00:06.53 |
CIA-128 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r49728
10/brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/CompilerFlags.cmake: Whoops - not
appending here. |
00:17.37 |
CIA-128 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r49729
10/brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/CompilerFlags.cmake: Restructure - try
not to run tests we don't need to run (if we've already go the 64
bit flag, don't need to test the rest. |
00:19.46 |
CIA-128 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r49730
10/brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/BRLCAD_CompilerFlags.cmake: copy/paste
strikes again |
00:48.58 |
CIA-128 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r49731
10/brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/CompilerFlags.cmake: Tweak Debug flag
handling |
01:04.21 |
starseeker |
ah - that's better |
01:06.11 |
CIA-128 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r49732
10/brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/BRLCAD_CompilerFlags.cmake: whoops -
stray macro name holdout |
01:37.20 |
brlcad |
starseeker: ah, I thought I mentioned that
site a long while back |
01:37.43 |
brlcad |
great resource for step models, I have GBs of
data from there |
01:51.45 |
brlcad |
so yes, to all, we were accepted into GSoC
again this year! woot! |
03:37.22 |
brlcad |
our gsoc profile is now properly filled out:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org/google/gsoc2012/brlcad |
03:58.07 |
brlcad |
been thinking about the hyphen on the new
logo, feedback appreciated on the three BRL-CAD_gear_logo_*.png
files in http://brlcad.org/tmp/. |
04:00.59 |
starseeker |
brlcad: is there a reason the "over" image
doesn't have the graphic centered over the text? |
04:03.30 |
starseeker |
I'd probably take that over the other
two... |
04:06.59 |
*** join/#brlcad ardahal
(0e8b55c1@gateway/web/freenode/ip.14.139.85.193) |
04:08.45 |
starseeker |
what about something like this but with
thicker "CAD" text? http://brlcad.org/~starseeker/logo_test.png |
04:22.50 |
brlcad |
no reason other than it was smaller when I was
playing with that idea, and it looked more appropriate balanced
over the A at that size |
04:23.15 |
brlcad |
like what you did there though, that is nice
fully balanced |
04:24.09 |
brlcad |
the CAD text and the BRL text are presently
intentionally unbalanced (so it stylistically matches the
links) |
04:25.01 |
brlcad |
the more I see it, the more it's been growing
on me, I must admit -- though I'd be interested in seeing the
opposite (BRL light, CAD bold) |
04:25.39 |
starseeker |
would probably work better on a light
background - firefox is happening to display it on a dark grey
bg |
04:29.12 |
starseeker |
the "mid" layout might do well for a "banner"
configuration, although I'd prefer the text a bit larger
personally... |
04:32.21 |
brlcad |
do you now if anyone else been able to give
the vm image a try? |
04:33.00 |
brlcad |
so it sounds like either way, you're more keen
on the hyphen at hyphen height, not connecting the L->C like a
hinge |
04:33.38 |
brlcad |
hard to see at that smaller size, but that
"hyphen" is actually the same chain link as the bigger three, just
with two links |
04:48.36 |
starseeker |
is trying to download the
vm |
05:11.04 |
*** join/#brlcad atneik
(3bb22dec@gateway/web/freenode/ip.59.178.45.236) |
05:16.27 |
*** part/#brlcad atneik
(3bb22dec@gateway/web/freenode/ip.59.178.45.236) |
06:40.08 |
*** join/#brlcad abhi2011
(~chatzilla@119.226.184.246) |
09:50.28 |
*** join/#brlcad Georgiy
(4e8bd6a9@gateway/web/freenode/ip.78.139.214.169) |
10:44.16 |
*** join/#brlcad abhi2011
(~chatzilla@119.226.184.246) |
11:03.02 |
*** join/#brlcad simion314
(~quassel@109.96.4.109) |
11:40.00 |
brlcad |
Georgiy: absolutely, but we prefer to hold all
of our discussions openly so everyone can benefit |
11:40.28 |
brlcad |
Georgiy: perhaps you can describe exactly what
you're thinking of doing in an e-mail to the brlcad-devel mailing
list? |
12:26.55 |
*** join/#brlcad andrei
(~andrei@188.25.161.208) |
12:27.09 |
*** part/#brlcad andrei
(~andrei@188.25.161.208) |
12:55.35 |
brlcad |
Georgiy: what sort of work have you done
