00:05.22 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r32113
10/brlcad/branches/pre-7-12-6/ (7 files in 5 dirs): r31957-66 misc
updates by brlcad |
00:18.49 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r32114
10/brlcad/branches/pre-7-12-6/src/ (4 files in 3 dirs): r31968-77
selective merging of updates to librt and librtserver |
00:20.36 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r32115
10/brlcad/branches/pre-7-12-6/sh/cmakecheck.sh: Add cmakecheck.sh
(r31980-81) |
00:24.09 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r32116
10/brlcad/branches/pre-7-12-6/ (11 files in 11 dirs): r31983 - add
svn properties for CMake lists |
00:26.25 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r32117
10/brlcad/branches/pre-7-12-6/ (4 files in 4 dirs): r31985-91
various updates - pipe primitive and make logic |
00:28.22 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r32118
10/brlcad/branches/pre-7-12-6/src/librtserver/ (rtserver.c
rtserverTest.c): r32059-60 rtserver updates |
00:29.33 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r32119
10/brlcad/branches/pre-7-12-6/src/ (librt/prep.c
librtserver/rtserver.c): r32061-62 more rtserver updates |
00:30.56 |
brlcad |
19:42 < starseeker> stustev: I would
suggest looking at clone for patterning geometry |
00:31.36 |
brlcad |
it's invariably more easily scriptable for
procedure development than the gui pattern tool |
00:32.49 |
starseeker |
reaches the end of the svn
trunk log (give or take the new kill stuff) and stops to see how
bad the damages are |
00:32.50 |
brlcad |
almost has mged working so
it'll invoke as an icon/shortcut for linux/mac without thinking
it's in non-interactive mode |
00:33.03 |
starseeker |
cool! |
00:33.11 |
starseeker |
may have spoken too
soon... |
00:36.37 |
stustev |
brlcad: thanks - I will look at it |
00:39.00 |
stustev |
I would still like to learn the pattern
commands though. |
00:39.52 |
starseeker |
is more likely at this point
to write a new pattern tool and document that - the interface on
the old one is non-intuitive even by MGED
standards |
00:45.00 |
stustev |
that sounds like a marvelous idea |
00:46.51 |
starseeker |
it's a lot of work though, and brlcad has me
doing more useful stuff at the moment... |
00:51.12 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r32120
10/brlcad/branches/pre-7-12-6/configure.ac: First tweaks to
configure to let it know about the docbook libpc dirs - start
looking at what havoc all the merges did. |
00:52.07 |
*** join/#brlcad iday
(n=jlowens@c-68-55-215-195.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
01:16.36 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r32121
10/brlcad/branches/pre-7-12-6/include/bu.h: |
01:16.37 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: Grab the renaming of
bu_structparse_get_terse_form, etc. in bu.h from r31595 - |
01:16.37 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: have this in libbu via one of the
updates. If it doesn't harm anything else |
01:16.37 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: it's a logical renaming based on the
use of Tcl_Interp in the functions, |
01:16.37 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: otherwise need to revert both this
and the corresponding libbu changes. |
01:35.15 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r32122
10/brlcad/branches/pre-7-12-6/ (6 files in 5 dirs): Merge in
changes r31595 and 31609 - libbu compiles now. |
01:45.06 |
*** join/#brlcad Twingy
(n=justin@74.92.144.217) |
02:16.02 |
pacman87 |
old: https://webspace.utexas.edu/trv82/www/rev_rt20.png |
02:16.03 |
pacman87 |
new: https://webspace.utexas.edu/trv82/www/rev_rt21.png |
02:27.51 |
Ralith |
how's new work? |
02:28.05 |
Ralith |
union? |
02:28.12 |
pacman87 |
yes |
02:28.47 |
Ralith |
that's where you have something like [===|=]
where | is x=0? |
02:28.54 |
Ralith |
and rotate it >180 degrees? |
02:29.03 |
pacman87 |
yes |
02:29.09 |
pacman87 |
270 there |
02:29.11 |
Ralith |
cool |
02:37.11 |
starseeker |
ooooohhh crap |
02:41.32 |
Ralith |
? |
02:46.40 |
starseeker |
has more of the libged stuff
mixed in than he intended |
02:50.41 |
starseeker |
well, I can do it the hard way I suppose -
start from the 7.12.4 release and check each change for
breakage |
03:38.37 |
*** join/#brlcad jonored
(n=jonored@dsl092-076-134.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net) |
03:44.48 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r32123
10/brlcad/branches/pre-7-12-6/current_successful_compile_rev.txt:
Add file to record last revision verified to have built - will go
away later, just for convenience now. |
03:45.37 |
starseeker |
alright, I'm outta here |
03:51.34 |
brlcad |
~pacman87++ |
03:51.57 |
brlcad |
teh awesome |
03:52.16 |
brlcad |
almost time for another showcase :) |
03:52.51 |
pacman87 |
showcase? |
04:10.13 |
brlcad |
to share some of the results with
users |
04:10.26 |
brlcad |
(nothing for you to do) |
04:10.30 |
pacman87 |
ah, ok |
04:10.47 |
pacman87 |
just fyi, revolve is still limited to straight
line sketches |
04:11.11 |
pacman87 |
i wanted to get that all ironed out before it
gets too complicated |
04:11.26 |
brlcad |
yep, got that |
04:11.39 |
brlcad |
tis a great approach |
04:11.54 |
pacman87 |
and i'm having some odd 'flipped normals
detected' |
04:12.14 |
pacman87 |
i can't quite figure out exactly what's
causing them |
04:12.18 |
brlcad |
that usually means that the hit points being
returned from shot() aren't sorted |
04:13.20 |
brlcad |
an exit before an entry for the given shotline
.. or a problem actually in norm() |
04:13.34 |
pacman87 |
i think it's in norm() |
04:13.58 |
pacman87 |
does it ever ask for the normal for a hit
other than the first one? |
04:14.13 |
brlcad |
rt doesn't |
04:14.25 |
brlcad |
but the "first one" might be wrong if they're
not sorted right from shot() |
04:14.41 |
pacman87 |
ok, i'll look at that again |
04:15.15 |
pacman87 |
for a revolve about Z, i use x/y coords, plus
the slope of the line at the hitpoint |
04:16.17 |
pacman87 |
but that doesnt tell me which way is out from
the surface |
04:17.46 |
pacman87 |
so i end up doing my own dot test between
normal direction and ray direction to see if i should
flip |
04:17.58 |
pacman87 |
which assumes only the first hit's normal is
used |
04:19.21 |
brlcad |
noteworthy: "Subversion service will be
offline on 2008-07-30 from 17:00 Pacific for not more than 12 hours
to permit a rebuild of the storage used by the service, followed by
further performance tuning." |
04:20.20 |
pacman87 |
is there a way to check whether a hitpoint is
an 'in' or an 'out'? |
04:20.24 |
brlcad |
that should be a fair assumption |
04:21.18 |
brlcad |
obviously shouldn't be going away from the ray
direction, should be coming back towards it |
04:21.29 |
pacman87 |
right, that's what i'm doing |
04:22.35 |
brlcad |
there's not really a fixed solution to check,
primitive-specific -- usually, though, the logic goes into shot()
and it just makes sure there is the right parity and
ordering |
04:22.45 |
