00:11.20 |
bhinesley |
what handles the main mged exit "X" GUI
button? |
00:13.33 |
bhinesley |
is done grepping
:) |
00:13.58 |
starseeker |
heh - you found it? |
00:14.10 |
bhinesley |
no, I've been looking for a while |
00:14.21 |
bhinesley |
I figured it was time to ask |
00:14.52 |
starseeker |
IIRC that involves either signal handling or
Tk bindings |
00:15.22 |
starseeker |
take a look at the exit or quit
commands |
00:15.55 |
bhinesley |
yeah, that's what I've been doing. That, and
the tcl files |
00:16.17 |
starseeker |
I'll have to ask our expert tomorrow - I
confess I don't know the details of that right offhand |
00:16.40 |
starseeker |
Tcl/Tk is kind of annoying in that respect -
debugging usually involves lots of print statements |
00:17.04 |
starseeker |
most of the debuggers I know about are
commercial :-( |
00:17.47 |
starseeker |
The only open source one I know of is http://www.compassis.com/ramdebugger/ |
00:18.00 |
starseeker |
and I've never actually gotten it working with
MGED or Archer |
00:18.10 |
starseeker |
('course I didn't try real hard) |
00:20.37 |
starseeker |
bhinesley: oh, I'll bet this is it - look for
instances of WM_DELETE_WINDOW |
00:21.02 |
bhinesley |
I have been |
00:21.33 |
starseeker |
http://www.tcl.tk/man/tcl8.5/TkCmd/wm.htm |
00:21.50 |
bhinesley |
I guess I'll pursue that a little
further |
00:21.58 |
starseeker |
the details of the window distruction are
handled by Tk, IIRC |
00:22.44 |
starseeker |
the "X" button is actually the responsibility
of the window manager |
00:23.17 |
starseeker |
so when you click on that "X", a
WM_DELETE_WINDOW event (or something similar) is
generated |
00:23.57 |
starseeker |
supposes if he's suggesting
Tcl/Tk projects he should make another stab at figuring out how to
hook up RamDebugger... |
00:24.35 |
starseeker |
bhinesley: are you running into problems with
closing windows? |
00:25.26 |
bhinesley |
well, I was trying to work on a bug |
00:25.37 |
starseeker |
ah, very good :-) |
00:25.40 |
starseeker |
which bug? |
00:26.42 |
bhinesley |
I believe these two may be related, and not
specific to Windows as it appears: |
00:26.44 |
bhinesley |
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2278072&group_id=105292&atid=640802 |
00:26.44 |
bhinesley |
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1961127&group_id=105292&atid=640802 |
00:28.25 |
starseeker |
bhinesley: note that at least the second one
reports using a VERY old version of BRL-CAD, so it might be worth
trying to reproduce the problem first |
00:28.59 |
bhinesley |
I am experiencing a similar problem in
Fedora |
00:29.07 |
starseeker |
ah, really! |
00:29.12 |
bhinesley |
actually... I've tested it in windows,
too |
00:29.21 |
starseeker |
very good |
00:29.53 |
starseeker |
brlcad may have more insight on how all that's
wired together |
00:30.41 |
starseeker |
bhinesley: a possible suggestion would be to
try to simplify the problem down - if you create a tk window
displaying a png file (say) and close it, does it have the same
problem? |
00:30.56 |
starseeker |
that might indicate a Tk issue |
00:31.33 |
bhinesley |
hmm, okay, I will try that in a little bit If
I cannot isolate it to one of the WM_DELETE_WINDOW's |
00:32.15 |
starseeker |
another question is is it Tk
specific? |
00:32.20 |
bhinesley |
the code for the 'q', 'quit', and 'exit'
commands works properly |
00:32.37 |
bhinesley |
so does file-> exit (oddly) |
00:32.53 |
starseeker |
so one possibility is to make sure the
WM_DELETE_WINDOW calls are triggering the same logic |
00:33.05 |
starseeker |
if you want to try without Tk, do mged
-c |
00:33.10 |
starseeker |
then pick nu |
00:33.17 |
starseeker |
non-graphical mged ;-) |
00:33.58 |
starseeker |
do that in one terminal, close the terminal
without quitting, the check the status of the file from a different
terminal |
00:34.41 |
brlcad |
bhinesley: which platform are you
on? |
00:34.59 |
brlcad |
ah, fedora .. just catching up |
00:35.10 |
bhinesley |
:) hello |
00:35.37 |
brlcad |
yeah, the issue is cross platform -- I think
our code that used to pick up with window-close event from tk-land
is no longer being handled or at least no longer being handled
sufficiently, so mged doesn't shut down |
00:37.27 |
brlcad |
lets see if I can get this right -- it's
supposed to close the application if the graphics window is closed,
but keep mged running if only the command window is
closed |
00:38.06 |
starseeker |
blinks - really? is there a
way to start up a new command window from the GUI? |
00:38.28 |
brlcad |
I'm not real keen on that behavior frankly, so
it's fair game to change -- I think it should either close both
windows if you close either, or not shut down mged until both
windows are closed regardless of which is closed first |
00:38.59 |
brlcad |
yeah, it would make total sense the other way
around since you can keep reattaching new graphics
windows |
00:39.17 |
brlcad |
I think the old reasoning was that you'd shut
down the command window and just end up with a pure
viewer |
00:39.41 |
starseeker |
votes for the other
way |
00:39.52 |
brlcad |
that's fine, but closing the graphics window
shouldn't close the command window.. |
00:39.55 |
starseeker |
the minimize button is a powerful
tool |
00:39.59 |
bhinesley |
if closing the command window closes the
graphics window, then perhaps the command window should just be
modal, and only allow closing from the graphics window |
00:40.18 |
bhinesley |
wait, closing the graphics window should leave
the command window up? |
00:40.39 |
starseeker |
that would be my vote. you can launch
multiple graphics windows from the command prompt |
00:40.56 |
bhinesley |
hm okay, sounds backwards to me, but I'm from
