00:30.36 |
*** join/#brlcad Axman6
(n=Axman6@pdpc/supporter/student/Axman6) |
00:44.02 |
mafm |
night |
00:50.39 |
brlcad |
cya |
01:01.41 |
starseeker |
growls at in
comand |
01:01.44 |
starseeker |
command |
01:03.33 |
brlcad |
sup? |
01:03.49 |
brlcad |
that would be a fun command to totally rewrite
to be more modular |
01:05.12 |
brlcad |
would be a little tricky to refactor a few
things, like making it a pass-through to primitive-specific
commands (e.g. "arb8 create param1 param2 param3 ...", "sph make",
etc) |
01:05.15 |
starseeker |
Oh, just making the test commands for
functionality checking |
01:05.33 |
starseeker |
is getting to figure out
legal parameters for all the primitives... |
01:06.06 |
starseeker |
is starting mged testing
script for libged work |
01:06.12 |
brlcad |
oh, awesome! |
01:06.25 |
brlcad |
I was thinking about that whilest in the
wonderful training today |
01:06.34 |
starseeker |
training? |
01:06.57 |
starseeker |
panics |
01:06.59 |
brlcad |
another construx course that ed and I are
in |
01:07.03 |
brlcad |
you're fine |
01:07.03 |
starseeker |
oh, ok |
01:07.05 |
starseeker |
phew |
01:07.15 |
brlcad |
today was 50% overlap with estimation
training |
01:07.25 |
brlcad |
next two days are more to the meat |
01:07.33 |
starseeker |
got to play with financial
stuff and car oil changes - got in at 5pm :-( |
01:07.36 |
starseeker |
cool |
01:07.47 |
brlcad |
and at least he covered and was familiar with
how his practices relate to agile methods |
01:08.05 |
starseeker |
well, that helps a bit :-) |
01:08.16 |
starseeker |
still has fond memories of
the previous course |
01:08.37 |
brlcad |
yeah, he seems a lot more knowledgable about
the differences in different types of projects, research-oriented,
production-oriented |
01:09.02 |
brlcad |
how they relate, how various techniques fall
apart |
01:09.13 |
starseeker |
awesome |
01:10.31 |
brlcad |
if anyone wants to talk to the sourceforge
staffers, they're hosting an "open house" meeting on the 29th
(Time: 2009-01-29 11:00AM Eastern (08:00AM Pacific, 15:00
UTC)) |
01:10.53 |
starseeker |
irc? |
01:10.57 |
brlcad |
they'll open to complaints, requests,
comments |
01:11.02 |
brlcad |
yeah on irc |
01:11.05 |
starseeker |
nifty |
01:11.10 |
brlcad |
irc.slashnet.org, #sourceforge |
01:11.34 |
brlcad |
it's not the first time they've done it, they
started irc meetings about a year ago, have held a couple |
01:11.56 |
brlcad |
is particularly interested in
the new trac integration... |
01:12.35 |
brlcad |
I'm not sure if it's a solution in search of a
problem, but trac is a much better tracking system than the sf.net
trackers |
01:12.40 |
starseeker |
doesn't really have too much
to complain about, aside from the connection being dropped on big
commits... |
01:12.46 |
starseeker |
nice |
01:12.47 |
brlcad |
for at least some definitions of
'better' |
01:13.37 |
brlcad |
if you want to kick the tires on it, lemme
know and I'll turn it on |
01:14.14 |
brlcad |
there are about a dozen other apps they've
recently integrated too with the new infrastructure, documented
somewhere.. (just lemme know) |
01:14.48 |
starseeker |
cool |
01:14.51 |
starseeker |
will look into
it |
01:15.22 |
starseeker |
is about to be drivin nuts by
the stray character capture in the tcl command
window |
01:16.26 |
brlcad |
you ran into it? |
01:16.33 |
brlcad |
it's *really* easy to fix |
01:16.41 |
brlcad |
IFF you find the keybinding that causes
it |
01:16.53 |
starseeker |
looks like it's popping up when I do a paste
into tcl, and then hit return too fast |
01:16.54 |
brlcad |
I fixed "most" of them over a year
ago |
01:17.12 |
starseeker |
can't nail it down yet |
01:17.36 |
starseeker |
glares at Tk for allowing it
to happen in the first place |
01:17.40 |
brlcad |
could be a scroll event (including you
clicking on the scroll bar) |
01:18.24 |
brlcad |
tk textareas with a scrollbar are very very
simple, app code controls pretty much every binding |
01:18.53 |
brlcad |
at least the way we use it -- there's probably
a better widget now that does much of it for free, but not back in
the day |
01:18.59 |
starseeker |
nods |
01:19.18 |
starseeker |
note to self - find better text
widget... |
01:22.15 |
brlcad |
not worth it |
01:22.49 |
brlcad |
it'd take a lot of work to decouple it and if
you did everything right, it'd be nearly identical |
01:23.05 |
starseeker |
wouldn't it be a benefit on the maintainance
side of things though? |
01:23.08 |
brlcad |
better effort spent merging archer with
mged |
01:23.11 |
starseeker |
true |
01:23.19 |
brlcad |
I think its text widget might be
newer/better |
01:24.58 |
starseeker |
that reminds me - how did you want to address
the "list of drawn objects" problem? It seems like a state issue,
and libged is supposed to be stateless, but some of the commands
need to "trigger" an entry in some list somewhere in MGED, at the
very least |
01:27.41 |
starseeker |
not to mention rt itself |
01:31.00 |
brlcad |
hmm.. hehe, now what a thing of beauty ..
