| 00:15.50 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 67345 brlcad/trunk/src/libdm/dm-osgl.cpp: See if this will work to properly/portably size and center things... |
| 00:20.24 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 67346 brlcad/trunk/src/libdm/dm-osgl.cpp: OK, the other windows bit just flat out wasn't working... Things at least draw now. The center dot seems to be behaving itself on Linux, but not on Windows... wonder what the platform inconsistency is there, may have something to do with how mouse xy coodinates are being recorded/propagated... arrgh. |
| 00:25.50 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 67347 brlcad/trunk/src/libdm/dm-osgl.cpp: print some diagnostics |
| 00:27.30 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) | |
| 00:38.10 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 67348 brlcad/trunk/src/libdm/dm-osgl.cpp: not seeing the variation there... |
| 01:15.50 | *** join/#brlcad Quantized_magic (4ca5eb16@gateway/web/freenode/ip.76.165.235.22) | |
| 01:17.02 | Quantized_magic | I'm trying to get in touch with the contacts in charge of the Celestial Mechanics and Free fall GSoC ideas |
| 02:09.30 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 67349 brlcad/trunk/src/libdm/dm-osgl.cpp: Can't pin down why, but the offset between the OpenGL center (which is used to draw the point) and the X,Y coordinates from the Tk windows seems to be different on Windows vs Linux??? |
| 02:11.46 | starseeker | well, at least it works now... |
| 02:12.09 | Stragus | That's darn weird. Tried measuring coordinates from screenshots? |
| 02:12.47 | Stragus | I'm more inclined to blame Tk than OpenGL (possibly regarding window decorations or whatever else) |
| 02:13.35 | starseeker | I've got common_dm in MGED printing the actual X,Y coordinates it's getting from clicking, then clicking over the center dot |
| 02:14.11 | starseeker | they *should* be the XY coordinates in that Window, and the math seems to bear that out |
| 02:14.20 | *** join/#brlcad kkr_ (~kkr@14.139.160.31) | |
| 02:14.42 | starseeker | I need to set up identical sized MGED windows on both Linux and Windows and see what that does |
| 02:15.03 | starseeker | it's possible that there's some internal OpenSceneGraph weirdness that's also platform specific |
| 02:15.24 | starseeker | ultimately, we're mating it's 2D coordinate system with Tk's |
| 02:16.22 | starseeker | would be nice to figure that out programmatically, but not sure if that's practical/possible with the available APIs... |
| 02:16.52 | starseeker | "given this 0,0 opengl dot in the OSG widget, find the corresponding coordinates in the parent tk window..." |
| 02:17.38 | starseeker | we're trusting that the osg window and the parent tk window are the same size, which *may* not be true univerally across platforms... |
| 02:17.40 | Stragus | In theory, the fact that it's OSG or Tk shouldn't matter at all. I would measure a screenshot ;) |
| 02:18.27 | starseeker | how would that help though? I need tk and osg to agree, whatever the "right" number of pixels is... |
| 02:19.59 | starseeker | wonders if Qt would do any better at this... I suppose conceptually these are the issues you deal with anytime you embed windows in parents... |
| 02:20.05 | Stragus | Just a step to isolate the problem, figuring out if Tk coordinates are what is expected |
| 02:20.19 | starseeker | nods |
| 03:32.43 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD Wiki:89.234.182.58 * 9552 /wiki/ARL_Technical_Reports: |
| 04:41.10 | *** join/#brlcad shubham_ (a5e1683c@gateway/web/freenode/ip.165.225.104.60) | |
| 04:58.08 | *** join/#brlcad nilram (~nilram@2001:250:3c02:763:bcf1:ea29:474:7acf) | |
| 05:23.33 | *** join/#brlcad poxip (~poxip@unaffiliated/mrpoxipol) | |
| 06:12.58 | *** join/#brlcad dracarys983 (dracarys98@nat/iiit/x-ralnfadijsfjowtq) | |
| 06:38.46 | *** join/#brlcad davee_ (~davee@71-83-188-23.dhcp.lnbh.ca.charter.com) | |
| 06:43.43 | *** join/#brlcad dracarys983 (dracarys98@nat/iiit/x-mxwowaqewknlrfgo) | |
| 07:42.54 | *** join/#brlcad teepee_ (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) | |
| 08:02.01 | *** join/#brlcad d_rossberg (~rossberg@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) | |
