00:45.40 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-4
(n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
00:59.34 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-4
(n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
01:10.59 |
louipc |
poor CIA |
01:19.11 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-4
(n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
02:18.21 |
*** join/#brlcad poolio
(n=poolio@12.158.28.131) |
02:46.19 |
*** mode/#brlcad [+o siggraph]
by ChanServ |
02:50.23 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
03:06.34 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-4
(n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
03:23.02 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
03:30.01 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-5
(n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
03:50.08 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-4
(n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
04:23.00 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-4
(n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
04:34.20 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-4
(n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
05:27.04 |
ewilhelm |
siggraph: did anything ever come out of the
nist SCL step parser? |
05:53.09 |
*** join/#brlcad cad86
(n=50c50fba@bz.bzflag.bz) |
09:57.56 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=elite01@dslc-082-082-090-013.pools.arcor-ip.net) |
10:59.34 |
*** join/#brlcad Elperion
(n=Bary@p54874D94.dip.t-dialin.net) |
13:09.32 |
*** join/#brlcad Ammar_it
(n=Ammar@90.153.210.107) |
13:16.21 |
*** part/#brlcad Ammar_it
(n=Ammar@90.153.210.107) |
13:27.09 |
*** join/#brlcad docelic
(n=docelic@212.91.113.186) |
15:50.34 |
louipc |
oh my |
15:53.39 |
Maloeran |
The hotel called me at 5am to tell me they
received my luggage. I was a bit worried |
16:01.36 |
louipc |
wow where are you? |
16:16.14 |
Maloeran |
I'm at the Hilton San Diego Mission Valley,
are you around San Diego? |
16:24.12 |
louipc |
I'm around toronto |
16:24.47 |
louipc |
but I'm going to LA in a couple of weeks
(direct flight) yar har har |
16:44.42 |
*** join/#brlcad b0ef
(n=b0ef@062016141081.customer.alfanett.no) |
17:39.57 |
*** join/#brlcad Elperion
(n=Bary@p54874D94.dip.t-dialin.net) |
18:08.35 |
*** join/#brlcad digitalfredy
(n=digitalf@200.71.62.161) |
18:17.12 |
*** part/#brlcad digitalfredy
(n=digitalf@200.71.62.161) |
18:17.20 |
*** join/#brlcad digitalfredy
(n=digitalf@200.71.62.161) |
18:34.16 |
*** join/#brlcad digitalfredy
(n=digitalf@200.71.62.161) |
18:38.32 |
*** join/#brlcad yukonbob
(n=yukonbob@whthyt224-180.northwestel.net) |
18:52.05 |
*** join/#brlcad digitalfredy_
(n=digitalf@200.71.62.161) |
19:05.01 |
*** join/#brlcad Laniakea
(i=clock@217-162-228-9.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
20:43.36 |
*** join/#brlcad ertugerata
(n=Ertugrul@88.224.38.9) |
20:43.46 |
ertugerata |
salut |
21:17.36 |
*** join/#brlcad Laniakea
(i=clock@217-162-228-9.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
22:16.06 |
siggraph |
ewilhelm: yes and no |
22:17.12 |
siggraph |
a step converter (and everything related,
which includes nurbs/brep, tessellation, and the actual step
converter) are our #1 priority for the past and next 12 months (at
least) |
22:17.47 |
siggraph |
basically, it's still under development.. a
ton of effort has been put into nurbs/brep to date (which is pretty
much requisite for full/proper step support |
22:21.17 |
MinuteElectron |
siggraph: How is LDAP going? |
23:10.20 |
*** join/#brlcad Twingy
(n=justin@74.92.144.217) |
23:24.09 |
ewilhelm |
siggraph: thx. did narnia's work on the scl
stuff get published? |
23:24.58 |
ewilhelm |
I'm looking at doing some work with IFC, so I
think I'm going to be building some kind of express schema support
code |
23:25.24 |
ewilhelm |
currently, the nist SCL code won't compile
(and it looks like ./configure is a mess) |
23:34.18 |
siggraph |
louipc: good info! thanks .. if you've still
got gdb handy, I've got some other things you could check that
would help -- and I presume that the patch didn't fix the problem
by itself? |
23:35.56 |
siggraph |
ewilhelm: narnia outright disappeared on me --
both he and I had fixed their build system (i.e. replaced it with a
configure that actually works) but has not yet been integrated back
into our repository because neither he or I got to a usable tool
point |
23:36.17 |
siggraph |
could have been on a branch, but like I said
.. he disappeared on me, and he was unfamiliar with cvs |
23:36.48 |
siggraph |
i could dig up what I have and commit it to a
branch probably and get you access if you are interested in working
on it |
23:37.36 |
ewilhelm |
sure, or e-mail me a tarball even |
23:39.04 |
ewilhelm |
looks like there was some other work at
http://nwg.phy.bnl.gov/~bviren/uno/other/geant4.5.2-opt/source/geometry/solids/STEP/ |
23:39.35 |
ewilhelm |
though maybe that was a subset |
23:40.56 |
siggraph |
what's your work, if I may ask? |
23:41.14 |
ewilhelm |
http://scratchcomputing.com |
23:41.38 |
ewilhelm |
you might remember me from 2-3 years
back |
23:41.50 |
siggraph |
oh, I remember exactly who you are
:) |
23:42.01 |
siggraph |
i mean specifically what are you doing with
step/express |
23:42.40 |
ewilhelm |
Industry Foundation Classes -- a Building
Information Modeling exchange format |
23:45.13 |
ewilhelm |
for architecture/engineering/construction
data |
23:45.13 |
siggraph |
so you're using step as your format? or
express? or just importing/exporting step? |
23:46.18 |
ewilhelm |
IFC is derived from STEP/express |
23:47.14 |
siggraph |
derived as in a proper subset or an actual
incompatible derivative? |
23:47.15 |
ewilhelm |
or, I suppose the correct way to say it is
"defined as an express schema" |
23:47.21 |
siggraph |
ah, so same 'base language' but different
schema |
23:48.00 |
siggraph |
akin to sgml and xml |
23:48.12 |
ewilhelm |
yeah, at least "as I currently understand
it" |
23:48.48 |
ewilhelm |
still getting my head bootstrapped into
it |
23:51.57 |
ewilhelm |
I guess 10303-11 is 'EXPRESS', which lets you
define a schema (.exp file) which can then be referenced from a
10303-21 file with FILE_SCHEMA() |
23:52.22 |
ewilhelm |
e.g. ISO-10303-21; |
23:52.23 |
ewilhelm |
... |
23:52.28 |
ewilhelm |
FILE_SCHEMA(('IFC2X2_FINAL')); |
23:56.19 |
ewilhelm |
IAI seems to be a little kinder about
providing documents than ISO |
23:58.11 |
siggraph |
~IAI |