01:08.47 |
punkrockgirl |
hi |
01:23.50 |
pacman87 |
punkrockgirl: hi |
01:25.20 |
punkrockgirl |
:) |
01:25.28 |
punkrockgirl |
i'm dj'ing if you guys wanna hear |
01:25.42 |
punkrockgirl |
www.troubleradio.net |
01:28.49 |
pacman87 |
your 'listener forums' link is
broken |
01:30.20 |
punkrockgirl |
yeah, its not mine ;) |
01:30.30 |
punkrockgirl |
i just dj, this other dude runs it |
01:30.44 |
punkrockgirl |
but i'll tell him :) |
01:31.00 |
punkrockgirl |
are you listening? :) |
01:31.27 |
pacman87 |
yeah |
01:31.52 |
punkrockgirl |
cool |
01:32.10 |
punkrockgirl |
if you wanna hear something let me know, most
my music is on my playlist thing on there |
01:32.20 |
punkrockgirl |
i need to update though |
01:37.53 |
punkrockgirl |
ok i asked him he said that he is working on
the forums |
02:37.17 |
*** join/#brlcad thing0
(n=ric@124-169-214-111.dyn.iinet.net.au) |
03:57.13 |
*** join/#brlcad Axman6
(n=Axman6@pdpc/supporter/student/Axman6) |
05:00.57 |
*** join/#brlcad andre|away__
(n=chatzill@189.71.51.90) |
05:38.11 |
brlcad |
tunes in |
05:43.10 |
brlcad |
could go for some Gravity
Kills |
05:43.32 |
brlcad |
( punkrockgirl ) |
07:24.05 |
CIA-22 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r31402
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libpc/: ignore generated goo |
08:00.29 |
*** join/#brlcad thing1
(n=ric@203-59-26-22.perm.iinet.net.au) |
08:10.57 |
*** join/#brlcad vedge
(n=vedge@205-237-251-204.ilesdelamadeleine.ca) |
08:13.43 |
*** join/#brlcad thing1
(n=ric@203-59-26-22.perm.iinet.net.au) |
08:16.19 |
*** join/#brlcad thing2
(n=ric@203-59-26-22.perm.iinet.net.au) |
08:44.40 |
*** join/#brlcad clock_
(n=clock@77-56-88-76.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
12:00.06 |
*** join/#brlcad tjyang
(n=tjyang@c-71-194-123-60.hsd1.il.comcast.net) |
12:00.35 |
tjyang |
anyone online ? |
12:26.26 |
clock_ |
is online |
12:36.31 |
tjyang |
Thanks, for the response. I fount the answer
of my own (brlcad beginner) question. |
12:37.38 |
tjyang |
just a comment. why not make a "demo" button,
in either mged or archer to show off what brlcad can do. |
12:38.00 |
tjyang |
it took me a while by RTFM ;-< |
12:40.11 |
*** join/#brlcad tjyang
(n=tjyang@c-71-194-123-60.hsd1.il.comcast.net) |
12:56.08 |
*** join/#brlcad andre|away___
(n=chatzill@189.71.51.90) |
13:35.47 |
brlcad |
tjyang: that's a good suggestion, you're quite
welcome to work on that if you're a developer :) |
13:36.03 |
brlcad |
i'd be glad to point you in the right
directions and help out |
13:37.20 |
tjyang |
how will started with baby step by putting a
simple procedure on brlcad wiki site. |
13:37.49 |
tjyang |
who will -> I will |
13:38.07 |
brlcad |
great! |
13:43.59 |
tjyang |
http://brlcad.org/wiki/FAQ#How_do_I_getting_started_with_Windows_version_of_BRL-CAD |
13:44.59 |
brlcad |
Hm, that'll only get you so far -- Archer is a
nice interface, but only a prototype |
13:45.09 |
brlcad |
the real functionality is in MGED |
13:45.30 |
tjyang |
understood, "Getting started" is the keyword
;) |
13:45.31 |
brlcad |
Archer only does about 25% of what MGED can
do |
13:45.50 |
tjyang |
that is enough for beginner like me
;) |
13:46.12 |
``Erik |
hehehe |
13:46.46 |
brlcad |
then you should maybe make a page dedicated
with screenshots and a walkthrough (e.g. where are the example
files) |
13:46.48 |
tjyang |
BTW, who decide the direction of using docbook
for future brl-cad |
13:46.54 |
``Erik |
isn't sure how much of what
you learn in archer will actually transfer to mged |
13:47.03 |
tjyang |
brl-cad doc format. |
13:47.15 |
brlcad |
tjyang: in what regard? |
13:47.43 |
``Erik |
throws monty python on the tv
and looks at some code |
13:47.45 |
tjyang |
I used framemaker,msword,docbook and latex
before |
13:47.55 |
tjyang |
I think docbook is not as good as
latex. |
13:48.05 |
brlcad |
same as most project decisions, the folks
doing the work (i.e. usually the devs) decide |
13:48.09 |
tjyang |
I switch from docbook to latex. |
13:48.13 |
``Erik |
docbook has slightly different goals (and can
generate TeX) |
13:48.32 |
``Erik |
you're not gonna touch latex for printed