http://brlcad.org/~sean/tmp/lotii.jpg |
01:31.30 |
starseeker |
heh |
01:31.45 |
starseeker |
where'd that come from? |
01:31.55 |
*** join/#brlcad schwinn434
(n=schwinn4@75.81.196.139) |
01:31.57 |
brlcad |
libged operates on a ged structure, which
includes lists -- so the commands themselves are stateless, but
they are passed lists to operate upon (and have to be
written/modified to recognize the ged lists) |
01:32.04 |
brlcad |
just found it somewhere |
01:32.11 |
starseeker |
cool |
01:32.13 |
brlcad |
i think that's all the colors :) |
01:32.20 |
starseeker |
thought for a second it was a
raytraced image :-P |
01:32.23 |
brlcad |
except two exotics |
01:32.47 |
brlcad |
don't think the mother-of-pearl one is
there |
01:41.41 |
*** join/#brlcad BigAToo
(n=BigAToo@pool-96-230-124-236.sbndin.btas.verizon.net) |
01:42.15 |
starseeker |
phew |
01:44.12 |
starseeker |
that's all the primitives in claims to support
in 7.12.6 |
01:54.37 |
starseeker |
brlcad: I'm going to stick what I've got into
svn for safe keeping, but it's nowhere near ready so it's a
temporary file name and not being added to the test
routines |
01:55.09 |
starseeker |
however, using the "would I want to redo this
if I lost it" metric i don't want to lose it ;-) |
01:56.15 |
CIA-31 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r33608
10/brlcad/trunk/regress/mged_test.sh: Add early stages of mged test
script intended to exercise (eventually) all mged
commands. |
02:04.28 |
brlcad |
starseeker: k, just don't forget EXTRA_DIST
though in the meantime |
02:04.49 |
brlcad |
distcheck will fail if files are
missing |
02:17.13 |
CIA-31 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r33609
10/brlcad/trunk/regress/Makefile.am: put mged_test.sh in
EXTRA_DIST |
02:25.48 |
*** join/#brlcad IriX64
(n=IriX64@bas2-sudbury98-1128565480.dsl.bell.ca) |
03:12.30 |
yukonbob |
hello, cadheads |
03:12.34 |
brlcad |
howdy |
03:24.21 |
*** join/#brlcad Axman6
(n=Axman6@pdpc/supporter/student/Axman6) |
03:41.08 |
starseeker |
brlcad: I don't suppose there are any docs
anywhere on the implementation of sketch and what { bezier D 4 P {
4 7 9 8 0 } } is actually describing? |
03:44.54 |
brlcad |
bezier curve, degree 4, control points 4 5 9 8
and 0 |
03:45.39 |
starseeker |
hmm - so points are defined independently of
particular segments? |
03:46.26 |
starseeker |
what about { carc S 6 E 5 R -1 L 0 O 0
} |
03:48.13 |
brlcad |
yeah |
03:48.18 |
brlcad |
there should be a vertex list |
03:48.26 |
starseeker |
weird |
03:48.37 |
brlcad |
lines, carcs, bezeiers, reference indices of
that array |
03:48.56 |
brlcad |
S 5 E 4 .. starts at vertex 5 ends at
4 |
03:49.07 |
starseeker |
ok - R is radius? |
03:49.09 |
brlcad |
R -1 |
03:49.10 |
brlcad |
right |
03:49.43 |
starseeker |
is that for storage/efficiency
reasons? |
03:50.04 |
starseeker |
would have stored line, xy
start, xy end |
03:50.27 |
brlcad |
yeah, generally way more compact as points are
usually referenced at least twice |
03:50.59 |
brlcad |
and it makes for a topological
structure |
03:51.24 |
brlcad |
you know that two line segments actually
connect by the fact that they reference the same point |
03:51.32 |
brlcad |
not just because they are "close" within a
tolerance |
03:51.41 |
starseeker |
OK, I can see that |
03:51.57 |
starseeker |
REALLY needs to work on his
primitives documentation... |
03:53.02 |
brlcad |
it's pretty common paradigm, most geometry
formats do that for all primitives (check out an stl or dxf file
sometime to see more examples) |
03:53.24 |
starseeker |
nods - I can see the logic,
just makes for very unintuitive "interactive" geometry
entering |
03:53.45 |
brlcad |
yeah :) |
03:53.57 |
brlcad |
have to specify all your points in
advance |
03:54.03 |
brlcad |
it shouldn't be the interactive form |
03:54.47 |
starseeker |
hmm. |
03:55.04 |
starseeker |
was setting up the "in"
command to do just that, but perhaps that's a bad
move |
03:55.07 |
brlcad |
make interactive whatever is most intuitive
for interactive |
03:55.17 |
brlcad |
you have a lot more flexibility
there |
03:55.37 |
brlcad |
none of the other primitives match the tclget
form |
03:55.52 |
brlcad |
at least not 1-1, none that come to
mind |
03:56.10 |
starseeker |
's first thought is to
specify line segments, arcs, etc. and have the in command figure
out the points and make them "available" if the user wants to
specify them |
03:57.06 |
starseeker |
hmm |
03:57.18 |
starseeker |
I could really go to town with this if I'm not
careful |
03:57.26 |
brlcad |
since you have the "points" in ascii form at
that point (no pun intended), you should be able to dervie the
vertex list |
03:57.34 |
starseeker |
sure |
03:57.42 |
brlcad |
or.. |
03:58.27 |
starseeker |
I was thinking to be able to specify either
"X,Y" line segments or "2->4" style to save typing |
03:58.52 |
brlcad |
without much thought into it, could be similar
to the tclget form sans the VL, but allowing 'in' to have segmented
sections for each 'primitive' type prefixed with an
identifier |
03:58.52 |
