00:44.27 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03johnranderson * r33162
10/jbrlcad/trunk/ (90 files in 13 dirs): Refactored package names
(they all start with "org.brlcad" now) |
00:56.10 |
Ralith |
jbrlcad is actually active? |
00:57.56 |
Ralith |
isn't sure whether this is a
good thing |
01:11.51 |
brlcad |
Ralith: yeah, there is some light
activity |
01:12.31 |
Ralith |
that is amusing |
01:12.52 |
Ralith |
in light of the barriers to tweaking vector
syntax due to performance impact |
01:16.11 |
brlcad |
until the geometry service is online, the
jbrlcad approach is pretty convenient for them just because it's
just barely enough to open a binary .g file without needing a JNI
layer |
01:17.02 |
brlcad |
well the project they're using it for has a
completely different perspective and set of requirements for
performance than we do for modeling purposes |
01:17.05 |
Ralith |
ah. |
01:17.33 |
brlcad |
the vector syntax is at the heart of
ray-tracing too .. and jbrlcad is nowhere near being a replacement
to actually shoot rays |
01:17.43 |
Ralith |
well, yeah |
01:17.44 |
brlcad |
it'll shoot at a few of the simple
primitives |
01:17.47 |
Ralith |
still |
01:17.52 |
Ralith |
it made a nice visceral comparison
:P |
01:18.08 |
Ralith |
(bet you didn't expect to see that applied to
code!) |
01:18.21 |
brlcad |
what do you mean? |
01:18.56 |
Ralith |
the word visceral |
01:26.38 |
``Erik |
klingon code does not have parameters. it has
arguments. and it always wins them! |
01:26.45 |
``Erik |
runs autogen.sh on his new
macbook |
01:28.12 |
Ralith |
hehe |
01:31.58 |
brlcad |
Ralith: ah, heh, k |
01:32.23 |
Ralith |
worried I'd snuck in a commit while nobody was
watching, or something? :P |
02:03.52 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03johnranderson * r33163
10/jbrlcad/trunk/ (build.xml test/test.g): Added build.xml and
test.g |
02:08.46 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03johnranderson * r33164
10/jbrlcad/trunk/src/ (5 files in 5 dirs): Removed empty
directories |
02:32.11 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03johnranderson * r33165
10/jbrlcad/trunk/src/org/brlcad/ (info/ info/RegionInfo.java
samples/GetRegionMap.java): Refactored GetRegionMap.java to create
a Regionlnfo class |
02:51.15 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03johnranderson * r33166
10/jbrlcad/trunk/src/org/brlcad/info/RegionInfo.java: Added map
from ident to region path |
06:23.50 |
starseeker |
OK, here's the point cloud -> mesh process
via open source only tools |
06:24.24 |
starseeker |
step 1 - take xyz point cloud and stick a v in
front of each point, save as a .obj file |
06:24.34 |
starseeker |
step 2 - import into meshlab: http://bzflag.bz/~starseeker/phone_meshlab_pnts.png |
06:27.08 |
starseeker |
Run Filters->Ball Pivoting Surface
Reconstruction to build the mesh (for the screenshot extra
colorizing was applied to improve the visual effect): http://bzflag.bz/~starseeker/phone_meshlab_mesh.png |
06:28.02 |
starseeker |
Save the result as a .dxf file, import into
MGED using dxf-g, and raytrace: http://bzflag.bz/~starseeker/phone_mged_render.png |
06:29.01 |
starseeker |
there are probably lots of things that could
have been done to improve the mesh once generated inside meshlab,
but for the purposes of quick illustration of the possibility it's
not bad |
06:29.14 |
starseeker |
at least for a completely free toolchain
:-) |
06:48.51 |
Axman6 |
starseeker: nice :) |
06:49.18 |
Axman6 |
not sure what you did, but it looks
cool |
07:28.47 |
Ralith |
I wonder why the screen has such mangled
height information |
07:28.52 |
Ralith |
reflective I guess |
07:28.55 |
Ralith |
or something |
07:38.41 |
Ralith |
I'd be amazed if that algo couldn't be
optimized to find flat surface, though |
07:38.46 |
Ralith |
and it did a remarkably bad job on the
backdrop |
07:46.48 |
*** join/#brlcad Axman6_
(n=Axman6@pdpc/supporter/student/Axman6) |
07:56.00 |
louipc |
/clear/clear |
08:17.28 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33167
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libbu/color.c: implement bu_color_to_rgb_floats
and bu_color_of_rgb_floats so the points primitive can use them.