materials, but the web materials come out... rough |
13:49.14 |
brlcad |
and can't even really *think* about
integrating latex into applications, whereas with docbook it's
pretty straightforward |
13:49.18 |
tjyang |
not really , I will provide an example later,
multitasking right now. |
13:49.39 |
``Erik |
<-- big LaTeX fan, but has seen 'nuff from
the FreeBSD docbook/jade to accept it :) |
13:51.40 |
brlcad |
tjyang: just about every major documentation
project has moved to docbook and with good reason, it's simply
easier to work with as a hub format |
13:52.08 |
brlcad |
not as ideal as some of the formats that are
specifically suited to certain tasks (e.g. latex->print) but
overall it's a win |
13:52.44 |
``Erik |
heh, 488 record hits, 153 url hits, 2
subscribers... not too terrible for what it is I suppose |
13:53.34 |
``Erik |
ponders coding something
useful |
13:53.38 |
tjyang |
brlcad: I switched for the reason you
mentioned and in the end I decided to switch to latex. |
13:54.40 |
brlcad |
tjyang: understood, but that doesn't really
say much about whether that was a good decision or not :) |
13:54.54 |
brlcad |
and what your considerations/needs
were |
13:55.20 |
brlcad |
and what problems you actually ran
into |
13:55.31 |
``Erik |
*shrug* both are simple text formats that can
be trivially parsed, so it doesn't look like there's a "problem"
here... it's not like the docs are in ms word or quark
format |
13:55.41 |
``Erik |
codes O.o |
13:55.52 |
brlcad |
woot, code ftw |
13:56.10 |
``Erik |
yes, the world needs better faster stronger
brainfuck compilers. |
13:56.52 |
brlcad |
heh |
13:59.19 |
tjyang |
sorry, I am still on the phone with my
mom. |
13:59.22 |
tjyang |
later |
14:05.46 |
``Erik |
10:05AM up 178 days, 22 mins, 5 users, load
averages: 0.72, 0.18, 0.07 |
14:06.10 |
``Erik |
it may be telling that I'm accepting "bad
syscall" errors from a 'hot' upgrade to keep service up |
14:06.12 |
``Erik |
:/ |
14:06.17 |
*** join/#brlcad dtidrow
(n=dtidrow@c-69-255-182-248.hsd1.va.comcast.net) |
14:15.36 |
*** join/#brlcad ``Bman
(n=erik@bz.bzflag.bz) |
14:15.43 |
``Bman |
10:15AM up 154 days, 15 mins, 11 users, load
averages: 2.22, 2.18, 2.19 |
14:16.14 |
``Erik |
oh yeah, pheer my den p2's uptime, stomps the
almighty bz uptime :D *duck* |
14:18.20 |
CIA-22 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r31403
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libged/draw.c: make function declarations match
definition wrt being static and constness. fixes build failure
reported by tjyang (thanks). |
14:19.10 |
``Erik |
maybe I need to update more often. Every time
I update, there is a commit during my compile. If it update more
often, does that mean we'll get commits more often? |
14:19.58 |
``Erik |
my compile made it to libbu when that message
came out, at least |
14:20.39 |
tjyang |
http://brlcad.org/wiki/FAQ#How_do_I_getting_started_with_Windows_version_of_BRL-CAD_.3F |
14:20.52 |
brlcad |
mebbie |
14:20.54 |
tjyang |
this was the FAQ, I was hoping to
see. |
14:22.05 |
``Erik |
if you don't like the existing tutorial pdf's,
feel free to start a tutorial wiki chain |
14:23.15 |
``Erik |
would call archer an
experimental avenue, would NOT point new users there yet... *shrug*
personal opinion |
14:23.25 |
tjyang |
no, I do like it. I think there should be some
material for total beginner like me. |
14:24.06 |
``Erik |
feel free to create new wiki pages
*shrug* |
14:24.07 |
brlcad |
tjyang: that's the point -- you're a total
beginner even with regards to what you like about it |
14:24.11 |
brlcad |
you can't actually do much with it |
14:24.21 |
brlcad |
which you'll quickly find out |
14:24.29 |
brlcad |
there's a reason we don't point anyone to it
just yet |
14:24.38 |
brlcad |
it's there to encourage developer
interest |
14:24.39 |
tjyang |
I do have a plan to use it. |
14:24.54 |
brlcad |
and you'll find that you can't actually "do"
much with it regardless of your plans :) |
14:25.05 |
``Erik |
if you look at the recent commit history, the
entire libged effort has been kinda part of bobs plan to turn
archer from being a useless but pretty toy into something
