00:00.54 |
kanzure |
was that just because someone bulk downloaded
papers? |
00:01.32 |
starseeker |
no, you're probably thinking of JSTOR and
Aaron Swartz |
00:02.00 |
kanzure |
i'm familiar with aaronsw's work, but i
specifically remember something about the reason for nasa taking
down their server was something about "china" and
"downloads" |
00:04.00 |
kanzure |
maybe not. |
00:05.09 |
starseeker |
http://www.space.com/20355-nasa-chinese-spy-reports-database.html |
00:05.18 |
starseeker |
that what you're thinking of? |
00:05.33 |
kanzure |
tbh i got the "china" information second-hand
from a person heh |
00:05.54 |
kanzure |
looks right |
00:07.52 |
*** join/#brlcad crdueck
(~cdk@24.212.219.10) |
00:49.28 |
*** join/#brlcad RcHaCk
(RcHaCk@174.1.98.67) |
00:49.33 |
RcHaCk |
hey |
00:56.29 |
*** part/#brlcad RcHaCk
(RcHaCk@174.1.98.67) |
01:09.33 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
01:09.36 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
01:14.32 |
*** join/#brlcad starseeker
(~starseeke@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
01:14.33 |
*** join/#brlcad n_reed
(~molto_cre@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
02:47.22 |
*** join/#brlcad gdh
(~quassel@70.36.71.180) |
03:24.09 |
starseeker |
hopes someone publishes a new
book on the Antikythera mechanism in the next few years... so much
new info |
05:40.02 |
*** join/#brlcad caen23
(~cezar@92.81.176.149) |
06:20.29 |
*** join/#brlcad kanzure
(~kanzure@131.252.130.248) |
06:40.52 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
06:41.40 |
*** join/#brlcad starseeker
(~starseeke@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
06:41.53 |
*** join/#brlcad n_reed
(~molto_cre@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
08:29.52 |
*** join/#brlcad caen23
(~cezar@92.83.176.183) |
10:04.05 |
*** join/#brlcad Notify
(~notify@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
10:05.05 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD Wiki:Fooldzoonia * 0
/wiki/User:Fooldzoonia: |
10:10.26 |
``Erik |
interesting http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-639/041-minkowitz.pdf |
11:00.16 |
*** join/#brlcad ncsaba
(~ncsaba@p549828CC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
11:01.10 |
ncsaba |
Hi all |
11:01.13 |
ncsaba |
anybody around who knows the pipe.c code
? |
11:15.00 |
``Erik |
if there isn't, there will be... ask your
question and hang around until someone responds :) |
11:43.32 |
ncsaba |
well I would like to ask about the meaning of
the fields of the bend_pipe structure |
11:45.52 |
ncsaba |
I suppose "bend_V" is the center of the circle
with radius "bend_radius", of which the bend's center line is part
of |
11:48.56 |
ncsaba |
what I'm actually after is if there is any of
those parameters helpful to get a unit vector from the bend's
center (as I understand it) pointing to the middle of the bend ?
With "middle" I mean the mid-point of the center-line of the torus
segment |
12:06.11 |
ncsaba |
ok, I think I will use: VCOMB2(cp,
bend->bend_start, 0.5, bend->bend_end, 0.5); VSUB2(cp, cp,
bend->bend_V); VUNITIZE(cp); |
12:07.36 |
brlcad |
you mean bend_ra? |
12:09.22 |
``Erik |
http://youtu.be/o8TssbmY-GM
wringing water out of a washcloth in space |
12:36.39 |
*** join/#brlcad caen23
(~cezar@92.81.162.211) |
12:40.44 |
ncsaba |
brlcad: Hi there :-) |
12:41.14 |
ncsaba |
brlcad: isn't "bend_ra" the vector from bend_V
-> bend_start ? |
12:41.52 |
ncsaba |
I need one from bend_V to the middle point
between bend_start and bend_end (if I understand the meaning of
these correctly) |
12:43.43 |
ncsaba |
this is for the centroid - I managed to
understand the math behind it, solved my integrals, and then took
what you suggested originally and calculate the centroid of the
center line of the torus segment :-) |
12:47.19 |
ncsaba |
so if my math is correct, the centroid sits on
the line from the bend's center to the middle of the center line,
at distance cos(bend_angle/4)*(bend_radius + bend_or) |
12:48.00 |
ncsaba |
sorry, was wrong:
cos(bend_angle/4)*bend_radius |
12:48.08 |
ncsaba |
bend_or has nothing to do there |
