01:02.44 |
starseeker |
brlcad: what were you worried about with the
merging of the NEWS file from the 7.12.6 branch? |
01:06.43 |
starseeker |
nevermind, I see |
01:17.46 |
Twingy |
heh |
01:47.01 |
brlcad |
pokes in |
01:47.23 |
brlcad |
starseeker: there are options to pull only
open, only closed, only closed with N days (that's what I usually
use) |
01:47.33 |
brlcad |
er, open and closed within N days |
01:48.23 |
starseeker |
OK, so anything that's appeared since the last
CCB, and anything that's been closed since then as well? |
01:48.24 |
brlcad |
and yeah, ``Erik is spot on about detail --
they wanted even more than what that report generates (e.g. needs
to include the entire discussion log) |
01:48.49 |
brlcad |
anything open (since it's still a
prioritization issue) and anything closed since last ccb |
01:49.03 |
starseeker |
ick. OK, anything open |
01:49.16 |
starseeker |
I can pull the discussion logs - it'll take
time though |
01:49.19 |
brlcad |
but he's also right in that there's usually
nowhere near enough time to go over everything .. it'd take all day
to do more than skim |
01:49.38 |
brlcad |
I wouldn't worry about it, I've yet to include
them |
01:49.50 |
brlcad |
unless you want to |
01:50.13 |
starseeker |
will see how his patience
holds out |
01:50.25 |
brlcad |
it would be a nice touch for someone that
cared, but that will take probably an hour to do manually and
probably a couple hours to properly script it |
01:50.27 |
starseeker |
What's the color code for formatting |
01:50.42 |
starseeker |
would just pull the highlight
discussions |
01:50.43 |
brlcad |
oh, hell, do you have the last one? |
01:50.49 |
starseeker |
somewhere |
01:51.02 |
brlcad |
could use that as a guide -- that was done
manually |
01:51.16 |
starseeker |
may not have survived the move - let me
see |
01:51.34 |
starseeker |
can make something up, what
with new head honcho and all... |
01:52.00 |
brlcad |
i usually highlight the high-priority ones,
sort based on artifact type followed by status (closed/open)
followed by priority .. or something like that |
01:52.20 |
brlcad |
usually alternating sections formatted so it's
easy to read, etc |
01:52.29 |
brlcad |
fitted to A4 |
01:52.34 |
starseeker |
A4? |
01:52.42 |
brlcad |
the big paper |
01:52.50 |
starseeker |
I know - where do we print it around
here? |
01:52.58 |
brlcad |
printer has it |
01:53.03 |
starseeker |
huh. OK |
01:53.07 |
brlcad |
photocopier too |
01:53.48 |
starseeker |
brlcad: I doubt I'll get through it tonight,
but I'll try to have something ready for you to check by Mon. or
Tues. next week |
01:54.24 |
starseeker |
what about the mailing list, if they want
discussions? |
01:55.05 |
brlcad |
just as a guide, I've usually spent no more
than a couple hours improving the scripts each time and a half hour
formatting |
01:55.25 |
starseeker |
scripts actually worked :-) |
01:55.31 |
brlcad |
kinda disgusting to spend more time preparing
for the meeting than the meeting itself lasts, so no worries
keeping it minimal |
01:55.34 |
brlcad |
great |
01:55.47 |
brlcad |
you see the html entities that need to be
replaced? |
01:55.54 |
starseeker |
yeah, I think I got em |
01:55.57 |
brlcad |
they're in the comments |
01:55.59 |
brlcad |
ah, ki |
01:56.10 |
starseeker |
vim global search and replace ftw |
01:56.26 |
brlcad |
don't include the mailing lists (or any of the
discussion channels) |
01:56.33 |
starseeker |
right |
01:56.38 |
brlcad |
that's not the ccb's business |
01:57.18 |
starseeker |
is bemused at the thought of
the ccb going over an IRC discussion of ``Erik toasting people in
forum based space wars |
01:58.21 |
brlcad |
the primary point of the meeting is to simply