already? |
13:14.56 |
*** join/#brlcad ibot_
(~ibot@rikers.org) |
13:14.56 |
*** topic/#brlcad is BRL-CAD
Open Source Solid Modeling || http://brlcad.org || logs: http://ibot.rikers.org/%23brlcad/
|| BRL-CAD release 7.22.0 is forthcoming (eta: end of March) ||
BRL-CAD has applied to participate in GSoC 2012! |
13:47.40 |
Georgiy |
brlcad: i'm working on vector signal analyzing
and generating software for telecomunication technologies
(including signal processing). It is big project, we (me and my
team) already have spended 2 years for it, and it's not ready
(there is a lot of work), in fact this is my first programming
project. Also I've partisipiated in two projects where i've done
gui (using Qt) |
13:48.24 |
Georgiy |
brlcad: and plugin for EEGLab (using matlab
and C) for 2D & 3D graphs comparison and
classification. |
13:57.03 |
Georgiy |
brlcad: i can give you a link to eeglab plugin
wiki but you need know russian :) |
14:42.06 |
*** join/#brlcad simion314
(~quassel@109.96.4.109) |
14:56.53 |
*** part/#brlcad Georgiy
(4e8bd6a9@gateway/web/freenode/ip.78.139.214.169) |
14:58.24 |
*** join/#brlcad Georgiy
(4e8bd6a9@gateway/web/freenode/ip.78.139.214.169) |
15:28.15 |
*** join/#brlcad simion314
(~quassel@109.96.4.109) |
16:14.36 |
CIA-128 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r49733
10/brlcad/trunk/ (CMakeLists.txt
misc/CMake/BRLCAD_CompilerFlags.cmake): Tweak optimization flag
handling. |
16:16.10 |
CIA-128 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r49734
10/brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/CompilerFlags.cmake: We're not doing
anything specifically with MinSizeRel as yet, so don't wipe CMake's
version. |
16:16.10 |
*** join/#brlcad razoraxon
(0e8b5206@gateway/web/freenode/ip.14.139.82.6) |
16:22.27 |
CIA-128 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r49735
10/brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/BRLCAD_Summary.cmake: add
spacer |
16:47.25 |
CIA-128 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r49736
10/brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/distcheck_repo_verify.cmake.in: Add a
note suggesting enabling all bundled libs for distcheck, if that
has not already been done. |
18:20.21 |
CIA-128 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r49737
10/brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/ (Distcheck.cmake
distcheck_repo_verify.cmake.in): Few minor tweaks to
distcheck |
18:22.29 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@223.190.200.213) |
18:22.29 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@unaffiliated/stattrav) |
18:27.09 |
Stattrav |
hey folks |
18:27.40 |
Stattrav |
Shall come back when Sean is active. |
18:32.33 |
Stattrav |
I wanted to talk about the web development
idea implementations. |
19:14.37 |
*** join/#brlcad simion314
(~quassel@109.96.4.109) |
19:45.55 |
brlcad |
Stattrav: sean is usually active, just not
always on irc -- best to just ask/say what you want and read the
resonse(s) in backlog |
19:46.17 |
brlcad |
someone else is just as likely able to answer
questions, and you'll be helped much more quickly ;) |
19:47.37 |
Stattrav |
btw I was reading through the web development
Idea, so what is needed is a two way sync between docbook and
mediawiki aint it ? |
19:47.52 |
brlcad |
which web dev idea? |
19:48.12 |
brlcad |
we have a lot of potential web work |
19:48.12 |
Stattrav |
Synchronize with Docbook |
19:48.45 |
brlcad |
ah yeah, that could be either through
mediawiki or drupal frankly |
19:48.55 |
brlcad |
ideally, it could be something else too
really |
19:49.12 |
Stattrav |
If I were to start with the webwork, benchmark
db |
19:49.23 |
Stattrav |
would be where I'd like to start. |
19:49.26 |
brlcad |
something that is more modular that fits in
with an existing framework would probably get more widespread
use |
19:49.36 |
Stattrav |
so could you help me understand the problem
better ? |
19:49.56 |
Stattrav |
so what you are currently using is a mediawiki
aint it ? |
19:49.57 |
brlcad |
the BRL-CAD benchmark is one of my favorite
golden nuggets within our codebase |
19:50.13 |
brlcad |
we presently use
drupal+mediawiki+gallery2 |
19:51.02 |
brlcad |
so for the benchmark project, the best way to
explain it is to probably run the brl-cad benchmark on your own
system |
19:51.27 |
Stattrav |
so one needs to build a web API for the
submissions of the logs when when runs the benchmark on the
individual's system |
19:51.43 |
brlcad |
right, that's the basic idea |
19:52.03 |
Stattrav |
and then the web end needs to parse the log
file with the regexes and store it according to the db schema
? |
19:52.09 |
brlcad |
or at least a processing system that reads
logs from a mail directory or something similar |
19:52.25 |
Stattrav |
yes |
19:52.36 |
brlcad |
or both :) |
19:52.54 |
brlcad |
the easier it is to submit, the more useful
the system will be, obviously |
19:53.24 |
Stattrav |
Ideally, reading from the mail directory can
be a wrapper over the web API |
19:53.29 |
brlcad |
just will need some mechanism for manually
loading logs since some will come from systems that have no
networking |
19:53.47 |
Stattrav |
yes. |
19:54.24 |
Stattrav |
One could also provide an "upload" page
? |
19:54.26 |
brlcad |
Stattrav: are you familiar with CIA? |
19:54.48 |
Stattrav |
not really. Just know what it is |
19:55.11 |
brlcad |
http://cia.vc/doc/development/ |
19:55.33 |
brlcad |
that's way overkill for this, but it's an
example of a multi-input processing system that works
sublime |
19:55.54 |
Stattrav |
ohh |
19:56.43 |
Stattrav |
We had something like this where I was working
before getting back into academia |
19:57.29 |
Stattrav |
you were referring to the diagram. werent you
? |
19:59.33 |
Stattrav |
brlcad: so could I ask what are the targets
for the summers and as said the remnants could be developed
later. |
20:05.43 |
brlcad |
yes, the diagram |
20:06.03 |
Stattrav |
so a {submission infrastructure} -> {data
extraction} -> {db} -> {analysis} |
20:07.56 |
brlcad |
the summer target would be more about getting
the database in place with a processing backend working with a live
front end |
20:08.10 |
brlcad |
the analysis has mostly already happened and
is in the report |
20:08.26 |
brlcad |
so it's just aggregate reporting via the web
interface |
20:09.17 |
brlcad |
i'd keep that aspect very simple -- enough to
submit a new entry and see how it fits in with other results in the
database |
20:09.44 |
Stattrav |
aah k. Let me write the draft proposal for the
submission ifrastructure, data extraction and storage. Once that is
done, I shall ping you for for some comments. |
20:10.00 |
brlcad |
coding complete would be a real emphasis for
that project, making sure the system is not in a partially complete
state at most any point of development as much possible |
20:10.10 |
brlcad |
that sounds great |
20:10.36 |
brlcad |
if you have a brl-cad install, just run the
"benchmark" command and you'll see the report it
generates |
20:10.40 |
Stattrav |
yes |
20:10.50 |
Stattrav |
done that |
20:11.33 |
brlcad |
that's basically it, the master
run-*benchmark.log file is what we're working with |
20:12.52 |
Stattrav |
btw I have applied to brlcad before but did
not get through :) This was my proposal http://brlcad.org/wiki/User:Hippieindamakin87 |
20:13.06 |
brlcad |
I remember you ;) |
20:13.11 |
Stattrav |
I've worked with Sahana the year BRLCAD did
not apply |
20:13.23 |
Stattrav |
and then work and then this year back to
academia. |
20:13.48 |
brlcad |
graduate-level or more undergrad? |
20:13.59 |
Stattrav |
grad-level |
20:14.21 |
Stattrav |
MSc http://www.cmi.ac.in/~suryajith/ |
20:15.29 |
brlcad |
if I recall correctly, you were
underconsideration, but just didn't seem to have enough technical
background for the (substantially hard) project you were interested
in working on |
20:15.39 |
Stattrav |
true :) |
20:17.03 |
Stattrav |
shall be back later, classes in the morning.
(2am here) |
20:17.26 |
brlcad |
I think you not only promised implementing
robust brep evaluation but also implementing an entire exact
precision computing library on top of CSG conversion to BREP to
boot |
23:24.03 |
*** join/#brlcad b0ef
(~b0ef@175.134.202.84.customer.cdi.no) |
23:33.28 |
CIA-128 |
BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r49738
10/brlcad/trunk/TODO: it was tkhtml3 |
23:51.38 |
*** join/#brlcad stas
(~stas@188.24.46.106) |