add a new material" with
mediawiki, though? |
15:16.02 |
ken |
the one problem I can see is that I've been
told wikis can be a bit nuts with sql queries |
15:16.40 |
brlcad |
I'm just having trouble seeing how it'd work I
suppose, without them copy/pasting another existing material record
that already had a given set of fields |
15:16.59 |
ken |
upload file, fill out a few info fields, and
somewhere in the back some voodoo happens that pulls out any
numeric data thats too banal to make uploaders type in |
15:17.14 |
brlcad |
mind you, I'm not adept in all the intricate
details of mediawiki, I mostly know it from the initial setup, and
basic editing aspects |
15:20.42 |
brlcad |
there isn't any file to upload for materials
(at least not yet), it's all fundamental material properties for
the most part where materials have items like their name, density,
brinell hardness, formal name, short name, young's modulus, tensile
strength, elongation at break, etc |
15:22.48 |
ken |
yea, as long as it can be read from whatever's
uploaded |
15:24.32 |
brlcad |
erm, there isn't a standard file format or
anything for this stuff |
15:24.50 |
ken |
yea, I was just looking into that |
15:25.08 |
brlcad |
that's where I was thinking you'd just have a
form or sections of properties that people filled in |
15:25.48 |
brlcad |
sometimes you know just a couple items like
the name and a density, sometimes you know everything like the
actaul % breakdown of elemental molecules |
15:26.28 |
``Erik |
http://www.explosm.net/comics
brutal |
15:26.32 |
ken |
so just autofill the rest with NA or
unknown? |
15:27.10 |
``Erik |
(and it seems to me... with the section
visibility thingymajigger... if everything was real simple and
properly marked, then a couple stylesheets could be chucked out to
'pretty' it up |
15:27.12 |
``Erik |
) |
15:27.13 |
brlcad |
by the way, for that particular task, there is
a site that provides some of this information, but the difference
here is that this is entirely open and free to all and that the
content is specifically related to solid modeling and rendering so
we can do things like associate textures and visible properties
along with the physical traits |
15:28.07 |
``Erik |
that'd allow archaic browsers like lynx to
still be happy, as the page source is, y'know, content oriented
instead of visually oriented |
15:28.08 |
``Erik |
O.o |
15:28.41 |
ken |
yea, thats how the internets been wanting to
be lately |
15:29.16 |
``Erik |
and last I heard, there was no canonical list
of what properties a material has :/ that has to be decided before
any serious 'content aware' search mechanism could really be
decided |
15:29.24 |
``Erik |
does water have a brinell hardness?
O.o |
15:29.31 |
brlcad |
ken: yeah, it can be autofilled, but I'm just
not seeing what then that means w.r.t. mediawiki data -- as
traditionally at least, they're basically tracking the content for
a given page that can be freeform |
15:29.49 |
brlcad |
is there a way to force pages to have a
particular format in mw? |
15:29.59 |
``Erik |
css |
15:30.08 |
ken |
take for example the image template |
15:30.25 |
``Erik |
iirc, the default mw look is all in
css |
15:30.29 |
brlcad |
``Erik: huh?? |
15:30.32 |
ken |
it is |
15:30.34 |
ken |
well |
15:30.34 |
brlcad |
you're talking about something
different |
15:30.40 |
brlcad |
i'm not talking about the visual
layout |
15:30.43 |
``Erik |
oh |
15:30.44 |
ken |
its xhtml + css + jscript |
15:30.44 |
``Erik |
heh |
15:30.59 |
brlcad |
i don't care about that, I mean the format of
the data |
15:31.05 |
``Erik |
I don't think so |
15:31.08 |
brlcad |
what fields are there and which
aren't |
15:31.19 |
``Erik |
other than hacking the php or the local config
.inc file |
15:32.22 |
``Erik |
I know with the admin pages, you can tweak
what's on the sidebar |
15:32.24 |
ken |
