01:42.45 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/doc/Makefile.am:
include deprecation.txt in dist |
02:07.43 |
*** join/#brlcad poolio
(n=poolio@c-71-206-215-46.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) |
02:24.45 |
*** join/#brlcad IriX64
(n=IriX64@bas2-sudbury98-1096600612.dsl.bell.ca) |
04:52.30 |
brlcad |
the baseline for sphereflake isn't normalized
to the vax |
04:53.00 |
brlcad |
that's part of why it's pretty exciting
getting a baseline vgr of 1 again so that sphflake can be
renormalized |
04:55.37 |
poolio |
So is legacy code always going to be a part of
BRL-CAD so you can establish a baseline vgr? |
04:56.39 |
yukonbob |
brlcad: you see my report about the artifacts
still there w/ the rotated pipe (using latest (few hours old) HEAD
(7.10.3)) |
04:57.37 |
brlcad |
poolio: no, the code has already changed quite
dramatically .. but the baseline can still be run -- just using the
old sources and/or old binaries |
04:57.47 |
brlcad |
the harder part is getting access to a vax
:) |
04:57.58 |
brlcad |
yukonbob: yeah, I saw, but havne't looked at
that |
04:58.15 |
brlcad |
i'm not exceptionally familiar with the pipe
code .. that's more john's area |
04:58.31 |
yukonbob |
so long as it gets to where it needs to
be... |
04:58.35 |
brlcad |
knee-jerk reaction is "don't do that"
:) |
04:59.24 |
yukonbob |
heh -- I can shake the artifacts off w/ rot 0
1 0;rot 0 -1 0 |
05:00.37 |
brlcad |
dtidrow_work: 'summary' just retains the
latest performance summary with the first line being a "Ray Trace
Figure of Merit" (RTFM) that sort of amounts to rays per second,
and the second line being the linear metric comparison to the base
(called vgr) which amounts to how many VAX 11/780's you're
machine's worth computationally |
05:00.42 |
yukonbob |
so I'm running 7.10.3 -- is that the latest
fully buildable version -- you mentioned 7.11 was branched, but
it's really near the start of it's life isn't it (only a few files
present)? |
05:01.17 |
brlcad |
yeah, 7.10.3 is the latest, 7.11 is what's on
head now, but it's not changed wrt pipes |
05:01.54 |
brlcad |
yeah, you are |
05:02.06 |
yukonbob |
have fun in California |
05:02.14 |
brlcad |
looks like it's just a refresh of the display
list needed |
05:03.02 |
brlcad |
i.e., it's not "really" shifted like that ..
just displaying the wireframe wrong |
05:03.30 |
yukonbob |
in 7.8.3 at least, unloading/reloading the db
preserved the bad display... was weird. |
05:37.10 |
CIA-4 |
libirc: 03mm_202 * r238
10/trunk/libirc/src/irClientCommands.cpp: Fixed the op()/deop()
bug. sf.net bug 1807356. |
05:56.38 |
*** join/#brlcad Z80-Boy
(i=clock@77-56-91-179.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
06:42.15 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=elite01@195.37.106.60) |
09:08.17 |
*** join/#brlcad Z80-Boy
(n=clock@zux221-122-143.adsl.green.ch) |
09:15.22 |
Z80-Boy |
brlcad: looks like now something changed in
brl-cad. |
09:15.40 |
Z80-Boy |
brlcad: because I did CVS update and now it
renders the "poisonous" ronja_new better. |
09:15.52 |
Z80-Boy |
Before the arbn was missing in the triangular
plate |
09:16.00 |
Z80-Boy |
Now it's present but is bigger than should
be |
09:16.12 |
Z80-Boy |
Looks like it has again something to do with
unnormalized equation |
09:16.38 |
Z80-Boy |
Because the one boundary plane that is placed
too much out is the one that was entered as not normalized
. |
09:25.23 |
*** join/#brlcad Elperion
(n=Bary@p54874F58.dip.t-dialin.net) |
09:49.53 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=elite01@dslb-088-070-023-115.pools.arcor-ip.net) |
10:12.57 |
CIA-4 |
libirc: 03mm_202 * r239 10/trunk/libirc/ (4
files in 2 dirs): Some minor clean and typo fixes. |
10:51.50 |
*** join/#brlcad thing0
(n=ric@203-59-35-171.dyn.iinet.net.au) |
11:47.07 |