brlcad |
so norm can just pop off the first hit and
return the normal |
04:22.53 |
brlcad |
there is an rt flag to debug normals |
04:26.17 |
brlcad |
various ways to do it using either nirt or rt,
the trick being to just fire a single ray so you're not drowned in
data and use the -x option |
04:26.33 |
brlcad |
various debug flags listed in
include/raytrace.h, -x2 being useful for this |
04:26.50 |
brlcad |
it'll tell you the in/out segments |
04:27.39 |
pacman87 |
the thing is, the normal direction is right,
so it's shaded properly; it's just reversed |
04:28.06 |
brlcad |
nirt -x2 something.g your_object .. then there
are a slew of interactive commands for shooting from az/el's of
interest for example |
04:28.37 |
brlcad |
rt trys to compensate when it gets a flipped
normal by flipping it for you |
04:28.45 |
brlcad |
it does the same dot check |
04:39.06 |
Ralith |
hm, something's wrong with nirt's
manpage |
04:39.45 |
Ralith |
<standard input>:785: cannot use
character `1' as a starting delimiter |
04:42.49 |
pacman87 |
ah, i think i found it |
04:43.09 |
pacman87 |
paying attention to the surfno in the flipped
normals error is helpful |
04:43.39 |
pacman87 |
my initial assumption that the sketch was
always +x is coming back to bite me |
04:57.45 |
brlcad |
ah |
04:57.59 |
brlcad |
Ralith: there are only so many 1's in there,
maybe you can pinpoint it? :) |
04:58.46 |
brlcad |
ah, I found it |
04:59.12 |
brlcad |
knows not what h
does |
04:59.17 |
Ralith |
I was going to |
04:59.19 |
Ralith |
but then you found it |
04:59.30 |
Ralith |
commitstealer. >_> |
04:59.47 |
brlcad |
heh |
05:07.32 |
pacman87 |
success! |
05:07.50 |
brlcad |
~pacman87++ |
05:07.56 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r32124
10/brlcad/trunk/src/nirt/nirt.1: fix the manpage so it doesn't have
a \h 1 delimiter error. snarf a .FN macro to list the
files |
05:08.39 |
starseeker |
returns to home
base |
05:11.11 |
brlcad |
starseeker: wow, long day :) |
05:11.16 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r32125
10/brlcad/trunk/src/fbed/fbed.1: apply the .FN macro |
05:11.25 |
brlcad |
was thinking about maybe
heading in soon |
05:11.27 |
starseeker |
is ready to admit he probably
went about the release prep the wrong way |
05:11.35 |
starseeker |
heh - figures |
05:11.40 |
brlcad |
my shedule is about 12 hours off sync
now |
05:11.53 |
pacman87 |
brlcad: move to new zealand |
05:11.59 |
starseeker |
at this rate, I'll show up about when you
leave ;-) |
05:12.04 |
brlcad |
pacman87: heh |
05:12.15 |
brlcad |
usually operates on west
coast US time |
05:12.45 |
starseeker |
is agast that subversion will
be down - bad timing! |
05:13.19 |
starseeker |
just when I'm going back and checking
incrementally |
05:13.20 |
pacman87 |
set up your own svn on brlcad's
server? |
05:13.34 |
starseeker |
could grab a git
repo |
05:13.38 |
starseeker |
or make one rather |
05:14.21 |
starseeker |
brlcad: At least make fun of my release prep
so I don't feel so newbish |
05:15.33 |
brlcad |
or just build up into a bigger commit since
you're on a branch, it's probably not worth the effort to do
anything else but wait |
05:16.02 |
brlcad |
starseeker: make fun of it? heh |
05:16.10 |
brlcad |
it is rather .. methodical :) |
05:16.36 |
brlcad |
but good experience reviewing/merging changes
too |
05:16.51 |
starseeker |
idiotic - I should have checked incrementally.
I sucked in some libged stuff without intending to, and now it's
well and truly foobared |
05:17.21 |
brlcad |
you can undo individual ranges if you know the
revision numbers |
05:17.38 |
starseeker |
nods |
05:17.44 |
brlcad |
svn merge -rstart:end |
05:18.14 |
starseeker |
once I find the first breakage commit, that's
probably what I'll do |
05:18.15 |
brlcad |
where start would be the newest and end the
pre-commit state -- that reverts the change |
05:19.04 |
starseeker |
cool |
05:19.16 |
starseeker |
did that a couple times when
he grabbed the wrong range |
05:20.15 |
starseeker |
I'm guessing I started to go off base when I
merged in the primitive reorg - hyp and friends probably snuck
in |
05:20.47 |
pacman87 |
aww, poor hyp didn't want to be left out of
the fun ;) |
05:20.55 |
starseeker |
heh :-) |
05:21.23 |
starseeker |
it's not quite ready for stable - that's most
of the challenge for this release, and the reason it requires a
branch |
05:21.34 |
starseeker |
trunk has a lot of stuff in flux right
now |
05:21.34 |
pacman87 |
i understand |
05:22.52 |
pacman87 |
if i have spare time during the 'finalize
week', i'll look into finishing the todo for hyp |
05:22.59 |
starseeker |
cool :-) |
05:23.10 |
pacman87 |
when's the release date? |
05:23.40 |
starseeker |
whenever I get the branch straightened out and
tested - probably sometime next week at this rate |
05:24.01 |
starseeker |
doesn't even want to think
about the Windows build... |
05:24.38 |
starseeker |
brlcad: If you do go in soon, watch out for
the deer - I must have seen four or five on the way out |
05:24.38 |
pacman87 |
just use (wine)^-1 |
05:24.51 |
starseeker |
heh |
05:25.03 |
pacman87 |
translate from linux to windows
calls |
05:25.24 |
Ralith |
that's called mingw |
05:25.56 |
brlcad |
starseeker: yeah, it's always that way after
about 10pm |
05:26.56 |
pacman87 |
"Students can begin submitting required code
samples to Google" - from gsoc timeline |
05:26.58 |
brlcad |
i don't know that i've ever not seen one
traveling between 10pm and 4am |
05:27.12 |
pacman87 |
what's that mean? |
05:27.28 |
brlcad |
pacman87: you upload code you've worked
on |
05:28.02 |
brlcad |
that's technically your actual legal
responsibility per the arrangement in place, that's what they pay
you for |
05:28.17 |
pacman87 |
hmm, don't remmeber reading that
part |
05:28.25 |
pacman87 |
and i though i read through the whole
think |
05:28.27 |
pacman87 |
thing* |
05:28.29 |
brlcad |
which can be anything really, usually a
tarball of files you've worked on, or svn diffs |
05:28.37 |
starseeker |
thinks dark thoughts about
venison burgers and realizes he probably needs
sleep |
05:30.52 |
brlcad |
crazy talk |
05:31.21 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r32126
10/brlcad/trunk/src/ (7 files in 5 dirs): apply the same FN macro
changes consistently to the (surprisingly few) manual pages that
have a FILES section. |
05:31.36 |
starseeker |
my grandfather used to hunt - venison meat is
actually pretty darn tasty when prepared right |
05:32.19 |
brlcad |
nods |
05:33.15 |
brlcad |
one of the guys (that you haven't met yet)
that used to work next to where you're sitting would bring in deer
sticks and deer steaks from time to time, delicious |
05:33.42 |
starseeker |
:-) |
05:34.26 |
starseeker |
wants to read the slashdot
LaTeX article but remembers he needs to be present at a
presentation tomorrow... |
05:34.40 |
starseeker |
brlcad: Incidently, thanks for reviewing that
for her |
05:34.43 |
pacman87 |
present and alert, or just present? |
05:35.05 |
starseeker |
snores, so at a minimum I
need to be awake |
05:35.12 |
brlcad |
grrrr... |
05:35.12 |