for uploading an image, the default gives you
the option to name it and leave a comment |
15:32.37 |
brlcad |
ken: that's what I'm referring to about making
it work with mw -- you can do that sort of forced customization in
other CMS systems without the customization (drupal, plone, joomla,
etc) |
15:32.47 |
ken |
but theyre stored a single sql db |
15:33.10 |
brlcad |
yeah, this is sort of like how images
themselves are managed |
15:33.12 |
ken |
all the junk associated with uploaded
media |
15:33.21 |
brlcad |
but instead of images, it's a set of material
properties (as a collection) |
15:33.26 |
ken |
right |
15:33.37 |
brlcad |
how to *enforce* that set is the
trick |
15:33.51 |
brlcad |
as new users aren't going to know anything
about which to include or not |
15:37.05 |
ken |
I see what youre saying |
15:37.46 |
ken |
for some reason, I'm still thinking of
materials being uploaded files |
15:38.04 |
ken |
ok |
15:38.07 |
brlcad |
yeah, there are no files, the data is really
scattered too (hence the strong need for a single
database) |
15:38.45 |
ken |
ok, so then this beast'll pretty much have to
be built from the ground up, right? |
15:38.54 |
brlcad |
media might be able to do it, i mean wikipedia
sort of does this for corporations, countries, movies, and other
items |
15:39.15 |
brlcad |
e.g. the right column on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_project
is sort of what we're needing |
15:39.30 |
brlcad |
but actually enforced consistent format that
would be used .. hundreds of times |
15:40.07 |
brlcad |
and if we have to add a field two months down
the road, do we have to edit several hundred pages, or is it just
added in one place as part of the template, etc |
15:40.07 |
ken |
so just pulling data into a table? |
15:40.47 |
brlcad |
pretty much, though there are also
relations |
15:41.02 |
brlcad |
and categories (that are not fully known right
now, but do exist) |
15:41.03 |
ken |
if its just data-to-table, then you can add a
field and let the contributors fill in the blanks where they find
them |
15:41.37 |
brlcad |
hmm.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infobox |
15:42.07 |
brlcad |
it's a matter of whether they actually "see"
that there are blanks |
15:42.20 |
brlcad |
how would they know? |
15:42.43 |
ken |
drop a form feild in the blank with a default
fill of "unknown" |
15:42.53 |
ken |
something that looks editable |
15:43.00 |
brlcad |
that works for new, what about those already
existing? |
15:43.00 |
ken |
like it needs to be filled in |
15:43.46 |
brlcad |
say you want to add a new field called "Ken's
stamp of approval" to a database that already has 500 items, for
example |
15:44.23 |
brlcad |
how would I as a user browsing/editing know
that there's now a new field that could be filled in |
15:44.58 |
ken |
right, it would add a value of <input
type="text" ...>unknown</input> to all pre existing
items |
15:45.11 |
brlcad |
with the infobox approah, according to what
i'm (just now) reading .. you could add the field, but it won't be
applied to any existing data |
15:45.33 |
brlcad |
"it would add" .. howso? and what is
it? |
15:46.55 |
ken |
when you add a new field, it would add a new
sql column to the table. the default fill would be the unknown
field |
15:47.40 |
brlcad |
er, are you talking about custom or through
mediawiki or both or neither? :) |
15:47.46 |
ken |
custom |
15:47.50 |
brlcad |
ahhh |
15:48.00 |
brlcad |
well, for custom sure! =) |
15:48.07 |
brlcad |
I thought you were taking mw would do
that |
15:48.12 |
brlcad |
s/taking/saying/ |
15:48.13 |
ken |
probably |
15:48.16 |
ken |
it might |
15:48.43 |
ken |
but I was talking about custom |
15:48.48 |
brlcad |
okay |
15:49.04 |
ken |
I'm not entirely sure of EVERYTHING mediawiki
capable of out of the box |
15:49.16 |
ken |
*is capable |