AutoCAD-world |
00:41.12 |
starseeker |
we're a trifle command line centric
:-P |
00:41.16 |
bhinesley |
yeah |
00:41.43 |
brlcad |
depends if we're talking about what it
"should" do, what it's "supposed" to do, or what it "presently"
does? :) |
00:42.19 |
starseeker |
Archer is currently organized more around the
traditional desktop app paradigm, but we hadn't gotten to
addressing desired behavior there with respect to this
question |
00:43.19 |
bhinesley |
well the Archer command window is
embedded |
00:43.28 |
brlcad |
if we ignore "presently" and "supposed"
behavior, what I'd want it to do is not have either the graphics
window or command window close button quit the application unless
it's the last window open |
00:43.30 |
starseeker |
bhinesley: you can detach it :-) |
00:43.34 |
bhinesley |
ah I see now :) |
00:44.14 |
bhinesley |
brlcad: ok |
00:44.17 |
starseeker |
brlcad: yeah, I was thinking that too - as
long as you can launch display managers from the command prompt,
and command prompts from the display, you're fully up as long as
you have a window |
00:44.21 |
bhinesley |
I have to leave guys, I'll bbl |
00:44.27 |
bhinesley |
thanks, bye |
00:44.30 |
starseeker |
bhinesley: bye! |
00:44.37 |
brlcad |
bhinesley: something to keep in mind while
testing is you can "attach X" as many times as you like from the
command window, you can also run mged -c to get classic mode and
then run "gui" to start up the tcl/tk gui |
00:45.23 |
starseeker |
realizes he has to get up at
5am and heads home... |
00:45.32 |
brlcad |
wee |
00:45.48 |
brlcad |
encounters compilation
success! |
00:57.04 |
brlcad |
pretty impressive mesh manipulation tool
http://www.meshmixer.com/ |
01:02.53 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2622
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: de-emphasize an idea
of their own. want integrated code |
01:09.03 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2623
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: add programming
languages potentially involved |
01:09.56 |
*** join/#brlcad crazy_imp
(~mj@a89-183-78-5.net-htp.de) |
03:27.15 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2624
10/wiki/OGRE_Display_Manager: combine ogre and qt into the same
topic |
03:27.24 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r0
10/wiki/Special:Log/delete: deleted "[[Qt Display Manager]]":
merged in with the ogre idea |
03:27.50 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r0
10/wiki/Special:Log/move: [[OGRE Display Manager]] moved to [[Cross
Platform Display Manager]]: rename post-merge |
03:28.13 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2627
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: merged |
03:29.12 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r0
10/wiki/Special:Log/move: [[Other Cross Platform Framebuffer]]
moved to [[Cross Platform Framebuffer]]: simplify |
03:36.46 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2630
10/wiki/Cross_Platform_Framebuffer: merge in qt |
03:37.06 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r0
10/wiki/Special:Log/delete: deleted "[[Qt Framebuffer]]": no longer
needed, merged with the more general cross-platform
tasker |
03:37.39 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2631
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: merged framebuffer
tasks, only need one |
03:44.24 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2632
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: recategorize the gui
projects |
03:48.44 |
*** join/#brlcad Ralith
(~ralith@S010600221561996a.vc.shawcable.net) |
04:09.56 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r0
10/wiki/Special:Log/move: [[Cross Platform Display Manager]] moved
to [[New Cross-Platform 3D Display Manager]] |
04:10.13 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r0
10/wiki/Special:Log/move: [[Cross Platform Framebuffer]] moved to
[[New Cross Platform 2D Framebuffer]] |
04:10.53 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r0
10/wiki/Special:Log/move: [[New Cross Platform 2D Framebuffer]]
moved to [[New Cross-Platform 2D Framebuffer]] |
04:12.33 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2639
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: make the task
descriptions sub-context information |
04:22.28 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r0
10/wiki/Special:Log/upload: uploaded "[[Image:BRL-CAD
Priorities.png]]": Overview of our project scope, vision, mission,
and main priorities. |
04:28.25 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2641
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: link in project
priorities image |
04:43.42 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2642
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: bump up nurbs,
priority |
06:16.43 |
bhinesley |
brlcad: is the project idea labeled "MGED to
Archer Command Migration" considered a priority? |
06:25.26 |
*** join/#brlcad packrat
(~packrator@99-67-225-40.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net) |
06:47.23 |
bhinesley |
I'm leaning towards the MGED Sketch Editor
Migration and Enhancement project, as suggested by
starseeker |
06:54.56 |
*** join/#brlcad bhinesley
(~bhinesley@99.125.83.101) |
07:19.50 |
bhinesley |
is there a mentor assigned to the MGED Sketch
Editor Migration and Enhancement project? |
08:04.08 |
*** join/#brlcad merzo
(~merzo@193.254.217.44) |
08:57.40 |
*** join/#brlcad piksi
(piksi@83.145.207.200) |
09:55.40 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 0399.125.83.101 07http://brlcad.org * r2643
10/wiki/User:Bhinesley: First profile post |
11:26.35 |
dloman |
Mernin all |
11:30.14 |
dloman |