brlcad |
data is pending on stdin |
05:35.12 |
brlcad |
DATA is: [] |
05:35.26 |
starseeker |
that's... odd |
05:35.48 |
pacman87 |
wonders how he lived for so
long without knowing shitf+left/right arrow to change konsole
tabs |
05:48.49 |
Ralith |
I don't understand the complaints some people
have about LaTeX |
05:49.41 |
Ralith |
for me at least, it had very little learning
curve (largely thanks to google) and behaved wonderfully for
everything short of long URLs, which it can't seem to work out when
to break. |
05:54.19 |
pacman87 |
brlcad: i'd rather keep " [ (x*x) / aa^2 ] - [
(y-h)^2 / bb^2 ] = 1 " in a comment in revolve, so i can remember
where my variables are used in the formula for a
hyperbola |
06:01.42 |
pacman87 |
ctrl+z just saved my life |
06:03.39 |
brlcad |
pacman87: ok .. am I supposed to object to
useful comments? :) |
06:04.00 |
pacman87 |
you deleted it with the rest of the old
code |
06:04.11 |
brlcad |
many of them spell out their equations, it's a
good thing |
06:04.15 |
brlcad |
ooh, that wasn't intentional |
06:04.23 |
brlcad |
it was more the code |
06:04.31 |
brlcad |
sorry about that |
06:07.27 |
pacman87 |
np, but i'm pretty sure that line isnt' valid
C when uncommented ;) |
06:07.59 |
brlcad |
depends on what cpp macros are defines
;) |
06:08.29 |
brlcad |
s/defines/defined/ |
06:08.56 |
pacman87 |
ok, maybe. but even if that was valid, it'd
be horrible coding practice |
06:09.55 |
brlcad |
indeed |
06:10.01 |
brlcad |
obfuscated fun |
06:10.11 |
brlcad |
ugh, the is horrible .. select says there is
data waiting on stdin .. but there's nothing to read |
06:10.29 |
brlcad |
that's seriously screwing with detecting
whether we're interactive or not |
06:10.56 |
pacman87 |
how hard would it be to add mged history
between sessions? |
06:12.02 |
brlcad |
not too hard, could probably keep a
.mged_history file with a few variables to control it |
06:12.31 |
pacman87 |
i find myself exiting to do make &&
make install |
06:12.34 |
pacman87 |
then restarting |
06:12.42 |
pacman87 |
and wanting to run the same commands
again |
06:13.05 |
pacman87 |
i've been using ; to seperate commands on a
line |
06:13.08 |
brlcad |
yeah, that's be pretty useful |
06:13.10 |
pacman87 |
and shift+insert |
06:22.06 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03pacman87 * r32127
10/brlcad/trunk/src/librt/primitives/ (revolve/revolve.c
sketch/sketch.c): |
06:22.06 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: change revolve to use a union instead
of an xor when the -X and +X sides of a |
06:22.06 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: revolve overlap (ie, angle > 180).
also, modify norm() to give the proper |
06:22.06 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: vector direction when the start/end
surface is hit on a point with a -X |
06:22.06 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: coordinate. |
06:22.12 |
pacman87 |
that took way longer than it
should've |
06:22.31 |
pacman87 |
i need more practice merging |
06:23.09 |
pacman87 |
almost completely wiped out my changes, then
wiped out the other updates, and had to merge by hand |
06:23.30 |
pacman87 |
and being past 1am probably had something to
do with it |
06:23.38 |
pacman87 |
anyway, goodnight |
06:23.42 |
brlcad |
or could work on a direct checkout too
;) |
06:23.53 |
brlcad |
avoid the hassle altogether |
06:24.16 |
pacman87 |
i usually do |
06:24.32 |
brlcad |
so why not? |
06:24.52 |
pacman87 |
well, if i'm working and you commit changes,
i'll have to merge, right |
06:24.53 |
pacman87 |
? |
06:25.25 |
brlcad |
ah, you mean actually just dealing with svn
update merging, conflicts, etc? |
06:25.30 |
pacman87 |
yes |
06:25.34 |
brlcad |
ah, misunderstood |
06:25.41 |
brlcad |
though you were merging from a separate
copy |
06:25.51 |
pacman87 |
since i'm usually the only one working on my
files, i rarely have to deal with it |
06:26.00 |
pacman87 |
i think maybe three times so far |
06:26.04 |
brlcad |
ah |
06:26.11 |
pacman87 |
and most of those were oneliners |
06:26.12 |
brlcad |
shame that you can actually count the
times |
06:26.32 |
brlcad |
what's really cool is seeing a half dozen guys
all hit the same file simultaneously trying to get something done
fast |
06:26.41 |
pacman87 |
sounds scary |
06:26.56 |
brlcad |
you end up wanting to svn up faster than you
save |
06:27.18 |
brlcad |
really cool watching the file grow,
though |
06:27.37 |
pacman87 |
so long as everyone know what part they're
doing |
06:27.47 |
brlcad |
just wish it could be done live -- like with
shared emacs editing sessions very cool to watch code just grow
live in front of you |
06:27.58 |
brlcad |
two people editing the same line
simultaneously |
06:28.00 |
pacman87 |
that would be cool |
06:28.10 |
brlcad |
it works, it's just a pita to set up |
06:28.28 |
pacman87 |
use comments to discuss code |
06:28.34 |
brlcad |
subethaedit folks also have it working, but
for lan-only |
06:28.53 |
brlcad |
yeah, like google docs, but for code |
06:29.51 |
pacman87 |
really should be asleep, have
fun playing with/trying to break revolve |
06:29.56 |
brlcad |
now if someone made a module to eclipse for
that, I'd seriously revisit a switch .. something that keeps you
continuously up to date with live code updates (line by
line) |
06:30.01 |
brlcad |
hehe, k |
06:30.17 |
pacman87 |
too bad i can't distcc sleep |
06:30.35 |
pacman87 |
everyone else in the house is asleep, i'd be
perfect |
06:30.48 |
brlcad |
:) |
06:31.07 |
brlcad |
the answer to that is to wake everyone else
up, then go to bed |
06:31.37 |
brlcad |
yay, progress |
06:31.55 |
brlcad |
stdin has an exception pending in addition to
select saying it's ready for reading |
06:32.07 |
brlcad |
even though feof and ferror are
clear |
06:34.20 |
brlcad |
and NOW I run across a DDD snippet that does
exactly what I just implemented |
06:37.30 |
brlcad |
consults the stevens
bible |
07:12.38 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=elite01@unaffiliated/elite01) |
07:13.11 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r32128
10/brlcad/trunk/src/librt/primitives/revolve/revolve.c: restore the
other portion of the comment that I accidentally blew
away |
07:21.36 |
*** join/#brlcad d_rossberg
(n=rossberg@bz.bzflag.bz) |
07:26.43 |
*** join/#brlcad clock_
(n=clock@84-72-91-240.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
07:52.42 |
d_rossberg |
pacman87: i would recommend to initialize
"angle" in rt_revolve_shot before using it |
08:00.52 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03d_rossberg * r32129
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libged/CMakeLists.txt: some modifications to be
consistent with Makefile.am |
08:04.44 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r32130
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libged/CMakeLists.txt: presumably which.c, not
which |
08:06.54 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r32131
10/brlcad/trunk/src/mged/mged.c: (log message trimmed) |
