01:20.32 |
*** join/#brlcad infobot
(ibot@rikers.org) |
01:20.32 |
*** topic/#brlcad is BRL-CAD
and open source CAx discussion ! Also @ http://brlcad.zulipchat.com !
Logs @ http://infobot.rikers.org/%23brlcad/ |
01:30.27 |
*** join/#brlcad
kslojwdzlikztuaj
(~armin@dslb-092-075-151-183.092.075.pools.vodafone-ip.de) |
04:56.55 |
*** join/#brlcad Dark_Energy
(~dark_ener@146.88.193.142) |
10:33.23 |
*** join/#brlcad KimK
(~KimK@2001:579:d00c:800:c520:5b3d:ff4e:c378) |
13:15.26 |
*** join/#brlcad KimK
(~KimK@2001:579:d00c:800:115a:2202:db74:a615) |
13:51.15 |
*** join/#brlcad merzo
(~merzo@31-23-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net) |
19:24.35 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 70692
brlcad/trunk/src/libanalyze/nirt.cxx: Set useair for rtip_air,
tweak units printing. Remaining differences with original
regression test NIRT output seem to be correct gap reporting
(apparently that was broken when the nirt 'regression' test file
was assembled?? - urk\!) and differences in the text related to
reporting of attributes, having to do with standardization and prep
ordering. |
20:04.16 |
*** join/#brlcad merzo
(~merzo@31-23-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net) |
20:26.23 |
Notify |
03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 70693
brlcad/trunk/src/libanalyze/nirt.cxx: try a bit of
restructuring |
20:33.05 |
*** join/#brlcad merzo
(~merzo@87-14-132-95.pool.ukrtel.net) |
20:49.22 |
starseeker |
brlcad: the rt prep output in nirt is
currently being output to stdout - I'm thinking it might be nicer
to put that output (and anything else not directly a command
output) into the err channel |
20:50.37 |
starseeker |
that's (one of) the current diff sources in
old vs. new nirt - I'm prepping after listing objects, and it looks
like that stage is deferred longer in the original nirt code -
hence, one of their "attr -p" calls prints before the raytrace prep
messages |
22:06.47 |
*** join/#brlcad Radicarian
(~Radicaria@cpe-72-231-246-183.buffalo.res.rr.com) |