12:49.16 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:bob1961 * 55188
brlcad/trunk/src/tclscripts/archer/ShaderEdit.tcl: Added Archer
support for the envmap and unlisted/unknown shaders. |
13:44.32 |
*** join/#brlcad prakhnig
(~prakhnig@59.180.138.8) |
13:57.11 |
*** join/#brlcad vladbogo
(~vlad@188.25.239.23) |
14:02.28 |
*** join/#brlcad adirocks11
(0e8b5206@gateway/web/freenode/ip.14.139.82.6) |
14:03.04 |
*** part/#brlcad adirocks11
(0e8b5206@gateway/web/freenode/ip.14.139.82.6) |
14:05.09 |
*** join/#brlcad hawthorn
(0e8b5206@gateway/web/freenode/ip.14.139.82.6) |
14:05.24 |
hawthorn |
hi |
14:08.27 |
hawthorn |
hello Mr. Erik |
14:09.32 |
hawthorn |
i was going trough the ideas page and was
interested in the code duplication reduction |
14:10.40 |
hawthorn |
i am using the irc channel for the very first
time and I dont know whether my msg is posted or not |
14:10.50 |
hawthorn |
anyone please reply if my msgs are
posted |
14:10.57 |
vladbogo |
hi |
14:11.12 |
vladbogo |
the messages are posted :) |
14:11.23 |
hawthorn |
oh thanks :) |
14:11.41 |
vladbogo |
it could take a while until someone answers
but it will |
14:11.48 |
hawthorn |
when do the mentors reply ? |
14:11.57 |
hawthorn |
oh thanks again ..you answered well before
:D |
14:12.08 |
vladbogo |
you're welcome |
14:12.27 |
hawthorn |
you a frequent user of this irc channel
? |
14:13.40 |
vladbogo |
i am also interested in a gsoc project so i
started to use this channel just a few days ago |
14:14.13 |
hawthorn |
oh..got it |
14:14.22 |
vladbogo |
you can also send a message on the mailing
list |
14:14.38 |
hawthorn |
where is it ? |
14:15.44 |
vladbogo |
there's a checklist link on the idea page and
you find there the address of the mailing list |
14:16.21 |
hawthorn |
ok..thank you very much.! |
14:16.27 |
vladbogo |
you're welcome |
14:26.08 |
*** join/#brlcad gdh_
(~quassel@70.36.71.180) |
14:36.59 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:bob1961 * 55189
brlcad/trunk/src/tclscripts/archer/ShaderEdit.tcl: Added support in
Archer for the air shader. |
14:49.56 |
*** join/#brlcad n_reed
(~molto_cre@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
14:50.10 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
15:01.47 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
15:06.18 |
*** join/#brlcad prakhnig2
(~prakhnig@59.180.128.106) |
15:07.53 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
15:17.30 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
15:17.31 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
15:17.50 |
*** join/#brlcad starseeker
(~starseeke@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
15:23.16 |
*** join/#brlcad starseeker
(~starseeke@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
15:23.37 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
15:51.03 |
*** join/#brlcad caen23
(~cezar@109.97.114.47) |
16:19.21 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
16:20.38 |
*** join/#brlcad starseeker
(~starseeke@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
16:20.38 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
16:32.49 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
16:32.54 |
*** join/#brlcad n_reed
(~molto_cre@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
16:41.37 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
16:41.38 |
*** join/#brlcad starseeker
(~starseeke@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
17:01.56 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
17:11.17 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
17:36.38 |
*** join/#brlcad n_reed
(~molto_cre@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
17:36.50 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
17:38.36 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
17:39.37 |
*** join/#brlcad Ch3ck
(~Ch3ck@41.205.13.161) |
17:39.48 |
Ch3ck |
Hi |
17:40.15 |
Ch3ck |
i want to work on some of the bugs from the
bug file in the src i downloaded yesterday |
17:40.54 |
Ch3ck |
and i wnat to work on the bu_log() routine
width which does not allign with the printf |
17:41.16 |
