IRC log for #brlcad on 20160220

00:11.25 *** join/#brlcad bvirtual (~bvirtual@2602:30a:2c9f:dd00:6148:ed8d:4edf:6be6)
00:34.27 *** join/#brlcad teepee_ (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee)
07:52.48 *** join/#brlcad ickby (~stefan@x5d84c64c.dyn.telefonica.de)
09:30.05 brlcad starseeker: I mention it because I coincidentally encountered a hash crash testing the bundling changes I'm working on
09:30.34 brlcad see if you can reproduce, I ran: bin/rtshot -p 0 0 0 -d 1 0 0 share/db/havoc.g havoc
09:31.17 brlcad ends up calling strlen on the hash "pointer", which is not necessarily a string
09:32.32 brlcad even though it's a char pointer data type
09:32.59 brlcad probably should be a uintptr_t since I think the intention is to let the caller store int values or strings as keys
09:34.22 brlcad starseeker: and to answer your question, working is enough .. but it shouldn't be unnecessarily / egrgiously slow :)
09:35.17 brlcad if you have both wired in momentarily while yanking out tcl's it'd be useful to at least roughly know what the performance looks like, but not a big deal by any stretch (yet)
09:35.49 brlcad calls it a long day hacking on the new website landing page
12:22.29 *** join/#brlcad ickby (~stefan@x5d84c64c.dyn.telefonica.de)
14:24.29 *** join/#brlcad stefan_ (~stefan@x5d84c64c.dyn.telefonica.de)
15:28.18 *** join/#brlcad boj_ (~boj@183.234.195.245)
15:28.24 *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel)
16:30.42 *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel)
17:07.12 *** join/#brlcad teepee_ (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee)
17:57.39 *** join/#brlcad witness_ (uid10044@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-tlienahilkybfxym)
18:11.53 *** join/#brlcad ickby (~stefan@x5d84c64c.dyn.telefonica.de)
18:41.52 *** join/#brlcad ickby (~stefan@x5d84c64c.dyn.telefonica.de)
19:15.01 *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel)
20:41.46 *** join/#brlcad tandoorichick (b64b2d01@gateway/web/freenode/ip.182.75.45.1)
20:53.35 *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel)
21:04.51 *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel)
21:07.19 starseeker brlcad: was that crash on latest trunk, or on a branch?
21:07.29 starseeker (assuming OSX?)
21:07.55 starseeker doesn't appear to crash with latest trunk on Linux, but that may or may not mean anything...
21:09.54 *** join/#brlcad ickby (~stefan@x5d84c64c.dyn.telefonica.de)
21:21.14 *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@87-71-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net)
21:21.52 *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel)
21:39.42 *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel)
21:41.53 *** join/#brlcad ickby (~stefan@x5d84c64c.dyn.telefonica.de)
21:45.07 *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel)
21:59.25 *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel)
22:24.01 brlcad starseeker: yeah, osx trunk
23:42.04 starseeker may go ahead and finish his "port" of the Tcl version... I'll try to hammer it out early next week

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.