15:49.53 |
brlcad |
nor am I frankly, just going by what I already
know and what I've been reading about the infoboxes that seem to be
the closest to what we'd need |
15:49.57 |
ken |
but its just some really simple php to do this
custom |
15:50.42 |
brlcad |
except that I see zero-consistency enforcement
with infoboxes, you have to edit all pages if the infobox template
changes .. that'd suck :) |
15:50.55 |
ken |
right |
15:57.27 |
ken |
so we're dropping the infobox deal and going
with a fresh and new addition to the wiki to handle this,
right? |
15:57.35 |
ken |
sorry, I thought I sent that already |
16:02.58 |
brlcad |
maybe you did and I just misunderstood you
:) |
16:03.33 |
ken |
no, I made a pot of coffee and came back, it
was still sitting here waiting for me to hit enter |
16:03.38 |
brlcad |
do you still think a wiki would be best, or a
cms, or fully custom, or ? |
16:04.40 |
ken |
well, for community development I like the
idea of a wiki as opposed to another cms simply because its so much
easier for just anyone to add to or edit or anything like
that |
16:06.04 |
ken |
just about everyone's already familiar with
wiki markup (as opposed to most other cmses where to, say, add a
link you have to know about the anchor tag - or use markdown, which
all of 6 people on earth have experience with) |
16:06.23 |
ken |
and if theyre not, its a lot simpler to learn
and faster to use |
16:07.50 |
ken |
for this part, just tack it on to mw |
16:09.33 |
ken |
write the functionality we're looking for,
staple it to the wiki as either a plug in or part of the actual
base... something like that |
16:10.03 |
ken |
or drupal, or whatever youre going
with |
16:11.42 |
ken |
like I said, I like the idea of a wiki for
this part, but then I just kinda walked in today, and I'm not
entirely as familiar with the needs of the site overall as anyone
who's been working on it (or even just thinking about it) for more
than 20 minutes |
16:12.24 |
ken |
a wiki also has the benefit of functioning as
a wiki |
16:18.10 |
brlcad |
I agree in general on the ease of use, wiki
certainly has the power over cms for that, though in this case it's
sort of "form-centric" where there's a predefined set of data (that
will likely change over time, but is part of the structure
regardless) |
16:19.18 |
brlcad |
and don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating one
vs the other -- I just like to think things through for how they'd
work in practice down the road, maintainability and
growth |
16:20.36 |
brlcad |
the wiki has a big leg up on customizability
since, as you note, anyone could amend the template without needing
to know html or sql or php, etc .. it's just then consistency of
the "database" itself where some materials would be conformant to
an old template, some to a newer |
16:21.28 |
brlcad |
the main portal site is actually going to be a
drupal/mediawiki hybrid that work with each other |
16:22.00 |
brlcad |
MinuteElectron already has both set up and
working now, ready for data to start being entered to populate that
section |
16:23.22 |
brlcad |
there's another guy looking at the performance
database, though from what he'd discussed, I think he's going a
custom route (conceptually, it could use the same mediawiki plugin
if one was made for the materials) |
16:28.52 |
brlcad |
ken: so, I like your idea .. the next question
then is how familiar are you with mediawiki plugins :) |
16:29.10 |
ken |
brb, phone |
16:30.48 |
brlcad |
otherwise, I'd have to imagine that mediawiki
already has _something_ that would help for doing this already as
I'd think it'd be pretty common to want to have form data in the
wiki format |
16:35.00 |
ken |
i have this minor crisis to deal with, whens a
good time to come band get ahold of ya? this
evening/tomorrowish? |
16:37.22 |
brlcad |