review what has happened since the last review to 1) see what they
might impact users (analysts, modelers, developers), 2)
disseminate/share our changes so folks know about them, and 3) give
our users a forum to provide feedback/questions/concerns |
01:58.57 |
brlcad |
basically performing a peer review in a
semi-open forum |
01:59.14 |
starseeker |
brlcad: heh. OK. I made the mistake of
reading that CCB document Ed has defining the purpose of the
CCB |
01:59.47 |
brlcad |
there has been argument over that in the past,
it's not actually right |
02:00.05 |
brlcad |
it started modeled after a different code that
has an entirely different process |
02:00.23 |
brlcad |
orca's document is actually closer |
02:00.33 |
brlcad |
we need to formally publish an updated version
that is correct |
02:01.04 |
brlcad |
which basically amounts to the HACKING file
with details about how things pertain to ARL |
02:01.52 |
brlcad |
the controlling authority and "change
approval" as presently worded is bogus |
02:01.59 |
starseeker |
I think Ed would feel better if we had a new
one :-) |
02:05.00 |
brlcad |
the biggest issue is that it's all overhead (a
negative time sink) that could literally take months of time away
from development if not careful |
02:05.08 |
starseeker |
nods |
02:05.10 |
brlcad |
it's like the scripts -- they could easily
turn into a nice/fancy tool |
02:05.24 |
brlcad |
but ultimately, they're a negative on
development .. even from a communication perspective |
02:05.43 |
starseeker |
I'll be very interested to see how the new
boss works at the CCB - it should be instructive |
02:06.38 |
brlcad |
<PROTECTED> |
02:06.55 |
brlcad |
she'll want to emphasize how to better get the
word out |
02:07.13 |
brlcad |
since arl users often don't pay attention to
what we say, don't know what we do |
02:07.32 |
starseeker |
I think there'll be questions about how we set
our priorities too |
02:07.37 |
brlcad |
it's a mild chicken n' egg problem |
02:08.25 |
starseeker |
favors hauling them into the
library's meeting hall and showing off :-P |
02:09.04 |
brlcad |
I did that one year |
02:09.09 |
yukonbob |
waves in: "Hello,
cadheads" |
02:09.18 |
starseeker |
waste of time? |
02:09.20 |
brlcad |
a couple dozen showed up, somewhat waste of
time |
02:09.22 |
starseeker |
waves back |
02:09.27 |
starseeker |
nuts |
02:09.54 |
brlcad |
and took a fair bit of time to prepare,
negative time sink |
02:10.12 |
brlcad |
the real goal from our perspective is like
most open source projects -- the demand is WAY higher than
capacity |
02:10.25 |
brlcad |
it's all vaporware and talk until a product is
actually *released* |
02:11.01 |
starseeker |
nods. I would place a $10 bet
that some open source education will be needed |
02:11.14 |
brlcad |
so that really is our best communication means
-- getting the features out there sooner, fast/faster frequent
iterations, make noise accordingly |
02:11.44 |
brlcad |
not getting everyone's buy-in on what we're
going to do beforehand, not micromanaging how we do what we
do |
02:12.03 |
starseeker |
Dwayne came by just today and mentioned some
guys at LLNL (I think it was LLNL) were interested in building
models with BRL-CAD |
02:12.21 |
brlcad |
we talk plenty (here, on forums, on mailing
list, in person) -- it's more about actually "getting things
done" |
02:12.39 |
starseeker |
absolutely |
02:12.57 |
starseeker |
he was gonna send them tire.exe :-) |
02:13.05 |
brlcad |
cool |
02:13.20 |
starseeker |
forgot we don't have an exe
on sourceforge that has tire |
02:13.38 |
brlcad |
is it hooked into the windows build? |
02:13.56 |
starseeker |
It is now - that's actually a news item
somewhere |
02:14.06 |
starseeker |
