00:05.05 |
*** join/#brlcad BigAToo
(n=BigAToo@pool-96-230-124-10.sbndin.btas.verizon.net) |
00:31.39 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33969
10/brlcad/branches/STABLE/ (844 files in 82 dirs): merge trunk to
STABLE from r33711 to HEAD r33968, syncs rel-7-14-4
candidate |
01:22.15 |
starseeker |
grinds teeth as his efforts
at work on the mac flop on gentoo AGAIN |
01:39.46 |
bjorkintosh |
so ... |
01:39.56 |
bjorkintosh |
how comes the mged tutorial is in reverse
order? |
01:42.43 |
brlcad |
bjorkintosh: reverse order in what
way? |
01:43.25 |
bjorkintosh |
Postscript Version (258 pages, in reverse
order). |
01:43.48 |
bjorkintosh |
from this page: http://ftp.arl.army.mil/~mike/papers/88mged/ |
01:43.57 |
brlcad |
jeez, that's old |
01:44.20 |
bjorkintosh |
indeed. is it not worth reading at all
then? |
01:44.46 |
brlcad |
reverse order probably because of some printer
that required it to output in-order |
01:44.59 |
bjorkintosh |
'cause some very kind people in #ghostscript
(kens) righted the order! |
01:45.01 |
bjorkintosh |
and emailed it to me. |
01:45.11 |
bjorkintosh |
in both pdf and ps. |
01:46.27 |
brlcad |
you could certainly read it, but realize that
it was written in '88 .. 21 years ago |
01:46.35 |
brlcad |
a couple things have changed |
01:46.48 |
bjorkintosh |
what's a good replacement for the
document? |
01:48.20 |
brlcad |
bjorkintosh: have you even been to the main
website? :) |
01:48.25 |
bjorkintosh |
yes. |
01:49.19 |
brlcad |
then it should be kinda obvious, I'd
hope |
01:50.30 |
bjorkintosh |
intro to mged. |
01:50.33 |
bjorkintosh |
indeedy. |
01:54.29 |
bjorkintosh |
deep curiousity... i just had to read
it |
01:54.42 |
bjorkintosh |
it was a little too annoying to read it in the
reverse order though. |
02:31.37 |
starseeker |
smashes scl into building on
gentoo and tars up for testing on the mac... |
02:40.42 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33970
10/brlcad/tags/rel-7-14-4/: |
02:40.42 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: stable merging and testing finally
finished, tag 7.14.4 |
02:40.42 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: next time use a faster
machine. |
02:44.06 |
starseeker |
brlcad: Are we open for committing
again? |
02:46.16 |
brlcad |
not until you see step 14 |
02:48.39 |
starseeker |
k |
02:49.26 |
bjorkintosh |
i got an old book called the art of 3-d
design... it's revived all these latent interests again. |
02:49.38 |
bjorkintosh |
i'm going to try to work through it using brl
cad |
02:50.40 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33971 10/brlcad/trunk/
(NEWS README include/conf/PATCH): post-release bump revision number
to 7.14.5 in anticipation of 7.14.6 |
02:57.32 |
starseeker |
realizes he shouldn't commit
this until he has it in a form that won't bust distcheck
anyway |
02:59.40 |
brlcad |
bjorkintosh: cool, feel free to share your
progress as you work through it |
02:59.50 |
brlcad |
and of course ask away if you have
questions |
03:00.15 |
brlcad |
starseeker: indeed |
03:00.43 |
bjorkintosh |
i will. |
03:01.01 |
bjorkintosh |
so far, all the examples from muus's manual
have worked. |
03:01.23 |
bjorkintosh |
i'm guessing mged is fully backwards
compatible? |
03:01.46 |
starseeker |
not guaranteed, but it's not surprising a lot
of it still works |
03:02.49 |
bjorkintosh |
very well then, i shall go through the entire
thing and note any broken parts... |
03:03.12 |
bjorkintosh |
i've been skipping the hardware specific
content though |
03:03.15 |
bjorkintosh |
so i'm cheating a little. |
03:08.14 |
brlcad |
if you see /dev/sgip, just replace it with
/dev/X |
03:09.25 |
bjorkintosh |
okay. |
03:10.15 |
bjorkintosh |
is tcl/tk already in it's
20somethings?! |
03:10.20 |
bjorkintosh |
i'm rather surprised... |
03:19.49 |
*** join/#brlcad
PrezKennedyIII (i=Matthew@whitecalf.net) |
04:33.57 |
Ralith |
it's pretty old |
04:34.04 |
Ralith |
you can tell by how ugly its widgets are
>_> |
06:13.14 |
*** join/#brlcad Ralith
(n=ralith@216.162.199.202) |
08:14.34 |