bah, blast it all! I can't 'apply' to be a
mentor cause their application process is 'down' in preps for the
launch of their new GUI later this week. :/ |
11:40.40 |
*** part/#brlcad cjdevlin
(~devlin@d118-75-70-176.try.wideopenwest.com) |
12:22.03 |
brlcad |
dloman: it's been that way since
monday |
12:23.25 |
brlcad |
bhinesley: note that I would consider that
project "hard" so you should define lots of small
milestones |
12:24.14 |
brlcad |
we generally perform group mentoring so that
you're not reliant upon getting answers from any one
mentor |
12:24.34 |
brlcad |
bhinesley: as the current code is all Tcl and
archer is predominantly Tcl, I hope you like Tcl :) |
12:25.40 |
brlcad |
that said, the three people most likely able
to help you or get answers to your questions are going to be
myself, starseeker, and "bob" who you'll probably only be able to
talk to via e-mail (but is the foremost knowledgeable on all things
Tcl) |
12:28.17 |
brlcad |
bhinesley: ah, missed your first question -- I
would consider the command migration higher priority than sketch
editing |
12:28.51 |
brlcad |
intends to spend a lot more
time hashing out more ideas onto the ideas list
today |
12:39.31 |
dloman |
brlcad: can the project lead send invites?
...or is that disabled also? |
12:42.08 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2644
10/wiki/New_Cross-Platform_3D_Display_Manager: |
12:43.56 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2645
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: put the ideas into a
table for more concise readability |
12:48.48 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03davidloman * r43949
10/geomcore/trunk/ (2 files in 2 dirs): Verbage change: 'Data' to
'Path' ...makes more better cents. |
12:52.20 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2646
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: impact |
12:52.46 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2647
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: tablify |
12:54.09 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2648
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: Undo revision 2647 by
[[Special:Contributions/Sean|Sean]] ([[User
talk:Sean|Talk]]) |
12:55.43 |
dloman |
brlcad: are there any file IO functions in the
brlcad libs for reading/writing plain ol files? |
12:59.31 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2649
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: tablify
redux |
13:04.18 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2650
10/wiki/New_Cross-Platform_3D_Display_Manager: |
13:05.36 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2651
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: /* Graphical User
Interface (GUI) Projects */ |
13:05.56 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2652
10/wiki/New_Cross-Platform_2D_Framebuffer: new layout |
13:08.34 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2653
10/wiki/MGED_to_Archer_Command_Migration: new layout |
13:10.07 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2654
10/wiki/MGED_Sketch_Editor_Migration_and_Enhancement: new
layout |
13:11.42 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2655
10/wiki/New_Cross-Platform_3D_Display_Manager: ogre/qt as
refs |
13:12.26 |
brlcad |
dloman: also disabled |
13:13.35 |
brlcad |
dloman: if they're really "plain", then libc
would be the most appropriate |
13:14.14 |
brlcad |
otherwise we have routines to read lines from
files and map files to memory buffers that are commonly
used |
13:16.48 |
brlcad |
routines for creating temp files, locating
files, logging to a file, reading/writing strings to
files |
13:17.31 |
brlcad |
what are you trying to do? |
13:19.38 |
dloman |
simple check if a directory exists |
13:19.54 |
dloman |
wanted to use a brlcad way to do it since
there's a larger chance it will be cross platform ;) |
13:20.05 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2656
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: bgcolor |
13:21.06 |
*** join/#brlcad Elrohir
(~kvirc@p5B14BA4E.dip.t-dialin.net) |
13:23.14 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2657
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: smaller priorites
link, push to top |
13:28.45 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2658
10/wiki/New_Cross-Platform_3D_Display_Manager: medium |
13:30.43 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2659
10/wiki/NURBS_Intersections: new layout, add references |
13:32.47 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2660
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: kiss |
13:34.50 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2661
10/wiki/NURBS_Tessellation: new layout, add references |
13:35.37 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2662
10/wiki/NURBS_Tessellation: redundant to repeat title |
13:36.05 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2663
10/wiki/NURBS_Intersections: dry |
13:36.23 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2664
10/wiki/New_Cross-Platform_3D_Display_Manager: dry |
13:38.01 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2665
10/wiki/CSG_to_NURBS_conversion: refs |
13:41.56 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2666
10/wiki/New_Cross-Platform_3D_Display_Manager: dry |
13:42.08 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2667
10/wiki/NURBS_Intersections: dry |
13:42.19 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2668
10/wiki/NURBS_Tessellation: dry |
13:43.59 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2669
10/wiki/Plate_Mode_NURBS_raytracing: code refs |
13:46.33 |
brlcad |
dloman: search include/bu.h for "directory" ..
there are two or three specifically for that |
13:49.19 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2670
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: CSG is the operator,
not the entity type |
13:49.48 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r0
10/wiki/Special:Log/move: [[CSG to NURBS conversion]] moved to
[[Implicit to NURBS conversion]]: CSG is an operator, not a
type |
14:05.11 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2673
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: add a code refactoring
section, move refactoring tasks up into it |
14:05.31 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2674
10/wiki/New_Cross-Platform_2D_Framebuffer: dry |
14:05.53 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2675
10/wiki/MGED_to_Archer_Command_Migration: dry |
14:06.09 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2676
10/wiki/MGED_Sketch_Editor_Migration_and_Enhancement: dry |
14:08.16 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2677
10/wiki/Ayam_Editor_Feature_Integration: new layout, add
refs |
14:09.10 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2678
10/wiki/New_Cross-Platform_2D_Framebuffer: consistency |
14:10.44 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2679
10/wiki/Analytical_Raytracing_Visualization: new layout,
refs |
14:13.21 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2680
10/wiki/Level_of_Detail_Wireframes: new layout, add
references |
14:14.17 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2681
10/wiki/BoT_Editing: new layout, add references |
14:15.52 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2682
10/wiki/NMG_Editing: new layout, add references |
14:16.23 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2683
10/wiki/NMG_Editing: /* Requirements */ |
14:17.31 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2684
10/wiki/Graph_layout_based_geometry_hierarchy_view: new layout, add
references |
14:18.07 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2685
10/wiki/Graph_layout_based_geometry_hierarchy_view: /* References
*/ |
14:29.42 |
dloman |
starseeker:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.developer.usingapi.html#svn.developer.usingapi.urlpath |
14:30.20 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2686
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: expand all of the gui
projects |
14:46.33 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2687
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: expand the rest of the
sections with table views, impact, and difficulty |
14:48.16 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2688
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: move step up |
15:04.21 |
dloman |
brlcad: thanks! |
15:05.35 |
bhinesley |
brlcad: thanks for all of the info and new
updates. I will reconsider my project choice in the light of
this. |
15:08.32 |
starseeker |
brlcad: has subversion moved to the Apache
license? |
15:09.56 |
starseeker |
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/LICENSE |
15:11.01 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2689
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: terse is so much more
informative here. combine title with description and reduce to no
more than two lines (on my wide screen) |
15:12.52 |
starseeker |
ah, crap - yep
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/LICENSE?revision=878444&view=markup |
15:14.35 |
starseeker |
yeah, this was the old one:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/COPYING?revision=875073&view=markup&pathrev=878443 |
15:16.26 |
*** join/#brlcad dli
(~dli@dsl-173-248-203-45.acanac.net) |
15:16.33 |
dloman |
...so are we incompatable with
apache? |
15:19.06 |
starseeker |
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html |
15:19.33 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 0399.125.83.101 07http://brlcad.org * r2690
10/wiki/User:Bhinesley: reconsidering project choice |
15:21.34 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 0399.125.83.101 07http://brlcad.org * r2691
10/wiki/User:Bhinesley: /* BRL-CAD Project Proposal */ remove
superfluous blank line |
15:22.19 |
dloman |
starseeker: that really reads for people
trying to package stuff instde Apache products... not the other way
around. :/ |
15:25.59 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2692
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: another awesome
reduction |
15:36.46 |
starseeker |
dloman: yeah, but it works both ways, unless
I'm missing something |
15:36.55 |
starseeker |
(quite possible) |
15:41.29 |
starseeker |
brlcad: I don't suppose you have those scripts
you used to benchmark breaking up a file and reassembling it from
the command line? Those might be a good way to try fossil with
just a little tweaking |
15:45.32 |
brlcad |
using apache isn't a problem because we're not
deriving or integrating, no more compatible/incompatible than a
proprietary system using an apache product |
15:46.22 |
brlcad |
now that they've switched from a bsd-like
license to apache, that does represent a problem to us in terms of
integrating their code into ours and making updates -- has to stay
separate or we have to change our license |
15:46.29 |
brlcad |
we can, however, still use them |
15:46.43 |
brlcad |
they can't use us is the bigger
incompatibility |
15:47.03 |
dloman |
so... what about the eventual plan to make a
FS-G back end? |
15:47.19 |
dloman |
with the current liscense... isn't that plan
now out the window? |
15:47.20 |
starseeker |
brlcad: I thought we had been avoiding apache
licensed stuff to avoid uncertainties about what code moved
where... |
15:47.24 |
brlcad |
that's fine, we just can't bundle their
sources together with ours |
15:47.52 |
starseeker |
so I should take the subversion directory out
of geomcore |
15:48.26 |
brlcad |
if it's the full sources, probably -- should
be fine in a separate module with svn:external set up |
15:49.04 |
brlcad |
source repo isn't a big deal, it's any
published/distributed source tarballs where we'd have to be careful
and not bundle them together |
15:49.22 |
brlcad |
and that's more just for perception, not
necessarily legal requirement |
15:49.39 |
dloman |
So, if we put the svn code in a top level
module licensed Apache, and make our FS-G code there.... then
that's okay? |
15:50.03 |
dloman |
so long as GS and the FS-G 'products' are
distinctly different... even though GS requires the FS-G
? |
15:50.21 |
dloman |
(Just making sure I understand
things....) |
15:51.09 |
brlcad |
yeah, that can work |
15:51.35 |
brlcad |
it's really not that big a problem for us
because apache is not viral like gpl/lgpl in imposing requirements
on code it's combined with |
15:52.27 |
brlcad |
their license merely applies to their code, so
if we ever combined their code with ours, the license terms would
conflict (lgpl isn't a superset of apache) |
15:53.36 |
brlcad |
our lgpl can't apply to their code and their
license can't apply to our code |
15:53.43 |
dloman |
okay then, so if our mythical fs-g module
needs to have brlcad libraries as a dependancy... that's okay since
the LGPL won't impose any restrictions on the fs-g's Apache
license? |
15:54.15 |
brlcad |
so we can't make a blanket statement if it was
bundled into a source tarball to say that "this collective work is
lgpl" .. because we can't apply lgpl to their code -- it would
merely be two projects with two licenses in one tarball |
15:55.05 |
brlcad |
it's "okay" in the sense that we can develop
that module, make it lgpl, use our libs .. but it could never be
integrated into svn proper |
15:55.58 |
dloman |
I am pretty sure the fs-g would need to be a
*modified* version of svn, rather than something that uses svn as a
dep |
15:56.38 |
starseeker |
would tend to
agree |
15:59.02 |
brlcad |
it'd probably make more sense for fs-g to be
apache licensed, and merely use brl-cad's libs as an installed but
not bundled dependency |
15:59.31 |
brlcad |
as we'd be deriving from their existing fs-fs
or other code anyways |
16:00.49 |
brlcad |
notes that many of these
concerns become moot if we switched to the BSD license
:) |
16:01.06 |
dloman |
'we' being brlcad code? |
16:02.54 |
brlcad |
all brl-cad code, yes |
16:03.13 |
brlcad |
or mit |
16:03.19 |
brlcad |
or apache 2.0 for the patent grant |
16:03.27 |
brlcad |
either way, more flexibility |
16:03.56 |
starseeker |
brlcad: the original motivator for LGPL was to
ensure some reciprocity, correct? |
16:05.25 |
brlcad |
and to abate concerns at the time of any
entity forking brl-cad, making extensive valuable modifications,
then trying to sell that derived version back to the
gov't |
16:05.54 |
brlcad |
thinks he might have picked
up whatever ed has |
16:06.01 |
starseeker |
doesn't that risk still exist? |
16:06.05 |
starseeker |
uh-oh |
16:07.25 |
brlcad |
sure, it still exists |
16:07.31 |
brlcad |
but it's not nearly as much of a concern any
more |
16:08.06 |
starseeker |
we've established enough momentum
now? |
16:08.20 |
brlcad |
after 7 years open source, I think
so |
16:08.42 |
brlcad |
at worse, the risk is minimized as much as
reasonably possible |
16:08.51 |
starseeker |
nods |
16:09.30 |
brlcad |
moreover, the benefits of allowing
unencumbered use, whether commercial or not, would still benefit
the brl-cad open source community and gov't regardless |
16:10.12 |
brlcad |
even if their changes were never released or
integrated, it would be more .g files floating around, brl-cad
libraries being used, etc |
16:10.18 |
brlcad |
anyways, not a problem that needs solving
today |
16:10.23 |
starseeker |
right |
16:47.47 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2693
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: more awesome |
16:51.21 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2694
10/wiki/General_Tree_Walker: new layout, add references |
16:52.20 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2695
10/wiki/Rework_of_libbu/libbn_to_not_require_Tcl: new layout, add
references |
16:55.18 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2696
10/wiki/Complete_bu_image/libicv_and_redo_all_pix_tools_to_use_it:
new layout, add references |
16:55.58 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r0
10/wiki/Special:Log/move: [[Complete bu image/libicv and redo all
pix tools to use it]] moved to [[Consolidate image
processing]] |
16:57.09 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2699
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: new name |
16:57.50 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2700
10/wiki/Consolidate_image_processing: |
17:02.18 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r0
10/wiki/Special:Log/move: [[MGED Sketch Editor Migration and
Enhancement]] moved to [[2D Sketch Editor]] |
17:04.36 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r0
10/wiki/Special:Log/move: [[Analytical Raytracing Visualization]]
moved to [[GUI Integration of Analysis Tools]] |
17:05.02 |
starseeker |
brlcad: wow that looks nice |
17:05.09 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r0
10/wiki/Special:Log/move: [[Graph layout based geometry hierarchy
view]] moved to [[Visualizing Constructive Solid Geometry
(CSG)]] |
17:05.27 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2707
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: new names |
17:07.53 |
``Erik |
hm, apache license 2.0 is compatible with
GPLv3, if that means anything |
17:08.09 |
starseeker |
``Erik: yeah, I think it primarily has to do
with the patent stuff |
17:08.53 |
starseeker |
sucky that some projects are LGPL2 only, some
are LGPL3 only - makes me appreciate the simplicity of
BSD/MIT |
17:09.20 |
starseeker |
I finally (belatedly) contacted the NURBS++
author, but wasn't able to sell him on BSD |
17:11.14 |
``Erik |
the fork risk is probably greatly diminished,
there was a core competency migration from the dangerous group O.o
:D |
17:12.01 |
starseeker |
hehe |
17:12.31 |
starseeker |
'course, NURBS++ was LGPL2 with the later
version clause, so that's somewhat better |
17:12.36 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2708
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: another one bites the
dust |
17:12.38 |
starseeker |
s/was/is |
17:14.12 |
starseeker |
wish I could have found him before the
takeover request went through, but only dug up his contact info
months later |
17:14.22 |
starseeker |
oh, well - not like there was much going on
with it |
17:14.56 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2709
10/wiki/Geometry_Conversion_Library: new layout, add
references |
17:16.29 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2710 10/wiki/Voxelize:
new layout, add references |
17:17.47 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03erikgreenwald * r43950
10/geomcore/trunk/src/GS/DataManager.cxx: getData changed to
getPath |
17:20.42 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2711
10/wiki/IGES_import_improvements: |
17:21.50 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2712
10/wiki/STEP_Libraries: new layout, add references |
17:22.01 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2713
10/wiki/IGES_import_improvements: ws |
17:22.24 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2714
10/wiki/IGES_import_improvements: |
17:36.21 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2715
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: more awesome
expansion |
17:36.49 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2716
10/wiki/GED_Transactions: new layout, add references |
17:37.49 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2717
10/wiki/Add_exec_option_to_search: new layout, add
references |
17:38.54 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2718
10/wiki/Geometry_Selection_Functionality: new layout, add
references |
17:40.45 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2719
10/wiki/Geometric_Constraint_Solver: new layout, add
references |
17:43.38 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2720
10/wiki/Space_Partitioning_for_Tessellation: new layout, add
references |
17:46.33 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2721
10/wiki/Libsvn_within_Geometry_Database_Format: new layout, add
references |
17:56.39 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2722
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: final awesome
restructure |
17:57.43 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2723
10/wiki/Shader_Enhancements: new layout, add references |
17:58.36 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2724
10/wiki/Shader_Enhancements: refs |
17:59.40 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2725
10/wiki/Material_and_Shader_Objects: new layout, add
references |
18:01.21 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2726
10/wiki/NMG_Raytracing_Performance_Improvement: new layout, add
references |
18:02.25 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2727
10/wiki/Generalized_abstracted_spacial_partitioning_capability: new
layout, add references |
18:03.59 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2728
10/wiki/High_Dynamic_Range_Support: new layout, add
references |
18:05.23 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2729
10/wiki/Vector_output_from_raytracing: new layout, add
references |
18:07.01 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2730
10/wiki/Analysis_Library: new layout, add references |
18:08.01 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2731
10/wiki/Analysis_Library: /* References */ |
18:11.44 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2733
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: overlap tool is
geometry processing |
18:12.55 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2734
10/wiki/Overlap_tool: new layout, add references |
18:13.31 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2735
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: ws |
18:25.22 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03davidloman * r43951
10/geomcore/trunk/ (3 files in 2 dirs): Move DataManager
Initialization over to the DataManager itself. |
18:28.59 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@117.192.129.170) |
18:29.08 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@unaffiliated/stattrav) |
18:30.12 |
*** join/#brlcad alex_joni
(~alex_joni@emc/board-of-directors/alexjoni) |
18:40.16 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2736
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: add mentors |
18:40.50 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2737
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: |
18:40.58 |
brlcad |
woot, done |
18:42.29 |
brlcad |
"the patent thing" is actually what makes it
incompat with gpl/lgpl v2, adds a new requirement which those
licenses say you can't do |
18:42.38 |
dloman |
Nice! Im an 'expert modeler' ! |
18:42.43 |
dloman |
nice page btw brlcad ! |
18:42.52 |
brlcad |
also why gpl v2 and v3 are only compat in one
direction |
18:42.58 |
brlcad |
thanks dloman |
18:43.21 |
brlcad |
starseeker and ``Erik did most of the hard
work writing up all those topics |
18:44.30 |
brlcad |
felt kinda dirty putting
'guru' after NMG, but the poor guy needed something
there |
18:45.04 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r43952
10/geomcore/trunk/tests/svntest/main.c: |
18:45.05 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: Start major reworking of our approach
to svn - use lower level api. Whole new |
18:45.05 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: learning curve here, so everything
that was previously working isn't - got it to |
18:45.05 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: compile, so checkpointing. Also gut
all the old svn client code we were using |
18:45.05 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: to avoid license questions - figure
out how to use the APIs from scratch with |
18:45.05 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: examples. |
18:45.38 |
brlcad |
heh |
18:46.04 |
starseeker |
one step forward, two steps back...
sigh |
18:46.42 |
dloman |
and turn your self around... that's what its
all about! |
18:47.10 |
starseeker |
oh, I'm alredy dizzy |
18:47.39 |
brlcad |
paula abdul loves you |
18:48.31 |
starseeker |
aaand another reference sails right over my
head... :-P |
18:48.57 |
brlcad |
heh |
18:49.00 |
brlcad |
opposites attract! |
18:49.13 |
brlcad |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xweiQukBM_k |
18:49.25 |
starseeker |
safe for work? |
18:49.29 |
brlcad |
just a song |
18:51.09 |
brlcad |
ahh, good ol' 80's music videos |
18:53.41 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03erikgreenwald * r43953
10/geomcore/trunk/src/GS/testclient/gstestclient.c: start cleaning
up and simplying things |
18:56.30 |
``Erik |
is there any reason to be pushing strings
across the pipe as unicode16 instead of ascii? |
18:57.00 |
starseeker |
I was doing that because of the definition of
the string type on the wiki |
18:57.04 |
starseeker |
or were you asking dloman ? |
18:57.10 |
``Erik |
open question |
18:57.20 |
dloman |
i down graded them to 1 byte char strings....
last week i think. |
18:57.21 |
``Erik |
suspects it's a qstring
thing |
18:57.38 |
dloman |
qstring and java thing |
18:57.54 |
starseeker |
http://brlcad.org/wiki/GSNet_String |
18:58.06 |
``Erik |
java has some dandy unicode16/ascii conversion
stuff already in it |
18:58.25 |
dloman |
starseeker: thats out of date :( |
18:59.26 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Dloman 07http://brlcad.org * r2738
10/wiki/GSNet_String: |
18:59.26 |
starseeker |
oh - are we all agreed on GS, GE and GUI for
toplevel modules? |
18:59.49 |
dloman |
shakes magic
8ball. |
18:59.59 |
dloman |
.....Sounds good starseeker! |
19:00.26 |
starseeker |
magic8 ball... haven't seen one of those for
many years |
19:02.45 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03davidloman * r43954
10/geomcore/trunk/ (include/FileDataSource.h
src/GS/FileDataSource.cxx): Stub in init routine for
FileDataSource |
19:06.23 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03davidloman * r43955
10/rt^3/trunk/include/ (70 files): Dump all the old GS header
files. No longer needed here. |
19:14.26 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r43956
10/geomcore/trunk/tests/svntest/main.c: Oh yeah, need to init apr
and friends. |
19:21.21 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2739
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: /* Geometry Conversion
Projects */ |
19:25.32 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r43957
10/geomcore/trunk/tests/svntest/main.c: Somewhat surprisingly, this
approach to subdirectory addition works too. Files still aren't
right |
19:27.27 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2740
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: add a couple more STEP
tasks |
19:28.06 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r43958
10/geomcore/trunk/tests/svntest/main.c: And we can create empty
files. |
19:28.45 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2741
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: |
19:35.59 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2742
10/wiki/STEP_exporter: New page: STEP is the current standard for
exchange of CAD data between different software packages. BRL-CAD
makes use of the NIST STEP Class Libraries code to support its
step-g converter, but we ... |
19:40.22 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2743
10/wiki/STEP_importer_improvements: New page: STEP is the current
standard for exchange of CAD data between different software
packages. BRL-CAD makes use of the NIST STEP Class Libraries code
to support its step-g converter, but th... |
19:42.45 |
*** join/#brlcad hyarion
(c05ben@peppar.cs.umu.se) |
20:09.58 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03erikgreenwald * r43959
10/geomcore/trunk/src/GS/testclient/ (CMakeLists.txt
gstestclient.c): complete rewrite. (hey, it works) |
20:11.59 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2744
10/wiki/Benchmark_Performance_Database: initial benchmark web
interface idea |
20:17.14 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2745
10/wiki/Materials_Database: New page: BRL-CAD uses simple material
properties, presently limited to density, for calculating weights,
moments of inertia and other geometric analyses. There is presently
no centralized reposito... |
20:18.23 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03erikgreenwald * r43960
10/geomcore/trunk/src/GS/testclient/gstestclient.c: cleanup the
socket |
20:19.19 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2746
10/wiki/Materials_Database: |
20:19.55 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2747
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: add a couple web tasks
with discouraging wording |
20:28.02 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2748 10/wiki/Fix_Bugs:
initial bugs idea |
20:35.12 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03erikgreenwald * r43961
10/geomcore/trunk/src/GS/testclient/gstestclient.c: parse and print
response packet |
20:37.06 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2749
10/wiki/Code_Reduction: code reduction |
20:37.16 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2750
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: add code
reduction |
20:38.20 |
brlcad |
awesome, up to 42 project ideas now -- 47 if
you count the other tool projects .. I think that's sufficient now
:) |
20:38.33 |
brlcad |
has the new catch-all ones too |
20:39.59 |
brlcad |
starseeker: I'd prefer lowercase for top-level
modules just for consistency (probably less error-prone for
newbies), but not strong preference |
20:41.07 |
brlcad |
16 byte strings across the wire will be 50%
waste 99.9% of the time :) |
20:42.07 |
brlcad |
don't know of anyone even attempting to deal
with 16-bit stringery at the moment |
20:42.23 |
brlcad |
maybe catia, but then they're french |
21:02.40 |
starseeker |
brlcad: sure, lower is fine |
21:06.11 |
starseeker |
ouch - Apple is now going to avoid Samba
because of GPLv3 |
21:07.40 |
starseeker |
brlcad: the dynamic range one... IIRC (and I
may not) another point there was to generate output images that fit
better into image processing pipelines that make use of
HDR |
21:08.23 |
starseeker |
not that that changes priority or anything,
but I think that may have been the envisioned immediate practical
consequence |
21:08.34 |
starseeker |
(HDR displays would be neat
though...) |
21:08.59 |
``Erik |
or like CMYK or YUV for printing or
something |
21:46.05 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2751
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: /* Mentors
*/ |
21:48.06 |
brlcad |
starseeker: the labels aren't really weighted
well |
21:48.49 |
brlcad |
in the big scheme of things with the dozens of
other "high" priority high impact topics on there, I think HDR is
still *relatively* low impact yet it'd still be useful and cool to
have |
21:48.54 |
brlcad |
immediately useful even |
21:49.09 |
brlcad |
the description can be reworded, didn't mean
to downplay it if it comes off that way |
21:49.33 |
starseeker |
nah, it's cool |
21:49.46 |
starseeker |
don't know how much role it will play in
submissions anyway |
21:49.54 |
brlcad |
as for the high/medium/low, I was actually
considering a simple two-level instead of three |
21:50.24 |
brlcad |
HIGH and LOW do sound like they're being
discouraged, though, when it's really meant to just emphasize the
high ones |
21:50.26 |
starseeker |
baby-bottle and skull+crossbones?
:-P |
21:50.33 |
brlcad |
heh |
21:51.06 |
brlcad |
maybe BIG and BIGGER |
21:52.04 |
brlcad |
ha, winner .. BIG and HUGE |
21:55.03 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03Sean 07http://brlcad.org * r2752
10/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Project_Ideas: BIG AND
BIGGEREST! |
21:58.08 |
starseeker |
wangs his head on the wall...
why can't I get file content into files??? auugh |
22:30.03 |
*** join/#brlcad dli
(~dli@dyn-217-029.wireless.concordia.ca) |
22:35.21 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r43962
10/geomcore/trunk/tests/svntest/main.c: OK, we're getting non-zero
sized files now. No way to know if they're anything like correct
yet. |
23:53.14 |
CIA-52 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r43963
10/geomcore/trunk/tests/svntest/ (CMakeLists.txt main.c): start
working out how to reassemble using the lower level
api... |