Ch3ck |
so i wish to know where the bu_log() routine
is defined in the src |
17:41.22 |
Ch3ck |
so i could take a peek at it.. |
17:42.23 |
``Erik |
function names are prefixed with what lib
their in, so probably something like src/libbu/log.c |
17:42.49 |
Ch3ck |
also concerning the rt_mirror() function which
i am to refactor into the functab |
17:42.52 |
``Erik |
s/their/they're/ |
17:43.14 |
Ch3ck |
ok thanks Erik |
17:43.21 |
Ch3ck |
wanna fix the bug right away.. |
17:43.31 |
``Erik |
~/src/brlcad/src/librt$ grep -r ^rt_mirror
. |
17:43.31 |
``Erik |
./primitives/mirror.c:rt_mirror(struct db_i
*dbip, |
17:43.53 |
Ch3ck |
ok |
17:45.33 |
Ch3ck |
i don't get it.. |
17:46.11 |
``Erik |
? |
17:46.53 |
Ch3ck |
ok the ~/src/brlcad/src/librt$ grep
* |
17:46.59 |
Ch3ck |
thing |
17:47.19 |
``Erik |
oh, my BRL-CAD checkout is src/brlcad, so in
the src, here's src/librt/primitives/mirror.c that contains
rt_mirror() |
17:52.09 |
*** join/#brlcad starseeker
(~starseeke@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
17:54.43 |
Ch3ck |
ok |
17:54.51 |
Ch3ck |
thanks @Erik.. |
17:54.59 |
Ch3ck |
i see |
17:55.21 |
Ch3ck |
so i am to refactor rt_mirror() in mirror.c
right? |
18:05.17 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
18:10.05 |
*** join/#brlcad Ch3ck_
(~Ch3ck@41.205.13.161) |
18:16.49 |
*** join/#brlcad Ch3ck
(~Ch3ck@41.205.13.161) |
18:21.56 |
*** join/#brlcad n_reed
(~molto_cre@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
18:24.41 |
*** join/#brlcad Ch3ck
(~Ch3ck@41.205.13.161) |
18:34.42 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
18:37.37 |
*** join/#brlcad n_reed
(~molto_cre@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
18:55.14 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
18:55.26 |
*** join/#brlcad n_reed
(~molto_cre@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
18:56.54 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
18:57.02 |
*** join/#brlcad Notify
(~notify@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
18:57.31 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:bob1961 * 55190
brlcad/trunk/src/tclscripts/archer/ShaderEdit.tcl: Added support in
Archer for the projection shader. |
18:57.37 |
*** join/#brlcad starseeker
(~starseeke@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
19:05.24 |
*** join/#brlcad vladbogo
(~vlad@188.25.239.23) |
19:30.23 |
*** join/#brlcad caen23
(~cezar@92.81.190.254) |
19:45.14 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
19:48.01 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
19:51.38 |
*** join/#brlcad tofu1
(~morrison@c-71-206-34-125.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
19:53.17 |
*** join/#brlcad vladbogo
(~vlad@188.25.239.23) |
19:56.06 |
*** join/#brlcad tofu1
(~morrison@c-71-206-34-125.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
19:56.07 |
*** part/#brlcad tofu1
(~morrison@c-71-206-34-125.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
19:57.34 |
*** join/#brlcad tofu1
(~morrison@c-71-206-34-125.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
19:58.10 |
*** mode/#brlcad [+o tofu] by
ChanServ |
19:58.31 |
tofu |
crazy sagonet |
19:58.51 |
tofu |
apparently, they're having massive network
issues |
19:59.04 |
tofu |
probably DDoS attacks |
20:04.17 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
20:05.45 |
*** join/#brlcad n_reed
(~molto_cre@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
20:26.16 |
*** join/#brlcad hawthorn
(0e8b5206@gateway/web/freenode/ip.14.139.82.6) |
20:26.30 |
hawthorn |
Hello Mr. Erik |
20:27.15 |
tofu |
hawthorn: he's not a Ms., but no need for
formality here |
20:28.06 |
hawthorn |
oh sorry |
20:28.16 |
tofu |
no need to be sorry either, relax ;) |
20:28.28 |
hawthorn |
actually I was interested in the reduction of
code duplication project |
20:28.37 |
tofu |
great |
20:28.39 |
tofu |
why? |
20:28.53 |
hawthorn |
gsoc project |
20:28.58 |
tofu |
I know |
20:29.04 |
tofu |
why do you want to work on code
reduction? |
20:29.26 |
hawthorn |
actually i am interested in OOP |
20:29.40 |
tofu |
what's that got to do with code reduction?