untested but they seem trivial enough given they match the internal
format of bu_color structures. |
08:18.41 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33168
10/brlcad/trunk/include/bu.h: don't speculate. only declare the
interfaces that are actually provided by libbu. commented out a
handful of bu_color_* conversion routines that were apparently
never implemented. |
08:21.02 |
*** join/#brlcad clock_
(n=clock@84-72-91-240.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
11:19.41 |
*** join/#brlcad mafm
(n=mafm@elnet-111.lip.pt) |
11:53.15 |
*** join/#brlcad
troll_revenant (n=ca9ba519@bz.bzflag.bz) |
11:54.36 |
mafm |
hi |
12:11.28 |
AFK-claymore |
Mornin all! |
12:16.05 |
claymore |
starseeker: Been doing lots of thinking about
your image-stiching-then-measuring idea... I am wondering if there
is a way to 'use a flash' on the camera to eliminate shadows...
THEN a conversion to greyscale and subsequent heightmap extrusion
into a mesh *MIGHT* actually work! |
13:03.39 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03johnranderson * r33169
10/jbrlcad/trunk/src/org/brlcad/ (info/RegionInfo.java
samples/GetRegionMap.java): Slight Improvement in the way
RegionInfo is constructed |
13:08.15 |
dloman |
go go jBRLCAD |
13:54.14 |
mafm |
NullPointerException |
13:54.16 |
mafm |
:P |
14:19.12 |
*** join/#brlcad d_rossberg
(n=rossberg@bz.bzflag.bz) |
14:29.04 |
starseeker |
growl |
14:29.43 |
starseeker |
either my camera is wrong about its
parameters, I don't have enough vertical and horizontal features to
get a good read, or something is buggered |
14:31.17 |
dloman |
what camera do you have? |
14:31.24 |
starseeker |
Canon A540 |
14:32.18 |
starseeker |
Or I could just be so damn close to the thing
that parallax is killing me for any dimension more than a foot or
so away from camera lens center |
14:32.29 |
dloman |
decent camera. What do you mean by 'vert and
horx' features? |
14:32.35 |
dloman |
horx = horz |
14:33.13 |
starseeker |
I'm distorting pictures of a tank to try and
get an orthogonal photo of the whole side of it, but trying to do
so is not resulting in images that can be cleanly
overlapped |
14:34.56 |
dloman |
distorting how? on the edges? |
14:35.37 |
starseeker |
correcting for lens effects and (hopefully)
perspective |
14:36.07 |
dloman |
have you tried a wide angle lens if you are so
close up? |
14:36.21 |
starseeker |
should, but I only have one
camera |
14:36.27 |
starseeker |
and zero budget |
14:37.05 |
starseeker |
http://bzflag.bz/~starseeker/overlap_example.png |
14:37.10 |
starseeker |
that's what's happening |
14:37.49 |
starseeker |
notice the center area where everything lines
up, and things on the overlayed image sort of radiate displacement
from that aligned center |
14:38.44 |
starseeker |
I can manually fiddle a bit, but it will only
get but so close |
14:39.07 |
starseeker |
and the whole point was to be able to get
automatically an image that can yield dimensional
information |
14:39.24 |
starseeker |
clearly not much chance of that here
:-( |
14:40.16 |
starseeker |
I might be able to do OK in individual images
if I have an on-site measurement to calibrate each one, but if I
can't correct to the point where they overlap that's
suspect |
14:40.30 |
starseeker |
I guess I need to sit down and actually work
through the math |
14:41.41 |
starseeker |
It may be I can only expect a teeny tiny
reasonable area from this distance, or perhaps a wide angle lens
would help too |
14:43.20 |
starseeker |
I can upload the available image sets if
anybody knows how to do this better and is interested |
14:44.14 |
dloman |
sorry, was on phone. |
14:44.19 |
starseeker |
np |
14:44.28 |
``Erik |
what formula are you using for adjustment as
you deviate from the center of the lense? I'm sure it's not a
perfectly linear transition |
14:44.53 |
starseeker |
I was trying to use Hugin to get a rectilinear
transformation |
14:45.24 |
``Erik |
doesn't it use regional morphing at the
seams? |
14:45.33 |
starseeker |
isn't sure |
14:45.46 |
dloman |
our back up camera is a Canon A650IS, so its
very similar to your 540. On the front, around the retractable
lense, is a detachable retainer ring. You can pull that ring off,
add an extention tube, and fix std size canon lenses/filters on the
end. |
14:46.29 |
dloman |
we have the extion tube, a .48x wide angle and
a 50-200 tele lense for it that you are more than welcome to
borrow. |
14:46.59 |
``Erik |
pheer my ancient olympus crap box that's been
dropped and abused so much that it no longer works right O.o work
policies have be being safe and simply not owning one, would hate
to accidently leave it in the car and get in trouble |
14:47.01 |
dloman |
also, I can get my rebel xti and brind it to
the museum someday if you need it. |
14:48.03 |
dloman |
erik: easy enough to get around. You are
allowed to have a camera on base, just not in the secure compound.