i'm on the channel most days every day at some
time of the day :) |
16:37.31 |
brlcad |
just hop on irc and linger a while, you'll
usually find me |
16:37.36 |
brlcad |
otherwise the mailing list is fine
too |
16:38.03 |
brlcad |
i'm eastern u.s. timezone-wise, if that
helps |
16:38.26 |
brlcad |
though my "offline"/sleep schedule is fairly
chaotic |
16:46.21 |
ken |
kk thx, I'll be back tonight |
16:52.45 |
*** topic/#brlcad by brlcad
-> BRL-CAD Open Source Solid Modeling || http://brlcad.org || http://sf.net/projects/brlcad
|| for ken:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help%3ATemplates#Using_parameters_in_templates |
16:53.02 |
brlcad |
looks like templates actually can work for
this |
16:53.13 |
brlcad |
the only issue then becomes comparisons,
searching, and summaries |
17:07.11 |
*** join/#brlcad b0ef
(n=b0ef@062016142179.customer.alfanett.no) |
17:12.52 |
*** join/#brlcad Laniakea
(i=clock@217-162-204-120.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
17:18.14 |
*** join/#brlcad poolio
(n=poolio@c-69-251-3-107.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
17:33.16 |
*** join/#brlcad IriX64
(n=mariodot@bas2-sudbury98-1177878618.dsl.bell.ca) |
17:56.48 |
poolio |
brlcad: what's up with my.brlcad.org? I kind
of like the new look... :P |
17:58.00 |
brlcad |
heh, that's drupal's default theme |
17:59.04 |
poolio |
I like it :) |
17:59.13 |
poolio |
brlcad: can I get a vhost on my.brlcad.org and
use it? |
17:59.29 |
brlcad |
sure |
17:59.56 |
IriX64 |
http://rafb.net/p/fo2gOO80.html
``Erik, look familiar ;) |
17:59.57 |
poolio |
sweeet |
18:00.22 |
poolio |
brlcad: how's that worth with like the
databases and stuff? can two simultaneous drupal vhosts exist
peacefully? |
18:02.22 |
brlcad |
they have nothing to do with each
other |
18:02.31 |
brlcad |
you could use the same db or an entirely
different db |
18:02.37 |
poolio |
hmm alright. |
18:02.41 |
brlcad |
vhosts can be set up fairly arbitrarily
too |
18:03.00 |
IriX64 |
http://rafb.net/p/Jd17Ls16.html
``Erik... too sweet :) |
18:03.01 |
brlcad |
vhost, btw would be on "brlcad.org" ..
"my.brlcad.org" is a vhost on brlcad.org |
18:03.03 |
poolio |
Hmm, so like if I wanted to have my own sited
hosted by you that used drupal, that'd work completely
fine? |
18:03.12 |
brlcad |
sure |
18:03.12 |
poolio |
brlcad: well I have my own domain
name |
18:03.20 |
poolio |
I justt don't have the box online
anymore |
18:03.27 |
brlcad |
ah, gotya |
18:03.31 |
poolio |
brlcad: So how would I go about doing that? Or
would you need to do it? |
18:03.37 |
brlcad |
i read it as the name, not the box |
18:03.59 |
brlcad |
box is generally called just .bz or mbo
;) |
18:04.26 |
brlcad |
you'd need to update your dns to point to an
IP that I'd give you, then I'd set up apache to respond to that
name |
18:04.37 |
brlcad |
then it'd be done |
18:04.44 |
poolio |
brlcad: I mainly want to get a blog going with
the progress of it. As I'm going to be tewaking a lot of variables
it'd be nice if I could see my own progress and see if it is in
fact progressing, and also that way I can aviod spamming the chat
so much with images and descriptions. (and also when people ask
what I'm working on I can point them to an explanation as opposed
to rewriting paragraphs and paragraphs ;)) |
18:04.50 |
brlcad |
takes all of 10 minutes to set up at
most |
18:05.06 |
poolio |
alright cool. whenever you have time that'd be
sweet |
18:06.14 |
brlcad |
aiight, the ip can be 66.111.56.56, so just
let me know which name |
18:07.07 |
poolio |
what do you mean which name? as in what's my
domain name? |
18:08.47 |
brlcad |
yes |
18:09.03 |
poolio |
poolio.org |
18:10.02 |
poolio |
brlcad has brlcad.org, poolio has
poolio.org |
18:18.44 |
brlcad |
done |
18:18.51 |
poolio |
brlcad: heh, thanks |
18:19.02 |
poolio |
brlcad: so what do I need to do on my side?