:) |
20:29.40 |
hawthorn |
so code reduction can be achieved by
it |
20:29.45 |
tofu |
hmm. |
20:29.53 |
hawthorn |
it falls under my interest thats it |
20:30.01 |
hawthorn |
am i wrong ? |
20:30.28 |
tofu |
code refactoring can lead to better
introduction of OOP |
20:30.37 |
tofu |
OOP in general however rarely leads to reduced
code |
20:31.05 |
hawthorn |
oh.. |
20:31.20 |
hawthorn |
thank you for that |
20:31.30 |
tofu |
obviously code reduction can be achieved by
refactoring … which can lead to better OOP design … they're just
not necessarily the case :) |
20:31.33 |
hawthorn |
but is that project allotted to someone
? |
20:31.38 |
tofu |
that's not how it works |
20:31.47 |
tofu |
you propose a project |
20:31.52 |
tofu |
others propose a project |
20:32.06 |
hawthorn |
i am new |
20:32.07 |
tofu |
the strongest candidates (based on a whole
slew of criteria) are selected |
20:32.13 |
hawthorn |
i dont know how to get a project |
20:32.29 |
tofu |
ultimately, it's YOUR project |
20:32.35 |
tofu |
you propose to do something |
20:32.49 |
hawthorn |
ok. |
20:32.56 |
hawthorn |
so I have to propose something new ? |
20:33.01 |
tofu |
that can be an idea from our ideas page, some
variation, or something else altogether |
20:33.19 |
hawthorn |
ok .. |
20:33.22 |
tofu |
regardless of what it is, your job is to flesh
out the idea with lots of detail |
20:33.43 |
tofu |
so we might suggest working on "code
refactoring" for example |
20:34.28 |
hawthorn |
oh.. |
20:34.31 |
``Erik |
hawthorn: we have an ideas page, but they're
just ideas... you can propose what ever you want, several people
can propose the same idea, you can do proposals for several
ideas... it's not a "pick one and get assigned" thing at the
moment |
20:34.34 |
tofu |
but then you'd turn that into a much more
specific proposal to perhaps refactor all of our geometry
converters into a library, or finding all the places where we
iterate over geometry types manually and push those up into the
primitives OOP style, or something else etc |
20:34.58 |
hawthorn |
so I have to present some idea related to code
refactoring and then if you like it you will assign me that
project..is it like this ? |
20:35.11 |
tofu |
mm, first patch received |
20:35.39 |
tofu |
vladbogo: thanks, someone will usually look at
it in a few days |
20:35.47 |
``Erik |
tofu: been watching the issues, it's been
hitting alter a fair bit, it'd seem (alter := uu + worldcom + mci +
verizonbiz) |
20:36.40 |
``Erik |
been seeing cyclic routing tables, too...
might be a ddos causing screwy failover behavior, or fat fingers in
very expensive router rulesets |
20:37.23 |
tofu |
yeah, I've been reading news reports that
there are several unprecedented DDoS attacks going on across the
net right now |
20:37.40 |
``Erik |
(fwiw, vladbogo has also been helping answer
questions in chan) |
20:37.41 |
tofu |
perhaps related to todays news or
coincidence |
20:37.42 |
hawthorn |
is the server busy ? I cant open the ideas
webpage |
20:38.07 |
tofu |
hawthorn: you and everyone else.. ISP is on
fire |
20:38.43 |
hawthorn |
I am also very much interested in computer
graphics |
20:39.07 |
hawthorn |
so can some small game can be made ?