useful |
14:25.05 |
brlcad |
unless that doing involves coding |
14:25.41 |
tjyang |
I need a opensource 3D modeling software for
my opensource scooter project ;) |
14:25.48 |
brlcad |
tjyang: the other faq item you mentioned is
being worked on, maybe this helps answer your question: http://brlcad.org/~sean/BRL-CAD_Priorities.png |
14:26.36 |
brlcad |
still under development is why that's not on
the wiki too |
14:27.03 |
``Erik |
hey, burley, check me; we completely lack
anything of the notion of, say, lightwaves scener? static models
being moved along bezier splines for animation? |
14:27.39 |
brlcad |
notes that havoc or m35 would
be a much more interesting intro than "axis" |
14:28.06 |
tjyang |
saw the png file, thanks brlcad. |
14:28.06 |
brlcad |
``Erik: no, we actually have that |
14:28.18 |
``Erik |
and I imagine if I were to do a 'pulling the
points apart' metaball animation, I'd probably be best generating
the 120 or so seperate primitives to play in succession? |
14:28.21 |
brlcad |
it's crusty as all hell.. stuff chris johnson
worked on way back when |
14:28.23 |
``Erik |
uhm, the track thing? |
14:28.26 |
brlcad |
the anim_* tools |
14:28.40 |
brlcad |
and some of the joint tools |
14:29.05 |
``Erik |
hum, back in, uhm, '96 or '97(?) that was one
of the few things I felt good with in lightwave |
14:29.29 |
tjyang |
how far is brlcad converted to docbook already
? |
14:29.29 |
``Erik |
lightwave 4? I took other peoples models, gave
'em paths, and pushed the button to render :D made me feel
good |
14:29.55 |
brlcad |
what we have works but is a total hack, not at
all robust .. but a slew of movies were made with the tools that
way (what rain and others are working on converting) |
14:30.35 |
brlcad |
ours involves a lot of tables a few anim
commands and even a bit of sed/awk scripting :) |
14:30.57 |
``Erik |
ohyeah, that reminds me |
14:31.05 |
``Erik |
dude, wtf, the knights and shit? wtf?
hahahaha |
14:31.30 |
``Erik |
and the koosh ball with the eyeball, we
TOTALLY need that koosh in our distro :D |
14:31.46 |
``Erik |
it was freaking rain out :D |
14:32.10 |
tjyang |
brlcad = sean ? |
14:32.23 |
brlcad |
tjyang: depends what you count .. we have a
hell of a lot of docs in various formats, but the bulk of what
we're counting is probably halfway there |
14:32.32 |
brlcad |
tjyang: yeah |
14:32.41 |
brlcad |
a get assigned that value sometimes |
14:32.50 |
tjyang |
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=2082285&forum_id=362511,
thank you for this answer. |
14:33.18 |
brlcad |
``Erik: yeah, I haven't seen the nights bit in
like 10 years, don't really remember it |
14:33.29 |
brlcad |
and totally don't remember seeing a koosh
ball |
14:33.47 |
brlcad |
i've not seen all the videos myself, just a
handful |
14:33.53 |
``Erik |
starseeker and rain pulled me across the hall
to see it |
14:33.57 |
brlcad |
i'm looking forward to seeing what's in all of
them |
14:34.08 |
``Erik |
rain was REALLY freaking out on the koosh
ball... |
14:34.18 |
brlcad |
she freaks out easily |
14:34.23 |
brlcad |
noob |
14:34.26 |
``Erik |
"what is that thing??? it keeps showing
up!" |
14:34.58 |
tjyang |
brlcad: if doc->docbook is 50% done then I
rest my case of doc->latex. |
14:35.14 |
brlcad |
tjyang: eh how so? |
14:35.41 |
brlcad |
that's after just a couple days of actual
effort, and we're talking about *hundreds* of pages of existing
documentation |
14:35.52 |
tjyang |
brlcad: looks like decision has been to adopt
docbook which is my 2nd perference. |
14:35.53 |
``Erik |
tjyang: LaTeX has been in the discussion all
along... many of us STILL insist on sending our pubs down the pipe
as LaTeX and fighting the "it's not word" back-push |
14:36.01 |
brlcad |
it would take just as long to convert these
docs to latex |
14:36.10 |
``Erik |
trust me, it's not like we just don't know
about LaTeX |
14:36.42 |
brlcad |
yeah, some of our docs are (still) in
latex |
14:36.43 |
tjyang |
great to know. |
14:37.16 |
brlcad |
we probably have well over a thousand pages of
actual/useful documentation material |
14:37.34 |
``Erik |
heh, and millions of useless ones?
;D |
14:38.12 |
brlcad |
in various formats from word to latex to
docbook to only-available-in-printed-form-now that have accumulated
over the years |
14:38.18 |
tjyang |
mercurial book is a good example of using
latex. |
14:38.24 |
brlcad |
ah, and good ol troff |
14:38.43 |
``Erik |
yes, I've been tossed some very classic roff
files for review :/ |
14:39.06 |
``Erik |
rich s is good at what he does, but he is sure
stuck in his own time O.o |
14:39.38 |
tjyang |
I like to join brl-cad latex doc group, if
there is a such group. |
14:40.25 |
tjyang |
docbook is unecessary diversion effort of
tex/latex. |
14:41.19 |
``Erik |
the color, serifs, images and layout of the
priorities image make it feel very archaic, like, 1900's era
stuff |
14:41.52 |
tjyang |
google.com is down ? |
14:42.09 |
``Erik |
and it took a while for me to realize that the
summary was in the middle and channeled to the details, mebbe I'm
just special |
14:42.29 |
brlcad |
tjyang: you still haven't quantified what's
actually technically "wrong" about docbook other than you don't
like it and/or find it unnecessary |
14:43.03 |
brlcad |
you're welcome to work on latex docs, maybe
through sheer volume of contributions you can make something happen
there |
14:43.25 |
brlcad |
but as for a project direction on the docs,
I'm still going to keep going down the docbook path for many
reasons |
14:43.44 |
tjyang |
ok, what is your pro reason for docbook
? |
14:43.45 |
brlcad |
you'd have to do some serious convincing and
contributing to derail that |
14:44.15 |
brlcad |
no no, you're not going to bait on points you
can nit pick when you still haven't pointed out what you find
negative about it |
14:44.42 |
``Erik |
notes that docbook and latex
are awefully close to eachother than the progress right now towards
docbook is 98% towards latex... |
14:44.52 |
brlcad |
or even more, what makes latex better for
*all* of the necessary requirements |
14:45.12 |
brlcad |
yeah, it's not like we're moving away from
docbook |
14:45.17 |
brlcad |
s/docbook/latex/ |
14:45.18 |
brlcad |
heh |
14:45.32 |
``Erik |
we're off in middle of the ocean and we have
two lighthouses close to each other... we on the docbook one right
now *shrug* :) |
14:46.01 |
``Erik |
knowwhatImean,verne? |
14:46.14 |
brlcad |
yeah, you mean we're aimed at the docbook one,
but they're right next door to each other |
14:46.25 |
brlcad |
we just happen to be in the middle of the
ocean a couple miles away at this point :) |
14:46.26 |
tjyang |
http://brlcad.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_BRL-CAD_chose_docbook_over_latex_.3F |
14:46.44 |
tjyang |
lets put down some pros/cons of each
solutions. |
14:47.02 |
``Erik |
*sigh* |
14:47.08 |
brlcad |
tjyang: that's not the appropriate place ot
have a pro/con debate/discussion |
14:47.21 |
brlcad |
and it'd seriously be a waste of time
frankly |
14:48.21 |
``Erik |
if docbook has failings that LaTeX addresses,
why not put your effort into improving the docbook->LaTeX
converter? |
14:49.46 |
brlcad |
if you want to work on latex docs, go for it,
not going to stop you -- just not going to stop other efforts
happening for docbook |
14:49.56 |
tjyang |
I think the bottom line is the doers go to
pick the tool. |
14:50.50 |
``Erik |
yes |
14:50.53 |
``Erik |
that is the bottom line |
14:50.57 |
``Erik |
the doers picked docbook |
14:50.57 |
``Erik |
sorry |
14:50.58 |
``Erik |
:) |
14:51.01 |
tjyang |
agree ;) |
14:51.36 |
tjyang |
np, remember docobok is 2nd perference. if you
pick msword then I will scream ;) |
14:52.20 |
brlcad |
tjyang: what (if anything) are you actually
asking? :) |
14:52.33 |
``Erik |
oh, you're talking to a fistful of unix geeks
here, I mean, we buy macs cuz it's unix that "can do" office, but
we still use keynote instead of powerpoint for slides,
... |
14:53.20 |
brlcad |
why do you think it took nearly 5 years to get
the second release of brl-cad for windows out ... |
14:53.35 |
brlcad |
hm, three years I suppose |
14:53.39 |
tjyang |
keynote is not a common tool. |
14:54.27 |
brlcad |
you're missing the point |
14:54.28 |
brlcad |
twas an example dude |
14:54.28 |
tjyang |
use beam in latex ;) |
14:54.28 |
tjyang |
beams |
14:54.28 |
``Erik |
hopes that with a couple open
source windows developers, windows releases will happen more
often |
14:54.28 |
``Erik |
I think I've used beams before |
14:54.32 |
tjyang |
commens about beams ? |
14:54.34 |
tjyang |
comments |
14:54.47 |
``Erik |
I've also written a portable javascript
thingymajigger so I could use html for my display info and push the
space bar for 'next slide', with the right and left arrow doing
what's right |
14:55.10 |
``Erik |
anyways, we avoid microsoftian proprietary
lockin like the plague. |
14:55.51 |
tjyang |
ok, I am going to stop time wasting
chat(wasting your time). |
14:56.02 |
louipc |
haha I did html slides too |
14:56.14 |
tjyang |
osx 10.5.3 is building ;) |
14:56.25 |
tjyang |
thanks for the quick fix, sean. |
14:56.28 |
``Erik |
discussion is good, submitting patches is
better :) |
14:56.50 |
brlcad |
please, if beam is what I remember, it totally
sucked on many levels :) |
14:57.12 |
tjyang |
stand correct, I sould be more serious about
brl-cad. |
14:57.20 |
tjyang |
stand corrected. |
14:58.10 |
brlcad |
code > doc > chat ;) |
14:58.22 |
``Erik |
nods
solemnly |
14:58.43 |
``Erik |
unless it's my code, I produce some...