point the domain to that IP? |
18:21.26 |
poolio |
brlcad: is it ip-based? like can I just
forward to the mbo box? and it will disambiguate the IP to the
poolio.org vhost? |
18:32.17 |
poolio |
brlcad: woah, there's something messed up with
the DNS as it propogates....I'm pinging poolio.org and half the
time I'm getting my home address and the other half I'm getting the
right one on mbo :P |
18:34.31 |
brlcad |
poolio: you update your dns record for
poolio.org to point to that IP as the "A" record |
18:35.08 |
poolio |
brlcad: Yeah I got that, but in terms of how
the VHOST works |
18:35.12 |
brlcad |
you apparently have dns set to
everydns.net |
18:35.29 |
brlcad |
s/to/through/ |
18:35.32 |
poolio |
That IP is just the IP of mbo, how does it
distinguish whcih VHOST to send the request to? via the
header? |
18:35.39 |
poolio |
brlcad: I've updated the records
already |
18:35.46 |
brlcad |
requests come in by the url, by name |
18:35.52 |
poolio |
ah alright |
18:36.04 |
poolio |
and setting up drupal? is that hard? |
18:36.27 |
brlcad |
so the apache can be asked to respond to
requests for .. pretty much anything -- by default it won't respond
to anything it doesn't recognize |
18:36.40 |
brlcad |
you tell me, have fun :) |
18:36.47 |
IriX64 |
http://www.rafb.net/paste/ <---
man, help me out here where's that // coming from? |
18:36.51 |
brlcad |
(no, it's not hard at all .. one of the
easiest) |
18:37.11 |
poolio |
brlcad: alright, so drupal is installed in the
my.brlcad.org VHOST, do I have to ..reinstall it in mine? |
18:37.16 |
brlcad |
IriX64: that's an empty pastebin |
18:37.23 |
poolio |
and does the VHOST go to my
~/public_html? |
18:37.32 |
IriX64 |
whup, just a sec |
18:38.05 |
IriX64 |
http://rafb.net/p/dT8MFf21.html |
18:38.08 |
IriX64 |
there |
18:38.09 |
brlcad |
poolio: no, it doesn't -- you still have your
~poolio home if needed on any of the names (poolio.org/~poolio
should respond for example) |
18:38.26 |
brlcad |
it's in a different location |
18:38.36 |
louipc |
it should go to wherever your ip port 80
points to huh? |
18:40.20 |
brlcad |
yep |
18:40.57 |
brlcad |
IriX64: i've got no idea how you got yourself
into that situation |
18:41.13 |
IriX64 |
mmm i'll try --disable-shared |
18:41.13 |
brlcad |
obviously got a full path in there that should
not be there |
18:41.26 |
brlcad |
could just be an unclean build |
18:41.38 |
IriX64 |
thanks will tinker some. |
18:41.41 |
brlcad |
try "make distclean" |
18:41.46 |
IriX64 |
right |
18:41.52 |
brlcad |
then rerun autogen.sh |
18:42.02 |
IriX64 |
doing it now |
18:44.43 |
IriX64 |
back to dos work, I'm gonna make this thing
run doom yet :) |
18:45.44 |
louipc |
sweet |
18:45.45 |
brlcad |
inside mged? :) |
18:45.54 |
IriX64 |
heh in tcl ;) |
18:46.06 |
louipc |
I tried to run the original ultima it was
crazy |
18:46.26 |
louipc |
everything was sped up 10x |
18:46.30 |
IriX64 |
never tried ultima, have tried wing commander
II though |
18:46.38 |
IriX64 |
same problem |
18:46.51 |
IriX64 |
but doom is speshul :) |
18:46.53 |
louipc |