On the days I bring cameras on base, I just park in the lot in
front of 328. |
14:48.25 |
dloman |
besides, I need to walk more anyways. *pats
gut* |
14:48.46 |
``Erik |
I've thought about that |
14:48.56 |
``Erik |
parking infront of 328 and walking more, not
your gut, settle down |
14:48.56 |
*** join/#brlcad Elrohir
(n=kvirc@p5B14FA20.dip.t-dialin.net) |
14:49.07 |
starseeker |
dloman: That could be awesome - thank you!
Let me crunch some numbers first though - I think it's time to
figure out what the theoretical limits are (also a good way to
figure out what the *beep* I'm doing) |
14:49.26 |
starseeker |
ah, good point |
14:49.37 |
starseeker |
needs to park in front of 328
- forgot about that |
14:50.31 |
dloman |
starseeker: based on what I am seeing in the
pick you linked, the left to right seams look okay, but you are
getting some serious top & bottom parallax. If you stiched 3
pics across, you should stitch 3 up as well to make the 3x3. right
now it looks like a 3x1... |
14:50.45 |
dloman |
Oh, standup branch meeting in 10
mins |
14:50.48 |
dloman |
yay |
14:50.57 |
starseeker |
ah, crap |
14:51.01 |
starseeker |
take notes for me |
14:51.06 |
dloman |
will do. |
14:51.11 |
``Erik |
vagually recalls making a
stink about vertical parallax yesterday afternoon
:D |
14:51.22 |
starseeker |
yeah yeah |
14:51.23 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03d_rossberg * r33170 10/rt^3/trunk/
(8 files in 2 dirs): demonstration of an idea of how BRL-CAD
database objects could be addressed from an external
application |
14:51.25 |
starseeker |
you were right |
14:51.36 |
starseeker |
I just hoped it'd be a tad less
severe |
14:52.46 |
starseeker |
Well, here are the "artsy" shots anyway:
p5B14FA20 |
14:52.53 |
starseeker |
er http://bzflag.bz/~starseeker/markiv/ |
14:52.57 |
dloman |
tbh, minimizing parallax is easy. Just stand
500 ft away and use a telephoto. |
14:53.01 |
dloman |
:) |
14:53.13 |
*** join/#brlcad Anarchid
(n=c12805f5@bz.bzflag.bz) |
14:53.19 |
starseeker |
yeah, great - we'll just have them move the
tank to the middle of the field |
14:53.25 |
``Erik |
heh, I vagually recall saying something like
that, too, except I think I said 'optical zoom', cuz I'm not really
a camera weenie |
14:53.32 |
starseeker |
and watch it fall apart in a cloud of rust
dust... |
14:53.59 |
dloman |
is there a reason you picked *this*
tank? |
14:54.20 |
``Erik |
ancient and historic |
14:54.30 |
starseeker |
that's part of it - no one will care about it
:-) |
14:54.40 |
``Erik |
hopes the names on the side
are crew signatures and not recent additions :( |
14:54.53 |
dloman |
or could you pick a tank on the edge of the
museum where we *can* be 500+ ft away, on a tripod, with a
telephoto? |
14:55.20 |
starseeker |
plus there have been some scans done on this
one - I'm hoping having more data available as a control will allow
"checks" on various techniques |
14:55.30 |
starseeker |
oh, sure |
14:55.59 |
starseeker |
if you don't get taken out by sniper fire for
wandering around with a big telephoto on a military base
;-) |
14:56.00 |
``Erik |
ancient american ones may have historic
blueprints or design information available via our
library |
14:56.23 |
``Erik |
no, you'll get 5 trucks show up awfully fast
if they got concerned |
14:56.30 |
starseeker |
there aren't any american tanks I'm aware of
ancient enough to be out of copyright in the US |
14:56.35 |
dloman |
You drastically over estimate the security
here.... :/ |
14:56.38 |
``Erik |
bad form to shoot tourists in the us |
14:56.39 |
``Erik |
:D |
14:56.48 |
starseeker |
aw |
14:57.14 |
dloman |
meeting time. |
14:57.18 |
``Erik |
ayup |
14:57.19 |
starseeker |
k |
14:57.22 |
starseeker |
I |
14:57.28 |
starseeker |
m heading in now |
14:57.52 |
starseeker |
sighs - at least Ed will like
the math part |
15:04.15 |
PrezKennedy |
maths is hard! |
15:25.58 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33171
10/brlcad/trunk/include/rtgeom.h: make the magic number be an
unsigned long |
15:26.39 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33172
10/brlcad/trunk/include/raytrace.h: remove the wdb_fflush