special... code... :D |
15:02.28 |
tjyang |
imac:brlcad tj_yang$ find . -type f -name
*.tex |
15:02.28 |
tjyang |
./doc/html/manuals/mged/ged.tex |
15:02.28 |
tjyang |
imac:brlcad tj_yang$ |
15:02.41 |
tjyang |
only one tex file found in source
tree. |
15:03.05 |
``Erik |
very little documentation is in the
tree |
15:03.15 |
``Erik |
that's part of the docbook effort, to move
more into it |
15:03.23 |
tjyang |
what are docbook extension used in source
tree. |
15:03.39 |
tjyang |
docbook extension file name. docbook
? |
15:03.59 |
``Erik |
I'd assume something like xml? starseeker
would be the big doer on that, I think |
15:04.17 |
tjyang |
yeap, thanks, it is .xml |
15:04.20 |
``Erik |
writes .c, not
.xml |
15:05.00 |
tjyang |
BRL-CAD Release 7.12.5, Build
20080615 |
15:05.00 |
tjyang |
Elapsed compilation time: |
15:05.00 |
tjyang |
20 minutes, 57 seconds |
15:05.00 |
tjyang |
Elapsed time since configuration: |
15:05.00 |
tjyang |
22 minutes, 20 seconds |
15:05.21 |
tjyang |
thanks for the fix. |
15:06.11 |
``Erik |
no need to paste, brlcad wants to have
BRL-CAD's babies, he'll do what's necessary when necessary
:) |
15:06.58 |
``Erik |
I think it's a good thing to have, so I push
portability and internal correctness, and I don't mind the paycheck
:D |
15:07.11 |
``Erik |
I'm ALMOST good enough to model a box
:D |
15:07.48 |
tjyang |
how do I find out if my grapich card is used
by win32 brl-cad ? |
15:08.16 |
``Erik |
thinks it would be awesome to
model his house and be able to place furniture and render, or model
his truck and see where the big drag points are |
15:08.17 |
tjyang |
my son upgrade the card to play
game. |
15:08.44 |
``Erik |
uhm, do you mean the 3d components of your
graphics card? cuz, uh, if it comes up on the screen, your graphics
card was involved in some way or another |
15:09.18 |
``Erik |
we have an opengl mode, but it's all GL_LINE
stuff, so using opengl will actually slow you down vs X or
win32 |
15:09.43 |
``Erik |
it's in the big todo list to get 'shaded
displays' up, that'd be where a 3d card becomes useful |
15:10.29 |
tjyang |
I don't feel the rendering is fast in brl-cad
vs my Son's game. |
15:10.58 |
``Erik |
no, the purpose is very different. BRL-CAD is
looking to be accurate and deep. The game is looking to be fast and
pretty. |
15:11.50 |
tjyang |
(Erik) speaking of paycheck, how is
brl-cad.com doing ? is everybody there got fed properly ? |
15:11.53 |
``Erik |
in BRL-CAD, we care about sub-millimeter
accuracy and deep ray penetration at several KM out... it's
scientific software, not "pretty" :) |
15:12.12 |
tjyang |
ok, no problem. |
15:12.24 |
tjyang |
this is what I am looking for. |
15:12.47 |
``Erik |
uhm, I get my paycheck from http://www.arl.army.mil/slad,
brlcad gets his (indirectly) from the same place, dunno what a
brl-cad.com is O.o |
15:13.02 |
tjyang |
I did have educations both C.S. and building
ship. |
15:13.03 |
``Erik |
ohhhh, a cname for survice |
15:13.38 |
louipc |
opengl is faster than X for me |
15:13.48 |
*** join/#brlcad Elperion
(n=Bary@p5B14DF4C.dip.t-dialin.net) |
15:14.26 |
``Erik |
ok, BRL-CAD was designed and implemented more
for physics simulation and multispectral analysis than fast pretty
pictures |
15:14.28 |
tjyang |
I am thinking of using using brl-cad as the
modeling tool a opensource scooter project. |
15:14.56 |
``Erik |
that'd be awesome, clock used BRL-CAD quite a
bit in his 'ronja' project, which is effin' awesome |
15:14.59 |
tjyang |
physics simulation ? that sounds
cool. |
15:15.06 |
``Erik |
http://ronja.twibright.com/ |
15:15.33 |
``Erik |
well, it seems that we have big metal boxes,
and some people want to make holes in them... and other folk have
big metal boxes that WE want to mkae holes in... |
15:16.24 |
``Erik |
I get paid because some people want to use
BRL-CAD to figure out what happens when people try to make holes in
metal boxes *shrug* |
15:17.06 |
``Erik |
ronja is definitely a project that'll let a
feller sleep better at night |
