| 00:22.50 | *** join/#brlcad indianlarry (~indianlar@BZ.BZFLAG.BZ) | |
| 00:23.23 | *** join/#brlcad brlcad (~sean@BZ.BZFLAG.BZ) | |
| 01:43.27 | *** join/#brlcad velociostrich (~nsd@c-68-37-119-2.hsd1.nj.comcast.net) | |
| 04:44.11 | *** mode/#brlcad [+o brlcad] by ChanServ | |
| 06:00.24 | *** join/#brlcad Ralith (~ralith@S010600221561996a.vc.shawcable.net) | |
| 10:25.41 | *** join/#brlcad juanman (~quassel@unaffiliated/juanman) | |
| 11:08.08 | d-lo_ | Mernin |
| 11:08.43 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@213.252.192.120) | |
| 12:07.29 | ``Erik | is trying an experiment: drinking a cup of coffee before driving to work O.o let's see if I notice |
| 12:07.57 | *** join/#brlcad Zaebos (~irc@pd95b7f5e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) | |
| 12:08.12 | d-lo_ | drink one cup of coffee, do 15 jumping jacks, wait 10 mins, then to 15 more, hit the road |
| 12:08.36 | d-lo_ | kick up the heart rate to increase the rate of caffine absorbtion :) |
| 12:08.43 | ``Erik | I think I"d be done for at 3 :/ |
| 12:18.27 | *** join/#brlcad juanman (~quassel@unaffiliated/juanman) | |
| 12:47.12 | *** join/#brlcad ibot (~ibot@rikers.org) | |
| 12:47.12 | *** topic/#brlcad is BRL-CAD Open Source Solid Modeling || http://brlcad.org || http://sf.net/projects/brlcad || #brlcad logs: http://ibot.rikers.org/%23brlcad/ || BRL-CAD release 7.16.10 is posted! (20100805) | |
| 12:56.51 | d-lo_ | ...like seriously, she's pregnant? Or is that a joke? |
| 13:02.39 | brlcad | yes :) |
| 13:03.24 | d-lo_ | lol |
| 13:03.28 | d-lo_ | nice non-answer |
| 13:13.39 | ``Erik | http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/05/29/geek-gang-signs/ |
| 13:14.08 | brlcad | "BS and ISO produce standards to show recommended practices but it is up to individuals to produce the drawings. There is no definitive standard for layout or style. The only standard across engineering workshop drawings is in the creation of orthographic projections and cross section views." |
| 14:11.33 | starseeker | is unlikely to eat crab dip ever again - that's like the second or third time I've had major bad reactions to it |
| 14:11.43 | starseeker | almost wonder if its an allergy |
| 14:13.13 | starseeker | brlcad: whether or not there's a definitive standard, we need to pick something for defaults - wouldn't defaulting to recommended practices be logical? |
| 14:16.21 | d-lo_ | well I make it a general rule to not eat things that originally had more than 4 legs ;) |
| 14:18.42 | starseeker | nods - was a "buffet" style affair - we were both feeling a little queasy but I was the only one who wiped out completely, and the main distinction was she had the brains to avoid the dip and I didn't |
| 14:19.39 | starseeker | generally I avoid seafood as well, and my batting average when I don't is so poor you'd think I would learn... |
| 14:19.53 | starseeker | GLARES at Tcl/TK |
| 14:20.21 | TclTk | you lookin at me bub? |
| 14:20.29 | starseeker | even using their own build system on win32 isn't enough to make this go smooth |
| 14:21.37 | starseeker | is annoyed by the username/hostname problem, but it is probably solvable - but trying to build libbu with manually assigned values it looks for a dll file that isn't there |
| 14:22.01 | starseeker | looks like the nmake system built .lib files |
| 14:22.43 | starseeker | teeters on the edge of losing it and starting a CMake build system for Tcl/Tk... |
| 14:26.23 | d-lo | dont do it man. |
| 14:26.25 | d-lo | just dont |
| 14:26.36 | d-lo | put the keyboard down and back away |
| 14:40.22 | ``Erik | mmmm spidercakes |
| 14:40.42 | starseeker | heh - our cats might just go for those |
| 14:41.02 | ``Erik | .lib files are kinda needed for msvc, it's nto smart enough to read symbols from a .dll for linking, iirc |
| 14:47.25 | starseeker | uh... then why is CMake trying to look for a dll? (I didn't tell it to) |
| 14:48.53 | ``Erik | d'no? it used to need both, the .lib to put itself together and the dll handy to run |
| 14:53.20 | starseeker | grr |
| 14:54.35 | starseeker | diverts his attention to nurbs++ in a desperate attempt to avoid rewiring Tcl/Tk... |
| 15:55.52 | brlcad | starseeker: have you ever had a crab cake? |
| 15:56.16 | brlcad | or shrimp recently |
| 15:56.23 | brlcad | could just be bad dip.. but pretty easy to rule out shellfish |
| 16:02.41 | brlcad | starseeker: and of course something has to be decided upon for the formatting, that was an interesting tid-bit of information that confirmed my understanding |
| 16:03.42 | brlcad | from what I've been reading, iso128 isn't really used nearly as much as the asme standards .. I found a handful of good docs and examples |
| 16:04.46 | *** join/#brlcad _psilva (~psilva@static-96-255-52-7.washdc.fios.verizon.net) | |
| 16:04.53 | _psilva | hiyo |
| 16:27.12 | starseeker | brlcad: ah, gotcha. |
| 16:29.38 | starseeker | kinda surprising there isn't more of a standard, but I guess as long as a drawing like that conveys the necessary information the details are somewhat less critical |
| 16:34.06 | starseeker | brlcad: if we wanted to use a purely vanilla opennurbs, would we have to define a derived class from ON_Brep and define our own IsValidLoop function for that derived class? |
| 16:45.18 | brlcad | starseeker: several methods would have to be overridden iirc, but basically -- yes |
| 16:51.06 | starseeker | nods - sounds good |
| 16:51.35 | starseeker | 's takeover request for libnurbs was approved, so starting to play with ideas |
| 17:01.24 | ``Erik | http://punditkitchen.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/wzjsh.gif slot machines vs voting machines |
| 17:03.39 | CIA-42 | BRL-CAD: 03erikgreenwald * r40967 10/brlcad/branches/bottie/src/librt/primitives/bot/btg.c: force double mode |
| 17:05.51 | CIA-42 | BRL-CAD: 03erikgreenwald * r40968 10/brlcad/branches/bottie/src/librt/primitives/bot/tie.c: test to see if malloc succeeded. |
| 17:06.54 | CIA-42 | BRL-CAD: 03erikgreenwald * r40969 10/brlcad/branches/bottie/src/librt/primitives/bot/tie_kdtree.c: test for bad data field |
| 18:17.06 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@mail.revalinn.com) | |
| 18:51.22 | _psilva | anyone know what amrdec/dyn does |
| 18:53.37 | _psilva | hm could be aeroflightdynamics |
| 20:47.34 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@mail.revalinn.com) | |
| 21:03.37 | *** join/#brlcad R0b0t1 (~Enigma@64-136-219-55.dyn.everestkc.net) | |
| 21:03.37 | *** join/#brlcad R0b0t1 (~Enigma@unaffiliated/r0b0t1) | |
| 21:51.03 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@mail.revalinn.com) | |
| 23:10.05 | starseeker | brlcad: does this ring any bells for you? http://www.sai.msu.su/sal/B/0/DT_NURBS.html |
| 23:16.46 | starseeker | Humph http://www.dt.navy.mil/tot-shi-sys/des-int-pro/des-too-dev/index.html |
| 23:16.55 | starseeker | "current initiative" without an active weblink |