15:20.35 |
*** join/#brlcad ibot
(~ibot@rikers.org) |
15:20.35 |
*** topic/#brlcad is BRL-CAD
Open Source Solid Modeling || http://brlcad.org || logs: http://ibot.rikers.org/%23brlcad/
|| Congratulations to our 11 accepted GSoC
students!! |
15:42.40 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@ns.cmi.ac.in) |
15:42.41 |
*** join/#brlcad Stattrav
(~Stattrav@unaffiliated/stattrav) |
16:01.10 |
CIA-68 |
BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r52527
10/brlcad/trunk/src/libged/bot_fuse.c: quell may be used
uninitialized |
16:09.21 |
CIA-68 |
BRL-CAD: 03carlmoore * r52528
10/brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/Distcheck.cmake: fix 2
spellings |
16:10.49 |
CIA-68 |
BRL-CAD: 03carlmoore * r52529
10/brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/distcheck_autotools.cmake.in: fix
spelling in a quoted string |
16:20.34 |
*** join/#brlcad [1]elf11_
(~elf11_@92.80.57.5) |
16:27.10 |
brlcad |
elf11_: here's what was written |
16:27.10 |
brlcad |
22:30 < brlcad> elf11_: you should
totally document everything abhijit has been telling you in the
source code |
16:27.13 |
brlcad |
22:31 < brlcad> like the
broadphase/narrowphase information, bounding boxes, how things are
organized and processed, etc |
16:27.16 |
brlcad |
22:31 < brlcad> a comment in one of the
source files or even in a text README file is warranted |
16:27.19 |
brlcad |
22:31 < brlcad> as much detail an
information as possible |
16:36.42 |
elf11_ |
Hey, Sean. I was already doing that,
documenting for myself what Abhi told me, to organize stuff a
little bit in my mind - by writing it down, so I will add a file
with it in the source files |
16:38.02 |
brlcad |
great |
16:38.55 |
elf11_ |
and about the mm/m problem that we
encountered? |
16:39.18 |
elf11_ |
also I am currently trying to see why the mass
of the body is growing during the simulation |
16:45.12 |
brlcad |
elf11_: can you summarize the
problem? |
16:45.31 |
brlcad |
limiting working units to mm is fine for now,
but it does seem like a peculiar limitation |
16:47.02 |
elf11_ |
In the meter case we concluded that when
transfering information from mged to bullet, mged has the units
stored as n * 1000mm and not as n meters, so bullet gets n*1000
units, since bullet knows only about meters that's the unit we
get |
16:47.49 |
elf11_ |
so scaling when transferring from mged to
bullet is an option |
16:49.17 |
elf11_ |
also found out why the cube was penetrating
the gp in that simulation, bullet has a tolerance of 0.04m so for
collision detection to work properly geometry should be larger than
that tolerance |
16:49.26 |
elf11_ |
the geometry for that simulation
wasn't |
16:59.09 |
brlcad |
elf11_: brl-cad stores everything as mm and
lets you have working units be nearly anything |
16:59.59 |
brlcad |
you shouldn't be "scaling" anything.. should
be passing it in as-is |
17:01.23 |
brlcad |
if bullet has a tolerance of 0.04m, then it
may make sense to "scale" it when feeding it to bullet, but only to
overcome that limitation |
17:03.13 |
brlcad |
makes a note of
http://wikihelp.autodesk.com/Alias/enu/2013/Help/0124-Autodesk124/0281-How_to..281/0282-Model282/0363-Modify_g363/0427-Cut_or_t427/0433-Convert_433 |
17:04.59 |
elf11_ |
So you say that brlcad is storing everything
in mm, but when we transfer from mged to bullet we should have got
meters? Of course if the geometry we created was in
meters. |
18:45.35 |
brlcad |
elf11_: I wasn't speaking to what happens when
you transfer to bullet -- just what brl-cad does |
18:46.14 |
brlcad |
everything is (always) stored as mm along with
the working units so that numerics are stable -- conversion happens
on the fly to your working units only when needed |
18:47.17 |
brlcad |
if you created geometry in m, then the mm
values getting passed to bullet would be "too big" if bullet treats
the values as m |
20:30.42 |
starseeker |
Well, nuts. Why'd Pixar have to go with
Microsoft Public License... http://www.opensubdiv.com/?p=197 |
22:05.51 |
*** join/#brlcad crdueck
(~cdk@24-212-219-10.cable.teksavvy.com) |
22:29.57 |
*** join/#brlcad Yoshi47
(~jan@d24-204-236-81.home4.cgocable.net) |
22:46.32 |
*** join/#brlcad ChanServ
(ChanServ@services.) |
22:46.32 |
*** mode/#brlcad [+o ChanServ]
by kornbluth.freenode.net |
22:48.47 |
elf11_ |
Hmm okay, thanks brlcad for that, then the
scaling when transfering from mged to bullet is necessarily and
when working in mm there should be some kind of warning about the
size of the geometry. |
22:55.28 |
starseeker |
brlcad: hmm, another open font: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sourcecodepro.adobe/ |