starseeker |
I've got to be careful not to make "in" too
elaborate though |
03:59.19 |
brlcad |
then you could specify 'v'ertices as a
primitive of their own before use |
03:59.34 |
starseeker |
right |
04:00.04 |
brlcad |
like if you wanted to make a line: in sketch
sketch v 4.5 2.3 v 8.4 7.4 s 0 1 |
04:00.07 |
starseeker |
at user option either specify a vertix
explicitly, or have them deduced from more "intuitive
information |
04:00.51 |
starseeker |
or, in sketch sketch l 4.5 2.3 8.4 7.4 ->
same thing |
04:01.02 |
brlcad |
I don't think you'd be able to deduce index vs
value reliably without a hint |
04:01.20 |
starseeker |
l would be the hint - "line segment" |
04:01.34 |
brlcad |
e.g. in sketch sketch l 4 2 8 7 |
04:01.44 |
brlcad |
is that 4.0 2.0 8.0 7.0 or indices |
04:01.55 |
starseeker |
use l for xy xy form, s for v1 v2
form |
04:02.20 |
brlcad |
hm |
04:02.28 |
brlcad |
double up all the entity types |
04:02.32 |
brlcad |
interesting thought |
04:02.36 |
starseeker |
right |
04:02.46 |
starseeker |
what's "intuitive" will depend on the
situation |
04:03.04 |
starseeker |
or the user |
04:03.48 |
brlcad |
could be something like "s"/"si", "c"/"ci",
etc |
04:03.55 |
starseeker |
right |
04:04.17 |
brlcad |
more to type, but less to remember |
04:04.32 |
starseeker |
and consistent between types |
04:13.04 |
brlcad |
well, that's one bit you can probably have fun
with for sure |
04:13.11 |
starseeker |
:-) |
04:13.45 |
starseeker |
the sketch editor actually makes a bit more
sense now that I get how it's thinking about verticies |
04:14.08 |
brlcad |
yeah, you probably see how the interface
basically just directly ties to the data |
04:14.39 |
brlcad |
because it was completely written in just a
couple days |
04:14.48 |
starseeker |
nods |
04:15.19 |
starseeker |
soome sense of scale in the drawing window
would probably help |
04:15.49 |
brlcad |
probably |
04:16.00 |
brlcad |
though it does auto-adjust based on the points
that are created |
04:16.12 |
brlcad |
so they're semi-sensibly normalized to a
useful range |
04:16.32 |
starseeker |
sure, but you can't SEE that up front
;-) |
04:17.41 |
brlcad |
right, but if I saw the values and saw that
the values kept changing on me, that'd be a bigger problem (I'd
expect a fixed controllable scale like the 3D view) |
04:17.54 |
starseeker |
nods |
04:18.37 |
starseeker |
thinks it would also help to
have two panes - one which shows the sketch in its local coordinate
system and another which lets the user get at the 3D
settings |
04:19.29 |
starseeker |
or, alternately, have the MGED window's
display of the sketch object handle that part |
04:19.35 |
starseeker |
just like any other primitive |
04:20.52 |
starseeker |
brlcad: Thanks for the orientation - it
really helped |
04:21.48 |
brlcad |
nods |
04:22.57 |
starseeker |
I really should get out of here... |
04:22.59 |
yukonbob |
brlcad: question: ".a" archives are always
"static", correct? |
04:23.00 |
brlcad |
sketch really belongs integrated, just with a
distinction of 2D editing operations and 3D editing operations
(along with 4D) as separate "interfaces" |
04:23.10 |
brlcad |
yukonbob: .a are static archives,
yes |
04:27.01 |
Ralith |
yukonbob, iirc, .a is literally just an
amaglamation of .o |
04:27.48 |
brlcad |
pretty much, at least the symbols of the
specified .o files plus a table of contents |
04:27.54 |
brlcad |
not just a concatenation of files |
04:28.21 |
brlcad |
plus/minus a few discrepancies for various
platforms over the decades |
04:28.26 |
Ralith |
yeah, not quite that literally. |
04:28.48 |
starseeker |
:q |
04:28.53 |
starseeker |
whoops, that's not vim |
04:29.35 |
starseeker |
<grin> and now I'm going to go operate a
motor vehicle |
04:29.37 |
Ralith |
if I had the power to trigger a netsplit, that
would have been an awesome time to do so. |
04:29.54 |
starseeker |
lol |
04:29.54 |
yukonbob |
wtf would libtool be trying to dynamically
link a .a? |
04:30.02 |
Ralith |
O.o |
04:30.13 |
yukonbob |
www.pastebin.ca/1319264 |
04:30.14 |
brlcad |
yukonbob: because someone specified a .a as an
ldadd |
04:31.12 |
yukonbob |
Ralith: re: 'amalgamation' -- ya -- .a ==
archive, which iiuc is actually similar to tar, for example... it
has a ToC, etc. and can hold multiple files... |
04:31.59 |
yukonbob |
heh |
04:32.10 |
yukonbob |
sees this has been discussed
above... |
04:35.39 |
brlcad |
yukonbob: that pastebin is normal -- it's just
a warning that a "libtool archive" (.la) was created that
referenced linking against a library for which there was no dynamic
library found |
04:36.20 |
brlcad |
so it's saying that it'll have to differ
linking until the .la is used whereupon it'll use the .a it found
(which is fine for binaries) |
04:37.02 |
brlcad |
it didn't try to dynamically link a .a, it
said it couldn't but that was all it found |
04:50.50 |
CIA-31 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33610
10/brlcad/trunk/include/bu.h: gah, hard-coding to 5 is a problem on
64-bit platforms where long's can be 64-bit and require a 6 shift.