*** join/#brlcad _sushi_
(n=_sushi_@84-72-93-63.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
09:25.23 |
*** join/#brlcad mafm
(n=mafm@223.Red-83-49-86.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
11:54.57 |
brlcad |
Ralith: it actually has a fully revamped look
n' feel now (the new ttk widgets) |
11:56.15 |
brlcad |
fully themable widget set, http://wiki.tcl.tk/11075 |
12:10.36 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: 03indianlarry * r33972
10/brlcad/trunk/src/mged/chgmodel.c: |
12:10.36 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: updated f_qorot() to properly rotate
around point,direction related |
12:10.36 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: to BUG "[ 2663014 ] qorot does not
rotate around vector". |
12:33.15 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=omg@unaffiliated/elite01) |
13:20.37 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: 03indianlarry * r33973
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libwdb/wdb.c: |
13:20.37 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: changed vertex ordering in mk_rpp()
to match new arb8 ordering |
13:20.37 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: this relates to BUG "[ 2663183 ]
arb8/rpp vertex order different" |
13:28.45 |
``Erik_ |
uh |
13:29.25 |
``Erik_ |
oh, that's keith hah |
13:29.37 |
d-lo |
it lives! i mean, Hey Erik! |
13:29.43 |
``Erik_ |
yo, dave |
13:29.55 |
d-lo |
hows your new office? |
13:30.05 |
``Erik_ |
not bad now that the light is off |
13:30.08 |
``Erik_ |
:D |
13:30.35 |
``Erik_ |
here, wait, lemme push my sub up against the
wall and crank it, ya'll didn't want that whiteboard to stay
attached, didja? :D |
13:30.37 |
``Erik_ |
*duck* |
13:31.09 |
d-lo |
What we need is a McDonalds Style Drive Thru
window in our wall. I see no end to the entertainment with that.
:) |
13:31.13 |
``Erik_ |
ooh, I could stand on a desk and push the
ceiling tile up and throw shit at ya, too :D awesome |
13:31.26 |
d-lo |
Sub? "You don't have the balls" to do that
;) |
13:31.36 |
d-lo |
Well, not shit, but stuff. |
13:36.44 |
*** join/#brlcad piksi
(n=piksi@pi-xi.net) |
13:37.21 |
piksi |
hi, on the brlcad homepage you state that "The
solid modeling system is frequently used in a wide range of
military, academic, and industrial applications including in the
design and analysis of vehicles, mechanical parts, and
architecture." |
13:37.28 |
piksi |
are there any examples of brl's usage in
architecture? |
13:48.11 |
piksi |
in the quest for a foss bim modeler for
architecture i've stumbled upon brl numerous times |
13:52.07 |
*** join/#brlcad BigAToo
(n=BigAToo@pool-96-230-124-10.sbndin.btas.verizon.net) |
14:03.58 |
brlcad |
hi pk |
14:04.01 |
brlcad |
er, piksi |
14:04.40 |
piksi |
hi |
14:05.11 |
brlcad |
piksi: you'd stumble upon us mostly becasue we
are 'the' (only/main) foss CAD system in production use (that we're
aware of, fully foss) |
14:05.47 |
brlcad |
most of our architecture history has been
folks modeling buildings that perform loading and structural
analyses |
14:06.04 |
brlcad |
like what happens when you explode something
near a pillar |
14:06.42 |
brlcad |
alas, not so much bim requirements as modeling
for the purpose of running very specific analyses |
14:06.54 |
brlcad |
or for generating basic
drawings/visualizations |
14:06.58 |
piksi |
brlcad: yep, i know. there really really
aren't any viable realistic cad options in foss apart form
brl |
14:07.06 |
brlcad |
nods |
14:07.32 |
piksi |
there's an interest in the architecture field
to strive away from autodesk due to their licensing and horrendous
reliability |
14:07.54 |
piksi |
and there have been some isolated efforts to
develop from architects to architects software |
14:08.22 |
piksi |
i'm just thinking how realistic basis could
brl be for a plugin(?) or other framework on top of it for
bim/nurbs modelling of buildings |
14:08.36 |
piksi |
as far as i've understood brl understands
materials very well? |
14:10.45 |
brlcad |
depends what you mean my "understands", but