declaration since the implementation was removed earlier |
15:31.44 |
*** join/#brlcad elmom
(n=elmom@hoasnet-ff04dd00-187.dhcp.inet.fi) |
15:36.33 |
dloman |
Prez: I think that its *awesome* that the
statement you uttered is nearly identical to what the very first
'talking Barbie' said :) Imagine that... a disproportioned blonde
bombshell stating "Math is hard." LOL |
15:39.00 |
clock_ |
In that case Math is a name of a
male. |
15:39.12 |
clock_ |
Maybe abbreviation of Mathew? |
15:40.19 |
dloman |
ewww... bad joke clock :( |
15:58.33 |
``Erik |
in a class all his own |
16:00.00 |
dloman |
Erik: Hopefully not Special Ed Clas.....
;) |
16:00.25 |
``Erik |
aw, c'mon now, hockey helmets alone bring
things up to a positive number |
16:00.34 |
``Erik |
O:-) |
16:00.55 |
*** join/#brlcad elmom_
(n=elmom@hoasnet-ff04dd00-187.dhcp.inet.fi) |
16:01.29 |
dloman |
timmehhh! |
16:02.24 |
dloman |
is begining to question
brlcad's existance. |
16:02.46 |
``Erik |
heh |
16:03.20 |
``Erik |
well, he's committing, so unless it's an at
job or something |
16:04.32 |
dloman |
or.... its the super AI computer he created
just prior to his death and that computer has been working on
BRLCAD ever since...... O.o |
16:04.40 |
``Erik |
uhm |
16:05.01 |
``Erik |
that was 12 years ago, the thing you've seen
in the office is animatronic |
16:05.17 |
``Erik |
(explains a lot, don't it?) |
16:05.46 |
dloman |
speaking of potentially horrid plotlines, has
anyone seen that new series 'The Seeker of Truth' or something like
that? |
16:05.57 |
dloman |
supposedly based on T Goodkinds
books. |
16:06.17 |
dloman |
Missed the first 2 episodes, but wanted to see
at least one. Anyone? |
16:13.41 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33173
10/brlcad/trunk/src/ (librt/primitives/pnts/pnts.c mged/typein.c):
(log message trimmed) |
16:13.41 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: okay, so commit this since this is at
least back into a compiling state. this |
16:13.41 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: adds support for reading in pnts that
optionally have an orientation, per-point |
16:13.41 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: color values, and per-point sizes.
the typein interface is slightly different |
16:13.41 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: from others in that it asks a handful
of yes/no questions that then determines |
16:13.45 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: the variable number of arguments that
follow. export support is only done for |
16:13.47 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: two of the eight pnt types and import
support is just wrong (it'll crash if you |
16:16.18 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33174
10/brlcad/trunk/TODO: pnts needs some work. import, export, and
file input. |
16:42.40 |
*** join/#brlcad archivist
(n=archivis@host81-149-119-172.in-addr.btopenworld.com) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
16:43.17 |
*** join/#brlcad
archivist_emc
(n=archivis@host81-149-119-172.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
17:03.20 |
mafm |
brlcad: what do you use for indentation of
source code files? emacs or some command line tool (or emacs
command of some sort?) |
18:08.23 |
brlcad |
mafm: emacs does a great job at indentation,
there are a variety of commands you can use |
18:08.58 |
mafm |
but it's cumbersome to iterate over all files
of a hierarchy by hand :) |
18:09.11 |
brlcad |
there's a script in the brlcad repository to
that will automatically indent all files in a directory |
18:09.21 |
brlcad |
that's what find is for ;) |
18:09.42 |
brlcad |
find src/librt -name \*.c -exec sh/indent.sh
{} \; |
18:11.07 |
brlcad |
most effective if you ensure that the files
all have a local variables footer first so it kicks off the right
style |
18:11.41 |
brlcad |
(there's a script for that too,
sh/footer.sh) |
18:11.50 |
mafm |
that I already added with find command
:) |
18:13.55 |
brlcad |
fwiw, the emacs command is 'indent-region' --
it applies whatever style is currently set for the given
mode |
18:13.55 |
mafm |