: |
20:39.26 |
tofu |
hawthorn: you can propose pretty much
anything |
20:39.36 |
tofu |
I'd suggest discussing any idea in here in
detail |
20:39.48 |
tofu |
like if you wanted to make a small game, how
would it involve brl-cad? |
20:40.08 |
vladbogo |
tofu: thanks, I will wait for the
review |
20:40.28 |
tofu |
and thanks for helping others, that means a
lot |
20:40.31 |
hawthorn |
yaa..that would be an issue |
20:40.40 |
hawthorn |
i know OpenGL |
20:41.20 |
tofu |
hawthorn: if you wanted to work in that area,
you might check out what the blender folks did X years ago for
their game engine, you could propose creating something similar for
BRL-CAD |
20:41.52 |
tofu |
but know that would be a stretch to fit into
GSoC timeframe given you have very limited experience (at least
with BRL-CAD), don't know about your API design
background |
20:42.39 |
tofu |
there's certainly tons of games that could be
implemented using brl-cad geometry and rendering under the
hood |
20:43.01 |
*** join/#brlcad hawthorn_
(0e8b5206@gateway/web/freenode/ip.14.139.82.6) |
20:43.26 |
``Erik |
libfb/if_SDL.c ? |
20:43.44 |
``Erik |
(semi-game related, sorta, almost) |
20:43.48 |
tofu |
hawthorn_: you see the other
messages? |
20:43.57 |
tofu |
heh SDL |
20:44.01 |
hawthorn_ |
let me have a look at blender |
20:44.42 |
tofu |
hawthorn_: that really is a massive
undertaking (it took them a couple years to develop their
interface) |
20:44.46 |
tofu |
just FYI |
20:44.53 |
tofu |
but you might be able to carve out a
piece |
20:44.53 |
``Erik |
not quite ogre integration, but it'd provide a
cross platform interface layer |
20:45.02 |
tofu |
if_qt would too |
20:45.30 |
hawthorn_ |
:( |
20:45.31 |
``Erik |
if_svgalib.c w00t *duck* |
20:45.37 |
hawthorn_ |
confused |
20:47.02 |
``Erik |
hawthorn_: have you compiled/installed BRL-CAD
and tried mged and rt out yet? it may be useful to play around a
bit to see what might be possible |
20:48.31 |
*** join/#brlcad gdh_
(~quassel@70.36.71.180) |
20:48.42 |
tofu |
hawthorn_: confused about what? |
20:49.11 |
tofu |
don't be shy with questions … we live and
breath this stuff and have for many years, so we certainly don't
expect you to understand everything we say :) |
20:49.20 |
hawthorn_ |
yaa |
20:50.10 |
hawthorn_ |
i will first install BRL-CAD, have a look at
it and then i ll ping you with some possible ideas |
20:50.18 |
hawthorn_ |
thank you btw |
20:50.54 |
tofu |
excited to hear what you might come up
with |
20:51.42 |
tofu |
as soon as the webserver is back up, I'd
suggest taking a look over our top-listed projects to see if/how
any of them might be interesting too or see if we can brainstorm
something based off those ideas |
20:51.58 |
hawthorn_ |
actually i also wanted to ask that how many
projects have you already selected ? ..if you could tell |
20:52.01 |
tofu |
it's helpful to consolidate effort in as few
areas as possible so real useful progress is made |
20:52.08 |
tofu |
we haven't selected any |
20:52.19 |
hawthorn_ |
oh.. |
20:52.21 |
tofu |
the application timeframe hasn't opened yet,
there are no official submissions |
20:52.27 |
tofu |
see the timeline on the GSoC site |
20:52.34 |
tofu |
you're good and early, that's a really good
thing |
20:52.38 |
*** join/#brlcad starseeker
(~starseeke@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
20:52.41 |
hawthorn_ |
yaa yaa..i have seen that |
20:52.41 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
20:52.50 |
hawthorn_ |
but we can make proposal now right ? |
20:53.08 |
tofu |
we don't start making selections until after
the submission window *closes* |
20:53.10 |
tofu |
absolutely |
20:53.22 |
tofu |
several have already put up some text on our
wiki and mailing list for review |
20:53.34 |
tofu |
see our checklist (again, when the website is
back up) |
20:54.22 |
tofu |
looks like it happens to be up right this
second |
20:54.23 |
``Erik |
looks like the server may be semi-connect for
now |
20:54.35 |
hawthorn_ |
so till 21st we just have to discuss the
application ideas |
20:54.45 |
hawthorn_ |
selection process would be afterwards ..right
? |
20:55.11 |
tofu |
proposals can be discussed and modified right
up to the submission deadline |
20:55.48 |
hawthorn_ |
ok ..so if I cannot come up with a good
proposal by 21st, can i propose something after 21st ? |
20:55.50 |
*** join/#brlcad n_reed
(~molto_cre@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
20:56.21 |
tofu |
hawthorn_: you can propose and continue to
make edits right up to the submission deadline |
20:56.35 |
tofu |
but I hope you hang around and keep
discussing |
20:56.37 |
hawthorn_ |
yup.. |
20:56.39 |
tofu |
the more you discuss and research, the better
your chances will be |
20:56.55 |
hawthorn_ |
currently having my end semester
exams |
20:57.13 |
tofu |
another page of ideas: http://brlcad.org/~sean/ideas.html |
20:57.24 |
tofu |
needs to update that list
with some that are completed now |
20:57.27 |
hawthorn_ |
so it is difficult for me to manage time till
25th |
20:57.31 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
20:57.57 |
tofu |
screen+irssi or some other persistent
connection is a beautiful thing |
20:58.04 |
tofu |
we're on here 24/7 |
20:58.09 |
tofu |
even when we're not physically |
20:58.43 |
``Erik |
(unless the servers isp is being ddos'd
*cough*) |
20:59.24 |
hawthorn_ |
can you also write the programming language to
be used along side the ideas ? |
20:59.56 |
*** join/#brlcad rays2pix
(~deepak@110.234.229.2) |
21:01.20 |
rays2pix |
Hi ..this is Deepak GSoC aspirant. I am
working on converting the bwfilter utility in to libicv functions.