15:17.07 |
``Erik |
O.o |
15:18.00 |
``Erik |
(we're more CAE than CAD) |
15:18.10 |
tjyang |
I want to use brlcad to build a three wheel
scooter like BugE. http://www.bugev.net/ |
15:18.47 |
tjyang |
am I picking the right tool ? |
15:18.47 |
brlcad |
cocks his head at the image
of having BRL-CAD's babies |
15:18.55 |
brlcad |
ow |
15:18.57 |
``Erik |
that'd be neat, how exactly will BRL-CAD aid
you in that? |
15:19.08 |
louipc |
tjyang: that's sweet |
15:19.13 |
tjyang |
like m35 |
15:19.32 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=elite01@dslb-088-071-037-042.pools.arcor-ip.net) |
15:19.34 |
``Erik |
the current NURBS work would really benefit
that kinda project, I think |
15:19.47 |
tjyang |
it brlcad can model m35 truck then it can
model a bugE alike |
15:19.50 |
``Erik |
but, um, we don't do blueprints |
15:19.58 |
``Erik |
yt |
15:19.59 |
``Erik |
yet |
15:20.08 |
tjyang |
I can wait |
15:20.27 |
tjyang |
it is hobby project . |
15:20.32 |
``Erik |
it may take more than waiting, you might have
to do :) |
15:21.00 |
brlcad |
brlcad.com (i.e. SURVICE's support service)
does their own thing, gets some attention |
15:21.05 |
``Erik |
the people paying for BRL-CAD development are
analysis, not design... blueprints are irrelevant to them, so
*shrug* |
15:21.06 |
brlcad |
i'm sure not as much as they'd like |
15:22.30 |
tjyang |
Erik, so I am picking the wrong tool
? |
15:22.39 |
brlcad |
tjyang: I'd really suggest going through the
Vol II tutorials in order to get a feel for how you model |
15:22.40 |
``Erik |
now if you lay down code to do blueprints,
you'd be a hero to many... most of the developers have someone
saying to pay attention to other stuff and holding the
paycheck |
15:22.48 |
``Erik |
it depends on what exactly you want out of
it |
15:23.39 |
``Erik |
if you want to verify assembly, visualize
subassemblies, computer actual weights and stuff... BRL-CAD is
great... if you want to hit a button and get a blueprint to take to
the machine shop? no. :( |
15:24.11 |
tjyang |
I see, that whaty pro/E is doing, correct
? |
15:24.18 |
brlcad |
as far as open source CAD goes, we're (imho)
as good as it gets but still with a long ways to go |
15:24.40 |
``Erik |
pro/E and unigraphics are very into CAM
stuff |
15:24.46 |
``Erik |
we're more CAE |
15:24.50 |
brlcad |
pro/e, unigraphics/nx, catia, solidworks,
.. |
15:25.08 |
brlcad |
autocad is king of blueprints |
15:25.26 |
tjyang |
I really don't have a big wallet to spend on
those CAE/CAM commerical tool |
15:25.30 |
``Erik |
http://brlcad.org/w/images/4/44/Industry_Diagram.pdf |
15:25.49 |
``Erik |
that pdf has a *LOT* of information in it,
brlcad spent a lot of effort getting it just right |
15:25.52 |
tjyang |
yeah, I saw that pdf file. |
15:26.15 |
``Erik |
might take a little look at http://gcam.js.cx/index.php/Main_Page
if CAM is what you're looking for |
15:26.16 |
tjyang |
very nice pdf file. |
15:26.21 |
brlcad |
tjyang: the amount of manpower effort that has
to go into a functionally useful CAD system is truely massive and
they know it and they charge accordingly |
15:26.34 |
brlcad |
about a 6 billion dollar commercial market
last year |
15:27.09 |
louipc |
tjyang: looks like you won't be able to see
anything on the road ahead if you're behind other cars :P |
15:27.22 |
brlcad |
we've got almost 25 years of non-stop
development, nearly 500 man-years of effort, and we still mostly
focus on CAE aspects and could easily double that and still not be
at the commercial systems level in some regards |
15:27.59 |
``Erik |
was it uni that you talked to with 100
dedicated developers? |
15:28.21 |
tjyang |
louipc: that is oppertunity that BugE 2/3 can
fix ;) |
15:28.48 |
brlcad |
yeah, uni |
15:29.01 |
brlcad |
talked to catia dev at solid modeling
... |
15:29.10 |
brlcad |
they have about 1000 *devs* :) |
15:29.14 |
louipc |
ouch |
15:30.00 |
tjyang |
it is not I don't appreicate the value of
commerical cad/cam tool, it is the problem I can't afford it.