| 08:15.33 | *** join/#brlcad jasvir (~jass@75-142-124-111.static.mtpk.ca.charter.com) | |
| 08:48.33 | *** join/#brlcad jasvir (~jass@75-142-109-136.static.mtpk.ca.charter.com) | |
| 09:02.42 | *** join/#brlcad tandoorichick (3d0c28b1@gateway/web/freenode/ip.61.12.40.177) | |
| 09:03.35 | *** join/#brlcad Gabriel_ (d5e9550e@gateway/web/freenode/ip.213.233.85.14) | |
| 09:09.13 | Gabriel_ | Hi, I have one question about migrating user interface functionality from mged/ to libged/ : does this reffer to creating new source files and then including them both in mged and search code? |
| 09:10.33 | Gabriel_ | So that the table mapping commands and function calls would be a sort of low level linkage between the mged and search? |
| 09:19.05 | d_rossberg | Gabriel_: as far as i can see from the project ideas page this migration already happened, the next step would be to have transactions |
| 09:21.15 | Gabriel_ | How would this help the commands passed to exec be processed? |
| 09:21.55 | Gabriel_ | (i forgot to say i'm reffering to the "add exec to search" project) |
| 09:22.51 | Gabriel_ | Why actually can't those commands be processed the way other commands are actually executed? |
| 09:26.50 | d_rossberg | which commands? libged contains functions, no commands |
| 09:29.09 | Gabriel_ | yes, meant to say that after processing the input string it would result into possibly more commands which would call functions |
| 09:30.22 | d_rossberg | did you read http://brlcad.org/wiki/Add_exec_option_to_search ? |
| 09:30.33 | Gabriel_ | like if we had search -name b* -exec draw {} ; we could take the draw {} command and then call the draw command |
| 09:31.23 | Gabriel_ | yes, I did, but I did not understand the part related to mged very well |
| 09:34.58 | d_rossberg | ok: mged uses TCL wich has commands, which can be seen as keywords which trigger functions from libged |
| 09:37.11 | d_rossberg | the keyword-function list is part of mged, but the sech functionality is coded in libged's ged_search() function |
| 09:38.03 | d_rossberg | this means that ged_search() has no knowledge about the meaning of keawords |
| 09:38.17 | d_rossberg | (at least today) |
| 09:39.04 | Gabriel_ | so if adding the keyword functionality inside libged we could trigger the commands by passing them the strings in exec? |
| 09:40.30 | d_rossberg | this is one possibility, or you could put it into another core library if there is a reason for it |
| 09:41.39 | d_rossberg | the keywords-map could be used by mged, archer, and libged |
| 09:43.09 | Gabriel_ | i think i get it now: define the keyword table inside a new core file which links mged, libged and archer together? |
| 09:45.21 | d_rossberg | not really, mged and archer shouldn't be linked together :) but they use the same core libraries, e.g. libbn, libbu, librt, libwdb, libged, ... |
| 09:47.08 | Gabriel_ | for this project i guess that only libged (because of search) and mged should be linked? |
| 09:49.33 | d_rossberg | they are already linked! but yes, you would have to touch (modify) mged and libged, and maybe archer as well |
| 09:51.48 | Gabriel_ | ok, I understand it better now, thanks for the clarifications |
| 09:54.44 | *** join/#brlcad tandoorichick (b64b2de1@gateway/web/freenode/ip.182.75.45.225) | |
| 10:06.32 | *** join/#brlcad teepee` (bc5c2134@gateway/web/freenode/ip.188.92.33.52) | |
| 10:24.37 | *** join/#brlcad Ch3ck_ (~Ch3ck@154.70.98.41) | |
| 11:13.56 | *** join/#brlcad gaganjyot (~gaganjyot@122.173.79.18) | |
| 12:24.22 | brlcad | notes http://brlcad.org/wiki/Online_Geometry/TODO needs updating |
| 12:58.37 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) | |
| 13:19.21 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) | |
| 13:51.30 | *** join/#brlcad gaganjyot (~gaganjyot@122.173.79.18) | |
| 14:00.24 | *** join/#brlcad yorik (~yorik@191.255.88.202) | |
| 14:42.30 | *** join/#brlcad tandoorichick (3d0c28b1@gateway/web/freenode/ip.61.12.40.177) | |
| 15:42.12 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) | |
| 15:50.17 | *** join/#brlcad adahp (~adahp@c-24-20-214-39.hsd1.or.comcast.net) | |
| 15:55.29 | *** join/#brlcad nilram_ (~nilram@2001:250:3c02:763:bcf1:ea29:474:7acf) | |
| 16:50.58 | *** join/#brlcad davee_ (~davee@71-83-188-23.dhcp.lnbh.ca.charter.com) | |