there is support for material types, region identifiers, arbitrary
attributes |
14:11.39 |
brlcad |
our new modeling environment is specifically
being designed to (hopefully) be fully plugin-based with modular
pieces of functionality that lets us plug in old as well as new
features |
14:12.06 |
brlcad |
biggest issue is really just developer
manpower -- the user demand is much much greater than the developer
capacity |
14:12.46 |
brlcad |
and the few folks (not on our team) that could
be devs are either off doing their own project or doing CAD
development for their day job |
14:13.05 |
brlcad |
at least, as far as I can tell ;) |
14:18.58 |
piksi |
yeah it's completely understandable
:-) |
14:19.59 |
piksi |
i could perhaps get a few developers working
on it but the funding would be from architects so the focus would
be either on a fork or extensions for architectural
bim... |
14:33.52 |
piksi |
so who are funding brl-development right
now? |
14:34.24 |
brlcad |
piksi: wouldn't need to be a fork
per-se |
14:34.44 |
piksi |
yeah i'm always against forking if it's
avoidable :-) |
14:34.53 |
brlcad |
there is plenty of mutual interest/overlap --
the bigger issue just might be how the GUI evolves or how a new one
is developed |
14:35.43 |
brlcad |
brl-cad is still heavily funded by
ARL |
14:36.22 |
brlcad |
more than half the core devs are paid by or
affiliated with the gov't in some fashion |
14:38.30 |
brlcad |
most development, though, happens via simple
consensus discussions where design decisions have to be made, only
influenced by a developer meritocracy (i.e., those who contribute
decide) |
14:41.08 |
piksi |
brlcad: ok |
14:41.28 |
piksi |
yeah the gui is a big issue |
14:41.48 |
brlcad |
if you've not seen this: http://brlcad.org/BRL-CAD_Priorities.png |
14:42.40 |
brlcad |
that's our major project priorities
(regardless of funding support, though most of that has major
support too) |
14:43.26 |
brlcad |
brep/nurbs support, networked geometry
service, enhanced gui, and more open source collaboration |
14:44.25 |
brlcad |
starseeker: tcl/tk aren't creating
symlinks/copies -- something is missing from
src/other/tcl/unix/Makefile.in and/or tk's too |
14:49.21 |
piksi |
brlcad: there are plenty of ideas for the gui
on making architecture efficent which might interest also the
funders oand developers of brl |
14:50.07 |
piksi |
because we architects know very well something
that isn't usable (due tot the horrendousness of many commercial
solutions such as ArchiCAD, AutoCAD ADT etc ;-) |
14:51.37 |
brlcad |
piksi: how much of that is really
architecture-specific as it pertains to a gui? |
14:52.54 |
brlcad |
to date, we've intentionally tried to utilize
domain-agnostic metaphors so that the package is really generalized
to most CAD/solid modeling needs |
14:53.20 |
brlcad |
otherwise we'd gravitate towards CAE and
analysis terms that are very niche |
14:53.34 |
brlcad |
(which would be bad imnsho) |
14:55.08 |
piksi |
brlcad: well, autocad architecture (used to be
autocad architectural desktop) is a prime example how how bim
modelling cannot be glued on top of a pure line/solid cad
modeller |
14:55.45 |
brlcad |
for domain-specific terms and metaphors, I'm
hoping/intending that the new GUI be modular enough to have
"overlays" where you get domain-specific (drafting, CAM,
Architecture, electronics, etc) |
14:56.05 |
brlcad |
piksi: you'll have to explain, never used
it |
14:56.11 |
brlcad |
nor even seen it |
14:56.47 |
brlcad |
plus, was it a bad design, or bad execution
(or both) .. could be a great idea and a horrible
implementation |
14:57.26 |
piksi |
yes i'm very much for minimal basic gui with
minimal restrictions on modularity (so that the basis of the gui
will not restrict modifying it suitable for a certain
job) |
14:57.29 |
piksi |
well |
14:57.42 |
piksi |
brlcad: bad design && bad execution
:-) |
14:57.43 |
piksi |
but |
14:59.18 |
piksi |
brlcad: autocad ADT was a prime example of how
the 30 year old autocad paradigm was so restrictive that it didn't