08:06.54 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: significant change to mged's
initialization. instead of using the (flawed) |
08:06.54 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: approach of using isatty() to
determine if we're interactive, make interactive |
08:06.54 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: the default mode and find a reason to
not be interactive. this is done by |
08:06.54 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: checking for command-mode args or
redirected standard input. the latter one in |
08:06.57 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: particular was tricky given some
means to invoke the application might leave the |
08:06.59 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: stdin read fd set even though there
may be no data. this was specifically |
08:09.55 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r32132
10/brlcad/trunk/NEWS: |
08:09.55 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: make it possible to have mged invoked
without needing a controlling terminal |
08:09.55 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: (e.g. as an icon or menu item). this
specifically supports sf bug report |
08:09.55 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 2019280 (mged incorrectly deduces
interactivity) from lode_leroy where he tried |
08:09.56 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: to create a linux mged.desktop icon.
was previously using a flawed approach |
08:09.58 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: that assumed being invoked from a
controlling terminal. |
08:24.24 |
*** join/#brlcad Axman6
(n=Axman6@pdpc/supporter/student/Axman6) |
08:24.49 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r32133
10/brlcad/trunk/TODO: |
08:24.49 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: bu_log() and friends use %S for
bu_vls structures. this was |
08:24.49 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: implemented long before libc decided
to use it as an alias for %ls to |
08:24.49 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: support wchar_t strings. we should
migrate to something else unused |
08:24.49 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: (like %V). somewhat non-trivial
effort to deprecate and update even |
08:24.50 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: our own uses safely. |
08:26.30 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r32134
10/brlcad/trunk/src/mged/mged.c: minor cleanup. quell warnings, add
some headers. |
08:43.50 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r32135
10/brlcad/trunk/misc/win32-msvc/CMakeLists.txt: |
08:43.50 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: stab in the dark. add the entire
include directory to the run-time library |
08:43.50 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: package so that folks can compile
against the libraries. this was requested by |
08:43.50 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: tom browder (ajem) in sf feature
request 2019346 (Run-time Library Packaging). |
08:51.22 |
d_rossberg |
if it would be so easy i would have already
done it |
08:51.28 |
d_rossberg |
;) |
08:52.04 |
*** join/#brlcad mafm
(n=mafm@elnet-111.lip.pt) |
09:02.38 |
mafm |
hey |
09:06.37 |
Ralith |
hey mafm |
09:06.41 |
Ralith |
got g3d working :] |
09:07.00 |
Ralith |
had fun rotating your
occluded wireframe |
09:07.15 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r32136 10/brlcad/trunk/ (5
files in 4 dirs): deprecate the duplicitous '-n' (not-new) option
to mged. use -c console/classic/command option instead. |
09:07.17 |
mafm |
yup, I saw it |
09:07.21 |
mafm |
congrats :) |
09:07.41 |
Ralith |
although either your 'zoom' actually moves the
camera around or your near clipping plane is set
unreasonably |
09:07.49 |
Ralith |
cuz the example object dissapears after very
little zooming in |
09:08.33 |
mafm |
I don't set the near clipping plane, so it
must be ogre defaults |
09:08.42 |
Ralith |
(also, random though -- perhaps you could
optionally render places where the near clipping plane intersects
with an object as a specially colored surface?) |
09:08.47 |
mafm |
but the zoom actually moves the camera,
yes |
09:09.12 |
Ralith |
mightn't literally zooming in be
preferable? |
09:09.32 |
Ralith |
alternatively, consider logarythmic
progression of zoom towards/away from the point on which the camera
is centered. |
09:11.25 |
mafm |
I only discovered the zooming (by modifying
size of window camera) yesterday, so the rest is implemented with
distances |
09:11.44 |
Ralith |
but what're your thoughts on the Correct
Way? |
09:11.57 |
Ralith |
btw, I'm happy to try implementing this
myself, if you like |
09:13.30 |
mafm |
dunno what's the correct way, I'm still
fighting to implement some of the MGED's functionalities |
09:14.27 |
mafm |
and trying to mimic them (Blender and MGED),
althought the numeric approaches -zoom increments and so on- might
not be always the more adequate |
09:14.50 |
mafm |
so maybe things like log() are more adequate,
who knows |
09:14.55 |
Ralith |
I think both zoom and camera movement should
probably be supported |
09:15.07 |
Ralith |
though I'm not sure how to do so
elegantly |
09:15.44 |
Ralith |
for orthographic views it doesn't matter much,
but once we start mapping g3d camera -> render config, this
might become important |
09:16.37 |
Ralith |
I've got to go for the night -- if you've got
any thoughts, including things that I could work on now that I've
got commit access, I'd be interested to hear them in
email. |
09:17.33 |
mafm |
ok |
09:17.51 |
mafm |
the thing is that I'm still fighting my way to
finish some of the milestones for gsoc |
09:18.12 |
mafm |
I don't know if your work in some of the areas
would be considered interfering or not |
09:18.24 |
mafm |
probably not from brlcad's (the person) point
of view |
09:18.32 |
Ralith |
sean mentioned that collaboration was
encouraged by gsoc |
09:18.42 |
Ralith |
I'm not sure of the specifics |
09:19.06 |
mafm |
you have my plans in the wiki page |
09:19.11 |
Ralith |
but I'm eager to work on whatever I can
there. |
09:19.27 |
Ralith |
specifics insofar as the difference between
collaboration and interference. |
09:19.27 |
mafm |
I'm now trying to make a widget from rbgui,
mged mode needs to be finished |
09:19.50 |
Ralith |
I'm hesitant to pick work items off your TODO
list for that reason |
09:19.58 |
mafm |
also Sean wants me to make a binary
release |
09:20.09 |
Ralith |
tweaks and elaborations on what's already
there are another matter |
09:20.18 |
Ralith |
anyway |
09:20.19 |
mafm |
and another thing that I can't remember at the
moment |
09:20.22 |
Ralith |
we can discuss this more later |
09:20.24 |
Ralith |
gtg |
09:20.27 |
Ralith |
good luck |
09:20.31 |
mafm |
okay, g'night! |
09:20.33 |
mafm |
:) |
09:34.19 |
*** join/#brlcad archivist_ub
(n=archivis@host81-149-119-172.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
09:44.57 |
*** join/#brlcad Elperion
(n=Bary@p5B14F60E.dip.t-dialin.net) |
10:53.23 |
*** join/#brlcad archivist_emc
(n=archivis@host81-149-119-172.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
11:49.56 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=elite01@unaffiliated/elite01) |
12:58.15 |
yukonbob |
morning, cadheads |
12:59.55 |
brlcad |
howdy yukonbob |
13:00.14 |
brlcad |
ponders taking a nap or
heading in |
13:01.44 |
yukonbob |
gets ready to head to
work... |
13:03.48 |
yukonbob |
...and heads out. |
13:04.10 |
yukonbob |
bbl. Hope everybody has a good
day... |
13:07.35 |
brlcad |
likewise! |
13:11.07 |
brlcad |
mafm: absolutely, you should put him to work
given he's interested (and capable) |
13:11.44 |
brlcad |
it's all about grooming new devs, not reaching
some end-of-summer project goal |
13:13.23 |
brlcad |
there's nothing he could do that will
negatively reflect on you no matter how much you collaborate (nor
what he screws up) |
13:14.16 |
brlcad |
ideally if this wasn't such a busy summer, all
the devs would have been heavily coordinating with other devs on
their projects throughout |
13:34.59 |
*** join/#brlcad thing0
(n=ric@123.208.126.249) |
13:52.55 |
starseeker |
brlcad: Is there any way to run filemerge on
OSX from the command line, supplying the two files as
arguments? |
13:53.51 |
brlcad |
dunno |
13:53.52 |
brlcad |
probably |
13:54.00 |
brlcad |
run the binary directly |
13:54.54 |
brlcad |
tries |
13:55.39 |
brlcad |
doesn't look like it |
13:55.57 |
brlcad |
would have to script it via
applescript |
13:58.23 |
starseeker |
ick |
13:58.33 |
starseeker |
likes xxdiff |
14:00.20 |
*** join/#brlcad elmom
(n=elmom@hoasnet-ff04dd00-187.dhcp.inet.fi) |
14:01.32 |
starseeker |
brlcad: ah - does opendiff work? |
14:02.08 |
starseeker |
reads man page on web and is
hopeful |
14:02.23 |
starseeker |
that would increase the utility of FileMerge
considerably |
14:02.32 |
starseeker |
OK, time to get in there |
14:13.49 |
starseeker |
note to self - check this out: http://ssel.vub.ac.be/ssel/internal:fmdiff |
14:24.58 |
brlcad |
ah yeah, opendiff does it |
14:25.57 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03d_rossberg * r32137
10/brlcad/trunk/misc/win32-msvc/CMakeLists.txt: undo previous
change, it breaks the CMake build (add_subdirectory has to point to
a directory containing a CMakeLists.txt file) and has no effect on
the *_devel package |
14:26.26 |
brlcad |
oopses |
14:26.36 |
brlcad |
blind stab ftl |
14:29.18 |
d_rossberg |
commented your commit here in
the irc |
14:30.01 |
d_rossberg |
i've created a package which includes the
header files |
14:32.21 |
brlcad |
yeah, I read it .. but didn't imply that it
was a totally failed attempt :) |
14:32.52 |
brlcad |
took it as "incomplete", was
just busy processing to comment at the time |
15:02.45 |
andrecastelo |
good morning all |
15:03.15 |
pacman87 |
morning, andrecastelo |
15:03.50 |
andrecastelo |
i've been looking at the light sources
creation, using light_maker(), in sh_light.c and it doesn't set a
specific position for the light |
15:04.15 |
andrecastelo |
makes sense, since default light rays give the
impression of being parallel.. |
15:04.30 |
andrecastelo |
it does, however, set up the direction of the
light |
15:04.56 |
andrecastelo |
is it safe to make the secondary rays point in
the opposite direction? |
15:06.21 |
andrecastelo |
when the light list is not empty, I get the
first element position though |
15:11.52 |
pacman87 |
secondary rays for shadows? |
15:15.54 |
andrecastelo |
yes |
15:16.04 |
andrecastelo |
the ones that i shoot after the first
hit |
15:20.23 |
pacman87 |
then yes, the secondary rays would point
opposite to the light direction |
15:20.35 |
pacman87 |
the question now is 'how far away is the light
source'? |
15:24.25 |
andrecastelo |
why? i think that at the moment it doesn't
matter |
15:25.29 |
pacman87 |
i guess you could assume the light source is
infinately far away |
15:26.23 |
pacman87 |
you need distance to the light in order to
determine whether the first intersection of your secondary ray is
before or after you get to the light source |
15:30.09 |
andrecastelo |
hmm.. true |
15:30.55 |
pacman87 |
though for default illumination, putting it at
infinity is probably fine |
15:48.52 |
mafm |
brlcad: so he can chime in and work on
*anything*? |
16:04.00 |
*** join/#brlcad clock_
(n=clock@77-56-91-54.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
16:04.37 |
pacman87 |
primitives/arb8/arb8.c:1771: error:
conflicting types for 'rt_arb_calc_planes' |
16:41.26 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r32138
10/brlcad/trunk/src/mged/mged.c: Minor mods to get things
compiling. :-) |
16:58.36 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r32139 10/brlcad/trunk/
(19 files in 4 dirs): Convert more dg_obj commands for use by
libged (i.e. rtcheck, rtabort, importFg4Section and
vdraw. |
17:58.56 |
*** join/#brlcad docelic
(n=docelic@78.134.192.19) |
18:31.28 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03davidloman * r32140
10/rt^3/trunk/src/geometryService/: |
18:35.51 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03davidloman * r32141
10/rt^3/trunk/src/geometryService/cpp/: |
18:36.28 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03davidloman * r32142
10/rt^3/trunk/src/geometryService/java/: |
18:37.45 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03davidloman * r32143
10/rt^3/trunk/src/geometryService/java/stractNet/: |
18:37.58 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r32144
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libged/title.c: Fixed typo. |
18:38.08 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03davidloman * r32145
10/rt^3/trunk/src/geometryService/java/stractThread/: |
18:42.29 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03davidloman * r32146
10/rt^3/trunk/src/geometryService/cpp/stractNet/: |
18:58.46 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r32147
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libged/tol.c: Mods to allow getting individual
tolerance settings. |
19:00.48 |
*** join/#brlcad Ralith
(n=ralith@216.162.199.202) |
19:05.31 |
mafm |
hi Ralith |
19:05.51 |
mafm |
I was about to write you, but basically: you
can work on anything you want |
19:07.54 |
*** join/#brlcad paroneayea
(n=user@fsf/member/paroneayea) |
19:08.11 |
mafm |
Ralith: preferably if it's not something in
what I'm working on without agreement ;) you have the list of what
I do in the wiki |
19:09.27 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r32148
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libged/summary.c: Minor alteration of the error
message. |
19:09.55 |
Ralith |
mafm: so leave the stuff on the wiki
alone? |
19:10.43 |
mafm |
You can work in things like
platform/compilation support, if that pleases you |
19:11.00 |
mafm |
including to make releases, is one of the
things that Sean wanted to see |
19:11.47 |
mafm |
if you want to work with cameras as you
suggested before, I can also delegate, but it's something that I
was working on actively and some things are not finished yet (e.g.
