00:50.13 |
*** join/#brlcad dreeves2
(n=dreeves@64.178.177.71) |
00:53.14 |
*** join/#brlcad dreeves2
(n=dreeves@64.178.177.71) |
01:07.39 |
*** join/#brlcad BigAToo
(n=BigAToo@pool-96-230-124-244.sbndin.btas.verizon.net) |
01:11.38 |
*** join/#brlcad dreeves
(n=dreeves@64.178.177.71) |
01:45.33 |
starseeker |
brlcad: I agree, real world geometry is the
way to go |
01:53.28 |
starseeker |
wonders if we can get the
ProE files for this sucker: http://www.longnow.org/projects/clock/prototype1/ |
02:00.54 |
*** join/#brlcad _pseudo
(n=irchon@wireless-128-62-174-226.public.utexas.edu) |
02:04.14 |
*** join/#brlcad pacman87
(i=500@resnet-46-40.dorm.utexas.edu) |
03:24.45 |
*** part/#brlcad pacman87
(i=500@resnet-46-40.dorm.utexas.edu) |
03:24.51 |
*** join/#brlcad pacman87
(i=500@resnet-46-40.dorm.utexas.edu) |
03:28.34 |
*** join/#brlcad BigAToo
(n=BigAToo@pool-96-230-124-244.sbndin.btas.verizon.net) |
04:21.58 |
yukonbob |
happy friday, cadheads |
04:25.19 |
pacman87 |
good evening |
07:10.11 |
*** join/#brlcad
hippieindamakin8 (n=hippiein@202.3.77.38) |
07:21.21 |
*** join/#brlcad
hippieindamakin8 (n=hippiein@202.3.77.38) |
07:33.59 |
*** join/#brlcad madant
(n=d@117.196.131.31) |
08:28.26 |
*** join/#brlcad Ralith
(n=ralith@216.162.199.202) |
08:37.48 |
*** join/#brlcad Ralith
(n=ralith@216.162.199.202) |
09:25.44 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=omg@unaffiliated/elite01) |
09:57.57 |
*** join/#brlcad _sushi_
(n=_sushi_@77.58.234.64) |
11:08.46 |
*** join/#brlcad
hippieindamakin8 (n=hippiein@202.3.77.38) |
11:49.26 |
*** join/#brlcad BigAToo
(n=BigAToo@pool-96-230-124-244.sbndin.btas.verizon.net) |
14:03.59 |
*** join/#brlcad dreeves
(n=40b2b147@bz.bzflag.bz) |
14:11.06 |
``Erik |
blinks and looks at the
microsoft access database sitting in rt^3 |
14:35.47 |
*** join/#brlcad dreeves
(n=IceChat7@64.178.177.71) |
14:46.38 |
madant |
searches for his
mojo |
16:04.12 |
*** join/#brlcad cad24
(n=71808c7b@bz.bzflag.bz) |
16:10.19 |
brlcad |
``Erik: eh? |
16:16.33 |
``Erik |
rt^3/docs/BME.eap ? |
16:17.51 |
``Erik |
hmmm, that uml thingy dave uses must use
access as the backend |
16:27.21 |
brlcad |
ah |
17:07.34 |
starseeker |
ew |
17:09.08 |
starseeker |
maybe http://argouml.tigris.org/ could
work? |
17:11.29 |
*** join/#brlcad FAMULUS
(n=mark@ool-ad028f27.dyn.optonline.net) |
17:12.05 |
FAMULUS |
what would cause an object which has been
Blasted to the canvas to show in a raytrace, but not in
wireframe? |
17:26.00 |
``Erik |
you mean like an overlay vs underlay
issue? |
17:26.21 |
FAMULUS |
``Erik: I can't see the object in wireframe
view |
17:26.27 |
FAMULUS |
but I can see it when I raytrace |
17:26.45 |
FAMULUS |
feature or bug? |
17:27.28 |
``Erik |
um, I'm not quite sure what state your mged is
in, if you raytrace and have it in overlay (I think?) mode, the
wireframe will not show |
17:27.39 |
brlcad |
starseeker: give it a go? only way to know
would be to try it out |
17:28.37 |
brlcad |
FAMULUS: Settings -> Framebuffer -> turn
off "Framebuffer Active" |
17:28.52 |
brlcad |
it's also a checkbox on the raytrace control
panel |
17:29.46 |
starseeker |
brlcad: I'll ask him on Monday |
17:30.14 |
starseeker |
doubt it can import the access database, but
maybe he can export it somehow |
17:30.25 |
brlcad |
starseeker: er, ask him what? :) I know he
tried out various tools, most that just crashed a lot on
him |
17:30.35 |
brlcad |
the only one that was mildly stable was the
commercial one he's using now |
17:30.48 |
brlcad |
there are renderings of those class
diagrams |
17:30.51 |
starseeker |
ask him to export the data from his commercial
tool into some non-access form |
17:30.59 |
starseeker |
nods |
17:31.13 |
brlcad |
http://brlcad.org/design/gs/ |
17:31.45 |
starseeker |
psd? |
17:32.00 |
brlcad |
photoshop |
17:32.06 |
starseeker |
ah |
17:32.16 |
brlcad |
gimp reads those iirc |
17:32.39 |
starseeker |
wonder why he stuck the access database into
svn |
17:32.55 |
brlcad |
what erik said more than likely |
17:33.03 |
brlcad |