unless I ask my kids stop there college education. |
15:30.02 |
brlcad |
distributed all over the place, lots of
competeting projects |
15:31.14 |
``Erik |
heh, ain't nothin' worth disadvantaging your
kids, dude |
15:31.20 |
brlcad |
tjyang: i'm not promoting them or saying go
with them -- my answer is help make brl-cad better, help make it do
what it needs to do to be the absolute best ;) |
15:31.44 |
``Erik |
we're open source and solid, if you run into a
serious stumbling block, we're here to talk to... if you can fix
it, we love patches |
15:31.54 |
brlcad |
yeah, because you'd not only have to take away
they're college, you'd have to start pimping them out for the
annual maintenance and upgrade costs ;) |
15:32.32 |
``Erik |
even taking away college, seems to me that
once you have a kid, your focus changes from doing for yourself to
making their life better *shrug* |
15:32.39 |
``Erik |
or SHOULD |
15:33.28 |
tjyang |
I still want to allocate some resources for
my personal hobbies ;) |
15:33.31 |
brlcad |
meh, they can fend for themselves, good
learning experiences ;) |
15:33.56 |
``Erik |
heh, it's a balance :D but if push comes to
shove, I think the kids take precidence |
15:34.23 |
tjyang |
be back, let me test the mac version of
brlcad. |
15:34.24 |
brlcad |
stopped being a negative
time/money sink as soon as he could be put to work (early
teens) |
15:34.53 |
``Erik |
my parents gave up a lot for me, but I wasn't
spoiled. i support 'em when they need it, ... I'm boggled at how
the bitch spoils her brats at times *shrug* |
15:36.11 |
``Erik |
(of course, I grew up in a single income
family with my dad being enlisted in the navy, not exactly
wealthy... buying a 'puter was a huge hobby expense that came hard
to my dad, but I got my fingers on a keyboard in '83, which
affected where I am now *shrug*) |
15:37.32 |
``Erik |
pancake tends to buy her kids video games and
dolls... last xmas, I bought her boy an electronic experimentor kit
and her daughter a projection lamp tracing table thing
O.o |
15:38.15 |
louipc |
drafting table ;) |
15:38.30 |
``Erik |
almost, but cheap plastic and with disney
images to project :D |
15:38.49 |
``Erik |
rachel is "artsy"... I don't grok it, my arts
are either aural or mathematical |
15:40.07 |
*** join/#brlcad dtidrow
(n=dtidrow@c-69-255-182-248.hsd1.va.comcast.net) |
15:40.08 |
brlcad |
I think I got joshua one of those for
xmas |
15:40.10 |
``Erik |
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000Q947SG?smid=A1OLFXZISZ8WL8&tag=nextag-toys-20&linkCode=asn |
15:40.14 |
brlcad |
pretty nifty |
15:40.52 |
brlcad |
heh, yeah .. cept the 'boy' version of that
apparently, "Cars" theme instead of princess |
15:40.59 |
``Erik |
heh, you HAVE to buy josh cool shit, you're
his godfather :D I'm just off in left field, not even invited to
hang out :D |
15:41.20 |
``Erik |
met up with jason and nettie a week or two ago
for lunch, josh is getting big! |
15:41.54 |
``Erik |
and was the first time I'd seen their
daughter |
15:42.23 |
brlcad |
aspires to be that affluent
godfather that joshua knows he can go to for toys whenever he wants
(or whenever mom n dad are being stubborn) |
15:42.32 |
``Erik |
hah |
15:42.48 |
``Erik |
the faux grandfather roll? :> |
15:43.05 |
brlcad |
like when they were trying to ween him off
candy |
15:43.13 |
brlcad |
I show up with chocolate bars |
15:43.13 |
``Erik |
bwahahahaha |
15:43.33 |
``Erik |
I have to say, josh seems awfully well
behaved, it's boggling |
15:43.58 |
``Erik |
he got fitty with the crayons, jason told him
to settle downa nd be nice and ... he... did... *boggle* |
15:44.10 |
brlcad |
:) |
15:44.50 |
``Erik |
and the girl (I forgot her name) seems to be
the polar opposite |
15:45.08 |
``Erik |
she just stays quiet and happy |
15:45.12 |
``Erik |
no fits |
15:45.56 |
``Erik |
makes me jealous :) they have something
awesome going on |
15:47.06 |
``Erik |
(and nettie has an awesome ability to bounce
back, zomfg, jason is all sorts of lucky there *cough*
*duck*) |
15:47.11 |
``Erik |
so, code time :D |
15:49.51 |
``Erik |
is happy that it is cool
today, can actually run "make" without fear :/ |
16:00.58 |
punkrockgirl |
:/ |
16:05.01 |
brlcad |
punkrockgirl: g'morning :) |
16:06.24 |
brlcad |
``Erik: mira, yeah.. impressively
"calm" |
16:14.50 |
*** join/#brlcad clock_
(n=clock@77-56-88-155.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
16:23.22 |
CIA-22 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r31404
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libged/draw.c: reorder the functions so that
forward declarations are not needed for any except the (recursive)
callbacks |
16:24.36 |
CIA-22 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r31405