must have been asleep at the keyboard. |
05:01.29 |
*** join/#brlcad IriX64
(n=IriX64@bas2-sudbury98-1128565480.dsl.bell.ca) |
05:21.53 |
*** join/#brlcad ibot
(i=ibot@rikers.org) |
05:21.53 |
*** topic/#brlcad is BRL-CAD
Open Source Solid Modeling || http://brlcad.org || http://sf.net/projects/brlcad
|| GSoC 2008 Highlight: new prototype gui, check it out! || Source
Release 7.14.0 is now posted (20081108) |
05:21.53 |
*** join/#brlcad Twingy
(n=justin@74.92.144.217) |
05:22.12 |
*** join/#brlcad SWPadnos_
(n=Me@dsl107.esjtvtli.sover.net) |
05:22.14 |
*** join/#brlcad IriX64
(n=IriX64@bas2-sudbury98-1128565480.dsl.bell.ca) |
05:24.36 |
*** join/#brlcad louipc
(n=louipc@archlinux/trusteduser/louipc) |
05:27.10 |
*** join/#brlcad starseek1r
(n=starseek@bz.bzflag.bz) |
05:28.32 |
*** join/#brlcad
Dr_Phreakenstein (n=phreak@216.151.24.198) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
05:32.10 |
*** join/#brlcad louipc
(n=louipc@archlinux/trusteduser/louipc) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
05:32.12 |
*** join/#brlcad poolio
(n=poolio@bz.bzflag.bz) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
05:32.19 |
*** join/#brlcad Axman6
(n=Axman6@61.69.24.207) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
05:32.19 |
*** join/#brlcad bjork_
(n=bjork@ip72-204-40-138.fv.ks.cox.net) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
05:32.45 |
*** join/#brlcad Maloeran
(n=maloeran@glvortex.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
05:32.46 |
*** join/#brlcad
Dr_Phreakenstein (n=phreak@216.151.24.198) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
05:33.20 |
*** join/#brlcad ChanServ
(ChanServ@services.) |
05:33.20 |
*** mode/#brlcad [+o ChanServ]
by irc.freenode.net |
05:33.21 |
*** join/#brlcad Ralith
(n=ralith@216.162.199.202) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
05:33.21 |
*** join/#brlcad PrezKennedy
(i=Matthew@whitecalf.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
05:33.26 |
*** join/#brlcad
Dr_Phreakenstein (n=phreak@216.151.24.198) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
05:33.56 |
*** join/#brlcad ``Erik
(i=erik@c-76-111-12-116.hsd1.md.comcast.net) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
05:33.57 |
*** join/#brlcad b0ef
(n=b0ef@062016142244.customer.alfanett.no) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
05:33.57 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(n=sean@bz.bzflag.bz) |
05:37.52 |
*** join/#brlcad
MinuteElectron (n=MinuteEl@bz.bzflag.bz) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
05:37.52 |
*** join/#brlcad kanzure
(i=bbishop@66.112.232.117) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
05:39.11 |
*** join/#brlcad alex_joni
(n=juve@emc/board-of-directors/alexjoni) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
05:39.25 |
*** join/#brlcad Axman6
(n=Axman6@pdpc/supporter/student/Axman6) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
05:40.32 |
*** join/#brlcad CIA-32
(n=CIA@208.69.182.149) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
05:41.13 |
*** join/#brlcad poolio
(n=poolio@bz.bzflag.bz) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
05:42.42 |
*** join/#brlcad d-lo
(n=claymore@bz.bzflag.bz) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
05:45.46 |
*** join/#brlcad yukonbob
(i=1000@s142-179-54-198.bc.hsia.telus.net) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |
06:07.53 |
*** join/#brlcad madant
(n=madant@117.196.147.233) |
07:01.48 |
yukonbob |
brlcad: ok -- thx for that commentary -- I've
got more questions/cases coming -- I'm approaching this in a
measured baby-step fashion as much as I can... ;) |
07:55.37 |
starseek1r |
decides sleep is in
order... |
07:56.27 |
starseeker |
humph |
08:06.40 |
brlcad |
heh |
08:46.25 |
*** join/#brlcad archivist_ub
(n=archivis@host81-149-119-172.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
08:55.55 |
*** join/#brlcad csanyipal
(n=csanyipa@91.102.231.33) |
08:56.28 |
csanyipal |
Howdy! |
10:18.34 |
*** join/#brlcad mafm
(n=quassel@119.Red-81-39-20.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
11:43.40 |
*** join/#brlcad BigAToo
(n=BigAToo@pool-96-230-124-203.sbndin.btas.verizon.net) |
12:03.40 |
d-lo |
mernin all |
12:04.39 |
mafm |
mernin d-lo! |
12:07.10 |
d-lo |
Finally getting snow here. Time for some sled
action... well after work that is. |
12:13.43 |
mafm |
:) |
12:13.53 |
mafm |
we had a bit of snow several times, but not
very heavy |
12:14.01 |
mafm |
we never do |
12:21.00 |
d-lo |
well, aren't you somewhat close to the
Med? |
12:31.09 |
mafm |
mmm |
12:31.15 |
mafm |
I'll geolocate myself now: |
12:31.20 |
*** join/#brlcad madant
(n=madant@117.196.128.155) |
12:36.43 |
*** join/#brlcad mafm
(n=quassel@119.Red-81-39-20.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
12:36.50 |
mafm |
ops :) |
12:38.59 |
mafm |
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=lugo&sll=38.707163,-9.135517&sspn=0.428661,0.76561 |
12:41.17 |
madant |
mafm u are at Lugo ? |
12:41.27 |
mafm |
madant: yep |
12:42.03 |
mafm |
why, do you know somebody from
there? |
12:42.43 |
