04:15.32 |
*** join/#brlcad tandoorichick
(~rakshika@61.0.115.129) |
06:49.33 |
*** join/#brlcad teepee_
(~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) |
07:29.25 |
*** join/#brlcad sniok
(~sniok@89.252.2.135) |
07:49.32 |
*** join/#brlcad teepee]
(bc5c2134@gateway/web/freenode/ip.188.92.33.52) |
08:06.01 |
*** join/#brlcad tandoorichick
(~rakshika@117.216.48.191) |
08:28.58 |
*** join/#brlcad d_rossberg
(~rossberg@104.225.5.10) |
09:24.59 |
*** join/#brlcad sniok
(~sniok@89.252.2.135) |
09:56.35 |
*** join/#brlcad boj
(~boj@210.75.252.226) |
10:11.59 |
*** join/#brlcad sniok
(~sniok@89.252.2.135) |
11:19.42 |
*** join/#brlcad tandoorichick
(~rakshika@117.216.54.170) |
12:01.25 |
*** join/#brlcad tandoorichick
(~rakshika@103.207.142.178) |
12:13.24 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD Wiki:Jamegsemaj * 0
/wiki/User:Jamegsemaj: |
12:28.40 |
*** join/#brlcad tandoorichick
(~rakshika@103.207.142.178) |
12:30.12 |
*** join/#brlcad yorik
(~yorik@189-18-176-33.dsl.telesp.net.br) |
12:34.45 |
*** join/#brlcad sniok
(~sniok@89.252.2.135) |
12:36.09 |
tandoorichick |
d_rossberg: i've gotten results.. the mesh gap
is filled, but thin triangles make their way in.. |
12:58.12 |
d_rossberg |
what was the tolerance for the
healing? |
12:58.53 |
tandoorichick |
i tested with 5 units |
13:02.42 |
d_rossberg |
the size of your triangles is close to the
tolerance value, therefore a lot of ugly stuff can happen |
13:03.07 |
d_rossberg |
the healed mesh has unexpected differences to
the healed one |
13:03.37 |
tandoorichick |
unexpected as in? |
13:08.50 |
d_rossberg |
the original mesh has a hole with a diameter
of order of the triangles (or two of them), zipping it deforms the
bordering triangles a lot |
13:09.17 |
tandoorichick |
yeah, that is true.. |
13:09.58 |
d_rossberg |
a human would have added an edge and created
two triangles to fill the hole |
13:11.07 |
tandoorichick |
i'll test with meshes where the triangles and
the tolerance value are not so comparable then? |
13:11.37 |
tandoorichick |
also aren't these changes inevitable because
the algorithm works in that manner? :/ |
13:12.05 |
d_rossberg |
however, if you say "zip it" (via the
tolerance) you allow strong deformations |
13:12.30 |
d_rossberg |
yes, you should test it with a smaller
tollerance |
13:12.59 |
*** join/#brlcad amarjeet
(~amarjeet@101.213.161.93) |
13:13.13 |
tandoorichick |
yes, okay... |
13:14.24 |
d_rossberg |
btw, the is a reason why it's practical to
have the tolerance values |
13:15.50 |
tandoorichick |
what is a reason? |
13:17.57 |
d_rossberg |
big tolerance => big deformations possible,
small tolerance => small deformations but more
triangles |
13:18.08 |
d_rossberg |
the reason to have tolerance values |
13:18.38 |
tandoorichick |
okay.. |
13:43.23 |
*** join/#brlcad asad_
(~asad00@host10-2.natpool.mwn.de) |
13:44.06 |
*** join/#brlcad sniok
(~sniok@89.252.2.135) |
13:54.46 |
*** join/#brlcad Mathnerd314
(~quassel@supertux/Mathnerd314) |
15:04.09 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 68316
(brlcad/branches/tcltk86/src/other/tcl/CMake/FindTIMEZONE.cmake
brlcad/branches/tcltk86/src/other/tcl/CMake/ac_std_funcs.cmake and
2 others): Start looking at how we can simplify/streamline the Tcl
build logic. |
15:15.38 |
*** join/#brlcad kintel
(~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
15:53.45 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 68317
brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/autoheader.cmake: Add more OS flags to
ignore from Tcl - there's probably more, but this is a
start... |
16:20.44 |
*** join/#brlcad kintel_
(~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
16:51.25 |
*** join/#brlcad LordOfBikes
(~armin@dslb-088-066-130-116.088.066.pools.vodafone-ip.de) |
17:26.37 |
*** join/#brlcad amarjeet
(~amarjeet@101.213.161.93) |
18:03.12 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 68318
brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/autoheader.cmake: Use unifdef to extract
the conditional preprocessor symbols out of source files, rather
than attempting to hack it together ourselves in CMake. If this
ends up being something we want to make a built-in capability
unifdef is BSD licensed and has been ported to Windows. |
18:09.48 |
*** join/#brlcad sniok
(~sniok@89.252.2.135) |
18:19.56 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 68319
brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/autoheader.cmake: Check for zero length
lists before operating on them. |
18:30.18 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 68320
brlcad/trunk/include/dm/dm-design.h: fix unmatched endif |
18:33.59 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 68321
brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/autoheader.cmake: Simplify header guard
regex now that we're using unifdef |
18:46.16 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 68322
(brlcad/trunk/include/bg.h brlcad/trunk/include/bn/dvec.h and 15
others): Fix some headers whose guards didn't match convention
after getting moved around. |
18:54.29 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD Wiki:Tandoorichick * 9796
/wiki/User:Tandoorichick/GSoC2016/Logs: /* Development Logs
*/ |
19:02.10 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 68323
brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/autoheader.cmake: Adjust flag checking,
support both local and recursive scanning. |
19:25.48 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 68324
brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/autoheader.cmake: more rework |
19:39.06 |
*** join/#brlcad teepee_
(~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) |
19:59.12 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 68325
brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/autoheader.cmake: Add support for skipping
files |
20:09.45 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 68326
brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/autoheader.cmake: Convert dashes to
underscores while we're at it. |
20:16.06 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 68327
(brlcad/branches/tcltk86/include/bg.h
brlcad/branches/tcltk86/include/bn/dvec.h and 23 others): Sync with
trunk thru r68326 |
20:58.51 |
*** join/#brlcad asad_
(~asad00@host10-2.natpool.mwn.de) |
22:38.06 |
*** join/#brlcad KimK
(~Kim__@2600:8803:7a85:6d00:5f5:9813:7217:5dfa) |