Bob hooked in all the proc-db stuff,
IIRC |
02:14.18 |
brlcad |
ah, right |
02:28.52 |
starseeker |
brlcad: How do you sort this sucker? By date
of closure, then date opened for still open ones? keep the NEWS
items in the front for a quick overview? |
02:29.57 |
brlcad |
points up |
02:30.28 |
brlcad |
21:55 <@brlcad> i usually highlight the
high-priority ones, sort based on artifact type followed by status
(closed/open) followed by priority .. or something like
that |
02:30.31 |
brlcad |
21:56 <@brlcad> usually alternating
sections formatted so it's easy to read, etc |
02:30.37 |
starseeker |
what's "artifact type" mean? |
02:30.53 |
brlcad |
the type of line it is |
02:30.53 |
starseeker |
slaps self with wet noodle
for not reading log |
02:31.09 |
brlcad |
NEWS, bug, feature request, patch,
etc |
02:31.15 |
starseeker |
Gotcha |
02:31.19 |
brlcad |
there's a couple tricks to get it sorted
neatly |
02:31.28 |
brlcad |
want news first |
02:31.36 |
starseeker |
sub-section column based sorting? |
02:31.52 |
brlcad |
i think descending on that column actually
conveniently works out iirc |
02:32.04 |
starseeker |
Cool. |
02:32.07 |
brlcad |
no, the sorts work out globally |
02:32.23 |
brlcad |
you apply one rule-based filter set with two
or three sort rules |
02:32.51 |
brlcad |
might have used "category, priority, status"
last time |
02:33.18 |
brlcad |
careful to use the tracker ID number -- it
shows up initially as a string |
02:33.37 |
brlcad |
I usually select the columns and set their
data type where it matters |
02:33.55 |
brlcad |
so the dates are dates and not strings, so
they sort properly |
02:33.59 |
starseeker |
Ah. |
02:34.12 |
brlcad |
(if you wanted to sort by date, of
course) |
02:34.25 |
brlcad |
I forget exactly which sorting works out
best |
02:34.48 |
starseeker |
will figure it
out |
02:35.13 |
starseeker |
wonders if we can get Ed to
"run the show"... |
02:35.20 |
brlcad |
the point, though it to put the stuff done
most recent first, and then go back in time .. emphasizing news
then patches then closed bugs/feature requests/support, then
everything else |
02:35.47 |
brlcad |
nah, I'll probably still do it |
02:36.07 |
brlcad |
ed doesn't know what the items are, needs to
be a dev that can talk to most of the items |
02:36.15 |
starseeker |
nods |
02:36.33 |
starseeker |
is sorry he can't spare
brlcad having so much time eaten up... |
02:36.36 |
brlcad |
the information is incomplete, hard enough to
remember what some of them are in the moment |
02:36.56 |
brlcad |
it's a fixed point cost so long as we don't
promise to do more than absolutely necessary |
02:37.00 |
brlcad |
couple times a year is fine |
02:37.19 |
starseeker |
erm - should I take out the patches to rt^3
stuff? |
02:37.22 |
brlcad |
it's if we get signed up for it to be an even
bigger negative time sync |
02:37.37 |
brlcad |
were they tracker items? |
02:37.44 |
starseeker |
yeah |
02:37.46 |
brlcad |
sure |
02:38.05 |
brlcad |
it's a talking point showing open source
contributions |
02:38.15 |
starseeker |
so leave em in? |
02:38.23 |
brlcad |
yeah |
02:38.28 |
starseeker |
cool |
02:39.08 |
brlcad |
in the past, I've actually gone over each item
and labelled whether they are an "open source contribution" or not
.. but that does usually take another hour or so |
02:39.24 |
brlcad |
I'd only do that if we run into a
problem |
02:40.39 |
brlcad |
requires a bit of pontificating on the news
items as to whether the change was done "on the clock" or off it
for those of us that dip into the open source hobby time |
02:40.50 |
starseeker |
nods |
02:41.06 |
starseeker |
rather not dig into that one, personally -
gets too confusing :-) |
02:41.32 |