madant |
nah.. only Barcelona which is like the other
coast right :) |
12:42.51 |
madant |
ever been to Siurana ? |
12:42.56 |
mafm |
yep |
12:43.05 |
mafm |
1k km away |
12:43.20 |
mafm |
nope, I don't even know where Siurana is
:) |
12:43.55 |
mafm |
about the proximity to mediterranian sea: alps
are closer, pirinees are touching it, and there's a lot of snow
there :) |
12:44.18 |
d-lo |
mafm: So I see :) |
12:44.47 |
``Erik |
I don't think I can get to the main
road |
12:44.49 |
mafm |
but there are no big mountains around, the
tallest are about 2k meters |
12:45.48 |
d-lo |
``Erik: I am begining to see a pattern with
you and brlcad: "Oh i have this expensive, awesome sports car and
there is a bit of snow on the ground... guess I'll have to stay
home today!" :P |
12:45.51 |
madant |
Siurana is near barcelona . good for
climbing |
12:45.53 |
madant |
http://www.master-hunters.com/fotos/siurana.jpg |
12:46.23 |
mafm |
:) |
12:46.32 |
mafm |
I've only been a couple of times in
Catalonia |
12:46.33 |
d-lo |
madant: Thats a beautiful picture! |
12:46.35 |
``Erik |
they're light, have insane amounts of torque
and have tires that simply do not grab in snow and rain |
12:46.52 |
``Erik |
my truck woulda done it, my car
cannot |
12:47.33 |
d-lo |
Took the Jeep out and had some
pseudo-offroading/snowsleding fun this morning :) Its why I got to
work about an hour later than norm :) |
12:47.35 |
``Erik |
and amusingly, I think there's more snow on my
driveway than I can clear |
12:47.56 |
``Erik |
heh, I had an '80 honda civic stationwagon
that I did effin' insane shit in the snow with |
12:48.03 |
d-lo |
how much you have on the ground thus far
``Erik |
12:48.15 |
d-lo |
Honda's are great for that. |
12:48.25 |
``Erik |
at one point, I got stuck in mud and snow,
ended up pushing it into a ditch and slaloming down to the street
below |
12:48.40 |
d-lo |
CRX + snow covereed deserted mall parking lot
= crazy fun :) |
12:48.48 |
d-lo |
lol nice! |
12:48.56 |
``Erik |
um, well, ok, I'm sure it does clear, but I
can't see the road or sidewalk, it's hard to make out the
curb |
12:49.22 |
``Erik |
looks lik ea couple inches |
12:49.26 |
``Erik |
~2-3 |
12:49.27 |
ibot |
-1 |
12:49.33 |
d-lo |
lol |
12:49.53 |
d-lo |
damn 'bots always piping up when you don't
wantem to. |
12:50.05 |
d-lo |
~What is the meaning of life? |
12:50.07 |
ibot |
I think you lost me on that one,
d-lo |
12:50.19 |
``Erik |
I only see 3 cars tracks in the cul de sac
here |
12:50.21 |
d-lo |
its 42 silly. Sheesh. |
12:50.22 |
``Erik |
~what is 42? |
12:50.23 |
ibot |
42 is, like, the answer to life the universe
and everything, see also
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/the_answer_to_life,_the_universe,_and_everything |
12:50.29 |
``Erik |
NO ROUND TRIP! FAIL@ |
12:50.50 |
``Erik |
is the BC in? |
12:50.59 |
``Erik |
I'm getting no answer on the phone |
12:51.09 |
d-lo |
Dunno. They have that Software training thing
going on. |
12:51.16 |
``Erik |
ohhhh, hrm |
12:51.25 |
``Erik |
that'd be why I got no answer
yesterday |
12:51.37 |
d-lo |
if you want, "I saw Erik here today"
:) |
12:51.49 |
``Erik |
nah, I'm too honest for all that |
12:51.49 |
d-lo |
I think its me an d John A in the whole
building. |
12:51.53 |
``Erik |
hrm |
12:52.11 |
``Erik |
do you have a CoC? |
12:52.14 |
``Erik |
wow, that sounded wrong |
12:52.41 |
d-lo |
we only have abour 1" on the ground up by my
house, but by the way the radio and TV are reporting it, you'd
think its The End. |
12:52.46 |
d-lo |
lol |
12:53.13 |
``Erik |
it's moving east by northeast, so you might
get soem more |
12:53.34 |
d-lo |
CoC = Cohorts of Chaos. A Centaur based guild
on the game of Shadowbane known for their effective hit and run
tactics. |
12:53.38 |
``Erik |
here's the thing, I can't drive, but I want to
work, I d'no if it'd be ok for me to work from home, being open
source, etc |
12:53.42 |
``Erik |
I meant chain of command |
12:53.51 |
d-lo |
:D |
12:53.56 |
``Erik |
otherwise, it'd be corrosion of
conformity |
12:54.08 |
d-lo |
Just leave messages. If I see someone, I will
let em know. |
12:54.16 |
``Erik |
which became a pretty decent band when they
picked up pepper |
12:54.36 |
``Erik |
yeah buying an outback is looking more and
more attractive |
12:54.42 |
d-lo |
I saw them when the opened for Metallica
during the Poor ol Touring Me tour in Orlando. |
12:54.51 |
``Erik |
uhm, around '93 or '94? |
12:55.05 |
d-lo |
Outbank in addition to the M3? |
12:55.09 |
d-lo |
'97 |
12:55.15 |
d-lo |
summer of '97 |
12:55.26 |
``Erik |
my best bud in high school was hired as a
bouncer for metallica and CoC in seattle around '94 or so |
12:55.51 |
``Erik |
yeah, m3 for nice days, outback for not nice
days, plus the larger payload |
12:55.56 |
``Erik |
and selling my truck to a neighbor |
12:56.31 |
d-lo |
yeah, you told me about the truck. If you
need help pushing it out into the street, lemme know :) |
12:56.54 |
``Erik |
hehehe, well, a neighbors friend wants to buy
it to fix it up for his son, and the neighbor is thinking about
buying it himself |
12:56.56 |
d-lo |
So... normal Outback or Baja Outback