ok, so I was asking for the contents of
indent.sh |
18:13.57 |
mafm |
thanks :) |
18:14.37 |
mafm |
yes, but if you do it by hand you have to open
each file, select the beginning, go to de end, and execute the
"indent-region" thing |
18:14.58 |
mafm |
which I do for individual files, but not very
suitable for a lot of them at once :) |
18:15.24 |
brlcad |
indent.sh basically runs: emacs -batch -f
batch-indent-region which is a function I wrote, lives in
misc/batch-indent-region.el |
18:16.19 |
brlcad |
that overrides case-label and
statement-case-open so that switch/case statements indent properly,
marks the whole file as a region, then runs indent-region |
18:16.29 |
brlcad |
and saves the file |
18:17.17 |
brlcad |
emacs -batch -l batch-indent-region.el -f
batch-indent-region *.c |
18:17.29 |
mafm |
yup, I was already digging |
18:17.32 |
mafm |
nice |
18:17.47 |
mafm |
so that's why knowing LISP is worth! |
18:17.49 |
mafm |
:P |
18:18.02 |
brlcad |
yup |
18:18.43 |
mafm |
doesn't "indent" or similar tools do the same
job? |
18:19.13 |
brlcad |
for C, sure |
18:19.58 |
brlcad |
but I think emacs even handles C a bit better
(and a variety of common styles are predefined, not just
gnu's) |
18:20.03 |
mafm |
do they understand the local variables
thing? |
18:20.14 |
mafm |
ah, so indent is hardcoded somehow |
18:20.25 |
brlcad |
add to that the fact that emacs handles dozens
of other languages and you have a winning indentation
setup |
18:20.54 |
brlcad |
they == who? |
18:21.05 |
brlcad |
indent doesn't know about local vars, that's
an emacs thing |
18:21.24 |
mafm |
they, indent-like tools |
18:21.31 |
brlcad |
run 'indent' on some c++ code and you'll see
how it sucks nuts |
18:21.41 |
mafm |
oh :) |
18:21.56 |
brlcad |
gnu indent does a little better |
18:22.13 |
brlcad |
bsd indent is C-only iirc |
18:23.24 |
brlcad |
bcpp would normally be what you'd use instead
of indent if you had c++ |
18:23.59 |
brlcad |
but then you have multiple sets of indenters,
inconsistent indent rules .. emacs makes it a lot easier to make it
all uniform |
18:25.28 |
``Erik |
bsd indent breaks c++ like ma |
18:25.35 |
``Erik |
mad |
18:25.41 |
mafm |
it's not very coherent, it seems :D |
18:26.00 |
mafm |
when I open the file again by hand and press
tab, it reindents some stuff |
18:26.41 |
mafm |
(in emacs) |
18:27.37 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33175
10/brlcad/trunk/include/conf/Makefile.am: since we print the
timestamp, that's good enough indication that each invocation of
make generates a new timestamp |
18:28.30 |
``Erik |
both classic (bsd) indent and gindent to mess
stuf up a bit, I tend to use the '=' command in vim to fix things
up if I can... one of the things that emacs has been annoying me
with is how poorly it indents lisp code :( (yeah, wtf) |
19:00.29 |
brlcad |
mafm: tab can be bound to lots of different
things -- depending on how you have things set up |
19:01.29 |
brlcad |
``Erik: that's probably just the default lisp
style -- it's fully configurable.. default indent for C code sucks
horribly too because it defaults to gnu style (which hardly anybody
but gnu projects use) |
19:04.43 |
``Erik |
meh, vim needed some C tweaking, too, but the
lisp formatting came out of the box spot on... (of course, that's
CL style, not elisp) :) |
19:05.16 |
``Erik |
it's easier to bitch than to learn how to fix
the defaults in the config file :) |
19:05.36 |
``Erik |
will continue using
both |
19:10.01 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33176
10/brlcad/trunk/regress/repository.sh: |
19:10.01 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: add a cppflags check to make sure
there are not per-product cppflags being set. |
19:10.01 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: this came up during the last release
and several other releases causing build |
19:10.01 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: failures (because they're not
supported prior to automake 1.7). ignore the |
19:10.01 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: BREP_CPPFLAGS as a false positive
since it's only presently set to AM_CPPFLAGS |