Its not quite complete. Would like to send it across to the
group |
21:01.52 |
rays2pix |
Is it okay to send it that way? |
21:06.04 |
hawthorn_ |
hello |
21:06.19 |
hawthorn_ |
i ll come back tomorrow with an idea |
21:06.44 |
hawthorn_ |
thank you tofu for your support |
21:06.51 |
hawthorn_ |
see you tomorrow |
21:10.25 |
``Erik |
rays2pix: you can always send a link to the
patch... but if it's not complete and no specific questions are
posed, it might be ignored. A completed patch should be uploaded to
the sourceforge tracker, and that will be looked at hopefully
within a few days of upload |
21:10.46 |
tofu |
hawthorn_: we're kind of keen on C/C++, but it
really depends on what you propose to work on |
21:11.16 |
hawthorn_ |
yaa i am very good in C and C++ |
21:11.42 |
hawthorn_ |
i can do some good coding in these |
21:11.59 |
rays2pix |
Erik: thanks. I will goahead and come up with
patch and questions |
21:12.04 |
tofu |
rays2pix: yeah, what he said .. it takes a lot
of effort to review a patch, especially for the first time so it
should be as good as you can make it (without being late) |
21:12.55 |
tofu |
if you need help putting the patch together,
pastebin.ca code snippets and/or ask questions as you need to
here |
21:22.44 |
hawthorn_ |
proposal of ideas can continue after the
21st..? |
21:22.48 |
hawthorn_ |
please confirm |
21:23.56 |
*** join/#brlcad starseeker
(~starseeke@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
21:24.42 |
*** join/#brlcad hawthorn
(0e8b5206@gateway/web/freenode/ip.14.139.82.6) |
21:24.53 |
hawthorn |
sorry got disconnected |
21:25.16 |
hawthorn |
#tofu : can the proposal of the ideas continue
after 21st ? |
21:25.39 |
tofu |
hawthorn: heh, I've said twice
already |
21:25.50 |
tofu |
you can continue to propose and edit all the
way up to the deadline |
21:26.05 |
hawthorn |
i just wanted to confirm |
21:26.11 |
hawthorn |
sorry for bugging with the same
question |
21:26.16 |
hawthorn |
thanks |
21:26.22 |
tofu |
you should keep an eye on the gsoc
timeline |
21:26.25 |
hawthorn |
will come back tomorrow with some
stuff |
21:26.26 |
tofu |
that's the official deadline |
21:26.36 |
tofu |
and we have absolutely no control over it if
you miss the deadline |
21:26.41 |
hawthorn |
ya..submission of idea is main |
21:26.47 |
hawthorn |
i ll keep an eye on that date |
21:26.52 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
21:27.39 |
tofu |
ideally, you'll discuss here, then work on a
proposal, put it up on the wiki when you have a rough draft, ask
for comments/feedback, continue to make improvements, submit it to
google-melange, and CONTINUE to make improvements |
21:27.41 |
tofu |
bah! |
21:29.03 |
*** join/#brlcad n_reed
(~molto_cre@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
21:29.12 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
21:33.00 |
``Erik |
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/Document-Deep-Dive-What-Was-on-the-First-SAT-202748151.html |
21:35.23 |
*** join/#brlcad Notify
(~notify@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
21:36.11 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:carlmoore * 55193
brlcad/trunk/src/librt/tests/nurbs_tests.cpp: remove trailing
blanks/tabs |
21:36.12 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:carlmoore * 55194
brlcad/trunk/src/sig/d-f.c: shorten the logic in the setting of
'scale', and rearrange an if-else thru removal of '!' |
21:36.17 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:r_weiss * 55197
brlcad/trunk/CMakeLists.txt: Change to cmake build logic to add the
"_WIN64" definition for Windows 64bit using Visual Studio
2010. |
21:36.18 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:r_weiss * 55198
brlcad/trunk/src/librt/tests/CMakeLists.txt: Changed cmake build
logic to turn off the build of nurbs_tester to allow Windows 64bit
to build. |
