| 01:02.19 | *** join/#brlcad Stattrav (~Stattrav@117.192.148.4) | |
| 01:59.56 | *** join/#brlcad Nohla (~Nohla@201.255.254.72) | |
| 12:49.00 | *** join/#brlcad Nohla (~Nohla@201.255.254.72) | |
| 14:39.49 | brlcad | rx |
| 14:49.17 | CIA-43 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r40033 10/brlcad/branches/cmake/ (CMakeLists.txt src/other/libtermlib/CMakeLists.txt): Take a stab at setting up libtermlib with a CMakeLists file - haven't hooked up any of the other libs to use it yet. |
| 15:19.21 | *** join/#brlcad R0b0t1 (~Enigma@unaffiliated/r0b0t1) | |
| 16:55.26 | kanzure | someone is asking me why the us government can't produce open source software (i.e. they have to license it in the public domain) |
| 16:55.36 | kanzure | however, i can't find any good references for this on the net, something that might explain the legal aspects of this |
| 16:55.40 | kanzure | any hints? anyone here know? |
| 16:58.41 | kanzure | ooh gnu.org saves the day :) http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLUSGov http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLUSGovAdd |
| 17:42.43 | *** join/#brlcad Nohla (~Nohla@201.255.254.72) | |
| 17:48.19 | Ralith | kanzure: GPL â open source software |
| 17:49.19 | Ralith | BRL-CAD is an example of US government produced open source software |
| 17:49.38 | kanzure | GPL is an OSI-approved license for "open source" |
| 17:49.49 | kanzure | are you arguing otherwise? (just wondering) |
| 17:50.21 | Ralith | no, I'm saying that whether or not the GPL is applicable is irrelevant to the question of whether or not a piece of software is open souce. |
| 17:50.24 | Ralith | source* |
| 17:51.18 | Ralith | the pages you linked thus have nothing to do with your question. |
| 17:51.34 | Ralith | and your original implication is false |
| 18:52.01 | CIA-43 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r40034 10/brlcad/branches/cmake/src/other/step/ (4 files in 3 dirs): |
| 18:52.01 | CIA-43 | BRL-CAD: Start working on a CMake build system for the step libraries. Not much yet, but |
| 18:52.01 | CIA-43 | BRL-CAD: got a build of the express library on gentoo so committing. I doubt the |
| 18:52.01 | CIA-43 | BRL-CAD: flex/bison logic is robust yet - the -l flag is not being passed, and will |
| 18:52.01 | CIA-43 | BRL-CAD: likely be needed - but getting closer. |
| 18:53.07 | starseeker | kanzure: If I understand your question, works produced by the US Federal government (under most circumstances) are public domain by default |
| 18:54.02 | starseeker | the government can have copyright assigned to it for works that have copyright otherwise (for an example of this, see http://dlmf.nist.gov/about/notices |
| 18:56.28 | starseeker | eer, nevermind - that commit message is wrong - the -l flag IS being passed, just forgot to check with make VERBOSE=1 before committing |
| 18:58.01 | CIA-43 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r40035 10/brlcad/branches/cmake/src/other/step/src/express/CMakeLists.txt: Clean up stray line. Previous commit comment incorrect - -l flag actually was being passed to flex successfully. |
| 18:59.47 | starseeker | braces himself and starts upgrading his system from gcc 4.3 to gcc 4.4... |
| 19:19.45 | kanzure | starseeker: ah, didn't know that caveat about other copyrights, thanks |
| 21:04.59 | Ralith | kanzure: 'public domain' is as open as source can get. |
| 21:06.08 | kanzure | i see you don't like to use "open source" to mean the infectious share-alike aspects.. |
| 21:06.16 | kanzure | er, there's probably a better way for me to say that |
| 21:06.41 | starseeker | those licenses represent a subset of what are termed "open-source" licenses |
| 21:07.51 | Ralith | ^ |
| 21:08.05 | starseeker | http://www.opensource.org/osd.html |
| 21:10.00 | kanzure | "The license must allow modifications and derived works, and must allow them to be distributed under the same terms as the license of the original software." |
| 21:10.17 | kanzure | you know for the longest time i thought it said "and must be distributed under the same terms as the license of the original software" |
| 21:28.40 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@146-52-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net) | |
| 21:44.11 | Ralith | that wouldn't make any sense at all |
| 22:33.50 | CIA-43 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r40036 10/brlcad/branches/cmake/src/other/step/ (CMakeLists.txt src/exppp/CMakeLists.txt): Add exppp... may want to re-examine the #include statements in these libraries... |
| 22:43.41 | CIA-43 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r40037 10/brlcad/branches/cmake/src/other/step/ (CMakeLists.txt src/fedex_plus/CMakeLists.txt): Add fedex_plus to cmake build |
| 23:03.04 | *** join/#brlcad PrezAndroid (~PrezKenne@173-100-6-82.pools.spcsdns.net) | |
| 23:06.02 | CIA-43 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r40038 10/brlcad/branches/cmake/src/other/step/ (5 files in 5 dirs): Add in the rest of the step src dirs, although I'm not sure all the library links are right. |
| 23:13.03 | *** join/#brlcad IriX64 (~IriX64@bas2-sudbury98-1096601224.dsl.bell.ca) | |
| 23:17.44 | CIA-43 | BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r40039 10/brlcad/branches/cmake/src/other/step/src/ (5 files in 5 dirs): Whoops - remember that this needs to function as a subdir build and use the local project root, not the CMAKE root. |