some MGED constrained modes) |
19:12.30 |
mafm |
so I think that either you or me do it, but
not both at the same time (because I think that involves some
possible heavy refactoring/redesign) |
19:12.59 |
mafm |
now I'm trying to create a window to control
the camera, using some custom widgets |
19:13.15 |
mafm |
and the last remaining part is to start
showing real geometry, using libged |
19:14.33 |
mafm |
Ralith: http://brlcad.org/wiki/User:Mafm#To_finish_GSoC
(and the log, in the bottom, might be also interesting for
you) |
19:14.38 |
mafm |
I have to go now, see you! :) |
19:33.25 |
*** join/#brlcad andrecastelo
(n=chatzill@189.71.12.203) |
19:53.11 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r32149
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libged/showmats.c: Flesh out the showmats
command. |
19:54.15 |
*** join/#brlcad clock_
(n=clock@77-56-94-220.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
19:54.17 |
poolio |
stabs a tgc |
20:08.50 |
*** join/#brlcad Rigolo
(n=rigolo@cc14973-d.zwoll1.ov.home.nl) |
20:08.57 |
Rigolo |
good evening ... |
20:15.29 |
*** join/#brlcad saltan
(n=lievensa@d51530284.access.telenet.be) |
20:15.45 |
Rigolo |
good evening ... |
20:16.00 |
saltan |
evening all |
20:16.13 |
Rigolo |
well .. all ... |
20:16.29 |
Rigolo |
has been her now for a few
minutes .. and nobody talks :-) |
20:16.36 |
saltan |
evening some |
20:16.36 |
Rigolo |
untill you joined |
20:16.57 |
Rigolo |
saltan: can I ask you a BRL-CAD conversion
question? |
20:17.11 |
saltan |
please do but not an expert |
20:17.32 |
Rigolo |
knows noting about BRL-CAD
... so everybody in my is the expert |
20:17.45 |
Rigolo |
have you ever heard about the openmoko
project? |
20:18.05 |
jonored |
grins and
covets. |
20:18.22 |
saltan |
No, can't say that I have |
20:18.26 |
starseeker |
Rigolo: If you're asking about converting
their cad files to BRL-CAD, we can convert the IGES files - sort
of |
20:18.42 |
Rigolo |
starseeker: that was indeed my question ..
:-) |
20:19.15 |
Rigolo |
on their wiki they are looking for other
formats than what they currently have ... so i thought .. let's ask
here |
20:19.27 |
saltan |
is off to find openmoko on
the net |
20:19.54 |
Rigolo |
saltan: openmoko.org ... they are building a
complete "free" mobile phone |
20:20.27 |
Rigolo |
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Neo1973_case_schematics
that is where the CAD drawings for their phone can be
found |
20:20.29 |
starseeker |
http://brlcad.org/gallery/s/screenshots/iges-openmoko-conversion.png.html |
20:20.49 |
Rigolo |
see .. I should have googled some more
:-) |
20:21.28 |
jonored |
covets because he wants a
phone that'll actually let him compile and use SSH and gpsd, and
can be casemodded to survive being strapped to the outside of a
kayak... |
20:21.56 |
Rigolo |
jonored: well .. then openmoko is your friend
:-) |
20:22.06 |
Rigolo |
ssh and gpsd are standard on the new
freerunner |
20:22.56 |
Rigolo |
although still under development .... you can
make and receive calls, connect via sub to your desktop .. and then
ssh into your phone |
20:23.01 |
starseeker |
iges-g is the convertor used - I forget the
options |
20:23.13 |
starseeker |
so far i can only get the wireframe
though |
20:23.20 |
Rigolo |
it contains a agps device ... |
20:23.48 |
Rigolo |
starseeker: and the other formats .. like
those Pro/E files? |
20:24.40 |
starseeker |
Pro/E - not on its own, no |
20:25.11 |
starseeker |
needs other (commercial) libraries |
20:25.34 |
jonored |
I'd expect them to be - unfortunately, family
plan with sister where only verizon has coverage for two years. And
I've been curious whether it's actually got more computing power
than my current laptop (CF-27, 300mhz PII..) - and ssh and phone (X
perhaps) are all I need anyways :) |
20:25.36 |
starseeker |
Pro/E formats aren't documented anywhere that
I'm aware of, so importing them directly is a tough
problem |
20:25.42 |
Rigolo |
starseeker: okee ..because the wikipedia says
it can import them ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_CAD_software |
20:26.21 |
*** join/#brlcad Elperion
(n=Bary@p5B14F60E.dip.t-dialin.net) |
20:26.27 |
starseeker |
Rigolo: You might ask brlcad about that, when
he shows up |
20:27.21 |
Rigolo |
jonored: X is also on there .. it has a VGA
touchscreen display (640x480 2.8") |
20:27.27 |
jonored |
Rigolo: I think the restriction is something
loosely on the order of requiring a copy of Pro-E to do conversions
with it's format. |
20:28.22 |
Rigolo |
jonored: okee ... so if the people that made
these drawings (apparently using Pro/E) install BRL-CAD .. they
could do it them selfs? |
20:28.28 |
jonored |
is aware. He's aware of the
device, just stuck not having a service he can run it on for a
couple years, and so hasn't ordered one already. |
20:28.56 |
Rigolo |
has one right here .. to the
left ... GSM is eveywhere here in .nl |
20:29.13 |
Rigolo |
well ... you could start with the gps bits
:-) |
20:29.21 |
Rigolo |
and start using the phone later :-) |
20:29.46 |
jonored |
Rigolo: For that I'm not sure - I was more
justifying the listing of being able to convert, as it's as
possible as it's reasonable to make it. |
20:30.58 |
Rigolo |
jonored: okee ... well ... I might update the
openmoko wiki page and point to BRL-CAD as at least an opensource
free software applicaiton that can do something with the CAD
files |
20:31.50 |
Ralith |
Rigolo: does the latest model support
3G? |
20:32.01 |
Ralith |
starseeker: 'sort of' import IGES? |
20:32.03 |
Rigolo |
jonored: and ... within 2 years you must be
able to design a nice casing for the freerunner |
20:32.10 |
jonored |
There's also the part where it's on the list
after college expenses and a reprap :) - and GSM is, unfortunately,
not available in the north end of Vermont - hence the sister
needing verizon. |
20:32.20 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: no, only GSM with GPRS at the
moment |
20:32.33 |
Rigolo |
but is has wifi |
20:32.35 |
Ralith |
Rigolo: call me when they've got 3G, then I
want one. |
20:32.38 |
Ralith |
wifi drains battery life like no
other. |
20:32.39 |
starseeker |