*** part/#brlcad thing0
(n=ric@203-59-35-171.dyn.iinet.net.au) |
12:35.34 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01_
(n=elite01@dslb-088-070-022-069.pools.arcor-ip.net) |
15:22.49 |
*** join/#brlcad PrezKennedy
(i=Matt@74.86.45.130) |
16:59.23 |
*** join/#brlcad _jack-
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
17:00.22 |
*** join/#brlcad _jack-
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
17:01.08 |
*** join/#brlcad _jack-
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
17:02.08 |
*** join/#brlcad _jack-
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
17:02.52 |
*** join/#brlcad _jack-
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
17:03.38 |
*** join/#brlcad _jack-
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
17:04.24 |
*** join/#brlcad _jack-
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
17:04.35 |
brlcad |
having trouble _jack- ? |
17:05.22 |
*** join/#brlcad _jack-
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
17:05.33 |
*** kick/#brlcad
[_jack-!n=sean@pdpc/supporter/silver/brlcad] by brlcad
(brlcad) |
17:06.07 |
*** join/#brlcad _jack-
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
17:11.08 |
yukonbob |
you in Cali now? |
17:21.34 |
brlcad |
nope |
17:21.52 |
brlcad |
i'm 70%, landed in Pheonix AZ .. |
17:21.59 |
brlcad |
and it looks like my flight to san jose is now
delayed by at least an hour |
17:23.36 |
Maloeran |
Neat, are you going there on
vacation? |
17:25.12 |
brlcad |
nah, google's sending me out for the summer of
code summit |
17:25.23 |
MinuteElectron |
google? |
17:25.27 |
brlcad |
yeah |
17:25.33 |
MinuteElectron |
neat |
17:25.37 |
Maloeran |
Ah, interesting |
17:26.29 |
brlcad |
they'll be a rep from about 70% of the
projects that participated: http://code.google.com/soc/2007/ |
17:27.05 |
MinuteElectron |
I can't wait until SoC 2008, maybe that time I
will actually find out about it in time to participate in a
project. |
17:27.09 |
brlcad |
there are a few devs I know in AU that are
coming in for the summit too, looking forward to it |
17:27.16 |
brlcad |
... though going to AU is way cooler
;) |
17:27.40 |
MinuteElectron |
indeed |
17:28.14 |
Maloeran |
:) I'll be going alone despites getting
married in just 8 days, but I sure need the vacation and she's busy
with her studies anyhow |
17:28.31 |
brlcad |
do you have a big countdown clock? |
17:28.36 |
brlcad |
the beginning of the end of your life
;) |
17:29.08 |
Maloeran |
Eheh |
19:52.23 |
*** join/#brlcad thing0
(n=ric@203-59-35-171.dyn.iinet.net.au) |
20:24.01 |
*** join/#brlcad jgay
(n=jgay__@c-71-233-31-177.hsd1.ma.comcast.net) |
20:25.14 |
jgay |
hi, i'm from the Free Software Foundation, and
we are thinking of puting BRL-CAD on our urgent list of software to
be developed. Could anyone field a few questions? |
20:27.12 |
MinuteElectron |
Most of the people who hang around here are in
and out all the time. brlcad is your main man but a few others have
experience too. |
20:27.54 |
jgay |
MinuteElectron, cool. My questions are simple,
though. Mainly, I was just wondering how active the project
is |
20:28.38 |
MinuteElectron |
``Erik: You here? |
20:29.50 |
jgay |
I mean, it seems like the best free software
CAD program out there. And, it seems like the only one that is
actively being developed. But, I'm not the best judge. |
20:30.37 |
jgay |
We generally have success in finding new
developers for projects, so, if there is any advice on what kinds
of developers you are looking for, etc, that'd be good. |
20:30.58 |
MinuteElectron |
You might have to wait a while, I don't really
have the authority to answer questions regarding such things. I am
just the website developer. |
20:31.45 |
MinuteElectron |
brlcad is currently on his way to California
so probably won't be active for a good few hours\days. |
20:32.14 |
jgay |
oh ok |