| 16:55.22 | *** join/#brlcad shubham (71c1893d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.113.193.137.61) | |
| 17:20.06 | ``Erik | 314 gb drives for raspberry pi (on sale for pi day) http://wdlabs.wd.com/products/wd-pidrive-314gb/ |
| 17:20.46 | ``Erik | http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/data-storage/raspberry-pi-hard-drive-pidrive-187871 |
| 17:20.54 | ``Erik | cuz, y'know, pi pi pi pi pi pi... everything must be pi... |
| 17:22.53 | teepee` | would have liked raspberry pi version 3.14 with 3.14GB ram :) |
| 17:26.37 | starseeker | O.o |
| 17:48.44 | *** join/#brlcad qbz (~cLavelle@50.35.70.157) | |
| 17:49.25 | *** join/#brlcad jasvir (~jass@172.56.40.194) | |
| 17:52.14 | *** join/#brlcad tandoorichick (b64b2d01@gateway/web/freenode/ip.182.75.45.1) | |
| 18:11.02 | *** part/#brlcad kkr_ (~kkr@14.139.160.31) | |
| 18:11.36 | *** join/#brlcad kkrcodes (~kkr@14.139.160.31) | |
| 18:14.06 | *** join/#brlcad Ch3ck_ (~Ch3ck@154.70.111.152) | |
| 18:25.54 | *** join/#brlcad tandoorichick (b64b2d01@gateway/web/freenode/ip.182.75.45.1) | |
| 18:39.16 | tandoorichick | is dynamic addition of points and faces in BoT possible? |
| 18:39.46 | *** join/#brlcad dracarys983 (dracarys98@nat/iiit/x-aadwjcmbszxxcqen) | |
| 18:40.57 | tandoorichick | is dynamic addition of points and faces in BoT possible? |
| 19:32.16 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD:brlcad * 67350 brlcad/trunk/doc/STRATEGY: expand TODO items for the website project |
| 19:42.06 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD:brlcad * 67351 brlcad/trunk/doc/STRATEGY: expand and clarify the gcv deployment project tasks |
| 19:55.55 | *** join/#brlcad teepee (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) | |
| 20:40.01 | *** join/#brlcad gaganjyot (~gaganjyot@122.173.79.18) | |
| 20:40.30 | *** join/#brlcad davee_ (~davee@172.56.41.218) | |
| 20:50.57 | brlcad | fyi, server backups are underway for what will hopefully be the last time |
| 20:51.06 | brlcad | (the last time on this sago server) |
| 20:51.51 | brlcad | tandoorichick: yes, I believe so |
| 20:53.32 | brlcad | it's not a very good interface, but it's certainly technically possible as bots don't care about topology or connectivity |
| 20:53.48 | brlcad | I think the edit interace in mged will let you add and remove vertices |
| 20:54.06 | brlcad | not sure about command-line, but I'm not aware of editing there |
| 20:54.31 | tandoorichick | brlcad: okay... |
| 20:55.03 | tandoorichick | i've sent a mail on the mailing list regarding my ideas till now.. |
| 20:56.30 | shubham | brlcad: what is the best place to add the todo list for online geomtery viewer in the wiki? Maybe this http://brlcad.org/wiki/Online_Geometry/TODO ! |
| 20:58.11 | shubham | maybe under a separate heading "GSoC 2016 tasks", keeping the present content as is for now |
| 20:58.28 | tandoorichick | brlcad: i wasn't able to find an LGPL software that has healing features like gaps, overlaps, holes, etc.. i found one that does remeshing (OpenFlipper). i'm studying some papers that will aid me with the tasks. is that a good way? |
| 20:59.09 | brlcad | shubham: yes, I posted that link last night when you were detatched from irc |
| 20:59.30 | brlcad | the page will need to get updated or have a section added |
| 20:59.52 | brlcad | don't want to lose the previous thoughts and goals without discussion |
| 21:00.11 | shubham | yes, we'll update that, but for now adding a separate section will be fine |
| 21:00.47 | brlcad | shubham: please note where there is duplication with existing content |
| 21:01.09 | brlcad | some marker so we know it's a shared topic we've discussed before |
| 21:01.43 | brlcad | tandoorichick: can you back up and summarize what you're wanting to work on? |
| 21:02.12 | shubham | I will take note of that, for now i just wanted to dump the content from my google stylesheet to the wiki, i'll update it once i get some more time. thanks |
| 21:02.21 | tandoorichick | yeah sure. i wanted to work on the automatic polygonal mesh healing project |
| 21:04.13 | tandoorichick | and costa had suggested that i look at meshlab's features for reference, and i did. i also read up a bit and came up with a list of errors in meshes that can be corrected as a part of the project (namely- gaps, overlaps, holes, T-joints, singular vertices and edges, skewed elements, sliver patches, and degeneracies with triangles) |