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libged/ (8 files): ws |
16:27.53 |
``Erik |
yeah, that sounds right, was boggling at lunch
(grumpies) |
16:28.42 |
``Erik |
punker says good morning, she's lazy and
laying back in bed |
16:51.40 |
brlcad |
mm.. food |
17:25.14 |
andrecastelo |
sorry guys for being away for so much
time |
17:53.22 |
CIA-22 |
BRL-CAD: 03andrecastelo * r31406
10/brlcad/trunk/src/rt/viewarea.c: |
17:53.22 |
CIA-22 |
BRL-CAD: Regarding the center point algorithm
- fixed a bug that prevented the head of a |
17:53.22 |
CIA-22 |
BRL-CAD: point list from receiving data and a
crude hack was being used to prevent loss |
17:53.22 |
CIA-22 |
BRL-CAD: of precision. area_center() had a for
statement that didn't start with the head, |
17:53.23 |
CIA-22 |
BRL-CAD: now it has been improved and now uses
BU_LIST_FOR(). |
18:00.44 |
CIA-22 |
BRL-CAD: 03andrecastelo * r31407
10/brlcad/trunk/AUTHORS: Moved mafm and homovulgaris (Manuel
Fernandez and Dawn Thomas, respectively) from the Special Thanks
section to the Code Contribution section, as requested by Dawn
Thomas. |
18:21.03 |
brlcad |
howdy andrecastelo ! |
18:21.09 |
brlcad |
happy weekend to you |
18:21.38 |
andrecastelo |
howdy brlcad |
18:21.51 |
brlcad |
andrecastelo: normally requests to get "moved
up" by themselves aren't a valid reason :) |
18:22.07 |
brlcad |
though in this case all four of you should be
moved up by this point |
18:22.55 |
andrecastelo |
sorry about it S: |
18:23.03 |
andrecastelo |
i thought it was ok to edit it |
18:23.21 |
brlcad |
no, it's completely fine |
18:23.31 |
brlcad |
i'm just saying the commit "reason" isn't the
reason |
18:23.39 |
brlcad |
at least that shouldn't be the
reason |
18:24.15 |
brlcad |
the reason is that you guys are committing
code :) |
18:25.21 |
andrecastelo |
ah ok ok :) |
18:25.49 |
andrecastelo |
i've added a few files that weren't added to
the msvc 9 build |
18:25.58 |
andrecastelo |
just building now to see if i didn't forget
anything |
18:25.59 |
brlcad |
and by the end of summer, should be at dev
status, particularly if you all keep it up |
18:26.21 |
andrecastelo |
awesome :D |
18:26.26 |
andrecastelo |
hehehe |
18:26.37 |
brlcad |
as dev status is more an indicator of "time"
(though there is a magnitude of effort factor too) |
18:28.30 |
CIA-22 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r31408
10/brlcad/trunk/AUTHORS: denote all four gsocers as such |
20:10.34 |
starseeker |
chuckles to see the docbook
debate flare up again |
20:11.30 |
starseeker |
I'm using .xml for the moment, but that's not
set in stone |
20:12.35 |
starseeker |
is still a LaTeX fan, but
appreciates docbook more now that he can get pdf files out of it
and appreciates the magnitude of LaTeX conversion for essentially
nil gain |
20:13.20 |
brlcad |
he left :) |
20:13.27 |
starseeker |
bah |
20:13.33 |
starseeker |
that's no fun ;-) |
21:01.06 |
*** join/#brlcad pacman81
(n=Timothy@71.170.63.120) |
21:08.40 |
*** join/#brlcad dtidrow
(n=dtidrow@c-69-255-182-248.hsd1.va.comcast.net) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
21:08.40 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=elite01@dslb-088-071-037-042.pools.arcor-ip.net) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
21:12.32 |
*** join/#brlcad
MinuteElectron
(n=MinuteEl@silentflame/member/pdpc.base.minuteelectron) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
21:12.32 |
*** join/#brlcad poolio
(n=poolio@bz.bzflag.bz) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
21:14.59 |
*** join/#brlcad andrecastelo
(n=chatzill@189.71.51.90) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
21:14.59 |
*** join/#brlcad b0ef
(n=b0ef@062016141231.customer.alfanett.no) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
21:16.35 |
*** join/#brlcad pacman87
(n=Timothy@71.170.63.120) |
21:29.02 |
*** join/#brlcad dtidrow
(n=dtidrow@c-69-255-182-248.hsd1.va.comcast.net) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
21:29.02 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=elite01@dslb-088-071-037-042.pools.arcor-ip.net) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
21:57.35 |
*** join/#brlcad dtidrow
(n=dtidrow@c-69-255-182-248.hsd1.va.comcast.net) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
21:57.35 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=elite01@dslb-088-071-037-042.pools.arcor-ip.net) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
23:19.52 |
*** join/#brlcad tjyang
(n=tjyang@c-71-194-123-60.hsd1.il.comcast.net) |
23:29.16 |
CIA-22 |
BRL-CAD: 03andrecastelo * r31409
10/brlcad/trunk/misc/win32-msvc9/ (brlcad/brlcad.sln
libged/libged.vcproj): Updated the MSVC 9 build configuration.
Added files from libged that weren't added before. Added rtmlt back
into the configuration. |