20:32.20 |
dtidrow_work |
what's he going out there for? |
20:32.34 |
MinuteElectron |
Google Summer of Code 2008 summit. |
20:32.47 |
dtidrow_work |
ah |
20:33.08 |
MinuteElectron |
s/2008/2007 |
20:33.19 |
jgay |
oh neat, did brlcad do a project? |
20:33.19 |
dtidrow_work |
heh |
20:33.31 |
dtidrow_work |
that's what I was wondering |
20:33.33 |
MinuteElectron |
jgay: No, BZFlag. |
20:33.34 |
jgay |
*mentor |
20:33.36 |
jgay |
oh ok |
20:33.53 |
MinuteElectron |
brlcad is the project manager for both
projects. |
20:35.00 |
jgay |
dtidrow_work, can you tell me anything about
the varius licenses. Is there a lot under the BSD license, or is
that just some random bits? |
20:35.13 |
jgay |
I know it's mostly under the LGPL, but I just
want to survey what's waht |
20:35.15 |
jgay |
*waht |
20:35.40 |
jgay |
MinuteElectron, neat . . . is he a volunteer
or is he part of the army research office? |
20:36.18 |
MinuteElectron |
He is part of the army research office for
BRL-CAD as far as I know, BZflag is just a hobby IIRC. |
20:36.39 |
dtidrow_work |
jgay: dunno about the BRL-CAD licensing
details, that's more of a brlcad question |
20:37.58 |
jgay |
dtidrow_work, cool. Do youknow anything about
how active the project is being developed? |
20:38.06 |
jgay |
I will save more detailed development
questions for brlcad |
20:38.15 |
jgay |
like, what things need help, etc |
20:39.14 |
dtidrow_work |
it's pretty active - ARL has several
developers working on it, IIUC |
20:40.03 |
jgay |
I can't believe I didn't know about this
project, sooner |
20:40.09 |
jgay |
I mean, it's older than the GNU
Project! |
20:40.28 |
dtidrow_work |
well, it hasn't been GPL-ed for very
long |
20:40.46 |
dtidrow_work |
4-5 years or so |
20:41.15 |
dtidrow_work |
but the guts have been worked on for something
like 25-30 years |
20:42.50 |
dtidrow_work |
that's why they still use a VAX 11/780 as the
baseline to compare against - gives them historical
continuity |
20:43.19 |
jgay |
MinuteElectron, did you also do the delta3d
homepage? Both look great. |
20:43.33 |
jgay |
haha, nice, VAX |
20:43.34 |
dtidrow_work |
high-end desktop computers are nearly four
orders of magnitude faster than the old 780 |
20:44.14 |
dtidrow_work |
jgay: I need to get back to messing around
with delta3d |
20:44.28 |
dtidrow_work |
I mostly work with OSG, which Delta3D is based
on |
20:44.46 |
jgay |
is there a relationship between these two
projects? |
20:44.49 |
jgay |
what's OSG? |
20:45.01 |
dtidrow_work |
OpenSceneGraph |
20:45.36 |
dtidrow_work |
kind of an open-source Performer (if you know
what Performer is :-) |
20:48.04 |
jgay |
nope, don't know what Performer is |
20:48.42 |
dtidrow_work |
do you know what a scenegraph is, at
least? |
20:49.29 |
MinuteElectron |
MinuteElectron: Oh, no. brlcad did all the
imagery, I did the coding. |
20:49.59 |
MinuteElectron |
There is a new site though http://my.brlcad.org/ - not finished
yet. |
20:50.21 |
jgay |
i don't know what a scenegraph is |
20:50.34 |
jgay |
I've never had a programming job that involved
a real GUI :-) |
20:51.26 |
jgay |
MinuteElectron: you just sent yourself a
message :-) |
20:51.33 |
louipc |
BRL-CAD documentation has a special license
'BDL' |
20:51.40 |
louipc |
BSD Documentation License |
20:51.46 |
MinuteElectron |
jgay: I know, it was aimed at you
lol./ |
20:51.46 |
jgay |
interesting |
20:51.57 |
louipc |
jgay: do you have a copy of the
code? |
20:52.01 |
jgay |
yeah |
20:52.08 |
jgay |
louipc |
20:53.10 |
louipc |
should be in share/doc/legal |
20:53.10 |
dtidrow_work |
jgay: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scene_graph |
20:53.16 |
louipc |
or sorry doc/legal |
20:53.33 |
dtidrow_work |
http://www.gamedev.net/reference/programming/features/scenegraph/
- better pics here |
20:53.37 |
jgay |
louipc, I figured out the three licenses. I