;) |
12:57.17 |
``Erik |
uhm, they have like half a dozen variants now,
I was looking at the 'sports' edition, because I'm, well,
stupid |
12:58.51 |
*** join/#brlcad mafm2
(n=quassel@119.Red-81-39-20.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
12:58.59 |
brlcad |
has absolutely no aversion to
working (or going in to work), else I wouldn't do this for fun and
in most of my spare time too |
12:59.03 |
d-lo |
Nah, not stupid... just enjoys a nice toy or
two. |
12:59.13 |
brlcad |
suckers just pay me to do it too |
12:59.17 |
d-lo |
lol |
12:59.21 |
brlcad |
so I buy toys |
12:59.43 |
``Erik |
morning, "the boy" |
13:00.22 |
brlcad |
not nice to call mafm2 that! |
13:00.41 |
d-lo |
brlcad: hows the class? |
13:00.53 |
brlcad |
it's alright |
13:02.22 |
brlcad |
mostly a big rehash of things already known,
particularly for open source project management, agile practices,
estimation techniques |
13:02.37 |
brlcad |
today and tomorrow are diff topics, so will
see |
13:03.02 |
d-lo |
heh, well, known to you mebbe, hence why *I*
wanted to go :P |
13:04.48 |
d-lo |
brlcad: you gonna be able to make it to
post? |
13:04.50 |
brlcad |
wanting to get into project
management? |
13:05.16 |
brlcad |
d-lo: don't see why not |
13:06.01 |
brlcad |
ballerina on ice .. just have to take it
really slow |
13:06.02 |
d-lo |
brlcad: Yes, actually i do. And was just
asking about the roads because the one's I traveled were not that
great and getting worse. |
13:06.53 |
mafm2 |
d-lo: :P |
13:07.46 |
brlcad |
mm, frightening :) |
13:08.07 |
d-lo |
well, its not the roads, but the retarded
hicks with big trucks that scare me. |
13:08.20 |
brlcad |
not that, wanting to :) |
13:09.18 |
d-lo |
heh, well I have managed my way out of a few
wet paper bags in my life so there :P |
13:09.45 |
brlcad |
like many things, the job is often best served
by people that don't want it -- the don't meddle/impose, don't get
too involved, have more humble people skills, protect their people
better, etc |
13:10.27 |
brlcad |
particularly for software management, unless
you start up a production shop where you're just coding widgets
with no research aspect |
13:11.13 |
d-lo |
hrm, well, the opposite can be said also. Too
humble/univolved and the leadership aspect is nullified. |
13:11.29 |
brlcad |
sure, it's not black and white |
13:11.30 |
d-lo |
Its more a fine balance that makes a good
manager. |
13:11.34 |
brlcad |
it's just the bigger trend |
13:12.18 |
d-lo |
I'll agree 100% with the micromanagement. Let
the workers work and the leaders lead ;) |
13:12.46 |
brlcad |
it's not just micromanagement |
13:12.58 |
brlcad |
it doesn't take much at all to
demotivate |
13:13.57 |
brlcad |
hell, I honestly almost quit over an argument
about shutting doors many years ago |
13:14.30 |
d-lo |
Exactly, which is where a univolved/humble
manager will fail. If a manager cannot set realistic, attainable
waypoints/goals with tangible benefits for the workers, morale
drops quickly. |
13:14.56 |
brlcad |
authority or rules without merit or reason is
a non-starter in my world |
13:14.56 |
d-lo |
brlcad: as in you wanted your door shut but
management said to keep it open? |
13:15.41 |
brlcad |
no, different, but that's for another
day |
13:15.53 |
d-lo |
I think thats a given, actually. Very few
people nowadays are happy with 'just obeying the rules without
knowing the why behind them' |
13:16.35 |
d-lo |
okay. I could just see some of the managers
here starting BS like that, lol |
13:16.40 |
brlcad |
people bend to the rules *all* the time, put
up with crap and find work-arounds instead of fixing the imposition
problem |
13:17.23 |
d-lo |
heh, never said they didn't bend to them, just
said they aren't happy blindly following. They usually seek the
'Why' or just quit. |
13:17.53 |
d-lo |
But you are right, many people don't try to
fix the problem.... thats someone else's job... right? |
13:17.56 |
d-lo |
:) |
13:18.24 |
brlcad |
the point should be seen in the industry
productivity quotia .. that gov't employees on *average* are only
30% productive |
13:18.34 |
brlcad |
compared to industry's roughly 70%
average |
13:19.41 |
d-lo |
Thats okay though, because Obama will fix that
too. lol |
13:19.45 |
brlcad |
that implies that on average at least, that
gov't workers put up with and allow (or require) more than twice as
much overhead process in their work |
13:20.21 |
d-lo |
well, thats assuming that 'Laziness' is either
not accounted for or part of overhead :) |
13:20.42 |
brlcad |
process for the sake of process "to be safe",
process on top of process, inefficiency at every corner, entrenched
workers that do negative work |
13:20.56 |
brlcad |
the class actually touched on net negative
programmers, I was really glad to see that |
13:21.14 |
``Erik |
hides |
13:21.18 |
d-lo |
lol |
13:21.41 |
brlcad |
did not know that the rate of negative
programmers is actually around 30% |
13:21.45 |
``Erik |
I have an abstract to write, and a fistful of
crap I wanna work on, sucks |
13:21.48 |
``Erik |
really? huh |
13:22.04 |
``Erik |
uh, how did the bz migration go?
