00:39.57 |
*** join/#brlcad LordOfBikes
(~armin@dslb-088-066-136-217.088.066.pools.vodafone-ip.de) |
03:28.26 |
*** join/#brlcad Macinlew
(~MacInLew@2601:680:c000:6f:299b:7511:8ef0:d23e) |
06:17.29 |
brlcad |
yukonbob: for now yes, we haven't flipped the
switch just yet |
14:46.16 |
*** join/#brlcad starseek1r
(~starseeke@104.225.5.10) |
17:30.27 |
yukonbob |
re: repos -- when the switch flips, it'll be
-> git, or ->hg, or ->other ? |
17:31.42 |
yukonbob |
NetBSD -->.<-- this close to switching
over to hg |
17:34.15 |
yukonbob |
slightly disappointed w/
dscm... disappointment came on just recently. Still ~best thing to
happen for software development in the last ~15
years |
17:54.33 |
brlcad |
yukonbob: it'll be git on github |
17:55.52 |
brlcad |
we'll still be doing a centralized development
model and probably trunk based development |
18:10.39 |
yukonbob |
"trunk-based-development" excursions in
branches, then reviewed and integrated, or projects/experiments in
branches, but production commits really always (usually) happen in
trunk |
18:18.28 |
brlcad |
the latter |
18:47.22 |
yukonbob |
nods |
18:48.20 |
yukonbob |
, is always keen to hear
thoughts of @brlcad wrt philosophy of development |
18:51.52 |
yukonbob |
I occacsionally cite you re: defense of (iirc)
CVS at the time. Roughly: "Despite it's flaws, it's
battle-hardened, which is necessarily hard-fought. The flaws are
now well-known, so we live with them while deciding what new batch
of flaws to move on to..." |
18:55.15 |
brlcad |
well thank you |
19:01.00 |
yukonbob |
you're welcome |
19:02.17 |
yukonbob |
I think [that CVS story, for example] is a
perspective thats under-represented, if not generally unknown or at
least unconsidered. |
19:53.45 |
yukonbob |
laughts, seeing the CVS story
was also mentioned in our last email convo ;) |
19:53.50 |
yukonbob |
*laughs |
19:54.32 |
yukonbob |
it'll come to be my "burning rig" Nokia
rallying cry |
20:04.56 |
*** join/#brlcad Macinlew
(~MacInLew@2601:680:c000:6f:299b:7511:8ef0:d23e) |