was just trying to get a real sense of how much stuff is under the
BSD |
20:54.10 |
louipc |
FSF is anti-BSD eh? :P |
20:54.32 |
jgay |
louipc, well, I wouldn't put it that way
:-) |
20:55.19 |
MinuteElectron |
I gotta run. |
20:56.13 |
louipc |
<PROTECTED> |
20:56.14 |
louipc |
the geometric models, images, and other data
resources are also |
20:56.14 |
louipc |
provided under the BSD license. Refer to each
individual file for |
20:56.17 |
louipc |
specific terms. |
20:56.25 |
jgay |
louipc, ok, cool, thanks! |
20:56.27 |
louipc |
and buildfiles |
20:57.45 |
louipc |
it would be awesome to get more devs
sweet |
20:58.17 |
jgay |
louipc, yeah, I hope we can get some. I am
checking with my boss that we can go ahead and make this a high
priority project and put a call out |
20:58.28 |
louipc |
jgay: http://gcam.js.cx/index.php/Main_Page |
20:58.36 |
louipc |
check out that app too |
20:58.47 |
louipc |
that's on my list of 'things that should be
developed' :D |
20:59.10 |
louipc |
see.. I'm a machinist hehe so these are apps I
need/want |
20:59.18 |
jgay |
oh, neat :-) |
20:59.24 |
jgay |
My friend is doing this project: http://interreality.org/ |
20:59.28 |
jgay |
and he's pretty far along with it |
20:59.35 |
jgay |
but that is unrelated |
20:59.48 |
louipc |
ah ok |
21:00.16 |
jgay |
louipc, I don't think gcam will get on our
high priority projects |
21:00.23 |
louipc |
cool, seems more for entertainment |
21:00.40 |
louipc |
aww.. |
21:00.53 |
jgay |
louipc, he's bad at marketing, it's pretty
serious under the hood |
21:01.08 |
louipc |
there's no good open source CAM software
though :/ |
21:01.35 |
louipc |
you know what I don't understand is that
companies and schools would save TONS of money on licensing fees if
they got together and developed this stuff |
21:01.46 |
jgay |
louipc, can't you "just" throw a plug-in of
sorts into brl-cad? |
21:02.10 |
louipc |
the license for a single installation can be
$20,000 or more |
21:02.33 |
jgay |
louipc, I know, that's one of the things I
want to start talking more about . . . getting out to schools,
ngos, companies, orgs, etc, and talk about ways of pooling money
and contributing to the development of these great
projects |
21:02.38 |
louipc |
plus $5000 for upgrades |
21:02.48 |
jgay |
it will take some time, though, the FSF has a
small staff and a lot of things we are working on |
21:02.55 |
louipc |
and the quality of the commercial stuff isn't
always that great |
21:03.08 |
louipc |
yeah |
21:07.24 |
*** join/#brlcad jackkkk
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
21:08.06 |
*** join/#brlcad jackkkk
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
21:08.52 |
*** join/#brlcad jackkkk
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
21:09.39 |
*** join/#brlcad jackkkk
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
21:10.43 |
*** join/#brlcad jackkkk
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
21:11.14 |
*** join/#brlcad jackkkk
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
21:11.59 |
*** join/#brlcad jackkkk
(i=jack@dub.minimal.nl) |
21:13.27 |
dtidrow_work |
hmmm, wonder what's up with that |
21:13.37 |
louipc |
Excess Flood |
21:26.51 |
dtidrow_work |
but why is it happening? spam
attack? |
21:27.29 |
archivist |
copy pasting too large an amount |
21:27.32 |
Maloeran |
Someone got broken scripts in his IRC client,
probably |
21:30.22 |
dtidrow_work |
was thinking it was some sort of bot spam
attack |
21:33.09 |
*** join/#brlcad Elperion
(n=Bary@p54877D07.dip.t-dialin.net) |
21:43.51 |
``Erik |
nah, probably in too many channels |
21:44.15 |
``Erik |
happens to me on efnet at times, like a dozen
channel and if I get disconnected, the autojoin on reconnect cycles
me like that |
21:44.23 |
louipc |
oh yeah hah ouch |
21:44.26 |
``Erik |
and then I get banned for many months cuz mal
doesn't listen when I msg him |
21:44.27 |
``Erik |
:D |
21:48.49 |
``Erik |
heh, fsf 'urgent' project? O.o nutty |
21:49.15 |
Maloeran |
Hey Erik, there was trep in #opengl asking for
Scheme stuff |
21:49.39 |
Maloeran |
A very old regular appearing from
nowhere |
21:50.10 |
``Erik |
gcam is pretty nifty stuff, and it can't just
be a plugin for a cad system, you have to actually figure out how
to move the bit around... gcam does it with a fem type
simulator |
21:55.15 |
``Erik |
jgay: not much code is under BSD (mostly stuff
in the 'contrib' dir iirc).... and http://my.brlcad.org/~sean/ideas.html |
21:59.57 |
*** join/#brlcad thing0
(n=ric@203-59-35-171.dyn.iinet.net.au) |
22:01.12 |
louipc |
fem = ? |
22:01.34 |
archivist |
finite element modeling |
22:01.50 |
louipc |
``Erik: you could build an app around BRL-CAD
libs though eh? |
22:02.53 |
``Erik |
erm, of course... |
22:37.08 |
``Erik |
oi, dude, they set ya up in a decent hotel?
(and read the backscroll) |
22:38.41 |
brlcad |
not too shabby actually, definitely a "high"
three star |
22:38.57 |
brlcad |
there's even like three free intarwebs
here |
22:40.02 |
brlcad |
there's enough room for at least like 3 or 4
girls with me in the bed |
22:40.11 |
brlcad |
too bad none are attending this thing
:) |
22:40.35 |
brlcad |
jgay: howdy! |
22:40.42 |
louipc |
at least they must be attending the bar... or
some tables or something? |
22:42.26 |
brlcad |
dtidrow_work: not even 4-5 years, we're about
to close out year 3 |
22:45.20 |
brlcad |
jgay: there's more details in the COPYING
file, see
http://brlcad.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/brlcad/brlcad/COPYING |
22:46.44 |
brlcad |
but the gist is that the entire package is
under the LGPL with the exception of the build infrastructure, some
scripts, data files, and some of the documentation |
22:48.01 |
brlcad |
basically any of the stuff that is completely
"peripheral" and could disappear on a moment's notice, or that we
wouldn't even care if someone tried to sell it because it's
prevalently available in other places, is under BSD |
22:49.04 |
*** join/#brlcad Z80-Boy
(i=clock@77-56-91-122.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
22:49.09 |
brlcad |
the actual sources to BRL-CAD are almost
entirely under LGPL, save a few grandfathered files that arein the
public domain |
22:50.30 |
``Erik |
lgpl for libs, gpl for bins, I
thought |
22:51.48 |
louipc |
I didn't think anything is in gpl
anymore |
22:51.49 |
brlcad |
all lgpl now |
22:51.56 |
louipc |
:D |
22:52.06 |
louipc |
oh let me put my glasses on |
22:52.09 |
louipc |
8D |
22:54.00 |
brlcad |
the problem was actually with ARL .. we
couldn't refactor front-end gpl code into the libraries without
causing problems ... and gpl libs are an outright non-starter for
brl-cad's primary user and supporter (i.e. arl) |
22:55.09 |
``Erik |
hrm, I presume this was when I was a 'user'
sorta? |
22:55.27 |
louipc |
would GPL count if it isn't distributed
outside ARL? |
22:55.39 |
brlcad |
7.10.0 |
22:56.27 |
``Erik |
it's always been distributed out of
ARL |
22:57.03 |
brlcad |
louipc: that's where (imho) it's rather
questionable, since arl certainly "redistributes" to an extent (or
at least wants that right) |
22:57.04 |
louipc |
no I mean the 'secret' stuff |
22:57.14 |
louipc |
ah |
22:58.24 |
``Erik |
the non-public stuff is distributed outside of
ARL, but with pretty strict constraints on who can see it, ugly
license agreements... |
22:58.35 |
louipc |
of course |
22:58.37 |
brlcad |
so to have folks at arl contributing, and then
arl distributing one of the brl-cad libraries with a binary version
of one of the analysis codes (like muves or orca) .. they cannot do
that if the libs were gpl |
22:58.54 |
louipc |
yea |
22:59.07 |
brlcad |
so yeah, libs as gpl is an absolute ..