*** join/#brlcad zolcos
(n=zolcos@aeheathe.resnet.mtu.edu) |
02:43.05 |
brlcad |
yeah, it's only if the bean counters need (or
strongly want) the beans .. and it'll actually pay off and not just
be a counting exercise |
02:43.25 |
brlcad |
with W, it actually helped get the point
across and the numbers still help to this day |
02:43.36 |
brlcad |
I just pulled stats for her last week, though
the entire past year |
02:43.39 |
brlcad |
very interesting |
02:43.49 |
starseeker |
heh |
02:44.00 |
starseeker |
you mean your personal on/off clock? |
02:44.04 |
brlcad |
going to send a news announcement out, but
basically about 6 staff years of contributed time this past
year |
02:44.11 |
starseeker |
wow |
02:44.23 |
brlcad |
level of open source contributions is the
meter usually, as well as overall activity |
02:45.04 |
brlcad |
70 distinct "features" contributed as open
source |
02:45.13 |
brlcad |
(out of about 175 total) |
02:45.26 |
brlcad |
280 mailing lists posts :) |
02:45.39 |
brlcad |
(not including brlcad-commits or
brlcad-tracker) |
02:45.46 |
starseeker |
surprised W is still tracking the
numbers |
02:46.18 |
brlcad |
about 220,000 measured downloads, which is an
increase of 20% over last y ear |
02:46.27 |
starseeker |
eeep |
02:47.20 |
brlcad |
the one negative mark, though .. our average
age of a tracker item increased from 484 days to 517 days by the
end of the year (turn-around time) |
02:47.34 |
brlcad |
which means there are still more support
requests coming in than are being handled |
02:48.03 |
starseeker |
must work
faster |
02:48.08 |
brlcad |
:) |
02:48.15 |
brlcad |
cracks a whip on
richard |
02:49.25 |
brlcad |
interestingly, 110 new tracker items (bugs,
patches, support, feature requests) came in and 128 were
closed |
02:50.23 |
brlcad |
28/18 for open/closed on feature requests; 7/9
for support; 28/26 for patches; and 46/75 for bugs |
02:50.36 |
brlcad |
the first is bad, the last is great |
02:51.05 |
starseeker |
to be fair, some of those feature requests are
virtually meta-feature requests |
02:52.27 |
brlcad |
that contributed manpower estimate is the most
impressive -- it's not far from being on par with arl funding
capacity, probably will exceed it as the community continues to
grow |
02:53.23 |
starseeker |
that's a pretty compelling stat |
02:53.28 |
brlcad |
gives it two years .. right
about the time that the new interface is ready for production use
to replace mged |
02:56.05 |
brlcad |
thinks the portage ebuild
needs a kick |
02:56.22 |
starseeker |
needs a friggin sledgehammer |
02:56.44 |
brlcad |
someone just posted an mged failure to find tk
.. probably just a build setting |
02:58.34 |
starseeker |
is sure he'll probably have
to manually insert a few items into this thing before the CCB - but
it's nice to have it more or less "ready to go" ahead of
time |
02:59.07 |
starseeker |
is still convinced the only
way to get a proper BRL-CAD ebuild into portage is to become a
gentoo dev |
02:59.39 |
brlcad |
the important one to review are the
comments/description on the news items since that's where the time
is focused |
03:00.09 |
brlcad |
usually have to add a few commments, say how
it relates to arl if it specifically impacts |
03:00.35 |
starseeker |
nods |
03:02.22 |
zolcos |
Hello. I'm with the acoustic project, I have a
question-- |
03:02.43 |
zolcos |
the team has discovered how to fire rays,
calculate distances, attenuation, and so on, but when we go to add
the first usable feature (that is, point query), what interface
options do we have? |
03:02.51 |
brlcad |
howdy zolcos |
03:03.22 |
brlcad |
zolcos: you mean for displaying results of a
calculation? |
03:03.49 |
zolcos |
Yes, and for initiating a
calculation. |
03:03.52 |