21:36.19 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 55192
brlcad/trunk/include/brep.h: Looks like we need the dll logic for
get_closest_point for the NURBS test program on Windows. |
21:38.45 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:r_weiss * 55199
brlcad/trunk/src/libged/red.c: Bug fix for mged "red" command which
was preventing the temp file to be opened in the native text editor
on Windows 64bit. |
21:38.48 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:carlmoore * 55195
brlcad/trunk/src/sig/d-i.c: insert program name into warning
message |
21:43.52 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:r_weiss * 55200
(brlcad/trunk/src/other/libregex/regcomp.c
brlcad/trunk/src/other/libregex/regerror.c and 3 others): Update to
libregex library, for Windows 64bit, to fix issues with type "long"
versus "ptrdiff_t" and "ssize_t". Reorganized the headers for
libregex to use the "_WIN64" definition and build without
dependencies on BRL-CAD headers. More testing is needed with these
changes. |
21:48.56 |
*** join/#brlcad KimK
(~Kim__@wsip-184-176-200-171.ks.ks.cox.net) |
22:09.05 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
22:11.05 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
22:18.57 |
rays2pix |
tofu: thanks I uploaded a patch.Its fairly
complete and have also followed up with a mail. |
22:20.04 |
rays2pix |
tofu: I intend to prepare a GSOC proposal to
refactor image processing utilities. |
22:20.42 |
tofu |
excellent, glad to hear it |
22:20.59 |
tofu |
is that your main interest or do you have a
backup too? |
22:21.49 |
rays2pix |
Image analysis is my main interest . after
drafting a proposal for this , I intend to have a look at density
functions idea too. |
22:21.58 |
tofu |
great |
22:22.04 |
tofu |
it helps to have a backup |
22:22.09 |
tofu |
so long as the first proposal is
complete |
22:23.07 |
rays2pix |
sure..for image processing, I am trying to
understand how these utilities are used within brlcad any pointers
to a document or usecase? |
22:29.21 |
*** join/#brlcad n_reed
(~molto_cre@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
22:29.39 |
rays2pix |
I will have to leave now.Hope to have a
discussion sometime later. thx |
22:30.18 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
22:32.58 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
22:36.31 |
*** join/#brlcad starseeker
(~starseeke@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
22:39.35 |
*** join/#brlcad Notify
(~notify@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
23:08.30 |
starseeker |
``Erik: cool! |
23:09.59 |
starseeker |
wonders if we could switch to
a maintained regex library like pcre and use their pcreposix.h
instead - with any luck it wouldn't have the same conflict issues
with system regex functionality, and someone else is actively
maintaining it... |
23:19.25 |
starseeker |
notes bemusedly that the SAT
is a lot shorter without machine technology to evaluate answers -
maybe they were on to something |
23:33.17 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
23:35.57 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
23:37.14 |
tofu |
our regex variant was chosen specifically
because it was a drop-in compatible replacement for system (and
because it's so simple/fast especially compared to modern
libs) |
23:37.48 |
tofu |
i'd say it's working just fine now, leave it
alone and it'll leave us alone :) |
23:44.46 |
*** part/#brlcad tofu
(~morrison@c-71-206-34-125.hsd1.md.comcast.net) |
23:51.36 |
*** join/#brlcad maths22
(~gcimaths@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
23:52.02 |
*** join/#brlcad brlcad
(~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
23:53.28 |
*** join/#brlcad n_reed
(~molto_cre@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
23:53.39 |
*** join/#brlcad starseeker
(~starseeke@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |