| 00:05.14 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) | |
| 01:15.25 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) | |
| 02:51.20 | *** join/#brlcad nmz787 (~nmz787@bryan.fairlystable.org) | |
| 03:03.49 | *** join/#brlcad LordOfBikes (~armin@dslb-088-065-180-227.088.065.pools.vodafone-ip.de) | |
| 03:57.39 | brlcad | Caterpillar: what do you mean? |
| 03:58.23 | brlcad | wonders if erik ever saw / used http://www.cs.otago.ac.nz/homepages/andrew/papers/g2.pdf |
| 05:18.23 | Stragus | Solving 6th polynomials, eh |
| 05:21.47 | Stragus | By the way, I shared some idea about "curved triangles" with Christiaan Gribble (I assume you know him?). He said he would look into it but hasn't followed up, and I think there's some potential |
| 06:43.59 | *** join/#brlcad teepee (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) | |
| 06:45.21 | brlcad | Stragus: do you remember that indian guy that wanted to sell his curved triangles implementation back at rt06 in utah? |
| 06:48.03 | Stragus | I don't! |
| 06:48.37 | Stragus | I assume it's probably a different idea though?... |
| 06:51.20 | brlcad | don't know if it was exactly the same, wasn't interested in his business attempt -- but only so many ways to curve a triangle, no? :) |
| 06:52.09 | Stragus | Possibly :), it's a question of what data is stored, how the math is done, and how the ray intersection is done |
| 06:52.37 | Stragus | I'll forward you by email a short overview I had written for Christiaan |
| 06:53.43 | Stragus | Sent |
| 06:54.33 | Stragus | I was mostly wondering if something like this has been done, or if anyone would like to try it |
| 07:00.56 | Stragus | I mostly like the idea because you could take any regular standard triangle-based geometry, and make it very smooth with little extra storage; the ray intersection test is heavier, but that's less relevant each day |
| 07:55.25 | Caterpillar | brlcad: I remember brlcad was accepted in last GSOC, wasn't it? |
| 10:16.29 | *** join/#brlcad cymba (dc9e9088@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.220.158.144.136) | |
| 10:33.19 | *** join/#brlcad teepee (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) | |
| 10:50.21 | *** join/#brlcad teepee (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) | |
| 10:57.31 | *** join/#brlcad Caterpillar2 (~caterpill@unaffiliated/caterpillar) | |
| 11:03.52 | *** join/#brlcad teepee (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) | |
| 11:26.54 | *** join/#brlcad teepee (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) | |
| 11:45.25 | *** join/#brlcad teepee (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) | |
| 12:09.29 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@185.39.197.205) | |
| 12:45.34 | *** join/#brlcad Caterpillar2 (~caterpill@unaffiliated/caterpillar) | |
| 13:11.03 | *** join/#brlcad teepee (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) | |
| 13:21.09 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) | |
| 13:45.36 | *** join/#brlcad teepee (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) | |
| 14:36.53 | starseeker | brlcad: dunno (metaballs paper) but if he did I don't think he ever mentioned it to me - I haven't seen it previously! |
| 14:51.36 | brlcad | Stragus: I don't have anything from you -- where'd you send it? |
| 14:53.03 | brlcad | Caterpillar: yes, accepted in the last gsoc and we participated ... and it came to a conclusion about a month ago |
| 15:08.13 | *** join/#brlcad teepee (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) | |
| 15:41.44 | brlcad | starseeker: fyi, installed static libraries aren't usable -- they're the lto stubs |
| 15:42.11 | brlcad | nm /usr/brlcad/lib/librt.a for example, notice the lack of any symbols |
| 17:48.36 | *** join/#brlcad Caterpillar2 (~caterpill@unaffiliated/caterpillar) | |
| 20:43.11 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 70390 brlcad/trunk/include/nmg.h: Add a couple potentially useful links |