it just happens to be what the software uses
on the backend |
17:33.21 |
starseeker |
nods |
17:33.36 |
brlcad |
it is otherwise "just a binary file" that the
software stores its data into, whatever the name of that software
is |
17:33.44 |
brlcad |
or even more, might just happen to use the
same suffix |
17:33.51 |
brlcad |
dunno if he was reading the contents |
17:33.58 |
starseeker |
well, if that's the only thing that works, I
guess that's what we go with |
17:34.16 |
starseeker |
emerges argouml to see what
it's like |
17:34.18 |
``Erik |
notes that the extension
there is .eap where access is technically .mdb, 'file' told me it
was access and some googling shows that the 'jet database' is what
access actually calls itself internally |
17:34.44 |
brlcad |
on a more interesting note .. :) http://brlcad.org/tmp/tgcbug.rt |
17:34.51 |
``Erik |
imagines some company wrote a
'jet database' and ms bought it, now windows tools just use it as a
convenient backend, like sqlite |
17:35.19 |
brlcad |
isolated a tgc failure in havoc that returns
only one hit point -- good test case |
17:37.44 |
starseeker |
hmm |
17:38.02 |
``Erik |
the aging 'new' bz is all updated
again |
17:38.04 |
``Erik |
O.o |
17:38.39 |
brlcad |
woot |
17:38.57 |
``Erik |
most sarcastic woot ever? :D *duck* |
17:39.04 |
brlcad |
nope, good stuff |
17:39.10 |
brlcad |
genuine wootage |
17:39.16 |
starseeker |
brlcad: confirmed, returns a miss here
too |
17:39.19 |
starseeker |
odd |
17:39.33 |
brlcad |
it's a funky tgc with a pinched top, but it's
a clean shot |
17:39.38 |
``Erik |
migration would equal w00tage :D hop to, boy
:D *duck* |
17:39.42 |
brlcad |
right into the side and out the flat
disc |
17:40.35 |
brlcad |
nirt seems to plot the right entry and exit
values, so kind of odd |
17:40.48 |
brlcad |
``Erik: I did at least finally turn off the
german server |
17:41.05 |
brlcad |
spent much of last week sorting that
out |
17:41.22 |
brlcad |
they didn't want to "let me go" giving hell
about terms I never agreed to |
17:41.32 |
``Erik |
heh |
17:41.47 |
``Erik |
lame, as much as I like the notion of having a
backup on another continent, it sounds like they were being
dickish |
17:41.57 |
brlcad |
they were, I was very surprised |
17:42.11 |
brlcad |
up until then, everything had been
perfect/better with them |
17:42.17 |
``Erik |
did the florida one agree to migrate your IP
pool? |
17:42.47 |
``Erik |
lotr on tnt, btw, good background
noise |
17:42.53 |
brlcad |
but then they were royally being dicks when I
asked to cancel .. and it was even originally just going to be
temporary (until after bz is migrated, 6 months or so) |
17:43.04 |
brlcad |
they haven't answered |
17:44.20 |
brlcad |
even if I had agreed to an annual contract
renewal (which I didn't), my message to them was 12 days before the
end of term .. |
17:44.30 |
brlcad |
they claimed it needed to be 14 days in
advance |
17:44.38 |
brlcad |
which just made me even more livid |
17:45.20 |
brlcad |
6 e-mails later that just keep escalating,
they finally agreed to my request |
17:45.30 |
brlcad |
very absurd, disappointing |
17:45.44 |
``Erik |
hm, *shrug* they're probably feeling some
economic crunch and have some pointy haired fuckwit that thinks
forcing customers to stay is a viable business solution |
17:46.31 |
``Erik |
lots of service companies seem to try that
:( |
17:46.38 |
brlcad |
it's not like I'm going to just keep paying
them for the hell of it, especially after that |
17:47.59 |
brlcad |
especially given that they had an interesting
"we will terminate you instantly" clause if you put up
porn |
17:48.16 |
brlcad |
I told them, do I *really* need to put up porn
for you to get the point? |
17:48.56 |
``Erik |
heh, nothin' like a goatse or lemonparty to
get someones attention O.o |
17:49.06 |
brlcad |
especially given I didn't agree to the term
and I was before the end of the term I didn't agree to
anyways |
17:49.24 |
brlcad |
yeah, it was getting rather
unpleasant |
17:49.44 |
brlcad |
so now I'm thinking about whether I'd ever go
back to them |
17:49.52 |
brlcad |
shame really, it was just going to be
temporary |
17:50.01 |
``Erik |
there're still residual scars burnt into the
back of my brain from when I saw a particularly ... 'hardcore' gay
porn image iwth "verizon customer service" stashed in a humor pic
site (I'm ok with nsfw, but this was not safe for human
consumption) |
17:50.09 |
brlcad |
guess they don't realize how I throw money
away at having servers on standby *cough* |
17:50.32 |
brlcad |
heh |
17:50.45 |
brlcad |
when it was heated, those thoughts were
crossing my mind |
17:50.46 |
*** join/#brlcad dreeves
(n=IceChat7@64.178.177.71) |
17:51.13 |
brlcad |
wouldn't have taken a whole lot to turn the
site into "custom porn" for them with entire transcripts of our
discussions |
17:51.58 |
``Erik |
have you seen http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRgNOyCnbqg
? :D |
17:53.40 |
``Erik |
aaanyays, the new machine seems solid. given
that the old one provides many different services, it might be a
good time to migrate some of the less critical or less connected
ones over (like mebbe bind) |
17:54.01 |
``Erik |
thinks 'incremental
migration' might be a good strategy |
17:54.09 |
``Erik |
until then, it's still my personal playpen I
guess :D |
17:58.33 |
brlcad |
I fear migrating bind actually -- if you want
to tackle that one, go for it |
18:01.07 |
CIA-28 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r34242
10/brlcad/trunk/src/librt/primitives/tgc/tgc.c: note that the units
being displayed are in 'mm' regardless of the local units
set. |
18:02.52 |
CIA-28 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r34243
10/brlcad/trunk/include/raytrace.h: |
18:02.52 |
CIA-28 |
BRL-CAD: allow a NULL parameter to be passed
to RT_HIT_NORMAL if they don't have a normal |
18:02.52 |
CIA-28 |
BRL-CAD: array to be filled in and just want
hitp->hit_normal to be calculated. this |
18:02.52 |
CIA-28 |
BRL-CAD: makes it pretty trivial to update
code that used RT_HIT_NORM() over to |
18:02.52 |
CIA-28 |
BRL-CAD: RT_HIT_NORMAL() by just adding a NULL
and 0 flip value. |
18:20.22 |
*** join/#brlcad samrose
(n=samrose@ip-207-145-38-45.iad.megapath.net) |
18:20.49 |
brlcad |
so for information purposes, I'm applying to
the openusability call for projects |
18:21.04 |
brlcad |
there's little chance we'll be accepted as the
deadline was a couple days ago, but applying anyways |
18:21.17 |
brlcad |
basically, it's similar to gsoc but
specifically focused on usability |
18:21.50 |
brlcad |
and since usability is one of our biggest
problems, I figure why not |
18:21.59 |
brlcad |
(unfortunately, I just heard about the
effort) |
18:22.24 |
``Erik |
ratemyui.com? O.o heh |
18:22.26 |
brlcad |
that said, need to know who (of developers)
would be willing to mentor a usability project? |
18:22.29 |
louipc |
that's pretty cool |
18:22.37 |
``Erik |
uiornot.com? |
18:22.41 |
brlcad |
(if you have commit access, you
qualify) |
18:22.46 |
louipc |
I want all my console apps to have a vi-like
interface hehe |
18:22.53 |
brlcad |
louipc: hehe |
18:22.58 |
``Erik |
vi ftw |
18:23.10 |
brlcad |
scratches two names off the
list! |
18:23.11 |
brlcad |
j/k |
18:24.10 |
brlcad |
unlike gsoc, I don't think they'd actually be
coding -- I think their tasks are specifically towards usability
specifications, mockups, specific guideline formulations,
etc |
18:24.33 |
brlcad |
need an okay to give them your e-mail if
you're interested |
18:25.26 |
brlcad |
was thinking perhaps
starseeker and/or ``Erik and whomever else is
interested |
18:39.27 |
PrezKennedy |
i want brlcad to be like emacs... some games
and a mail app built right in |
18:45.50 |
brlcad |
I think we can make that happen |
18:46.00 |
brlcad |
even with justification! |
18:46.18 |
brlcad |
games for those down-time moments when they're
waiting for a render or a conversion to complete |
18:46.28 |
brlcad |
mail app for .. discussing model changes,
yeah |
18:48.55 |
brlcad |
starseeker: ``Erik: how about it? ..
*crickets*? :) |
18:49.25 |
archivist |
irc window? |
18:49.33 |
brlcad |
archivist: hm? |
18:49.55 |
brlcad |
archivist: you up for mentoring a usability
project? :) |
18:50.34 |
archivist |
dunno /me never dun nuffink like
that |
18:51.05 |
brlcad |
would you like to do somefink like
dat? |
18:51.52 |
archivist |
I would have a bias towards a Solidworks look
alike :) |
18:52.02 |
brlcad |
that would be fantastic |
18:52.24 |
brlcad |
actually, that's very good usability
background to be able to talk about with the student |
18:52.48 |
louipc |
I didn't think solidworks was very
usable |
18:53.01 |
archivist |
heh! |
18:53.03 |
louipc |
autocad was better I think |
18:53.09 |
archivist |
hell no |
18:53.16 |
brlcad |
the point would be really to engage the
student in a dialog |
18:53.23 |
brlcad |
be able to relate it to what industry
does |
18:53.31 |
brlcad |
and to how / why we do things |
18:53.51 |
brlcad |
and then (I gather) to figure out what we can
best focus on or how we can best approach improving our
usability |
18:54.03 |
brlcad |
such that it fulfills expectations, is
intuitive, is familiar, etc |
18:54.18 |
brlcad |
(and productive, can't forget the most
important aspect) :) |
18:54.28 |
brlcad |
louipc: you interested? |
18:54.58 |
louipc |
maybe if I have a partner :P |
18:55.09 |
brlcad |
you're not exactly committing to anything firm
just yet -- I just need to be able to give a list of potential
mentors as part of our application |
18:55.36 |
louipc |
so I would just talk about what I find helps
usability? |
18:55.48 |
brlcad |
I'd be glad to partner up there, I have a fair
bit of usability training and experience (contrary to brl-cad's
gui, heh) |
18:56.13 |
brlcad |
louipc: you would be mentoring a student that
would be working on some specific aspect of usability |
18:56.49 |
louipc |
hah |
18:56.49 |
brlcad |
like lets say, hypothetically, that they were
going to look at ways of making mged's existing menu mess be less
of a mess |
18:57.17 |
brlcad |
or finding patterns in our 400+ commands and
finding ways to make their command-line invocation more consistent
and intuitive |
18:58.27 |
louipc |
Yeah I would like to, but I don't want to lead
anyone on about knowing more than I really do... |
18:59.08 |
louipc |
brlcad: yeah that sounds alright |
18:59.17 |
brlcad |
or maybe formulating a specific case study on
the usability of a prescribed interaction scenario, like modeling a
cup, and going into excrutiating detail on the various calculatable
metrics to suggest changes that would improve efficiency |
18:59.56 |
louipc |
that's a good one |
19:00.08 |
brlcad |
louipc: your familiarity and mentoring ability
more comes from your ability to speak to (or figure out) what
brl-cad does, what CAD does/requires in general, and to explain
that to someone who probably has absolutely no experience with
CAD |
19:00.16 |
louipc |
I was kind of doing that at one
point |
19:00.48 |
brlcad |
sounds like we have a winner then! .. would
you PM me an e-mail? |
19:01.08 |
brlcad |
still an outstanding question for archivist
starseeker ``Erik ... and I'm sure more of you lurking
here! |
19:01.40 |
brlcad |
usability is our biggest problem, this has
huge impact potential |
19:02.06 |
archivist |
sure does |
19:02.33 |
archivist |
been trying and watching all sorts over the
years |
19:02.44 |
PrezKennedy |
brlcad needs a ribbon :) |
19:02.54 |
louipc |
archivist: I don't like how solidworks is so
click-and-point dialog-box heaven :P |
19:03.17 |
archivist |
its faster once you are used to it |
19:03.38 |
brlcad |
PrezKennedy: are you saying you want to mentor
too? :) |
19:03.51 |
archivist |
and on a cold day you can keep one hand in
your pocket |
19:03.51 |
PrezKennedy |
poor kid would be ruined for life |
19:04.50 |
brlcad |
humorously and coincedentally relevant:
http://corsix.org/gsoc/ribbon.html |
19:04.59 |
louipc |
well actually the point-and-click is more
usable for novices |
19:05.01 |
PrezKennedy |
brlcad, am i even qualified to mentor
anything? :p |
19:05.32 |
brlcad |
PrezKennedy: undoubtedly |
19:08.27 |
PrezKennedy |
scary, but it could be fun |
19:14.00 |
``Erik |
*readreadread* |
19:14.37 |
``Erik |
I have strange notions about usability, I
kinda prefer mged -c to mged for the incredibly rare occasion when
I can be assed to do it... O.o |
19:15.00 |
brlcad |
``Erik: so you could mentor someone
specifically about command-line usability metrics |
19:15.07 |
louipc |
``Erik: I agree |
19:15.11 |
brlcad |
they still propose what they're actually going
to work on |
19:15.13 |
louipc |
:D |
19:15.14 |
brlcad |
similar to gsoc |
19:15.40 |
brlcad |
thinks brl-cad would be a
formidable usability playground .. lots of ways to
improve |
19:16.45 |
``Erik |
*shrug* whatever, I suppose |
19:21.54 |
*** join/#brlcad Elrohir
(n=kvirc@p5B14C548.dip.t-dialin.net) |
19:23.18 |
*** join/#brlcad pacman87
(i=500@resnet-46-40.dorm.utexas.edu) |
19:23.36 |
brlcad |
``Erik: cool |
19:38.30 |
PrezKennedy |
dont forget to make it web 2.0! |
19:38.58 |
``Erik |
web 7.14, yo |
19:39.32 |
PrezKennedy |
web 3.11 for workgroups |
19:40.09 |
``Erik |
web bob? O.o |
19:40.09 |
archivist |
object oriented assembler rulz |
19:41.17 |
archivist |
sad thing is that did exist as a book Object
oriented assembly language byL. Dirfman |
19:41.31 |
archivist |
worse...I have it |
19:42.30 |
``Erik |
it's called objc, right? :D |
19:42.49 |
``Erik |
C is the pdp11 assembler, right? |
19:45.08 |
archivist |
High Level Assembler :) |
19:45.32 |
archivist |
I shouldnt joks as that exists as
well |
19:46.57 |
``Erik |
dang wussies and yoru labels and stuff *shakes
cane* whatever happened to good old machine code monitors?
:D |
19:50.01 |
*** join/#brlcad pacman87_
(n=pacman87@bz.bzflag.bz) |
19:50.19 |
*** join/#brlcad dreeves
(n=dreeves@64.178.177.71) |
20:15.43 |
pacman87_ |
ssh + screen + irssi + ipod touch
ftw |
20:22.37 |
brlcad |
heh, where'd you get an ssh client
from? |
20:24.39 |
pacman87 |
app store |
20:25.00 |
brlcad |
huh |
20:25.31 |
brlcad |
haven't syncd my phone in few months..
probably should |
20:31.25 |
brlcad |
which app do you have? looks like there's at
least 4 |
20:32.37 |
brlcad |
jugaari looks like it might be worth it if it
does all it says.. |
20:33.01 |
pacman87_ |
iSSH |
20:33.22 |
brlcad |
er, jaadu |
20:36.32 |
CIA-28 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r34244
10/brlcad/trunk/src/ (11 files in 4 dirs): remove all references
and instances of the old deprecated RT_HIT_NORM() macro, instead
using the new RT_HIT_NORMAL() macro. |
20:37.57 |
pacman87_ |
i won the ipod in a coding
competition |
20:38.05 |
pacman87_ |
got 3rd |
20:38.12 |
brlcad |
hah, awesome |
20:38.23 |
pacman87_ |
.2% away from 2nd |
20:38.33 |
brlcad |
what was 2nd's prize? :) |
20:38.46 |
pacman87_ |
24in hdtv/monitor |
20:38.47 |
brlcad |
acm competition? |
20:39.04 |
pacman87_ |
no, amd sponsored |
20:39.11 |
brlcad |
lemme guess, first was an amd laptop?
:) |
20:39.21 |
pacman87_ |
desktop |
20:39.25 |
brlcad |
ah |
20:39.33 |
pacman87_ |
plus tumer dard |
20:39.38 |
pacman87_ |
card |
20:39.46 |
pacman87_ |
quad core |
20:40.14 |
brlcad |
nice prizes |
20:40.45 |
brlcad |
the touch is probably a more useful productive
use of your time than an hdtv would have been :) |
20:41.07 |
*** join/#brlcad DGMurdockIII
(n=dgmurdoc@64-184-10-18.bb.hrtc.net) |
20:41.21 |
pacman87_ |
probably |
20:41.44 |
pacman87_ |
and my gf likes playing with it |
20:44.23 |
*** join/#brlcad _pseudo
(n=irchon@wireless-128-62-174-226.public.utexas.edu) |
20:44.55 |
*** part/#brlcad _pseudo
(n=irchon@wireless-128-62-174-226.public.utexas.edu) |
22:11.52 |
``Erik |
/t 04:42PM <pacman87_> and my gf likes
playing with it |
22:11.55 |
``Erik |
O:-) |
22:13.39 |
yukonbob |
"hey baby, wanna i-touch?" |
22:14.12 |
yukonbob |
"You mean an iPod Touch?" |
22:14.15 |
yukonbob |
"not exactly" |
22:14.24 |
pacman87_ |
was wondering when someone
would say something... |
22:14.35 |
yukonbob |
hi pacman87_ :) |
22:14.45 |
pacman87_ |
howdy |
22:18.00 |
pacman87 |
ping times to my ipod vary from 44ms to
1000 |
22:18.15 |
pacman87 |
or 15000 |
22:18.18 |
pacman87 |
1500 |
22:20.09 |
yukonbob |
?ping times |
22:20.37 |
pacman87 |
ssh out, ping back in |
22:21.06 |
yukonbob |
ah... /me forgot you said Touch, even after
was joking about it. :P |
22:21.57 |
pacman87 |
maybe i shouldn't port bzflag to it
:P |
22:23.08 |
pacman87 |
wifi access all over campus is very
nice |
22:23.23 |
pacman87 |
having the internet in my pocket :D |
22:32.35 |
brlcad |
pacman87: it was too easy ;) |
22:33.25 |
dreeves |
brlcad are you aware that dented sphere is a
revsurface? |
22:33.28 |
brlcad |
pacman87: didn't you hear my rant in the
channel about the latency last year wrt ipod/iphone port of
bzflag? |
22:33.45 |
brlcad |
dreeves: yeah, I vaguely recall that |
22:33.45 |
pacman87 |
i must've missed that one |
22:33.51 |
pacman87 |
~logs |
22:33.52 |
ibot |
All conversations are logged to http://ibot.rikers.org/channel,
where "channel" is replaced by the URL-encoded channel name, such
as %23freenode for #freenode. Lines starting with spaces are not
logged. |
22:34.13 |
brlcad |
not so much a rant as several semi-extended
discussions about why it'd kinda suck as a client :) |
22:34.28 |
pacman87 |
yeah, every other packet took really
long |
22:34.34 |
pacman87 |
and ended up out of order |
22:34.43 |
brlcad |
even if you could buffer up and stabilize the
networking, the cpu is a bit of a problem being somewhat
weak |
22:34.50 |
brlcad |
and being fully-interruptible |
22:34.57 |
pacman87 |
radar-only! |
22:35.03 |
brlcad |
the OS steals time from everything including
itself at times.. |
22:35.35 |
brlcad |
even when your app is running, especially if
you make a system call |
22:35.57 |
*** join/#brlcad BigAToo
(n=BigAToo@pool-96-230-124-244.sbndin.btas.verizon.net) |
22:37.32 |
pacman87 |
i don't suppose there's an easy to search the
online logs |
22:37.40 |
brlcad |
nah, it sucks |
22:37.47 |
brlcad |
but I basically just gave you the abridged
version |
22:38.08 |
pacman87 |
k |
22:44.49 |
*** join/#brlcad elite01
(n=omg@unaffiliated/elite01) |
22:54.13 |
hippieindamakin8 |
good morning/ good afternoon folks |
22:55.38 |
hippieindamakin8 |
woah ipod/iphone port of bzflag :
cool |
23:53.59 |
starseeker |
dreeves: how is it revolved? around the
center of the dent? |