allow for an easily usable bim modeller on top of it. so it had a
LOT of redundancies and also counterintuitive actions and in
addition many of the tools had different usage logic |
14:59.49 |
piksi |
so a random set of (old) tools worked with a
certain logic and a random set of other tools implemented later
worked with a completely different logic |
15:00.00 |
piksi |
(and i very much prefer a PROPER CLI in a
modeler) |
15:00.36 |
piksi |
i hope this explains something |
15:39.49 |
starseeker |
brlcad: re: tcl/tk - OK, I'll see if I can
track it down |
15:40.06 |
starseeker |
grr, I thought I had all the major functional
updates |
15:41.28 |
*** join/#brlcad louipc
(n=louipc@archlinux/trusteduser/louipc) |
15:45.03 |
starseeker |
ah I see it |
15:51.04 |
starseeker |
hmm - no, wait... |
15:51.46 |
louipc |
are there plans for a 7.14.4
tarball? |
15:52.48 |
starseeker |
should be - that's standard |
15:52.55 |
starseeker |
brlcad: want me to take care of that
part? |
15:53.16 |
louipc |
ok, just wondering hehe |
15:54.08 |
louipc |
I can pull off of svn, but some other people
may not follow releases/tagging as closely |
16:05.04 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r33974
10/brlcad/trunk/src/other/tk/unix/Makefile.in: Re-add change to
Makefile.in from revision 30417 |
16:10.43 |
starseeker |
brlcad: OK, that looks like it got it - tk
didn't know what SHLIB_SUFFIX was so it's no surprise things
weren't working |
16:13.37 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: 03d_rossberg * r33975 10/rt^3/trunk/
(2 files in 2 dirs): modification of a combination's tree |
16:17.49 |
*** join/#brlcad andrecastelo
(n=chatzill@189.71.28.157) |
16:35.54 |
brlcad |
piksi: yeah, that does (I think) :) |
16:36.03 |
brlcad |
sounds quite congruent too |
16:39.17 |
*** join/#brlcad mafm
(n=mafm@223.Red-83-49-86.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
16:47.25 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r33976
10/brlcad/branches/STABLE/src/other/tk/unix/Makefile.in: Add fix
for tk unix Makefile.in from trunk rev 33974 to STABLE
branch |
17:10.53 |
starseeker |
grr - now yylineno is not found in
libexpress |
17:24.15 |
*** join/#brlcad
hippieindamakin8 (n=hippiein@59.92.164.81) |
19:13.28 |
``Erik_ |
O.O
http://www.edibleapple.com/ifart-developer-makes-40000-in-2-days/
iphone owners seem to have... issues... :D |
19:23.10 |
*** join/#brlcad _sushi_
(n=_sushi_@77-58-232-171.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
19:35.58 |
*** join/#brlcad User59
(n=User@host218-51-dynamic.11-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
19:36.40 |
*** join/#brlcad User618
(n=User@host218-51-dynamic.11-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
19:55.24 |
piksi |
brlcad: if it's ok with you i'll discuss brl
in a meeting soon and ask if there's mutual interest in
cooperation/development and then discuss more with you brl
developers |
21:45.41 |
*** join/#brlcad BigAToo
(n=BigAToo@pool-96-230-124-10.sbndin.btas.verizon.net) |
22:08.04 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33977
10/brlcad/trunk/doc/ (Makefile.am TODO.BREP): additional BREP notes
to go with the brep.txt notes as a general work breakdown scratch
pad |
22:22.00 |
brlcad |
piksi: sounds great |
22:22.07 |
brlcad |
let me know if you need anything |
22:26.23 |
CIA-40 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r33978
10/brlcad/trunk/doc/TODO.BREP: few more entities and
modifiers |
22:27.23 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=omg@unaffiliated/elite01) |
23:23.01 |
starseeker |
grumble |
23:23.22 |
starseeker |
older bisons don't seem to be generating
yylineno, but the new one does |
23:27.38 |
Ralith |
brlcad: cool! What's needed to make that work
with mged? |
23:31.29 |
*** join/#brlcad piksi_
(n=piksi@pi-xi.net) |
23:32.20 |
Ralith |
just Tk 8.5 and some config file
somewhere? |
23:35.54 |
Ralith |
looks like it needs to be hardcoded. |
23:36.29 |
Ralith |
and adds a new dependency of tile |
23:48.05 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(n=sean@bz.bzflag.bz) |