IRC log for #brlcad on 20130811

00:17.54 *** join/#brlcad ClientAlive (~shine@216.16.61.156)
15:44.10 *** join/#brlcad infobot (~infobot@rikers.org)
15:44.10 *** topic/#brlcad is BRL-CAD || http://brlcad.org || logs: http://ibot.rikers.org/%23brlcad/ || GSoC 2013! http://brlcad.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code
15:47.48 *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@14-58-132-95.pool.ukrtel.net)
16:08.55 pawleeq_ brlcad, ok, thank you. Right now I am testing it inside mged, I will se hou mvall and cpall will deal with it.
16:13.07 ``Erik brlcad: I'd not really know what delete does, 'unlink' is how to rm a file, I'd think of delete as being a c++ memory op
16:17.21 ``Erik we have rt_new_rti() and rt_free_rti()... should we carry that and have icv_new() and icv_free() ?
16:18.23 ``Erik (I'm not really sure|I don't really know)
19:28.18 zero_level ``Erik : icv_create(..) and icv_load(..) are two functions for creating an image structure (allocating memory space as per the size.) and
19:28.49 zero_level for loading and image (from a file or stdin or a pipe.) respectively.
19:29.44 zero_level so as per your suggestion I believe we should change the name of icv_Create to icv_new.
19:29.50 zero_level right ?
20:29.51 Notify 03BRL-CAD Wiki:Vladbogolin * 5968 /wiki/User:Vladbogolin/GSoC2013/Logs: /* Week 8 */
20:51.33 zero_level brlcad : I am not sure if I should convert utilities like pixinterp2x and pixhalve. when we have very power utilities like pixscale and bwscale.
20:51.44 zero_level Pls suggest me if those are needed ?
22:36.24 *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@203-37-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net)
22:52.04 *** join/#brlcad mpictor (~mark@2601:d:b280:b5:d63d:7eff:fe2d:2505)
23:06.27 *** join/#brlcad caen23 (~caen23@92.81.188.106)

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.