Ralith: It doesn't quite get you what you're
probably expecting - it's not something (so far) that I can
raytrace, for example |
20:32.53 |
Ralith |
starseeker: that doesn't sound like a very
useful import |
20:33.21 |
Ralith |
it seems silly for me to ask you this, but did
you try creating regions of the parts manually? |
20:33.39 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: no idea when that happens ... it is
hard to get a "open" 3G chipset at the moment ... and that is not
to expensive |
20:33.45 |
starseeker |
no, I was just testing the direct
conversion |
20:34.02 |
Ralith |
Rigolo: unless the openmoko becomes incredibly
cheap, I don't really care about the 'why' |
20:34.14 |
starseeker |
I rather expect we'll need robust BREP support
before we can really handle openmoko importing "properly" |
20:34.17 |
Ralith |
I mean, it sounds like the perfect phone in
all other respect |
20:34.18 |
Ralith |
s |
20:34.24 |
starseeker |
again, brlcad is the real expert
here |
20:34.33 |
Ralith |
but I might as well wait for a proper
commercial android phone |
20:35.02 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: even on androids you can not get to
the real low level .. like with the openmoko phones |
20:35.18 |
Ralith |
Rigolo: they're linux. What's stopping
me? |
20:35.56 |
Ralith |
jonored: by the way, did you start out here
and go to reprap or vis versa? I can't work out where you
originated >:| |
20:36.08 |
jonored |
Ralith: Possibly no root, binary kernel
modules with tight lockdowns... |
20:36.11 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: start reading about android .... as
far as I can tell .. they use a linux framework, but you can not
"escape" from the android enviroment .. but I might be
wrong |
20:36.36 |
Ralith |
jonored: that sounds kinda ghey |
20:36.48 |
Ralith |
Rigolo: you can escape from any environment
when you own the hardware |
20:37.35 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: well, but if you can do anything with
it .. that is an other question |
20:38.44 |
jonored |
Ralith: I've been watching the reprap since it
was meccano and hot glue guns (and trying a little to get going
doing useful things), and looking at BRL-CAD (and playing with it a
little) since it hit slashdot... and just started using IRC, so hit
the channels :) |
20:38.47 |
Ralith |
it'd be ludicrous if they didn't give you
root |
20:38.50 |
Ralith |
even the iphone gives you root |
20:38.58 |
Ralith |
jonored: oh, neat! |
20:39.01 |
Ralith |
a kindred spirit :> |
20:39.08 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: .... software installed by end-users
must be written in Java, and will not have access to lower level
device APIs ... |
20:39.17 |
Ralith |
Rigolo: that sounds like BS to me |
20:39.18 |
Rigolo |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Android#Criticism |
20:39.35 |
Ralith |
wikipedia is not my idea of a reliable source
:P |
20:39.54 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: and the iphone does not give you real
root .... you can not run anything on the iPhone when it is not
signed by apple |
20:40.56 |
Rigolo |
http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/why-free-software-and-apples-iphone-dont-mix
.. read this then :-) |
20:41.45 |
Ralith |
Rigolo: people do it all the time; it's called
hacking it :P |
20:41.50 |
Rigolo |
but ... this channel is about BRL-CAD .. not
iphones and the pro and cons of free software :-) |
20:42.04 |
Ralith |
in practice I don't care if something's locked
down if it's a straightforward hack |
20:42.04 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: well .. .the iPhone linux guys are
still strugling ... |
20:42.15 |
Ralith |
iphones are already unixy enough for
me |
20:42.26 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: okee |
20:43.02 |
jonored |
The openmoko thing is a bit like the differene
between having a tivo that's built on linux and hacking into it and
having a gentoo box running a media app... |
20:43.02 |
Ralith |
I'm more interested in just where you got the
idea that andriod would only support java for third party
stuff |
20:43.38 |
Ralith |
jonored: to me, that says "openmoko probably
won't work, but at least it'll take all week to set up." |
20:43.52 |
Rigolo |
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/02/google_android_developers_view/ |
20:44.19 |
Rigolo |
and openmoko at the moment works for basic
things like calls and sms .. |
20:44.29 |
starseeker |
uses and likes
Gentoo |
20:45.03 |
Rigolo |
openmoko is build using the openembedded
framework ... |
20:45.31 |
Ralith |
Rigolo: that says quite clearly that *all*
apps run on a VM, not that java is used |
20:45.46 |
jonored |
is quite pleased with his
Gentoo machine; it's the one that lives on his back in the
CF-27. |
20:45.58 |
Rigolo |
and just like with any linux device .. there
are multiple "distributions" already .. so you can choose what you
like .. but don't expect the iphone user experiance just
yet |
20:46.36 |
Ralith |
Rigolo: I don't mind a unpolished GUI. Ever
used windows mobile? |
20:46.47 |
Ralith |
You wouldn't believe how horrible their GUI
is. |
20:46.48 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/110/ |
20:47.03 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: that is why I never user
WinMob |
20:47.32 |
Ralith |
What I want is mobile high speed internets in
a pocketable form, and with a sufficiently unixy system that I can
do fun things like set it up as a wifi access point |
20:48.16 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: well .. that last bit kills the moko
for your completly .. their wifi chips do not allow AP
functionality .. only client |
20:48.33 |
Ralith |
that can be prevented in hardware? |
20:48.38 |
Rigolo |
but don't expect an android phone to do that
either |
20:48.41 |
Ralith |
that sucks |
20:48.43 |
Ralith |
but it was only an example |
20:48.46 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: yes |
20:48.50 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: oke :-) |
20:49.02 |
Ralith |
Rigolo: that agains says that java is not