brlcad |
what sort of data/interface are you wanting to
present? |
03:04.37 |
zolcos |
The point query would just take in a x,y,z and
output a single decibel level |
03:04.43 |
starseeker |
yick - 28 pages |
03:04.48 |
brlcad |
initiating a calculation sounds like just a
command, button, or menu item |
03:07.35 |
zolcos |
That sounds right. How can I add new
commands? |
03:07.52 |
Ralith |
zolcos: acoustic project? |
03:07.54 |
brlcad |
zolcos: if you want the user to interact with
a 3D interface, you can hook into mged pretty easily -- our "nirt"
command does almost exactly what it sounds like you're doing where
(in mged) the user can either type "nirt" on the command line to
get a queried result based on the view center, or they can click in
the 3D view and get an interactive query along that ray |
03:09.14 |
brlcad |
zolcos: you can either hook in at compile-time
(via C, which could let you embed practically any other scripting
layer) or at run-time (via tcl, just a text file that is
loaded) |
03:09.28 |
brlcad |
the simplest/fastest is going to be the
latter |
03:09.37 |
brlcad |
the prior has a lot more power and integration
options |
03:10.02 |
Ralith |
brlcad: might not be the simplest/fastest if
they're not familiar with tcl and/or have to hook it into some
existing codebase |
03:10.35 |
brlcad |
well yes, tcl knowledge is a prerequisite for
the latter, though tcl scripting is pretty trivial -- sorta like
php |
03:11.03 |
brlcad |
and you could even write a simple tcl proc
that loads a compiled tcl extension (written in compiled language
of choice) |
03:12.47 |
starseeker |
brlcad: OK, think I got it |
03:13.15 |
starseeker |
(sans going through news comments) |
03:13.27 |
brlcad |
for what you guys are doing, since you have a
C proggie that hooks into the brl-cad libs, I'd think a tcl proc
would be the way to go and just have it exec your binary as a
command-line command |
03:13.50 |
starseeker |
heads home - I'll probably
have to leave sometime around 3pm tomorrow brlcad, just
fyi |
03:15.00 |
zolcos |
I'm not sure I follow -- we don't actually
have any code written yet, so our options are still completely
open |
03:16.37 |
Ralith |
zolcos: brlcad has described options for
adding your functionality to the mged interface |
03:19.20 |
brlcad |
zolcos: then what did you mean when you said
you figured out how to fire rays, calculate distances, etc?
:) |
03:20.34 |
brlcad |
you can actually script brl-cad in pretty much
any language by exec'ing nirt or one of the other tracers to query
rays |
03:21.02 |
zolcos |
Ah, that. We do have testing code and assorted
functionality -- I thought you were saying we had an existing
calculation module ready lol |
03:21.03 |
brlcad |
(or write your own tracer that hooks into our
librt library) |
03:21.22 |
brlcad |
okay, so you do hook into librt and call
rt_shootray() somewhere :) |
05:27.45 |
*** join/#brlcad dtidrow
(n=dtidrow@12.162.247.10) |
05:50.36 |
*** join/#brlcad clock_
(n=clock@77-56-89-140.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
06:10.21 |
brlcad |
awesome:
http://www.google.com/search2001/search?hl=en&q=brl-cad&btnG=Google+Search |
06:12.03 |
brlcad |
http://web.archive.org/web/20010903134532/www.ornl.gov/etd/fha/.index.html |
06:14.26 |
brlcad |
http://web.archive.org/web/20010506080305/www.aro.ncren.net/mcsc/redbook/manocha.htm |
06:14.49 |
brlcad |
and the best find of all.. |
06:15.20 |
brlcad |
carl's original AnimMate tutorial .. since
lost to the bits of time (thusfar, or at least until now) |
06:15.26 |
brlcad |
snarfs and
saves |
06:21.30 |
brlcad |
wow, includes manpages for three mged commands
.. starseeker, you didn't write the first one (search) after all!