there's something out there that will slow it
down for you |
18:47.03 |
IriX64 |
yeah varislow, i have it |
18:47.15 |
brlcad |
poolio: also noticed that you have a CNAME
record on "www.poolio.org" |
18:47.16 |
louipc |
I forget what it was... hmm is that open
source? |
18:47.21 |
brlcad |
you should remove that or update it |
18:47.36 |
IriX64 |
which varislow, i think its public
domain |
18:47.46 |
louipc |
ah cool |
18:48.07 |
IriX64 |
all i have is the binary, no idea where the
source is |
18:49.01 |
IriX64 |
wcII no speech though something wonky in the
sound linkage |
18:49.31 |
poolio |
brlcad: cname points to poolio.org |
18:50.37 |
brlcad |
mmm. Ultima V |
18:51.16 |
brlcad |
poolio: ah, my bad -- i was reading something
else |
18:51.26 |
brlcad |
compounded by a stale dns ip result |
18:52.26 |
poolio |
brlcad: yeah, it's still not updated, i forgot
to fix mail.poolio.org, but it doesn't really matter, don't use it
anyway |
18:53.11 |
IriX64 |
louipc: http://www3.sympatico.ca/mario.dulisse2/doom.png
<-- that soundblaster not responding is bogus, ive got
sound |
18:56.00 |
IriX64 |
can't show you a shot of it actually running
the demo, silly thing insists on full screen |
18:58.13 |
IriX64 |
wcii the same insists on full screen |
18:59.12 |
IriX64 |
wonder if i can jury rig soemthing to capture
the vga screen to disk... |
18:59.29 |
IriX64 |
back burner material |
19:13.00 |
IriX64 |
heh forgot to light that burner ;) |
19:23.14 |
IriX64 |
back to fun stuff, make install is running in
a ntvdm window. |
19:23.51 |
IriX64 |
heh wonder if we can call this a windows
compiler now :) |
19:28.05 |
IriX64 |
blah, never mind its buggered again, time to
rethink sections of this cyall l8r. |
20:10.33 |
poolio |
brlcad: is there any way to view the page as
someone not logged in would in drupal? getting sick of logging
out |
20:59.16 |
louipc |
poolio: depends on your browser I
guess |
20:59.46 |
louipc |
you could start a new browser instance, rather
than a new window so it has separate cookies etc... |
21:01.31 |
louipc |
That might be it if you use Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/support/firefox/profile |
21:15.29 |
``Erik |
for that reason, and others |
21:15.30 |
``Erik |
:) |
21:17.04 |
``Erik |
pheer, 'devrys' is hocking a psuedo-degree in
video game development |
21:17.27 |
louipc |
haha |
21:19.21 |
louipc |
I called it the 'deliriously expensive vessel
for retarded youngins' |
21:19.42 |
``Erik |
hehehe sounds about right |
21:19.48 |
*** join/#brlcad dtidrow
(n=dtidrow@c-69-255-182-248.hsd1.va.comcast.net) |
21:20.00 |
``Erik |
these 'get your degree in 3 weeks' outfits are
all over the place :( |
21:20.17 |
``Erik |
<-- has an omfg 4y degree that is omfg csab
accredited |
21:20.33 |
``Erik |
part of me feels that it was too little
training |
21:20.51 |
``Erik |
not 'nuff time for even the brightest O.o I
might go back for a doctorate in cs |
21:37.21 |
*** join/#brlcad IriX64
(n=mariodot@bas2-sudbury98-1177593701.dsl.bell.ca) |
23:08.02 |
*** join/#brlcad Twingy
(n=justin@74.92.144.217) |