non-starter |
22:59.30 |
brlcad |
so in our best interest to be able to refactor
back and forth from libs to front-end code and back, it really
simplifies to make it all lgpl |
22:59.42 |
louipc |
why not all just BSD? |
22:59.49 |
brlcad |
aside from just making it freaking easier to
talk about :) |
23:00.07 |
louipc |
hehe |
23:00.16 |
``Erik |
heh |
23:00.34 |
brlcad |
that's another perfectly viable option, but it
doesn't buy us anything |
23:00.37 |
``Erik |
gpl served the purposes |
23:00.56 |
louipc |
yeah no use changing it anymore |
23:01.55 |
brlcad |
that is one of the few areas where lgpl kinda
serves a purpose.. i mean closed-source CAD is about a 5-10 billion
dollar industry iirc, and the only difference of going to bsd would
be that folks could use our code in closed codes without needing to
share changes to our code (i.e. extensions) |
23:02.45 |
``Erik |
*nod* and we want the full experience
available to everyone |
23:02.51 |
``Erik |
cuz we ROCK! |
23:03.09 |
louipc |
roxorz |
23:03.18 |
brlcad |
lgpl's a good balance of having everyone work
on the same code without worries of what codes their hooking into,
and with the assurance that nobody (in this expensive industry) is
going to try to clam up and gain leverage -- encourages
collaboration |
23:04.23 |
``Erik |
industry amount aside, the big packages are
like $20k-40k a seat |
23:04.34 |
louipc |
yep |
23:04.36 |
louipc |
or more |
23:05.06 |
louipc |
if you ask me schools/companies are stupid to
not take initiative to develop open-source alternatives |
23:05.36 |
``Erik |
if it weren't virtually impenetrable, I'd try
to write up a cad system :D I wouldn't mind a garage full of
ferraris |
23:05.49 |
louipc |
yeah! |
23:06.11 |
louipc |
well even GPL allows you to sell the
software... |
23:06.27 |
brlcad |
yeah, it really is a massive market to make
any sort of dent in |
23:06.49 |
archivist |
sexy gui will make the difference |
23:06.50 |
brlcad |
we could have 10x the activity, and we'd still
be about a decade behind the commercial systems |
23:06.58 |
louipc |
archivist: yea definitely |
23:07.05 |
brlcad |
sexy gui will help get that 10x, if now
50x |
23:07.08 |
brlcad |
s/now/not/ |
23:07.28 |
louipc |
90% more users |
23:07.45 |
brlcad |
500% ;) |
23:07.46 |
louipc |
or uh more.. |
23:08.03 |
louipc |
yea |
23:08.30 |
``Erik |
start writing the replacement for mged,
archivist :D I can't wait to see your results |
23:08.40 |
archivist |
heh |
23:09.59 |
brlcad |
er, 5000% |
23:10.23 |
brlcad |
divide by 23, carry the one, add 82
.. |
23:10.27 |
archivist |
or more |
23:10.35 |
brlcad |
5000% == 50x ;) |
23:11.17 |
louipc |
I will pick up dev one day.... |
23:11.37 |
louipc |
I'll probably work on drafting aspects
:D |
23:12.37 |
archivist |
a "few" years ago |
23:12.41 |
louipc |
archivist: haha sweet that's the first
programming I ever did |
23:13.05 |
louipc |
borland turbo pascal |
23:13.15 |
archivist |
I used that before C |
23:14.11 |
``Erik |
<-- did basic and asm before C, thus is
code-tarded |
23:14.16 |
``Erik |
well |
23:14.26 |
``Erik |
basic and mnemonics using a monitor on the
c64 |
23:15.06 |
archivist |
SC/MP then PET for me |
23:15.10 |
louipc |
I found a printed copy of a WATFIV (fortran)
program in my garage |
23:15.21 |
louipc |
from 77 :D |
23:16.00 |
archivist |
send a copy to bitsavers.org |
23:16.13 |
louipc |
will do once I type it up |
23:16.51 |
louipc |
I need to find something to compile it
too |
23:17.20 |