:-) |
07:03.42 |
*** join/#brlcad clock_
(n=clock@84-72-91-240.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
07:19.14 |
Ralith |
brlcad: did BOOLE get intergrated? |
07:52.09 |
*** join/#brlcad Axman6
(n=Axman6@pdpc/supporter/student/Axman6) |
08:35.47 |
claymore_ |
yawns & digs in to a bowl
of apple jacks. |
08:36.31 |
claymore_ |
Just spent 30 minutes reading everything that
happened in irc since I logged for the night. Busy eh? |
08:36.41 |
claymore_ |
brlcad: Still up and working? |
08:59.28 |
*** join/#brlcad mafm
(n=mafm@elnet-111.lip.pt) |
09:00.17 |
mafm |
hi |
09:37.12 |
*** join/#brlcad archivist_emc
(n=archivis@host81-149-119-172.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
09:45.58 |
*** join/#brlcad
andrecastelo__ (n=chatzill@189.71.52.22) |
10:55.06 |
claymore_ |
hi mafm! |
11:00.35 |
*** join/#brlcad iandaletter
(n=asus@217.118.79.35) |
11:01.46 |
iandaletter |
starseeker:
http://brlcad.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/brlcad/brlcad/trunk/doc/docbook/books/tutorial_series/
....xml which file? I has somehow forgot it... |
11:17.26 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=elite01@unaffiliated/elite01) |
12:25.20 |
claymore_ |
erik: You gonna be in today are you still
feeling bum? |
14:22.54 |
claymore_ |
Guess not eh? :) |
14:37.27 |
*** join/#brlcad clock__
(n=clock@84-72-91-240.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
15:22.46 |
*** join/#brlcad naroth
(n=naroth@stoker.csl.mtu.edu) |
15:23.49 |
naroth |
hi everyone, I'm looking for some reference
material for using ray-tracing. Does anyone have some links that
would be useful? |
15:31.39 |
iandaletter |
naroth: ray-tracing in general? Could be
www.blender.org - their manuals |
15:32.22 |
iandaletter |
``Erik: create sm |
15:33.20 |
naroth |
well I was referring to using the BRL CAD ray
tracing functions. I have the source downloaded but now I'm just
looking for something that will give me an idea on how to use the
rt library. |
15:33.45 |
iandaletter |
i can not advice something |
15:35.11 |
iandaletter |
``Erik: create banana smoothie with apples
and parsley, totaling in half-a-gallon. Or you will jump as a goat,
or you will be a scapegoat at your disease. Your choice. |
15:35.54 |
iandaletter |
``Erik: http://www.sunfoodpages.com/forum/ultimatebb.php |
15:40.30 |
starseeker |
iandaletter: Do you have a sourceforge
account? |
15:41.06 |
starseeker |
Probably the best way to handle translations
is to go ahead and commit them to the repository |
15:41.19 |
iandaletter |
starseeker: no, because i pay us $ for 10 mb
aday, 5 mb at night. web-serfing is... not really for me |
15:41.34 |
iandaletter |
starseeker: ? |
15:42.06 |
starseeker |
Um. Sourceforge is where BRL-CAD's main
repository is stored and we use subversion to make updates to
it |
15:42.17 |
iandaletter |
what is a link to that .xml file?
/doc/docbook/... ? I has forgot it |
15:42.20 |
starseeker |
you can get a sourceforge account
free |
15:42.33 |
iandaletter |
let me send updates to you... at least at
start of all |
15:43.17 |
starseeker |
oh, um... - this is a good example xml file:
http://brlcad.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/brlcad/brlcad/trunk/doc/docbook/system/man1/search.xml?view=log |
15:43.35 |
starseeker |
iandaletter: Ok, if you'd prefer to send them
to me that's great |
15:43.36 |
iandaletter |
i know, but in internet, i'm usually in IRC...
Later, when the market will be able to offer it, i will have bought
probably 3G-modem... |
15:44.13 |
iandaletter |
ok, i will see the example soon at after my
midnight |
15:44.59 |
starseeker |
iandaletter: That file is pretty much the
style we're going to use for all commands, one file per command -
if you'd prefer to just translate existing pages that's OK too, I
can sort it out |
15:45.28 |
iandaletter |
will see... |
15:45.29 |
starseeker |
iandaletter: You don't HAVE to have every
section that search has, search is pretty extensive |
15:45.53 |
starseeker |
iandaletter: Thank you for your interest in
working on this |
15:46.13 |
*** part/#brlcad naroth
(n=naroth@stoker.csl.mtu.edu) |
15:47.32 |
iandaletter |
starseeker: i actually wanted a chance to be
in "they have somehow helped" section of the book of BRL-CAD - i.e.