used, and the former article implies that the VM is language
independent |
20:49.08 |
Ralith |
really |
20:49.17 |
Ralith |
so long as I can make the thing route traffic
from outside sources |
20:49.20 |
Ralith |
I don't mind having to wire it up |
20:49.37 |
starseeker |
Ah, no wonder they hyp primitive got sucked
into the reorg - it was there in 7.12.4 |
20:49.38 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: android apps are writen in java .. and
then compiles to a google owned VM enviroment |
20:49.38 |
Ralith |
Rigolo: can it do USB host? |
20:50.03 |
Ralith |
starseeker: despite being considered
incomplete? |
20:50.05 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: openmoko can do both ... but usb 1.1
on this version |
20:50.21 |
Ralith |
so long as it can be a host |
20:50.24 |
jonored |
Ralith: Being an AP requires capabilities that
aren't required for being a client - it's not really surprising
that they wouldn't neccessarily include it in a chipset. |
20:50.36 |
Ralith |
jonored: I wasn't sure how much is done in
hardware. |
20:50.48 |
starseeker |
Ralith: it happens sometimes - 7-12-4 was a
tag, it might have been removed from the tarball |
20:51.11 |
Ralith |
if openmoko can be a USB host, that probably
means I could wire up a USB wifi stick that *does* have AP
support |
20:51.19 |
Ralith |
even if it's unpowered host, it's not too hard
to stick a battery inline |
20:51.41 |
jonored |
Ralith: Depends on the chipset, I
think. |
20:51.43 |
Ralith |
then, instant mobile wireless internet for
anyone in my vicinity :> |
20:51.46 |
Ralith |
jonored: huh? |
20:51.52 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: yes ... that should work ... |
20:52.05 |
Ralith |
awesomeness. |
20:52.15 |
Ralith |
still needs to have 3G before I spend >$100
on one though |
20:52.16 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: but I already did that with a 50 Euro
ASUS wifi router and a UMTS usb card .. |
20:52.37 |
Ralith |
can you make/receive phone calls with that
router? :P |
20:52.50 |
Rigolo |
connected a complete computer
retails shop like that for over 30 days |
20:52.51 |
Ralith |
one cellular subscription is enough,
ty |
20:53.03 |
Ralith |
although |
20:53.12 |
Ralith |
do you know where I could get a USB HSDPA card
for not-hugely-expensive? |
20:53.25 |
Ralith |
with north american frequency
support |
20:53.50 |
Rigolo |
not straight away .... got mine via my
provider .. with a 2 year unlimited data only plan ... |
20:54.15 |
Rigolo |
and cancelled that after 30 days .. (and got
money back ..minus one month subscription fee) |
20:54.56 |
Ralith |
US cell phone providers are nowhere near as
kind |
20:55.05 |
Ralith |
$200+ cancellation fees |
20:55.13 |
Ralith |
shitty hardware-with-contract deals |
20:55.17 |
Rigolo |
well .. it helped that we had 200 other
subscriptions with them :-) |
20:55.24 |
Ralith |
heh |
20:55.50 |
Rigolo |
and .. they were also our DSL provider that
scrwed up with installing DSL at a new shop :-) |
20:55.55 |
Ralith |
has a PCMCIA HSDPA card, but
his new laptop only has an express card slot
>:| |
20:56.24 |
Rigolo |
Ralith: there must be express cards with HSDPA
out there .. or not? |
20:57.53 |
jonored |
Ralith: If there are USB ones, then there
should be express card ones - same design, just a different
connector - USB is one of the lines going to that slot. |
20:59.29 |
Ralith |
there are plenty, they're just all very
expensive |
20:59.46 |
Ralith |
$200+ for what I've seen |
20:59.57 |
Ralith |
cellular tech is very price-raped :( |
21:00.06 |
jonored |
Ah, okay. |
21:00.38 |
Ralith |
whereas my PCMCIA card was about $70 on
ebay |
21:02.49 |
saltan |
is off now and thanks for
fascinating banter |
21:04.16 |
Rigolo |
and Rigolo is also going .. thanks for the
update on BRL-CAD and openmoko CAD files :-) |
21:08.15 |
*** part/#brlcad Rigolo
(n=rigolo@cc14973-d.zwoll1.ov.home.nl) |
21:09.37 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03homovulgaris * r32150
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libpc/ (9 files): detemplating the PCSet class.
Using a list of VariableAbstract* rather than Variable<T> to
hold the set of Variables. noticing valgrind memory leak of 160
bytes : due to pc_pc_set macros/functions |
21:12.19 |
Ralith |
so poolio's working on the code to generate an
accurate set of surfaces from an arbitrary region is poolio's WIP,
right? Anyone feel able to quantify the state of that
project? |
21:37.33 |
*** join/#brlcad Elperion
(n=Bary@p5B14F60E.dip.t-dialin.net) |
21:55.50 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r32151
10/brlcad/branches/pre-7-12-6/current_successful_compile_rev.txt:
builds ok to this point with the one exception noted. |
22:12.21 |
*** join/#brlcad poolio
(n=poolio@bz.bzflag.bz) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
22:12.49 |
*** join/#brlcad
MinuteElectron
(n=MinuteEl@silentflame/member/pdpc.base.minuteelectron) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
22:13.26 |
*** join/#brlcad starseeker
(n=starseek@bz.bzflag.bz) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
22:32.51 |
*** join/#brlcad Elperion
(n=Bary@p5B14F60E.dip.t-dialin.net) |
22:46.26 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03homovulgaris * r32152
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libpc/ (pcPCSet.cpp pcPCSet.h): forward
declaration of Constraint Class and definition of getVariableID
function so as to support usage of PCSet methods by the constraint
object |
22:49.22 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03homovulgaris * r32153
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libpc/ (pcConstraint.cpp pcConstraint.h
solver_test.cpp): specifying PCSet reference in the constraint
object and corresponding modification in the constructors |
23:05.16 |
CIA-23 |
BRL-CAD: 03andrecastelo * r32154
10/brlcad/trunk/misc/win32-msvc9/libged/libged.vcproj: Added
several missing files to the msvc9 build. |
23:09.32 |
*** join/#brlcad andrecastelo_
(n=chatzill@189.71.31.114) |
23:30.31 |
*** join/#brlcad Elperion
(n=Bary@p5B14F60E.dip.t-dialin.net) |
23:50.53 |
*** join/#brlcad
andrecastelo__ (n=chatzill@189.71.78.186) |