| 21:05.38 | brlcad | shubham: thanks -- if you don't have time to merge them now, then I'll need to get someone else to because this is when students will be reading it in that context |
| 21:06.29 | brlcad | students will not know the source of the content and will see that as "the list" and that's not necessarily representative as this has not been collectively discussed afaik |
| 21:06.59 | shubham | i'm working on it |
| 21:07.50 | tandoorichick | and i also went through a list of softwares that have mesh healing features which could be integrated. but most of them turned out to be GPL softwares. OpenFlipper was one that had remeshng capabilities and some topological control features (like flipping or splitting edges, and adding or removing edges) |
| 21:08.39 | tandoorichick | so, i wanted to know if implementing them on my own would be fine? |
| 21:10.05 | shubham | brlcad: I'll need you to look at the list and provide some feedback on it. I'll complete it in the next ~12 hours |
| 21:12.25 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD Wiki:MeShubham99 * 9553 /wiki/Online_Geometry/TODO: |
| 21:30.29 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD Wiki:MeShubham99 * 9554 /wiki/Template:Prettytable: |
| 21:41.21 | brlcad | tandoorichick: next you should look at what healing facilities we already have in brl-cad (not sure about bot, but nmg has some) |
| 21:42.30 | brlcad | you can't really propose what you're going to suggest adding without knowing what we have ;) |
| 21:42.58 | brlcad | it'll probably take you hours to figure this out, maybe days -- we can help point you in the right dirs, but you'll need to read through lots of functions |
| 21:47.30 | tandoorichick | brlcad: okay, so should i start with nmg.c? |
| 21:51.01 | brlcad | shubham: please be careful to not write their proposal for them, e.g., telling them what they need to do at certain points in time |
| 21:51.33 | brlcad | that is dependent upon ability, experience, etc., and it's not our role to define that regardless |
| 21:52.02 | brlcad | we can define objectives/features/bugs/desires/requirements/etc |
| 21:52.59 | brlcad | tandoorichick: that is a minutia question that is yours to figure out .. there are hundreds of potential starting points, all valid |
| 21:53.18 | brlcad | I would start with the bot code myself, then nmg |
| 21:53.28 | brlcad | since bot is the closest data structure you're talking about |
| 21:53.40 | brlcad | src/librt/primitives/bot code |
| 21:53.53 | brlcad | and src/libged/bot*.c code for userland commands |
| 21:54.01 | brlcad | then src/librt/primitives/nmg code |
| 21:54.07 | brlcad | and src/libged/*nmg* code |
| 21:55.53 | tandoorichick | brlcad: thanks, i will work on this now.. one question, is it ok to mention reading papers to understand methodologies, as a part of the coding period? |
| 21:57.34 | brlcad | you're welcome to continue reading papers during the coding period, but that will not count as gsoc work |
| 21:57.59 | brlcad | and you shouldn't have tasks that rely on the results of reading those papers (i.e., you have to have a plan regardless) |
| 21:58.08 | shubham | brlcad: yes, thanks for pointing that out. Although, I have limited my suggestions to the desires and requirements for the project, that too at a very generic level. I'll take more care. There might have been some misunderstanding at some level. |
| 21:58.48 | tandoorichick | brlcad: okay, got it. |
| 22:01.17 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD Wiki:MeShubham99 * 9555 /wiki/Online_Geometry/TODO: /* GSoC 2016 */ |
| 22:04.08 | *** join/#brlcad dracarys983 (dracarys98@nat/iiit/x-evujycqomwprpeau) | |
| 22:07.57 | *** join/#brlcad qbz (~cLavelle@50.35.70.157) | |
| 22:10.11 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD Wiki:MeShubham99 * 9556 /wiki/Online_Geometry/TODO: /* GSoC 2016 */ |
| 22:27.37 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD Wiki:MeShubham99 * 9557 /wiki/Online_Geometry/TODO: /* GSoC 2016 task list*/ |
| 22:32.23 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) | |
| 22:33.06 | *** join/#brlcad teepee_ (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) | |