HRM? |
13:22.21 |
``Erik |
order of criticality is bz, the suns, then
code, right? |
13:22.22 |
``Erik |
:D |
13:22.39 |
brlcad |
the migration has actually been
underway |
13:22.39 |
d-lo |
rate.... as in the amount of negative
producicity they create or the amount of neg programmers compared
to the total amount of programmers. |
13:22.43 |
d-lo |
> |
13:22.45 |
d-lo |
? |
13:23.12 |
``Erik |
software developers have a HUGE difference
between 'stars' and 'tards' |
13:23.16 |
brlcad |
d-lo: that on a given team, the team would
actually get *more* work done if that programmer was not
there |
13:23.19 |
brlcad |
in the long run |
13:23.36 |
brlcad |
due to bugs that go unnoticed that have to get
fixed X months/years from now |
13:23.45 |
brlcad |
due to overhead communication to keep everyone
informed |
13:23.57 |
brlcad |
due to arguments and disconformity |
13:23.59 |
``Erik |
mythical man month provided brilliant insight
in the 70's |
13:24.16 |
``Erik |
but was mostly ignored by the "powers that
be" |
13:24.32 |
brlcad |
``Erik: you'll like one stat .. i'll have to
mention it later |
13:24.41 |
``Erik |
heh, pm? |
13:24.51 |
brlcad |
no, i'm just gonna be late |
13:24.56 |
brlcad |
ask me about paradigms |
13:25.24 |
``Erik |
ok, *shrug* when we're both in the office,
I'll jabber about four nickels |
13:25.53 |
``Erik |
a bit confused why this can't be said here and
now, but *shrug* |
13:25.55 |
brlcad |
or here later, I just gotta hit the road
:) |
13:26.22 |
``Erik |
ah, aight, you're riding what, michelin pilot
pros? be damn careful, they don't grab snow/ice owrth a
fuck |
13:26.37 |
``Erik |
I have 'em on the front, I refuse to drive cuz
I don't feel like dying today |
13:26.53 |
d-lo |
"Today is a good day to die." |
13:27.05 |
brlcad |
more worried about getting her prettiness all
sullied with muck and grime |
13:27.10 |
``Erik |
heh, amusingly, I have a wad of that
blood. |
13:27.13 |
``Erik |
but I disagree. |
13:27.45 |
archivist |
cars are meant to be used |
13:27.45 |
``Erik |
tell ya what, witht he m's, I'm FAR more
scared about the fucker behind me not having the braking
power |
13:28.26 |
``Erik |
I mean, good street conditions, I can clomp
down and stop in half the distance of an average sedan... fuckers
tailgate and don't pay attention, it's damn dangerous |
13:28.45 |
*** join/#brlcad smurfette
(n=Pandora@c-69-247-220-102.hsd1.mo.comcast.net) |
13:28.46 |
d-lo |
yeah, the snow has always been the least of my
worries... its all the idiots out there. |
13:29.43 |
d-lo |
I'll be watching the roads/storm progress.
I'll jet if it gets too bad. Although I don't think it will be a
problem. |
13:29.43 |
``Erik |
the, uh, silverado sportback that parks in the
same lot, I hit the brakes coming up on paradise, the dude was all
sideways and shit from hitting the brakes too hard :( he blew out
into the turn lane, but I was crapping my drawers |
13:29.54 |
d-lo |
has been playing ddo and
kinda likes it. |
13:30.07 |
``Erik |
your jeep should be able to track fairly well
in this east coast shit |
13:30.17 |
``Erik |
ddo? |
13:30.27 |
``Erik |
dance dance OBLIVION? |
13:30.39 |
d-lo |
vomits. |
13:30.56 |
d-lo |
No, not that retarded game. |
13:31.00 |
d-lo |
D&D online. |
13:31.08 |
d-lo |
playing the 10 day free trial. |
13:31.10 |
``Erik |
did you see the generic rip-off at the bowling
alley? |
13:31.25 |
d-lo |
Nope, must have missed it. |
13:31.35 |
d-lo |
Either that or my brain blocked it out from my
memory on purpose. |
13:31.48 |
``Erik |
they're redoing shit, it's amusing, in the
"arcade" section, there is a ddr rip-off |
13:32.04 |
``Erik |
richard claims it's going out due to green
tube failure |
13:32.18 |
d-lo |
'green tube failure' |
13:32.24 |
d-lo |
... is that medical talk? |
13:32.31 |
``Erik |
crt shit |
13:32.48 |
d-lo |
eww.... who uses crts anymore? |
13:33.02 |
``Erik |
it's a halfassed ddr rip with a little crt and
a shitty stomp pad thing |
13:33.50 |
d-lo |
heh, I threatend my mother-in-law's life when
she mentioned she might get us that DDR pad for Xmas. |
13:34.12 |
d-lo |
We got copies of NWN instead :) |
13:34.56 |
d-lo |
hates DDR in case you haven't
noticed. |
13:36.14 |
d-lo |
hey, where can you find the default size of
the Socket buffer at the OS level? |
13:38.55 |
``Erik |
um, usually it's the same as the page
buffer |
13:39.03 |
``Erik |
BUFSIZ in uh, stdlib.h I think |
13:39.08 |
d-lo |
kk. |
13:39.34 |
d-lo |
justr trying to size a socket buffer
intelligently. |
13:39.49 |
``Erik |
most os's have gone with 0-copy socket
buffers, so it's a page |
13:41.02 |
``Erik |
um, the ether spec says 1500, which comes out
to like 1486 or something, but frags are recouped immediately
now |
13:41.07 |
``Erik |
*think* |
13:41.18 |
d-lo |
1500 bytes? |
13:41.25 |
``Erik |
*fail* 1k is probably a good size |
13:41.26 |
``Erik |
yeah |
13:41.51 |
``Erik |
there's crap fro "large packets"... heh, I
d'no, I don't remember |
13:42.05 |
d-lo |
no worries... just looking for a starting
point. |
13:42.40 |
``Erik |
1k is safe, 4k is common |
13:43.13 |
``Erik |
BUFSIZ is usually 4k |
13:43.39 |
``Erik |
if you get to the point where it actually
matters, you'll know. |
13:44.18 |
d-lo |
well, I will be streaming several MB of data,
so I am going to fill the buffer every time.. |
13:45.50 |
``Erik |
don't sweat it until it becomes a
problem |
13:46.14 |
``Erik |