wanted to show it to my 'employer'. but nevermind |
15:48.31 |
starseeker |
iandaletter: why nevermind? You're
definitely going to be contributing |
15:49.01 |
starseeker |
individual docbook files are built up into
larger books |
15:50.01 |
iandaletter |
ok, later we will have a time for different
"proposals", "benefits", "fame", "girls", dirt money, big money,
cars and so on... |
15:51.15 |
starseeker |
brlcad handles the management of the credit
sections (like AUTHORS file here
http://brlcad.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/brlcad/brlcad/trunk/AUTHORS?view=log)
and he keeps track of who is doing work - he will not miss your
efforts |
15:51.33 |
iandaletter |
ok! |
15:52.57 |
starseeker |
once we start getting them integrated into
BRL-CAD proper, of course :-) |
15:54.06 |
starseeker |
decides not eating one meal
was a mistake, and not eating two would be a worse
mistake... |
15:55.06 |
iandaletter |
i don't really know much about it yet, i mean
about the world of open source... night builds and so on... Don't
have cheap internet connection... But i will probably have it
soon... even thru mobile cell phone. |
15:55.35 |
*** join/#brlcad docelic
(n=docelic@78.134.202.217) |
15:56.20 |
iandaletter |
starseeker: eat sauerkraut with steamed
potato. And drink cognac, or some beer. but don't become an
alcohol-addicted. ;) |
15:56.58 |
starseeker |
actually doesn't drink - his
brain malfunctions enough without any help |
15:57.08 |
starseeker |
ok, lunch |
15:57.15 |
*** join/#brlcad docelic_
(n=docelic@78.134.202.217) |
15:57.39 |
iandaletter |
ok, almost midnight |
15:58.00 |
iandaletter |
the world and mother earth is
wonderful |
16:03.47 |
docelic |
morn' |
16:10.40 |
brlcad |
aw, no ralith |
16:11.22 |
brlcad |
iandaletter: sending folks that come looking
for ray-tracing to another ray-tracer when we do ray-tracing
doesn't exactly help :) |
16:12.08 |
iandaletter |
ok :-X |
16:14.14 |
brlcad |
working on the docs definitely helps though
;) |
16:14.26 |
brlcad |
howdy docelic |
16:26.32 |
iandaletter |
docelic: at least you, listen to me: you need
to be raw vegan, you must like smoothies and nuts and salads and
probably milk, but it disagrees with www.peta.org |
16:27.42 |
docelic |
seems youre outta luck today, pal |
16:29.02 |
iandaletter |
no, i'm ok - even advise it sometimes. Fell
comfortable and young. don't sweat. do sport. (I do) |
16:29.37 |
iandaletter |
actually, it's too much of typing today - and
i feel myself crazy! |
17:48.13 |
*** join/#brlcad clock_
(n=clock@77-56-79-20.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
18:13.45 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r32817
10/brlcad/trunk/src/conv/bot_dump.c: Mods to fix output of binary
stl. Minor cleanup. |
18:17.00 |
louipc |
we can get fame, girls, and big money from
contributing to open source? since when? |
18:26.34 |
brlcad |
'bout '98 |
18:28.40 |
iandaletter |
battery ends |
18:28.43 |
*** part/#brlcad iandaletter
(n=asus@217.118.79.35) |
18:42.06 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r32818
10/brlcad/trunk/ (92 files in 23 dirs): Shift English docs into en
subdirectories in preparation for multi-lingual
documentation. |
18:48.26 |
``Erik |
wait, what? I've been doing it for a long
time, do you have to fill out a form to get the fame, girls and big
money? |
19:04.05 |
claymore_ |
erik: howya feelin? |
19:04.10 |
``Erik |
surviving :D |
19:05.47 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r32820
10/brlcad/trunk/src/conv/bot_dump.c: Added -u option for units and
removed the -i option. |
19:08.47 |
mafm |
goes to try to cure his
half-flu to home |
19:08.50 |
mafm |
take care |
22:21.52 |
CIA-4 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r32821
10/brlcad/trunk/doc/docbook/README: update notes on
docbook |
22:38.37 |
starseeker |
ah, nuts - forgot that pdf generation needs to
know where the images are from the xml. OK, need to restructure
install paths too and change the image links.
(grumble...) |
22:39.11 |
*** join/#brlcad Ralith
(n=Ralith@216.162.199.202) |
22:54.02 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=elite01@unaffiliated/elite01) |