19:10.04 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: (which works). |
19:17.24 |
mafm |
hmm |
19:17.24 |
mafm |
well, I thought that the main function of tab
in this context was indenting |
19:19.40 |
brlcad |
it is, but in interactive non-batch mode,
different files initialize |
19:19.54 |
brlcad |
it should be bound to indent-for-tab-command
unless you changed it |
19:25.49 |
mafm |
I see |
19:26.14 |
mafm |
well, it's easier than changing everything by
hand when there are lots of them anyway, it works very
well! |
19:26.31 |
mafm |
g3d is mostly clean so I didn't fix anything
:) |
19:26.37 |
mafm |
now I have to go, see you! |
19:26.42 |
brlcad |
see ya |
19:26.48 |
brlcad |
already ran indent at some
point :) |
19:26.52 |
brlcad |
(several times) |
19:26.54 |
mafm |
and thanks :) |
19:34.40 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33177
10/brlcad/trunk/BUGS: more path issues, rt doesn't appear to obey
the path and gives copious overlaps and displays the wrong object
if you e up a /path/to/something in mged and run rt. |
19:52.43 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03davidloman * r33178
10/rt^3/trunk/src/geometryService/cpp/docs/BME.eap: Continuing
Architecture Work. |
20:03.54 |
``Erik |
is that bugs thing related to what ed and lee
were talking about? e /car/suspension/frwheel.r; rt raytraces /car
instead of just the frwheel.r ? |
20:04.45 |
brlcad |
yes |
20:05.01 |
brlcad |
should be an easy fix |
20:07.02 |
``Erik |
that was my thought during lunch |
20:17.44 |
brlcad |
notes that "Continuing
Architecture Work" conveys absolutely nothing about what actually
changed.. |
20:21.09 |
``Erik |
eh? |
20:21.31 |
starseeker |
Dave's last commit message |
20:22.12 |
brlcad |
might as well have said "changed some stuff"
:) |
20:22.28 |
``Erik |
ah, gotcha |
20:22.51 |
``Erik |
svn commit -m 'did things. And...
stuff.'' |
20:23.31 |
``Erik |
wants vim editing of his irc
buffer :( |
20:35.32 |
brlcad |
hum, looks like idents needs to be
rewritten |
20:35.44 |
brlcad |
lots of reliance on unixisms, tmp files, and
system() |
20:36.00 |
brlcad |
it's amazing it even does anything at all on
windows |
20:39.24 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33179
10/brlcad/trunk/TODO: rewrite the tables command to not
suck |
20:39.28 |
``Erik |
um, lee was only able to recall 3/5 of his
list, did you get the full thing from him (or ed)? |
20:40.17 |
brlcad |
i'm just looking at the trackers |
20:40.51 |
brlcad |
don't exactly need to go looking for
more |
20:41.10 |
brlcad |
unless you're about done fixing all of them
already :P |
20:41.29 |
``Erik |
marks all of them as 'not a
problem for me' and moves on :D |
20:44.07 |
``Erik |
can't find crap on their new page layout
heh |
20:57.37 |
*** join/#brlcad Elrohir
(n=kvirc@p5B14FA20.dip.t-dialin.net) |
21:29.22 |
*** join/#brlcad SWPadnos_
(n=Me@dsl107.esjtvtli.sover.net) |
21:45.39 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=omg@unaffiliated/elite01) |
22:40.17 |
*** join/#brlcad Elrohir
(n=kvirc@p5B14FA20.dip.t-dialin.net) |
22:52.32 |
*** join/#brlcad Elrohir
(n=kvirc@p5B14FA20.dip.t-dialin.net) |
22:54.27 |
*** join/#brlcad Elrohir
(n=kvirc@p5B14FA20.dip.t-dialin.net) |
23:47.09 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33180
10/brlcad/trunk/TODO: |
23:47.09 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: plans for the next iteration (2 weeks
remaining) for me include optimizing bitv |
23:47.09 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: counting, pnts, and incrTcl. add an
item to document bot_dump, drop tables |
23:47.09 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: rewrite until later. others devs
should document their plans for the upcoming |
23:47.09 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: two weeks too as well as next
month. |
23:54.51 |
CIA-62 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r33181
10/brlcad/trunk/TODO: Let's get the poor hyp primitive tied
off |
23:56.16 |
``Erik_ |
adds "play lots of 'Wrath of
the Lich King'" to TODO |
23:58.52 |
brlcad |
wonders if ``Erik will ever
be a productive coder again |