fragment collectors and buffers are pretty
damn solid these days |
13:46.26 |
d-lo |
kk |
13:46.33 |
d-lo |
so what you upto today> |
13:46.34 |
d-lo |
? |
13:46.55 |
``Erik |
I need to write an abstract for a
conference |
13:47.02 |
``Erik |
and do some adrt/isst work |
13:47.05 |
d-lo |
abstract.... what? |
13:47.27 |
``Erik |
uh, some v/l conf up in jersey that BC is all
twisted in a knot about |
13:47.47 |
d-lo |
so an abstract presentation? |
13:48.17 |
``Erik |
yeah, she wants me to present in like may, but
it needs and abstract by end of jan |
13:48.41 |
d-lo |
wow... thats a bit ahead of
schedule! |
13:49.02 |
``Erik |
gov't is as gov't does |
13:53.16 |
*** join/#brlcad Vivek
(n=Vivek@gnu-india/admin/VivekVC) |
13:53.49 |
Vivek |
Where can I get the install instructions for
brl-cad ? |
13:54.26 |
Vivek |
I have downloaded the 64 bit version and
unzipped and untared it |
13:54.43 |
d-lo |
what OS? |
13:57.15 |
Vivek |
Ubuntu |
13:57.59 |
d-lo |
did you get the binaries or the
source? |
13:59.19 |
Vivek |
d-lo:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/brlcad/brlcad_7.12.2_x86_64.tar.gz?modtime=1209452298&big_mirror=0 |
13:59.53 |
Vivek |
d-lo: Source from the above URL. |
14:00.42 |
``Erik |
what is the fail? |
14:01.02 |
d-lo |
that looks like a Binary distribution. try
running mged from rel-7.12.2/bin/ |
14:01.39 |
Vivek |
``Erik: I need the howto to install it on
ubuntu, a pointer to the revelant document would be
nice.\ |
14:02.04 |
Vivek |
d-lo: I use ubuntu not rhel. |
14:02.23 |
d-lo |
Vivek: yes, you said that. |
14:02.30 |
``Erik |
the code is the doc :D I'm not looking at your
URL, the source is the one true way, fwiw |
14:02.54 |
Vivek |
``Erik: ahaa |
14:03.12 |
Vivek |
I was looking for a install or readme file
:) |
14:03.25 |
``Erik |
we have both an INSTALL and a README |
14:03.34 |
d-lo |
like I said, You downloaded a Binary dist, so
'cd' over to whereveryouuntarredit/rel-7.12.2/bin/ and try running
'mged' |
14:04.14 |
Vivek |
So can you point me to the URL to download the
latest souce :) |
14:04.34 |
``Erik |
being a 30 year old program, we install to
/usr/brlcad/ by default, old school unix style, yo |
14:05.00 |
Vivek |
``Erik: ok... |
14:05.06 |
``Erik |
yes, the sourceforge page has a link to the
latest source, it's like 7.14.0 or something |
14:05.12 |
d-lo |
latest tarball of source:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=105292&package_id=113368 |
14:05.36 |
d-lo |
or you can get a SVN checkout if you want the
latest (perhaps not greatest ;) ) |
14:06.53 |
Vivek |
``Erik and d-lo: Thanks |
14:08.47 |
d-lo |
np |
14:09.48 |
Vivek |
oops I had downloaded the binary earlier
;) |
14:51.59 |
*** join/#brlcad mafm2
(n=quassel@119.Red-81-39-20.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
15:03.23 |
*** join/#brlcad BigAToo
(n=BigAToo@pool-96-230-124-203.sbndin.btas.verizon.net) |
15:12.37 |
*** join/#brlcad madant
(n=madant@117.196.146.14) |
15:15.47 |
*** join/#brlcad mafm
(n=quassel@65.Red-81-34-125.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
15:41.23 |
starseeker |
struggles back to something
one might generously call awake and heads in |
15:41.46 |
starseeker |
mmm, purty snow |
15:41.51 |
starseeker |
this should be entertaining |
15:45.01 |
*** join/#brlcad Elrohir
(n=kvirc@p5B14F0CC.dip.t-dialin.net) |
15:47.26 |
*** join/#brlcad madant1
(n=madant@117.196.140.123) |
16:09.58 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=omg@unaffiliated/elite01) |
17:06.42 |
*** join/#brlcad samrose
(n=samrose@c-24-11-214-181.hsd1.mi.comcast.net) |
17:29.15 |
*** join/#brlcad madant
(n=madant@117.196.140.123) |
17:31.14 |
*** join/#brlcad uwe123
(n=uwe@a33-94.adsl.paltel.net) |
17:48.52 |
*** join/#brlcad BigATo1
(n=BigAToo@pool-96-230-124-203.sbndin.btas.verizon.net) |
18:25.10 |
CIA-32 |
BRL-CAD: 03bob1961 * r33611 10/brlcad/trunk/
(11 files in 4 dirs): Added the following functions to libged:
ged_grid2model_lu, ged_grid2view_lu, ged_model2grid_lu,
ged_model2view_lu, ged_view2grid_lu, ged_view2model_lu and
ged_view2model_vec. |
19:19.21 |
*** join/#brlcad BigAToo
(n=BigAToo@pool-96-230-124-80.sbndin.btas.verizon.net) |
19:33.17 |
*** join/#brlcad BigAToo
(n=BigAToo@pool-96-230-124-80.sbndin.btas.verizon.net) |
20:47.21 |
*** join/#brlcad AddZero
(n=user@c75-111-103-220.amrlcmta01.tx.dh.suddenlink.net) |
21:40.38 |
*** join/#brlcad Elrohir
(n=kvirc@p5B14F0CC.dip.t-dialin.net) |
21:56.37 |
brlcad |
mm.. today was much better, that was fairly
useful or at least interesting |
21:57.46 |
brlcad |
d-lo: that's one of those places where just
using libpkg as the underlying transport will save a lot of
work |
21:58.17 |
brlcad |
it's a fairly extensively tested codebase as
it is that already parcels up and delivers data across a pipe
through a fairly simple interface |
21:59.19 |
brlcad |
and it takes care of all of the portability
issues that you won't encounter (tcp issues, drop outs, splits,
kernel/system buffering, signals, etc) just testing on a couple
platforms |
22:02.12 |
brlcad |
also, fwiw, our INSTALL file is in both the
source and binary dists (in binary it's in
share/brlcad/VERSION/doc/INSTALL iirc, otherwise the http svn URL
helps) |
22:41.35 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=omg@unaffiliated/elite01) |
23:41.01 |
*** join/#brlcad yukonbob
(i=1000@s142-179-54-198.bc.hsia.telus.net) [NETSPLIT
VICTIM] |