archivist |
my debian box has fortran |
23:17.43 |
archivist |
g77 iirc |
23:17.53 |
louipc |
gcc-fortran is kickin still hey? |
23:18.20 |
archivist |
I was playing with it on my alpha so
yes |
23:19.12 |
louipc |
yeah |
23:19.30 |
``Erik |
can g77 do IV? O.o heh |
23:19.36 |
louipc |
university of waterloo's variation of it
anyways |
23:19.43 |
louipc |
I haven't tried compiling it yet |
23:19.58 |
archivist |
fortran-- for its column specific
sillyness |
23:20.25 |
``Erik |
lots of languages from the era have that kinda
silliness, archivist... take a look at, say, RPG |
23:20.28 |
louipc |
that has to do with punch cards
though |
23:20.37 |
louipc |
in that case it made sense, not so much
nowadays |
23:20.39 |
``Erik |
don't look very close, you'll have to gouge
your eyes out if you do |
23:22.36 |
archivist |
I may have RPG on punched cards in the loft at
home from an IBM 1130 |
23:27.24 |
``Erik |
I d'no, C was in the land of minis with
interactive terminals for a long time |
23:27.34 |
``Erik |
it was the unix programming language...
:/ |
23:28.10 |
louipc |
yeah |
23:28.14 |
jgay |
brlcad, when you get a chance, would you mind
emailing me at jgay@fsf.org |
23:28.31 |
jgay |
sorry I cut out earlier, I had to run
out. |
23:28.46 |
louipc |
what would he email you about? |
23:28.48 |
jgay |
I'm signing off for the night right now,
though. Look forward to chatting with you |
23:29.09 |
``Erik |
heh, mebbe YOU should email HIM with your list
of questions :D *duck* |
23:29.37 |
brlcad |
jgay: sure |
23:29.43 |
louipc |
otherwise he'd say "umm.. you asked me to
email you. Hi. wasup?" |
23:29.46 |
jgay |
thanks |
23:30.07 |
brlcad |
anything in particular I should write?
:) |
23:30.11 |
jgay |
louipc, exactly |
23:30.15 |
louipc |
lol |
23:30.21 |
jgay |
haha, i was just hoping to get your email
address and starta discussion |
23:30.38 |
louipc |
jgay: join the brlcad-dev ML |
23:30.40 |
louipc |
? |
23:30.40 |
jgay |
i want to put out a call to developers and
make brl-cad a high priority project according to the FSF |
23:30.52 |
louipc |
jgay: yeah make your announcement there
too |
23:30.55 |
jgay |
so i wanted to discuss with you some things
about what kinds of developers, etc |
23:31.22 |
jgay |
louipc, yeah, I can do that. I'll discuss it
on brlcad-dev ML if that makes sense. Are you brlcad's
administrative assistant? |
23:31.25 |
jgay |
I'm confused :-P |
23:31.34 |
louipc |
jgay: I'm an interloper |
23:31.46 |
jgay |
OK, I'm off for the night. Hehe. Thanks guys!
Sorry I ran out and then again! |
23:31.57 |
louipc |
cheers |
23:32.16 |
louipc |
administrative assistant =
secretary? |
23:32.40 |
archivist |
usually yes |
23:33.22 |
brlcad |
assists in administration ;) |
23:35.01 |
``Erik |
opposed to an administrator O.o |
23:35.05 |
archivist |
I hate these modern/higher terms being applied
to pre-existing jobs |
23:35.25 |
``Erik |
I guess we must've annoyed jgay to have him
wanting to talk in email instead of channel :D |
23:35.54 |
``Erik |
all in the name of political correctness
O.o |
23:35.59 |
louipc |
those damned FSF commies |
23:36.25 |
``Erik |
heh, I vagually recall something about drive
channels being renamed in california? from master/slave to
primary/secondary? O.o |
23:37.02 |
``Erik |
http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/26/135701.php |
23:37.33 |
*** join/#brlcad archivist_
(n=archivis@host217-35-76-52.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |