00:21.07 |
*** join/#brlcad Ralith
(~ralith@S010600221561996a.vc.shawcable.net) |
05:53.56 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@117.192.147.2) |
05:53.56 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@unaffiliated/stattrav) |
07:25.24 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@unaffiliated/stattrav) |
07:42.10 |
*** join/#brlcad Ralith
(~ralith@S010600221561996a.vc.shawcable.net) |
08:20.48 |
*** join/#brlcad merzo
(~merzo@237-129-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net) |
09:04.47 |
*** join/#brlcad KimK
(~Kim__@ip174-71-95-176.om.om.cox.net) |
14:40.07 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@117.192.147.2) |
14:40.07 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@unaffiliated/stattrav) |
15:46.26 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@unaffiliated/stattrav) |
16:10.11 |
*** join/#brlcad cjdevlin
(~devlin@d118-75-70-176.try.wideopenwest.com) |
17:53.27 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@117.192.147.2) |
17:53.27 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@unaffiliated/stattrav) |
18:07.27 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@117.192.147.2) |
18:07.28 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@unaffiliated/stattrav) |
18:17.10 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@unaffiliated/stattrav) |
18:31.21 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@117.192.147.2) |
18:31.21 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@unaffiliated/stattrav) |
18:42.11 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@117.192.147.2) |
18:42.11 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@unaffiliated/stattrav) |
19:50.21 |
*** join/#brlcad piksi
(piksi@pi-xi.net) |
20:31.51 |
*** join/#brlcad Jesselnz
(~jesse@ool-435573a5.dyn.optonline.net) |
20:33.52 |
Jesselnz |
I'm hoping to participate in Google Summer of
Code, and my idea is to implement a DWG importer based on LibreDWG.
I'd appreciate some feedback on how valuable such a tool would be,
and whether or not this could viably get accepted as a GSoC
project. |
20:43.30 |
brlcad |
hello Jesselnz |
20:43.40 |
Jesselnz |
Hi |
20:43.57 |
brlcad |
the idea sounds interesting, but the approach
using libredwg is a problem (for us) |
20:44.08 |
Jesselnz |
Why is that? |
20:44.09 |
brlcad |
license is no good for integration |
20:45.20 |
brlcad |
that library is GPL, so any tool developed
against it would also need to be GPL or go through obtuse release
integration steps making it practically infeasible |
20:45.48 |
brlcad |
there are plenty of other, more interesting,
converters needed -- is that your only interest? |
20:46.17 |
Jesselnz |
Doesn't BRL-CAD have different components
released under the GPL and BSD licenses? |
20:46.25 |
Jesselnz |
At least, that's the impression I was
under. |
20:47.27 |
Jesselnz |
What other converters are needed? |
20:47.35 |
brlcad |
Jesselnz: the majority of source code is LGPL,
build system and data files are BSD |
20:48.53 |
brlcad |
the main ones desired is a step exporter,
improving our step importer, and updating our existing iges
importer/exporter |
20:49.33 |
Jesselnz |
Alright, thanks. I'll look into
those. |
20:50.01 |
brlcad |
others are listed here: http://brlcad.org/~sean/ideas.html |
20:51.43 |
brlcad |
Jesselnz: if you're inspired, we're REALLY
interested in code refactoring/cleanup projects -- one of which is
establishing a code conversion library |
20:52.31 |
brlcad |
nuts and bolts infrastructure |
20:53.20 |
brlcad |
e.g., turning our 20+ existing converters into
library API with 100% clean common code reuse instead of
self-contained binaries like they are now |
20:53.53 |
Jesselnz |
Sure, that sounds like an interesting
project. |
20:54.51 |
brlcad |
if it's done perfectly, you wouldn't
necessarily end up with an end-user visible change other than maybe
some subtle consistency cleanup across converters |
20:55.36 |
brlcad |
more details at http://brlcad.org/wiki/Geometry_Conversion_Library
from our Project Ideas page |
20:58.51 |
*** topic/#brlcad by brlcad
-> BRL-CAD Open Source Solid Modeling || http://brlcad.org || http://sf.net/projects/brlcad
|| #brlcad logs: http://ibot.rikers.org/%23brlcad/
|| BRL-CAD release 7.18.4 ETA 20110321 || BRL-CAD is participating
in the 2011 Google Summer of Code! Students: speak up, ask
quesions! :) |
20:58.57 |
Jesselnz |
I'll definitely look into it. Thanks for the
suggestion. |
20:59.02 |
brlcad |
no problem |
21:00.11 |
brlcad |
starseeker: CGAL has been participating for
the past 2-3 years goo, not direct competition usually due to their
funky license problems |
21:00.45 |
brlcad |
willdye: thanks |
21:11.30 |
brlcad |
mmm, so I see nobody sync'd to trunk and
posted the release! |
21:21.35 |
brlcad |
hah, gource uses ftgl |
23:23.48 |
starseeker |
hates global variables...
grr... |
23:24.27 |
brlcad |
kill them! |
23:26.45 |
starseeker |
is trying, but it's not in
our codebase |
23:26.57 |
brlcad |
this is freaking awesome |
23:27.07 |
brlcad |
pulling up a visualization of brl-cad source
history |
23:27.13 |
starseeker |
cool! |
23:27.28 |
starseeker |
brlcad: back I take it? how was it? |
23:27.38 |
brlcad |
awesome |
23:27.57 |
starseeker |
hehe - welcome back to the letdown that is
american food |
23:28.53 |
starseeker |
what's the visualization? |
23:31.16 |
starseeker |
scowls at sqlite... don't
tell me... |
23:34.52 |
starseeker |
hrm. No wonder they were using a global, that
commit_hook doesn't pass any info... |
23:35.41 |
starseeker |
ah, wait |
23:35.56 |
starseeker |
pCommitArg... what's that... |
23:38.32 |
starseeker |
bingo |